Minister told new apartment guidelines are ‘insanity'
The Cabinet signed off on new guidelines for apartment building brought by Minister James Browne on Tuesday.
Advertisement
It includes a reduction in the minimum size of studio apartments from 37 square metres to 32 square metres.
In an attempt to improve delivery costs of apartment schemes, the Government would also remove any restrictions on apartment mix.
The stated aim of the measures is to improve the viability of apartment building.
Mr Browne said his proposals will reduce costs by between €50,000 to €100,000 per unit.
Advertisement
It is also proposed to remove any limitation on the number of units per lift and stair core per floor, subject to compliance with building regulations.
It also reduces the guidelines for the number of apartments required to have dual aspect windows.
The minister has insisted the changes will not compromise disability, fire safety, or environmental requirements.
Sinn Féin's Eoin O Broin. Photo: Niall Carson/PA.
At the Housing Committee on Tuesday, Mr Browne committed to providing members with the data behind the 100,000 euro figure on savings.
Advertisement
It came after Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin O Broin heavily criticised the proposals.
Mr O Broin said: 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results – and that's exactly what you and your colleagues in Cabinet are doing today.
'For the third time, a minister of Fianna Fail/Fine Gael Government has brought forward regulations to undermine and reduce standards of apartments.'
Mr Ó Broin said the new guidelines would allow for 'smaller, darker apartments in sub-optimally planned residential developments'.
Advertisement
He added: 'The irony, of course, is these are going to going to be the most expensive apartments, because these are the apartments that will have no protections whatsoever as you gut rent pressure zones.
'It will also push up land values – and I'm sure your officials have advised you of this – if you increase the density of a plot, it increases the price of the land, and that will impact on viability.'
Mr Ó Broin said the minister had also created 'huge uncertainty' in the planning and development sectors.
He added: 'What I don't understand is the claim that you've made – albeit with some caveats in your press release – that these changes will result in some cases of a reduction in cost per unit of 50,000 to 100,000 euro.'
Advertisement
Mr Ó Broin said he did not see any scenario from Department reports that reducing square meterage of one-bed apartments and studios would lead to those savings.
He said the Department's own reports showed that a reduction of three-to-seven square metres would result in a saving of just 9,000 euros per unit.
Social Democrats TD Rory Hearne. Photo: Niall Carson/PA.
Asked specifically to explain the claim, the minister said the savings also arose out of other measures including apartment mix, as well as the new rules on lift and stairwells.
'When you add it all up in terms of staircases etc, the number of lifts, you will get an offer of more units onto the same square footage on the envelope of the apartment block.
'And then when you divide that back down, you will find that there is significant savings.'
Pressed on whether he could provide data to support his claim to the committee, the minister said he would share the Departmental figures with the committee.
Ireland
Government eases apartment size rules aiming to cu...
Read More
Meanwhile, Social Democrats housing spokesman Rory Hearne asked if analysis had been undertaken to assess the impact of light reduction under the guidelines.
Mr Browne said 'careful consideration' had been given to the changes.
Asked if he could hand over such a report to the committee, Mr Browne said he was not sure what sort of analysis could be provided.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Russia has committed flagrant human rights abuses in Ukraine since 2014, rules ECHR
Russia has committed flagrant and unprecedented abuses of human rights since it invaded Ukraine in 2014, including extrajudicial killings, sexual violence and forced labour, the European court of human rights has found. The court's grand chamber unanimously held that between 11 May 2014 and 16 September 2022, when Russia ceased to be a party to the European convention on human rights it had committed 'manifestly unlawful conduct … on a massive scale'. Pro-Russia armed groups entered the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine in 2014 and Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. In its judgment, published on Wednesday, the court said there was evidence of widespread and systemic use of sexual violence, accompanied by acts of torture, such as beatings, strangling or electric shocks. Civilians and prisoners of war were subjected to mock executions, the severing of body parts and electric shocks, including to intimate areas of their bodies, the court said. Finding repeated violations of the convention, many of which had taken place over a period of more than eight years, the court said: 'These actions seek to undermine the very fabric of the democracy on which the Council of Europe and its member states are founded by their destruction of individual freedoms, their suppression of political liberties and their blatant disregard for the rule of law. 'In none of the conflicts previously before the court has there been such near universal condemnation of the 'flagrant' disregard by the respondent state for the foundations of the international legal order established after the second world war.' Ukraine hailed the judgment as 'historic and unprecedented', saying it was an 'undeniable victory'. Russia did not participate in the proceedings and said it would ignore the judgment. Violations identified by the court included: Indiscriminate military attacks. Summary executions of civilians and Ukrainian military personnel. Torture, including the use of rape as a weapon of war. Unlawful and arbitrary detention of civilians. Unjustified displacement and transfer of civilians. Intimidation, harassment and persecution of all religious groups other than adherents of the historically Moscow-aligned Ukrainian Orthodox church. Intimidation and violence against journalists and new laws prohibiting and penalising the dissemination of information in support of Ukraine. Forcible dispersal by the Russian military of peaceful protests in occupied towns and cities. Destruction, looting and expropriation of property. Suppression of the Ukrainian language in schools and indoctrination of Ukrainian schoolchildren. Transfer to Russia, and in many cases, the adoption there of Ukrainian children. The court said: 'The prevalence of sexual violence and rape by Russian soldiers in occupied territory is especially abhorrent. The evidence shows the extreme violence of the circumstances in which women were raped or sexually assaulted and the intent to terrorise, humiliate and debase them … In addition to the impact on the direct victims, the raping of women and girls in the context of an armed conflict has also been described as a means for the aggressor to symbolically and physically humiliate the defeated men. 