
How much Brits should actually have in their savings, according to their age
Rent: • Three months: £6,600• Four months: £8,800• Five months: £11,000• Six months: £13,200
Mortgage:
• Three months: £8,100 • Four months: £10,800• Five months: £13,500
• Six months: £16,200 (Picture: Getty Images) During this time of life, a solid six months is expected for financial security. Unfortunately, Prakash says that increased responsibilities and the impact of financial shocks, such as job loss, will be greater. Anything less in your savings account could be detrimental in the event of an emergency.
Rent: £13,200
Mortgage: £16,200 (Picture: Getty Images) For 51 to 60-year-olds, six months to a year is necessary. Prakash says that in addition to the above expenses, it is also important to be prepared for an early retirement or redundancy. Wages also start declining at this point, going from £42,796 between 40 to 49, to £36,036 from 60. From 50 to 59, it's £40,456.
Rent: • Six months: £13,200• Seven months: £15,400• Eight months: £17,600• Nine months: £19,800• 10 months: £22,000• 11 months: £24,200• 12 months: £26,400
Mortgage: • Six months: £16,200• Seven months: £18,900• Eight months: £21,600• Nine months: £24,300• 10 months: £27,000• 11 months: £29,700
• 12 months: £32,400 (Picture: Getty Images) 12 months of expenses are recommended at age 60 and above. This allows for a smooth transition into retirement. Those still in the workforce will earn, on average, £36,036. However, 94.4% of people aged 75 to 84 years are retired, according to 2023 ONS data. It rises to 95.2% for those 85 and over.
Rent: £26,400
Mortgage: £32,400 (Picture: Getty Images) As well as providing saving recommendations for each age group, Prakash has also shared five tips for liquid savings. These include:1. Set a clear goal after tracking your monthly expenses; aim to cover at least three to six months of expenses.2. Open a separate easy-access savings account separate from the current account. This avoids the temptation to spend.3. Save and then spend - rather than saving what remains after spending. Set a monthly standing order to transfer an amount from your current account to your savings account. Even £50-£100 monthly adds up over time.4. Treat the savings account as an emergency fund only - not for holidays, sales, etc.
5. Choose high-interest, easy-access savings account options provided by your bank. This will ensure your money grows, and avoids monetary trouble in the event of an emergency (Picture: Getty Images)
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
44 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
What is a reasonable budget for a holiday? Expert explains
Based on a survey of 2,114 UK adults by Starling Bank, holiday spending has increased by a quarter (23%) since 2023. Brits are spending £822.50 more per week abroad than at home, compared to £668 two years ago. However, they are also taking a savvier approach to their holiday spending, with nearly eight in ten (78%) holidaymakers setting a budget ahead of their trip, compared to 66% of those surveyed by Starling in 2023. It's important to remember that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to budgeting, and it will look different for every trip. Becca Stroud, Personal Finance Expert at Starling Bank, has shared a few tips for creating a reasonable holiday budget. What is a reasonable budget for a holiday, and how to create one? Think about the spending involved A good first step to creating a reasonable holiday budget is to make a list of all the things you need to account for when away and estimate how much it will all cost. Becca adds: "If your bank offers spending insights, you can try analysing your previous trip to see how much you typically spend on categories like drinks, groceries and experiences while away. "Once you know how much you'll need to roughly put aside, you can start saving up for your trip." Save up in advance, and separate out your savings Creating a dedicated savings fund can prevent you from accidentally spending money intended for your trip. Set a limit for how much you'd like to spend while you're away Planning what you'd like to do on your trip can be helpful in creating a rough daily spend target to stay within your holiday budget. Becca adds: "Some banks, like Starling, let you ringfence your funds into separate Spaces, so why not get creative with them? "You could create a Space for each day of your trip, or separate your Spaces for experiences, meals out and essentials." Keep track of your spending It's easy to lose track of your spending on holiday, particularly when you're having a nice time and you don't want to keep checking exchange rates. Becca explains: "It's worth having a daily check-in while on holiday to make sure you're aware of what you're spending. "To make this easier, you can turn on notifications for each time you make a purchase - this will give you a reality check and remind you to keep an eye on your budget." Don't tip your bank Transaction fees can be an issue when paying for items with your debit card, but some banks don't charge them. Becca says: "To avoid transaction fees make sure you click the option to pay in the local currency as opposed to in pounds. Recommended reading: "These small savings add up, giving you some extra cash to play with for guilt-free treats and activities." Consider a holiday spending buffer If you can, consider having a holiday spending buffer in place for any emergencies or unexpected expenses while away Becca explains: "Our research found that two-thirds of those surveyed created a buffer, setting aside a whopping £519.70 on average."


