
De Valera's acrimonious relationship with US President Roosevelt's man in Dublin during Second World War
The new American ambassador, Edward Walsh, is not the first to find himself at odds with Irish opinion makers – during his 1984 presidential visit, TDs and senators listened to Ronald Reagan's remarks on Central America in stony silence.
Such challenges do not compare, however, to the acrimony between Éamon de Valera and David Gray, then US president Franklin D Roosevelt's man in Dublin during the second World War. Before Germany surrendered, Gray had been told by the State Department Ireland would not be invited to participate in the inaugural conference of the United Nations in San Francisco.
De Valera's courtesy call on the German minister, Eduard Hempel, to express his condolences after Hitler's death caused outrage in Britain and the US, but at home it reinforced the perception that neutrality was administered impartially.
READ MORE
The extent of Ireland's co-operation with the Allies remained secret, and Winston Churchill's personal remarks about de Valera's policy on VE Day – the Irish government had stayed out of the war 'to frolic' with the Germans 'to their heart's content' – incensed public opinion.
De Valera's dignified response on radio won him admiration, and identified neutrality with Irish independence.
Following his visit to Hempel, a gesture his senior officials saw as grotesquely ill-judged, the taoiseach received fiercely critical letters from Irish-Americans. One serviceman in the Philippines wrote, 'I have a mother in Ireland, I also have brothers fighting this war, but I guess Dr Hempel means more to you. Have no more time, got to fight the Jap.' Other letter writers wrote of 'great embarrassment' and feeling 'ashamed'.
On the other hand, the tactful British representative in Dublin, John Maffey, thought that de Valera's pose as the elder statesman in his reply to Churchill – skilfully working on 'all the old passions' – represented a setback for Britain's approach to Ireland.
Gray arrived in Dublin in February 1940, three months before Hitler's tanks rolled over the Netherlands, Belgium, and then France. Like Roosevelt, the inexperienced American representative had no sympathy for Ireland's neutral stance – even though the US stayed out of the war until Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor in December the following year.
Gray could not understand the diplomatic balancing act de Valera had to perform to avoid antagonising the two nearest belligerent powers. As one of his critics put it, the American representative 'brandished the big stick too much'.
Relations between the two deteriorated when Frank Aiken went to Washington in April 1941 in an effort to ease the supplies squeeze enforced by Churchill.
De Valera's close cabinet colleague, responsible for co-ordinating defensive measures, did succeed in purchasing two ships, but only after a fraught meeting with the president.
According to an Irish source, Aiken insisted that Ireland had to contend with a twin threat of 'aggression' – from Britain, and Germany.
The pro-British Roosevelt thundered 'nonsense' and pulled the tablecloth to land his lunch on the floor. Furious with the reception Aiken received during his visit, de Valera believed Gray had misrepresented him to the president.
But their relationship reached a critical point in February 1944 when the American envoy asked de Valera to recall the German and Japanese representatives. The taoiseach saw the 'American note' as an ultimatum and rejected it as undermining Ireland's neutrality. When Hitler took his own life in April 1945, Gray demanded the keys of the German legation before its records could be destroyed ' – de Valera rejected this too. T
he cessation of hostilities in Europe did not mark the end of this period of testy US-Irish relations as Gray stayed in Dublin until 1947.
Sceptical about the benefits of joining the UN, de Valera told the Dáil in June 1946 that Ireland 'was losing nothing' by not applying for membership.
'But all changed in a matter of weeks,' his biographer Ronan Fanning writes, 'as the cold war deepened'. Soviet efforts to have their Eastern European satellites admitted as members of the UN led to the British and the Americans supporting the applications of neutral European countries.
However, the Soviet Union used its Security Council veto to reject Irish membership – ostensibly because diplomatic relations had not been established. This refusal caused little upset in Dublin, creating, as one leading civil servant put it, 'neither surprise nor disappointment'.
A Soviet spokesman later stated at the UN general assembly that states such as Ireland and Salazar's Portugal could not be regarded as 'peace-loving' because they had 'supported fascism' during the war, and, he said, they maintained 'particularly friendly relationships' with Franco's Spain, 'the last offshoot of fascism in Europe'.
Ireland finally became a member of the UN in 1955.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
University fees hike controversy
Sir, – I see there is division in Government in relation to a potential increase in university fees. I think I know the perfect solution that will result in all parties including students being happy and nobody loses face. A special commission should be set up to produce a report on how universities should be funded. It will probably take a year or so to complete. In the meantime, no hard decision is required and we kick this thorny issue down the road yet again. Sound familiar? – Yours, etc, EAMONN BYRNE, READ MORE Dublin 15.


Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on young people and democracy: increasing disenchantment
The increased polarisation of European politics appears to be marching in step with an alarming growth in disillusionment among young people with democracy itself, and fears for its survival. A new 10-country survey of 16-to-26-year-olds in Europe has found only six per cent believe their country's political system functions well and does not need reform. Some 57 per cent of young people still prefer democracy to any other form of government – support is highest in Germany at 71 per cent, lowest in Poland at 48 per cent – but, ominously, 21 per cent say they would favour authoritarianism under some circumstances. Only half of young people in France and Spain believe that democracy is the best form of government, the study found. And among those who see themselves as politically to the right of centre and feel economically disadvantaged, support for democracy sinks to just one in three. Forty-eight per cent – and 61 per cent in Germany – worry that the democratic system in their own country is endangered. The survey of 6,700 young people by YouGov was carried out for the German TUI Foundation. It did not include Ireland. READ MORE Political polarisation is deepening, manifested most clearly in the rise of populist parties: 19 per cent now identify with the right, up a quarter since 2021, 33 per cent with the centre, and an unchanged 32 per cent with the left. Sixteen per cent claim no label. The survey also found a widening gender divide, with women, in particular in Germany, France and Italy reporting increasing support for progressive views while young men, notably in Poland and Greece, have swung to the right. The poll also found 73 per cent of British young people want the UK to rejoin the EU. The growing alienation from politics and political institutions reflects the sense among young people that the system has failed them and that their parents' generation has abanoned them. The survey is a timely, important warning that doing things in the old way will not be enough.


Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Parents' plan to raise €60,000 to employ extra teacher refused by primary school patron
A plan by parents at a Dublin primary school to privately employ a teacher for €60,000 to avoid pupils being educated in 'supersized' classes has been turned down by its patron body, the Archdiocese of Dublin . Belgrove Infant Girls' School in Clontarf, Dublin 3 , will lose a teacher in September following a drop in enrolments last year. It means pupils going into first class will be amalgamated from three classes into two for part of the school day, resulting in enlarged class sizes of 34 pupils. Average primary class sizes nationally are 22.5 pupils, and the Government has pledged to reduce the average to 19 pupils. READ MORE Eamonn Broderick, the parent of a six-year-old child who is due to progress to first class in September, said most parents were willing to fund the appointment of a teacher which they estimated would cost about €60,000 or €600 per family. 'We were confident we would have the money together quickly,' he said. 'This is a relatively affluent area. Earlier this the school was able to raise €40,000 to do up the yard in a week. The school indicated they would need about €60,000 for a 10-month contract, as well as PRSI, insurance, etc.' However, the school's patron body, the Archdiocese of Dublin, told the principal in recent weeks that the move was not possible on the basis that a 'school cannot appoint a mainstream teacher and pay via private funds', records show. The school, meanwhile, has told parents that several appeals against the reduction in teacher numbers were unsuccessful and that every effort had been made to make the transition to amalgamated classes as 'smooth as possible'. It said the arrangement was for one year only, as the school's enrolment figures have since rebounded, and it will regain a teacher in September 2026. A letter to Minister for Education Helen McEntee , signed by 237 parents, says the planned class sizes for first class pupils are 'too large' and increase the potential for 'negative impacts on learning quality and the teaching environment for students'. The letter states that enlarged classes will also 'further reduce the available special education teaching resources to an unacceptably low level'. A spokesman for the Department of Education said pupil enrolments on the previous September 30th are the key factor for determining staff resources at schools. While an appeal by the school had been considered by an independent primary staffing appeals board, it was unsuccessful. The board's decision is final. 'The configuration of classes and the deployment of classroom teachers are done at local school level,' the spokesperson added. 'The department's guidance to schools is that the number of pupils in any class is kept as low as possible, taking all relevant contextual factors into account [eg, classroom accommodation, fluctuating enrolment, etc].' Parents' representatives met the school principal and chair of the board on June 19th last to express their concerns over the move. Minutes of the meeting show parents asked the school to provide further communication so all information could be 'properly conveyed' to the wider school community. However, the school declined and said that they had been advised by Catholic school managers 'not to have a public meeting', according to minutes of a meeting on June 19th last. Mr Broderick, meanwhile, said many parents were worried that the new arrangement would disrupt and dilute children's education, but felt their concerns were not being listened to by those in authority.