'Rape or the threat of rape is also used to drive communities off lands or to heighten terror during attacks. The evidence also attests to the horrific sexual violence frequently perpetrated upon male detainees. The sexual abuse, torture and mutilation of male detainees is often carried out to attack and destroy their sense of masculinity or manhood.' Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion The judges said that sexual violence and rape were deployed in Ukraine after the February 2022 invasion 'as part of a military strategy to dehumanise, humiliate and break the morale of the Ukrainian population, as individuals and as a community, and to assert dominance over Ukrainian sovereign territory'. The court will decide on whether to order compensation at a later date. However, Russia has previously told the court of its intention not to enforce judgments or pay damages. A total of 26 signatory states to the convention intervened as third parties in the case and expressed their support for making Russia accountable for violations of human rights arising from its invasion of Ukraine. The court also found that the shooting down of flight MH17 using a missile supplied and transported to eastern Ukraine by the Russian Federation, resulting in the deaths of all 298 civilians onboard, was in breach of the convention.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ex-Tory minister breached post-government jobs rules, watchdog says
A member of the House of Lords and former Tory minister has breached the rules ex-government figures should follow when taking jobs after leaving office, a watchdog has said. Lord Harrington, a non-affiliated peer who was a Conservative minister under Boris Johnson, failed to tell the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) about two roles he took after leaving government in 2022. Acoba said the peer's failure to notify it of roles with Stephenson Harwood LLP and Regal Holdco Limited showed an 'unambiguous breach and clear disregard' of the rules governing ex-ministers. He apologised, telling the committee he miscalculated the period within which he had to give notice, while Acoba has written to the current Government complaining there is a 'general lack of understanding' of the rules it enforces. On leaving Government, all ministers must notify Acoba for the next two years of any jobs they go on to hold, to ensure they do not use their influence or knowledge of government improperly. Lord Harrington left his role as a refugees minister, working across the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and the Home Office, in September 2022. In the role, he spearheaded co-ordination of the UK's efforts to house Ukrainian refugees in the early days of the war, as well as working to accommodate Afghan refugees fleeing the resurgent Taliban. Acoba said it found out he had taken up a role with law firm Stephenson Harwood, which he began in March 2024, when a member of the public made a freedom of information request about it. The committee also became aware of an appointment with Cluster Partners Limited in December 2023, and another with Regal Holdco Limited in July 2024. It wrote to Lord Harrington asking why he had failed to give notice of the jobs, describing his actions as 'surprising', as he had sought advice for past roles after serving in David Cameron's government, and 'within the first few months of leaving office in 2022'. In correspondence with the watchdog from April, which has now been published on Acoba's website, Lord Harrington apologised to the committee. He said: 'I apologise for miscalculating the period in which I was required to notify Acoba of such appointments. The ministerial role I undertook in 2022 was a strictly limited project, concerning a subject on which I have had no professional interaction with prior or since that period. 'No paid employment I have commenced within two years of leaving ministerial office has been related to that role nor to Government.' While he said Cluster Partners was established in 2023, Lord Harrington said the company did not 'commence any activity until much later on', until after the deadline by which he had to notify Acoba. The watchdog accepted his explanation, but said of the other two appointments: 'The purpose of the rules is to protect the integrity of Government by considering the real and perceived risks associated with former ministers joining outside organisations. 'Protecting the integrity of the Government has not been possible here. Failing to await advice before taking up roles with Stephenson Harwood LLP and Regal Holdco Limited is an unambiguous breach and clear disregard of the Government's rules and the requirements of the ministerial code.' Acoba also wrote to Pat McFadden, the most senior minister of the Cabinet Office, notifying him of the breach. In its letter to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the watchdog complained that the rules governing ex-ministers jobs are inadequate. It said: 'These breaches, alongside those of others, raise the wider issue around the general lack of understanding of the rules and the inadequacies of the framework in which the rules operate. 'As it stands, the process relies entirely on the co-operation of applicants in the absence of any sanctions or incentives to maintain compliance. This has risked undermining the integrity of the committee and the rules.'