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Poll reveals 'confidence collapsing' SNP can usher in clean energy jobs as oil and gas declines
The transition from fossil fuels to green energy is a serious challenge that needs serious people in charge (Picture: Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP via Getty Images) | AFP via Getty Images Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Only one in five Scots believe the energy transition away from oil and gas will create jobs, a new poll has revealed. The nationwide survey, conducted by YouGov for the GMB and Prospect trade unions, shows that Scots have more at stake in the drive to cut emissions than anywhere else in the UK, but share far less confidence it will deliver economic or climate benefits. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The transition from fossil fuels to green energy is a serious challenge (Picture: Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP via Getty Images) | AFP via Getty Images The UK and Scottish governments have insisted that a just transition will create hundreds of thousands of jobs in clean technologies for former oil and gas workers as the industry declines, but the poll of 2,100 people across the UK reveals most Scots are unconvinced. The survey suggests that 17 per cent of Scots work in the energy sector or know someone who does - a far higher proportion than anywhere else in the UK. But less than half, 47 per cent, feel positive about the transition from oil and gas to renewable energy - lower than in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - while 21 per cent feel negative, more than any of the other home nations. Almost one in three fear the energy transition will cost jobs in Scotland, also the highest proportion across the UK and almost three times the proportion in England. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Only 17 per cent of Scots think the transition will increase job opportunities, the lowest level of optimism across the country. Louise Gilmour, GMB Scotland secretary, said: 'Experienced and skilled workers across oil and gas know better than anyone what the scale of this transition will demand and what is at stake. GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour | Andrew Cawley 'Promises of green jobs tomorrow mean nothing when real jobs are being lost today and, so far, this transition has been something done to our workers and their communities not with them. 'These workers understand change and know how to make it happen but their expert voice has been drowned out by the din of politicians and campaigners making a noise instead of a plan. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad READ MORE: Rosebank and other North Sea oil and gas fields could be given green light under new guidelines 'The insight and expertise of workers must be front and centre in this transition and, if it is not, this transition will fail.' Prospect general secretary, Mike Clancy, added: 'The government have raised the ambition on energy policy, which is welcome. 'Now they need to be bigger and bolder when it comes to energy jobs and put energy workers at the heart of this agenda.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government is also under increasing pressure to reverse its ban on new nuclear power as the construction of new small modular reactors in England is poised to create thousands of well-paid jobs and apprenticeships. Scottish Labour net zero spokesperson, Sarah Boyack, said: 'Scotland can be a global clean energy superpower, but both the Tories and the SNP have been squandering this opportunity. Scottish Labour's Sarah Boyack 'Under the SNP green jobs targets have been missed, supply chain jobs have been sent abroad, our seabeds have been sold off on the cheap, and just transition funding has been frittered away with little to show for it.' Scottish Conservative energy and net zero spokesperson, Douglas Lumsden, said: 'With the SNP repeatedly missing their own emissions targets, it's little wonder public confidence is collapsing in their ability to deliver the renewable jobs they keep promising. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Warm words on green jobs are cold comfort to the thousands of skilled oil and gas workers who have been chucked on the scrapheap by both Labour and the SNP.' Climate Action and Energy Secretary Gillian Martin said: 'We're clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments. 'Communities, workers, and trade unions are at the heart of Scotland's renewable energy transition, and we are committed to ensuring local voices are central to any decisions we take, this includes the voices of the workforce within our oil and gas industry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Through initiatives such as the Just Transition Fund and the Energy Transition Fund, the Scottish Government has already invested £120 million in the North East's transition to net zero to help create green jobs, support innovation, and secure the highly skilled workforce of the future.


