logo
German GDP contracts in Q2 as pre-tariff boost ends

German GDP contracts in Q2 as pre-tariff boost ends

Reuters5 days ago
BERLIN, July 30 (Reuters) - Germany's economy contracted by 0.1% in the second quarter, data showed on Wednesday, as demand from the United States slowed following months of strong purchases in anticipation of U.S. tariffs.
The contraction was in line with forecasts, reversing the growth recorded in the first quarter, when importers in the U.S. bought more goods earlier than usual because they expected tariffs to go up.
This contraction left GDP still stuck at its pre-pandemic size, said Franziska Palmas, senior Europe economist at Capital Economics, who added that it was "partly, but not solely," due to the reversal of tariff front-running.
Investment in Germany fell in the second quarter, while consumption and government spending rose, compared to the previous quarter, the statistics office said.
The office also revised first-quarter growth downward to 0.3% from the previous 0.4%.
The U.S. struck a framework trade agreement with the European Union on Sunday, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods, half of what was originally threatened. The agreement helped avoid a bigger trade war between the two allies, who together make up almost a third of global trade.
The U.S. was Germany's biggest trading partner in 2024 with two-way goods trade totalling 253 billion euros ($278 billion).
"Germany is likely to be hit harder than other major economies by tariffs and continue to struggle this year before fiscal stimulus starts to boost the economy in 2026," Palmas said.
Despite optimism in recent surveys, Wednesday's GDP data is "a painful reminder that optimism alone does not automatically bring back strong growth", said Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING.
"The economy's flirtation with yet another year of stagnation continues."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want
Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want

The Sun

time23 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want

Boats sailed WHEN will the Government finally get the message on illegal immigration? Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's announcement of 300 extra National Crime Agency officers to tackle people-smuggling gangs is welcome, of course. 1 Anything that disrupts this evil trade is a good thing, in the same way that a crackdown is needed on profiteers who employ the migrants on the cheap — no questions asked — when they get here. But if this £100million investment is the Government's grand plan to 'break the business model' of the crooks then it is doomed to failure. When the risk-versus-reward equation is so much in their favour, the smugglers and the illegal migrants will always find a way. The incentives are too great: millions of pounds for the smugglers, for little effort; hand-outs, accommodation and black market jobs for the migrants, with virtually no chance of being deported. The only way to break the business model is to come up with a deterrent which makes the migrants worry that their money — and the dangers they will face — won't get them what they want. Or where they want. A deterrent like the Rwanda scheme, which was already beginning to work but which Labour couldn't wait to ditch. The soaring number of Channel small boats is the inevitable consequence. Jobs shame THE number of young people facing unemployment is one of the most heart-breaking results of the Chancellor's job-wrecking tax hikes. A million Neets — youngsters Not in Education, Employment or Training — is a disaster for the economy as well as a tragedy for them. Migrant boats are carrying 'bad people' REJECTED by other NATIONS says Trump At a time in their lives when they are desperately trying to find their place in the world, a job — or the skills to get one — gives them purpose and a sense of who they are, just as surely as being dumped on benefits crushes that. The Skills Tax Relief proposed by more than 100 business chiefs would be a vital boost to apprenticeships and vocational training, offering young Brits a route into the workplace. If Rachel Reeves isn't swayed by the thought of saving so many from the scrapheap, then she should be swayed by the £10billion of welfare savings it could bring over the next five years. It's not the water temperature that puts them off but the sewage dumped in it. What a blow for our coastal communities and seaside resorts.

ALEX BRUMMER: Bank under populist siege
ALEX BRUMMER: Bank under populist siege

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

ALEX BRUMMER: Bank under populist siege

Running in parallel with Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff horror has been the President's furious and uncouth attacks on America's independent central bank. Trump makes little secret of his contempt for current chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jay Powell, even though he nominated him for the job in his first term. Powell has refused to be a White House cipher, standing firm against Trump's unrelenting campaign to cut the US's key federal funds interest rate from the current 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent range. The Fed chairman's obduracy remains intact despite last week's dissent by two Trumpian choices as Fed interest rate-setters. Events across the Atlantic appear to have little relevance to the UK, where Chancellor Rachel Reeves started her illustrious rise to the nation's top economic post at the Bank of England. Governor Andrew Bailey is a friend, even though the Chancellor and Governor are currently at odds over lifting the burden of City regulation. A more important clash between the Bank and the Government is on the horizon. Bailey is known to be dismissive of the short-lived administration of Liz Truss. In her memoir, Truss was unforgiving of the role that she claims Bailey played in her downfall. Dangerously for the Bank, critics on the Left and the Right are targeting its credibility and independence. The Leftist New Economics Foundation has consistently campaigned against the Bank's approach to 'quantitative tightening'. This process involves running down the £895billion of gilt holdings the Bank acquired between 2009 and 2021 as it injected cash into the banking system with the aim of averting recession and calming markets. The Treasury agreed to indemnify the Bank against losses at a potential cost of £130billion over the current decade. The UK approach is seen as meeting standards of fiscal probity but imposes an extraordinary burden on public finances at a time when the debt to national output (GDP) ratio is close to 100 per cent. The Fed, in contrast to the UK, decided to continue to hold Treasuries (the equivalent of gilts), bought in the post-financial crisis era, on its books and hold them to maturity. So there are no paper losses. Neil Collins (a former colleague) pointed to the daftness of Bank policy in a recent letter to The Spectator magazine. He noted that in May 2020 the Bank bought a long-gilt, dated 2061, for £101. It recently sold the very same stock at a price as low as £28! Few people pay much attention to 'Reform-onomics', even though Nigel Farage leads in the opinion polls. The main criticism of Reform is that the party's big-spending, populist policies are costly and could trigger a fresh Truss-like crisis. Less debated is the dispute between Reform apparatchik Richard Tice MP and Bailey over monetary policy. Tice suggests that the Bank's approach to quantitative tightening has enriched high street banks and is costing the taxpayer money. But Bailey points out the Bank booked an earlier £124billion profit on its gilt purchases and, for the moment, the Government is £34billion up. Details of the dispute are obscure. The more sinister point for Threadneedle Street is that Tice and Reform see Bank independence as potentially a soft target. Echoes of Donald Trump's attacks on the Fed can be heard loudly.

Royal skincare boss backs our tourist tax campaign
Royal skincare boss backs our tourist tax campaign

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Royal skincare boss backs our tourist tax campaign

The boss of a skincare brand used by King Charles and Queen Camilla has warned that 'you can feel the economy slowing down' while Labour refuses to scrap the tourist tax. Deborah Mitchell (pictured with Camilla), whose company Heaven Health & Beauty sells nettle and bee 'venom' as anti-ageing Botox alternatives, has seen sales fall after VAT-free shopping for tourists was axed. The company has now joined 500 others in backing the Daily Mail's campaign to scrap the tourist tax and reinstate VAT-free shopping for visitors. Mitchell, 59, said this would help boost retailers' profits after they were whacked by more tax hikes, including higher wages and National Insurance contributions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store