The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
Christian Horner's Red Bull allies sacked at same time as team boss in major clearout at F1 team
CHRISTIAN Horner's Red Bull allies were sacked at the same time as the ousted team boss, SunSport can reveal. Several senior staff at the six-time constructors' champions were told to clear their desks as Horner was suddenly dumped after a 20-year stint at the helm of the Formula 1 giants. 7 7 7 7 The shock move was part of a clear-out by the team's Austrian parent company, with Horner giving an emotional leaving speech to hundreds of his staff at their Milton Keynes HQ earlier today. It is understood that several senior figures who were close to Red Bull's only ever boss were also given their marching orders. Many had been appointed to their jobs by the 51-year-old team chief, and a source called the relationships a 'double-edged sword'. Horner was replaced immediately by Frenchman Laurent Mekies, 48, who has run Red Bull's sister team Racing Bulls since the start of 2024. They added: "A number of staff had been brought in by Christian, and when he was told to go, they were too. "Some of them had a very close relationship with Christian, which has proved to be a double-edged sword. "Laurent has his own people to bring in and his own vision for the team. "He is far more anonymous." Earlier today, Horner gave a tearful speech and received a minutes-long standing ovation from staff. The firebrand team principal admitted his removal was a shock, but told engineers and designers he was proud of their success. Christian Horner 'in tears' during farewell speech to Red Bull employees as sacked boss admits decision came as 'shock' He told them: "I was informed by Red Bull that operationally, I would no longer be involved with the business or the team moving forward. "It came as a shock to myself. "I've had a chance to reflect over the last 12 hours and wanted to stand in front of all of you to break this news and to express my gratitude to each and every single member of the team that has given so much during the last 20-and-a-half years. "Watching and being part of this team has been the biggest privilege of my life." Horner will remain employed by the company, where he is thought to make £9million-a-year, but is effectively on indefinite gardening leave. The official departure of Red Bull's only ever team principal was announced shortly after he finished saying his goodbyes and left. Horner was the longest-reigning F1 boss, having taken charge of the Austrian team when it was bought from Jaguar in 2005. In May, he batted away rumours he would join Ferrari, declaring: "It's always flattering to be associated with other teams, but my commitment is with Red Bull." HORNER SCANDAL TIMELINE By Isabelle Barker, Sports Reporter 5 February, 2024 – the bombshell allegations from a female colleague about "inappropriate, controlling behaviour' drop Red Bull chief exec Oliver Mitzlaff takes seriously and Horner strongly denies accusations. 9 February, 2024 Horner meets lawyer A lawyer in charge of the investigation begins digging into the case on behalf of Red Bull GmbH in a nine-hour meeting at a secret location. 15 February, 2024 – Horner's first public appearance since allegations Horner says the team have been 'tremendously supportive'. Verstappen says his relationship with Horner remains 'very good'. 28 February, 2024 – Horner cleared of all charges A statement from Red Bull GmbH read: 'The independent investigation into the allegations made against Mr Horner is complete, and Red Bull can confirm that the grievance has been dismissed The complainant has a right of appeal.' 29 February, 2024 - Whatsapps leaked Just 24 hours after he was cleared, WhatsApp texts and pictures were leaked from an anonymous source – to FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, F1 chief executive Stefano Domenicali, the sport's nine other team principals and members of the media. 2 March, 2024 - Horner and Halliwell hand in hand The former Spice Girls singer puts on a united front with her husband as Verstappen soared to victory in the opener in Bahrain. Horner declared he is 'absolutely confident' he will stay on as Red Bull boss for the remainder of the season, while Red Bull's majority shareholder, Thai billionaire Chalerm Yoovidhya, also joined the duo on the team's terrace in a public show of support for Horner. 3 March, 2024 - Jos Verstappen takes aim Verstappen's father, Jos, claimed the team is 'in danger of being torn apart' if Christian Horner remains in his role. Verstappen Snr, also said the team would 'explode' if Horner remained in his position, and denied being the source of the leak. 8 August, 2024 - Horner cleared for second time as appeal dismissed During the F1 summer break, the appeal from a female colleague alleging 'inappropriate behaviour' from Horner is dismissed, clearing him for a second time. The complainant was suspended on full pay before launching an appeal but, on 8 August, her appeal was thrown out following another investigation by a different independent KC – with Red Bull adding that their 'internal process has concluded.' 9 July, 2025 - Horner sacked. Horner was accused of sending suggestive WhatsApp messages that were later leaked. The Brit vehemently denied the bombshell claims made by a female colleague about his behaviour. In February 2024, Horner was cleared of any wrongdoing after multiple probes. He had spent a tumultuous three weeks fighting for his career after a female colleague alleged controlling and coercive behaviour by the boss. The probe later investigated him allegedly sending improper messages to a woman. A KC cleared Horner for a second time in August after the unnamed accuser launched an appeal following the internal probe. Spice Girl Geri Halliwell stood by Horner despite reportedly being left "in floods of tears" when the scandal broke and was supported by pals, including her fellow Spice Girls. A source said at the time: "This has been weeks of hell for Christian and his family. "As he has said all along, these claims are 'nuts'." 7 7 7
