Terrified student gets 3-year restraining order against ex: 'He's following me'
The South American woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, applied for the order at Dublin District Court. In evidence, she recounted how after their relationship of a couple of years ended a few weeks ago, her ex started following her.
The student told the court she was afraid, and alleged, "He is saying he will attack me." Asked if he had followed her regularly, she said he had done twice in the previous week, once to work, and after school.
Giving evidence with the assistance of an interpreter, the visibly upset student said that he was threatening her, following her to school, to her home, and to her job. They did not have any children.
Her former partner did not attend the scheduled hearing to contest the claims against him. Judge Anthony Halpin accepted the sworn evidence tendered by the woman.
He granted the civil restraining order to protect her from the man's activities. He stipulated that he must not follow, watch, or beset the applicant or put her in fear or use language that threatened the applicant.
He also warned that the man would not communicate with her. Judge Halpin directed gardai to serve a copy of the order on the man, which is to remain in force for three years.
Breaching it can result in the subject of the order being brought to court, jailed for up to a year, and a maximum €4,000 fine. The restraining orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 as a remedy for people seeking protection.
The District Court may issue an order to prevent the respondent from violence or threats, stalking, harassing or approaching the applicant's home, work, or school. It can last up to five years but may be shorter depending on the presiding judge's assessment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
'Fagin's Law' offences by adults to groom children into criminality 'difficult to prove', review finds
New offences to prevent children being groomed into criminality are 'difficult to prove' and there is uncertainty over the law's 'operational effectiveness', a review has found. A post-enactment report from the Department of Justice into the Criminal Justice (Engagement of Children in Criminal Activity) Act 2024 said that a 'small number of offences' under the act have been brought before the court since it was enacted. 'Given the short timeframe since the enactment of the Act, very little data is presently available that is relevant to the performance of the Act's individual provisions,' the review said. The long-awaited laws criminalising adults who entice or force a child to engage in any form of criminality came into force last summer. Convictions in the higher courts can lead to a sentence of up to five years in jail under 'Fagin's Law'. It came after successive national drug strategies recommended the measure, given the issues around grooming of children as young as eight to engage in couriering and dealing drugs. Then-Minister for Justice Helen McEntee said the law would be an 'effective tool in tackling organised crime'. To analyse its performance so far, the Department of Justice asked for feedback from the Director of Public Prosecutions, the gardaí, the Courts Service and the Greentown Programme, which works in local areas aiming to disrupt the influence of criminal networks on children. In the case of the DPP, it said it does not collect formal data on offences under the act, while the gardaí said that less than 10 charges/summonses have been issued under the act. The Greentown Programme's management committee meanwhile, said the law has increased awareness around grooming and criminal behaviour. 'This increased awareness has acted as a deterrent for persons considering engaging a child for the purposes of committing a crime and for potential child victims who were previously unaware of the grooming process,' it said. However, it added the offences are difficult to prove and that garda interventions are more focused on more straightforward offences and those with higher penalties such as those to do with drug-dealing and organised crime. Read More Criminals target young people with offers of drugs in exchange for sex
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Meter tampering puts lives at risk, warns Gas Networks Ireland after Cork conviction
Tampering with a gas meter puts lives at risk, Gas Networks Ireland has warned following a successful prosecution in Cork. The company, which operates and maintains Ireland's €3bn, 14,725km national gas network, issued the warning after a person received a three-month suspended sentence for unlawfully tampering with a gas meter at a property in a housing estate in the Mahon area. An individual associated with the property pleaded guilty at Cork District Court on June 25 to the offence and was convicted under Section 15 of the Energy (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995. The court heard that Gas Networks Ireland had investigated the property in December 2024 and found the gas meter had been unlawfully tampered with, preventing the recording of gas consumption. Judge Joanne Carroll described it as a 'very serious matter' and pointed out that in addition to the individual receiving gas without paying, there was also a safety risk to the neighbourhood. She imposed a three-month prison sentence, fully suspended for 12 months. Owen Wilson, safety manager with Gas Networks Ireland, said the verdict sends an important message to the public that meter tampering is a serious crime with potentially deadly consequences. 'Theft of gas is a very serious issue, but far more serious is the risk to life that meter tampering poses to the perpetrator and to people nearby,' he said. 'We are working to end unlawful interference with gas meters and the dangers associated with this activity.' Due to the dangers involved, gas meter tampering is a criminal offence, with potential fines of up to €5,000 and prison sentences of up to six months for those found guilty. Gas Networks Ireland has detected more than 2,900 cases of meter tampering across the country since 2013. By law, only Gas Networks Ireland representatives and registered gas installers are authorised to work on gas meters and pipework. It is illegal to ask, pay, or allow anyone else to tamper with a gas meter. 'Anyone who either interferes with a gas meter themselves or agrees to allow someone who is not a registered gas installer to work on their gas installations is risking their own life, those of their family, and of people living nearby,' Mr Wilson said. Members of the public can report suspicions of gas meter tampering to Gas Networks Ireland in strict confidence by calling 1800 464 464.
Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
Three family members of suspected burglary gang charged with organised crime offences
The men, from Dublin, who are related and include a father and son, were denied bail at Sligo District Court and remanded in continuing custody. Three suspected members of a burglary gang were charged yesterday with organised crime offences. The men, from Dublin, who are related and include a father and son, were denied bail at Sligo District Court and remanded in continuing custody. The court previously heard the case against them was part of a wider investigation into a large number of burglaries, mostly in the west of Ireland. The three are Edward Connors (50) and his son Larry Connors (27), both of Bridgeview, Cloverhill Road, Clondalkin, and Edward Connors (28), of Drumkerring Park, Fettercairn, Tallaght. Edward Connors (50) Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 4th They face a range of charges linked to separate burglary and associated offences. They were brought before Sligo District Court yesterday and charged with organised crime offences as part of an investigation carried out by gardaí from the Western Region. The elder Edward Connors was charged with one count under Section 72 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006 of facilitating and enhancing the activities of a criminal organisation in relation to a garda interception in Co Kildare last November. He was further charged under Section 73 of the same act, which states that a person who commits a serious offence for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal organisation is guilty of an offence. In his case, these alleged offences are concerned with two burglaries, in Co Sligo in April 2023 and Co Tipperary last August. Larry Connors (27) Among other offences he is charged with is alleged criminal damage to a van that occurred in Co Roscommon last November. Larry Connors was charged with the same two offences under the Criminal Justice Act, with his Section 73 charge related to an alleged burglary in Co Roscommon last November. The men are further charged with handling stolen jewellery The younger Edward Connors was charged with a single Section 72 offence under the organised crime legislation. As with the other two defendants, this charge is related to the circumstances of his arrest in Co Kildare last November 29. Gardaí had earlier charged all three men with having in their possession gloves, torches, a pry bar, pliers, a heavy-duty axe, screwdrivers, a signal interference device, a telescopic ladder, a vehicle refuelling kit, surface disinfectant and two sets of number plates not matching the car they were travelling in, when they were stopped at Cadamstown, Johnstownbridge, Co Kildare, last November 29. They have been in custody since their arrests last November. All three were refused High Court bail during an application before Mr Justice Tony Hunt in early January and were again refused bail at yesterday's hearing. Bail could not have been granted to them at the district court on the organised crime charges. Convictions in relation to Section 72 or 73 of the act can attract a maximum prison sentence of 15 years. Their case is expected to be sent forward to the next sitting of Sligo Circuit Criminal Court, and it has been remanded for a week for service of books of evidence. The men are further charged with handling stolen jewellery taken during the course of a burglary at a house in Tuam, Co Galway, last November 28. They are charged with further separate offences, some of which were upgraded at yesterday's court sitting.