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
The £200bn reason why Swinney must not make a mess of Trump visit
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There is a surplus of advice to John Swinney about issues he should raise with President Donald Trump, most of it misguided. This is not an opportunity to be wasted on grandstanding or moral indignation. The policy area on which Mr Swinney might have some possibility of influence is around trade and tariffs. So far, Keir Starmer has done pretty well on that front so, at this point, the obligation is to consolidate that advantage, not to threaten it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There should be the closest possible co-operation between Downing Street and Edinburgh to ensure that Mr Swinney is singing from exactly the same hymn sheet as the Prime Minister, including appreciation of the trade deal to which Mr Trump has apparently signed up. It is advisable to include the word 'apparently' in every such statement since it is well established that when dealing with Mr Trump, the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away, particularly if provoked. A lot of livelihoods are dependent on not screwing it up. It also helps to understand and, to some extent, empathise with where Mr Trump is coming from on the whole question of tariffs and protectionism, which runs deep in the American psyche. It was only in 1947 that the USA converted to the principles of free trade, and even then a lot of its people and communities were never really convinced. We should be able to understand that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Keir Starmer has worked hard to mitigate the damage to the UK economy caused by Donald Trump's tariffs (Picture: Stefan Rousseau/pool) | Getty Images 'Liberation Day' stock market plunge It is received wisdom and probably true that nobody ever wins from trade wars. However, that seems a bit glib in the vast swathes of America which have seen the disappearance of proud manufacturing industry. Mr Trump has not found it difficult to convince his base that the old medicine of tariffs is required to save what's left, or even turn the lights back on in derelict factories and mills. He soon found out after being re-elected that rhetoric on this subject is easier than implementation. His great 'Liberation Day' tariffs announcement led to stock markets plummeting and they were hastily put on hold. Since then, there has been more bluster than clarity but as things stand, the UK will 'benefit' from a ten per cent tariff, significantly lower than the EU. Our exporting industries can live with that. The Scotch Whisky Association has welcomed the UK Government's 'measured and pragmatic approach'. So let's just keep the ship steady until the storm passes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cashmere tariff panic My own learning curve about the direct relevance of tariffs to that most basic human commodity – jobs – came shortly after I became UK trade minister and received a call at home one Saturday morning from the panic-stricken managing director of a Borders cashmere company which exported 90 per cent of its production to the United States. Did I know what was going on with the World Trade Organisation authorising US tariffs on cashmere knitwear as part of a long-running dispute about the EU giving preferential treatment to Caribbean bananas, as opposed to those imported from American-owned companies in Latin America? If this went ahead, many hundreds of jobs were at stake. It was the kind of call one does not forget. To the uninitiated, it would require a book to explain how cashmere knitwear had become intertwined with bananas in a trade war, but take my word for it. We did pretty well on that one, by underwriting the impact of tariffs until that particular storm had passed, which it duly did. But it taught me two lessons – first, the ruthlessness with which the US acts on trade issues and, second, the direct and immediate impact this has on jobs. That's why it is so important to proceed with care, particularly in the current, capricious environment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Harris Tweed also has a colourful history of avoiding punitive US tariffs which once involved a Free Church minister going to Washington to plead the industry's special case, having first rallied support for exemption among fellow fundamentalists in the textile-producing areas of the southern States. At that time, vast quantities of the fabric were exported to the US to be turned into jackets. The change that has taken place epitomises the issue. To all intents and purposes, there is no American garment-making industry any more. Much of the fabric goes to other countries with lower labour costs and it is the finished products which enter America and will be subject to tariffs at whatever rate is eventually set. Fortunately, the American market is much less dominant than it used to be, for there would now be no space for even a Free Church minister, never mind a trade one, to exercise benign influence! Value of exports to US is huge For similar reasons, Ireland is waiting with trepidation for the terms of the US-EU deal. By relying so heavily on American tech companies for low-taxed inward investment, the threat of tariffs on the finished products which are exported back to the US is a serious threat to its economic base. Trump's message to Apple and the likes that they should be manufacturing in America is intended to be powerful. Last time round, Trump's tariffs cost the Scotch Whisky industry around £600 million. Understandably, along with Scottish salmon, it tends to catch the headlines while representing a modest proportion of the overall picture. The United States market is worth almost £200 billion to the UK in goods and services, by far our biggest trading partner. The difference between ten per cent and even 15 per cent matters a lot, which is why Mr Starmer's trade deal is so important. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad