Indian official says political ‘constraints' led to jet losses
Firefighters give water cannon salute to a Rafale jet during its induction ceremony into the Indian Air Force at the Ambala Air Force Station in Ambala. PHOTO: AFP
NEW DELHI – India's political leadership didn't permit strikes on Pakistani military bases at the start of hostilities between the two countries in May, allowing Islamabad to shoot down its fighter jets, according to a military official.
'I do agree we did lose some aircraft. That happened only because of the constraints given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defence,' India's military attachė to Indonesia, Shiv Kumar, said at a seminar on the India-Pakistan conflict at the Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma in Jakarta on June 10.
The worst clash between the nuclear-armed neighbours in half a century erupted May 7, with both sides trading air, drone and missile strikes, as well as artillery and small-arms fire along their shared border.
It was triggered by an attack in Indian-controlled Kashmir on April 22 that killed 26 civilians in what India called an act of terrorism orchestrated by Pakistan. Islamabad has denied involvement.
Mr Kumar's comments are the most direct explanation so far from an Indian official on why the country lost fighter jets during the conflict with Pakistan.
The assertion from a military official that a political directive at the start of the conflict could be responsible for the downing of the planes may embolden India's opposition, which is scrutinising Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government over the hostilities.
India's Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of External Affairs didn't respond to emails seeking comments sent after office hours.
India's embassy in Indonesia said in a post on X that Mr Kumar's comments at the seminar were 'quoted out of context' and that he had wanted to convey that the 'Indian Armed Forces serve under civilian political leadership.'
In an interview in May, chief of defence staff of armed forces, Anil Chauhan, had accepted India lost an unspecified number of fighter aircraft but blamed the downing of the jets to tactical mistakes which were rectified.
New Delhi changed its policy after the initial losses, 'destroying' Pakistan air defence which allowed India to hit subsequently several military installations, including key airbases, Mr Kumar said. India claimed to have hit 11 Pakistan airbases alongside the destruction of air defence installations.
Mr Kumar said Islamabad capitulated after Indian strikes disabled several of its key military installations, leading New Delhi to conclude that 'Pakistan will never use their nuclear weapon against India.' BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
India's S Jaishankar heads to US for Quad meeting, Indo-Pacific expected to top agenda
India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will embark on a four-day visit to the US today. He will attend a Quad meeting — which includes Japan, Australia and the US — for foreign ministers. Security in the Indo Pacific, as well progress on existing Quad initiatives, are expected to top the agenda during discussions. Neha Poonia reports from New Delhi.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Lebanon seeks guarantees from Israel as US demands Hezbollah disarmed
Lebanese leaders have repeatedly vowed a state monopoly on bearing arms while demanding Israel comply with a ceasfire. PHOTO: REUTERS Lebanon seeks guarantees that Israeli forces fully withdraw from Lebanese territory in response to a US demand that Beirut formally commit to disarming militant group Hezbollah, a Lebanese official said on J une 30 . Lebanese leaders who took office in the aftermath of a war between Israel and Hezbollah in 2024 have repeatedly vowed a state monopoly on bearing arms while demanding Israel comply with a November ceasefire that ended the fighting. The Lebanese government official told AFP that in a recent visit, US envoy Tom Barrack had presented the demand for Beirut to officially commit to start disarming the Iran-backed group as stipulated in the November agreement, along with a full Israeli withdrawal. President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and parliament speaker Nabih Berri – who is a key Hezbollah ally – 'are preparing a response', said the official on condition of anonymity as they were not authorised to brief the media. With Mr Barrack, Washington's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, expected back in Beirut by mid-July, the Lebanese leaders 'will demand a halt to Israeli violations of the ceasefire, Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon, the release of prisoners (detained during the war) and the demarcation of the border', said the official. According to the official, Mr Barrack in his June 19 visit also asked that Lebanon work on securing its border with Syria and pursue economic reforms demanded by international creditors. Mr Aoun and Mr Salam took power early in 2025 as the balance of power shifted following the Israel-Hezbollah war that left the militant group – long an important player in Lebanese politics – severely weakened. Lebanese authorities say they have been dismantling Iran-backed Hezbollah's military infrastructure in the south, near the Israeli border. Israel has continued to strike Lebanon despite the November ceasefire, claiming to hit Hezbollah targets and accusing Beirut of not doing enough to disarm the group. According to the ceasefire agreement, Hezbollah is to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river, some 30km from the Israeli frontier. Israel was to withdraw its troops from all of Lebanon, but has kept them deployed in five points it deemed strategic. Meanwhile Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said on Monday that his government was 'interested' in normalising ties with Lebanon and neighbouring Syria, which both do not recognise Israel and have been technically at war with it since its creation in 1948. There was no comment from Beirut or Damascus, but the Lebanese government official told AFP normalisation was not among the US envoy's demands. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Indian tech hub state pushes jail terms for ‘fake news', sparks worries
The state government of Karnataka has said the Bill will be released for public consultation before implementation. PHOTO: REUTERS BENGALURU - Draft legislation by India's tech hub state of Karnataka that would impose jail terms of up to seven years for spreading 'fake news' and other misinformation has stirred concerns among free speech activists that it could lead to censorship. With nearly one billion internet users, the stakes are high in a sprawling country of many ethnic and religious communities where fake news risks stirring deadly strife and AI deepfake videos have alarmed officials during elections. India's federal government already regulates social media content with legislation empowering it to order takedowns of disputed content. But some states such as Karnataka have begun taking their own measures. Karnataka's Bill, the strictest of its kind yet, stipulates that those posting 'fake news' and 'anti-feminist' content, or 'promoting superstition', would face imprisonment along with potential fines. The 11-page Karnataka Mis-Information And Fake News (Prohibition) Bill does not define such offences in practice, but said special courts and a regulatory committee would be set up to implement it. Free speech advocates have cited what they say would be the risk of selective enforcement arising from Karnataka's measure and flagged concerns that people posting memes or making honest mistakes online could be prosecuted. 'Misinformation is fairly subjective and every person who uses the internet is susceptible to falling within the dragnet of this law,' said Mr Apar Gupta, founder of the Internet Freedom Foundation, a New Delhi-based digital advocacy group which first made the Karnataka draft legislation public. The state government of Karnataka, home to the city of Bengaluru that hosts the offices or branches of many Indian and foreign tech giants, has said the Bill will be released for public consultation before implementation. Mr Priyank Kharge, Karnataka's IT minister, said on June 27 'there is a lot of misinformation on the proposed Misinformation Bill in public'. He later added that the 'sole objective is to address the growing digital information disorder' and the government's focus was to tackle misinformation and fake news, 'and nothing beyond that'. He did not immediately respond to Reuters calls seeking further comment on June 30 . Karnataka's move could risk creating multiple regulations imposing conflicting obligations and regulatory challenges for companies, said Mr Aman Taneja, partner at law and policy firm Ikigai. Some Indian media have sharply criticised the draft Bill. The Deccan Herald newspaper on June 30 titled an opinion piece A Remedy That's Worse Than The Menace, saying the Karnataka government should 'do away with the criminal provisions' in the legislation. India has over the years held talks with US tech giants like Google it sees as having been slow to remove fake news posts, and New Delhi in 2019 set up a Fact Check Unit to debunk what it sees as misinformation. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
