logo
The Growing Pains of Asia's Newest Country

The Growing Pains of Asia's Newest Country

New York Times16-02-2025
Three decades ago, he was a scrappy campaigner roaming the world's corridors of power with a dream to win independence for his tiny homeland. Today, at 75, José Ramos-Horta is both the president and a relentless salesman for East Timor.
He asked China's president, Xi Jinping, to 'help us resolve the problem of agriculture, food security and poverty.' He pleaded with Vietnam's leaders to do the same. He pitched Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, the ruler of the United Arab Emirates, his dream of building student dormitories.
Mr. Ramos-Horta is under mounting pressure to sustain his nation — Asia's youngest and one of its poorest. Home to about 1.4 million people, East Timor is one half of an island that lies near the northern tip of Australia; the other half is part of Indonesia. A Portuguese colony for centuries, it emerged as an independent state in 2002 after a brutal occupation by Indonesia. Its roughly $2 billion economy remains heavily reliant on oil and gas revenue, which is evaporating quickly, and more than 40 percent of its people are estimated to live in poverty.
'No country in Southeast Asia or in Africa began as we did, from ashes, from total destruction,' Mr. Ramos-Horta said. But, he added: 'In 22 years, we should have resolved child poverty, child malnutrition, mother malnutrition and extreme poverty. So that has been a failure.'
Still, by other measures, East Timor, or Timor-Leste as it is known in Portuguese, is a success. It has strengthened its young democracy, holding competitive elections with multiple transfers of power. It ranks among the highest in Asia for press freedom. Life expectancy is around 70, up from around 64 in 2002. The entire population now has access to electricity.
While politically motivated violence followed independence, including an assassination attempt on Mr. Ramos-Horta in 2008, during his first term as president, the country is stable now.
East Timor is a positive case study for young post-conflict states, said Parker Novak, an Indo-Pacific expert at the Atlantic Council. 'They've built a fairly resilient democracy. That's something they're very proud of, and rightfully so.'
In September, a visit by Pope Francis briefly put East Timor in the global spotlight. About 97 percent of the population identifies as Roman Catholic, a legacy of the Portuguese colonizers and, more recently, the pivotal role the church played in winning independence from Indonesia. Some clergy fought for independence, and bishops and nuns protected people from Indonesian forces.
In Dili, the capital, streets were scrubbed and walls freshly painted to primp for the papal trip. The prime minister, Xanana Gusmão, was out with a broom.
For one of the least visited countries in Asia, it was a major moment. Outside of Dili, the major population center, East Timor still feels like an untouched paradise. Tall, lush mountains are surrounded by wide expanses of azure seas. There are few people on its white sandy beaches.
Francis' arrival also resurrected memories of a tainted past. Bishop Carlos Ximenes Belo, one of the heroes of the independence movement, was accused in 2022 of having sexually abused children decades ago.
Few Timorese speak up about Bishop Belo, who remains widely revered. Mr. Ramos-Horta, who was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in 1996 along with Bishop Belo for their work to win independence, said the matter had 'already been addressed years ago by the Vatican' and that any restitution had already been made between the church and the victims.
The China Factor
At the grounds of the presidential palace in Dili, members of the public stroll in freely and sit in the lush gardens.
It was all made possible by China.
Beijing gave nearly $7 million to build the palace, which opened in 2009. (The U.S. dollar is the official currency here.) Less than a mile away are the defense and foreign ministries, both also built by China.
Mr. Ramos-Horta recounted how he had asked the Chinese ambassador for help in providing clean water.
'Even before I went to China, Chinese engineers were coming to Timor already, to look at the water sources for irrigation and water supply to communities,' he said. 'The Chinese, they deliver very fast.'
This reliance on China has triggered fears about Beijing's intentions in East Timor, and what it could mean for the United States, which has stepped up its troop presence in the Australian port city of Darwin, just a few hundred miles from East Timor.
'When China looks at investing in another developing country, they do so with one eye, certainly on a viable business, but with the other eye, very much on a longer-term strategic interest,' said Damien Kingsbury, an emeritus professor at Deakin University in Australia.
As Mr. Ramos-Horta took me on a tour of the palace, he dismissed those fears, saying 'China is not a threat to the world.'
He said Beijing was reluctant to help more, such as with building a police force, because it was aware of American and Australian sensitivities. He added that East Timor does not borrow money from China, and that the only military security arrangement it has is with Australia.
Not 'Hostages of the Past'
Mr. Ramos-Horta is fond of sharing anecdotes. One was about bumping into Indonesia's president, Prabowo Subianto, in Singapore in July. Mr. Prabowo asked after Mr. Ramos-Horta's younger brother, a close friend of his.
'That's the level of the friendship we have with Indonesian leaders,' Mr. Ramos-Horta said.
The same Mr. Prabowo who led the feared Kopassus special forces unit that slaughtered hundreds in East Timor during the Indonesian occupation?
The Indonesian military moved in days after the Portuguese left in 1975, after the United States had greenlighted the invasion. They killed, according to some estimates, as many as 200,000 people before allowing a referendum in 1999. Mr. Ramos-Horta lost four siblings.
Still, in recognition of Indonesia honoring the results of the referendum, Mr. Ramos-Horta said he and Mr. Gusmão, the prime minister, decided that they would not allow 'ourselves to be hostages of the past.'
'We honor the victims. We bury the dead, but we look forward.'
He recounted how when he and Mr. Gusmão first heard that Mr. Prabowo had been elected, Mr. Gusmão 'was very happy' and gave him a thumbs up.
'Those who were here, during the difficult time, they have the greatest emotional connection' to East Timor, Mr. Ramos-Horta said, adding that such people would be more supportive of the country's stability.
Familiar Challenges
A quarter-century after the Indonesians left, many of East Timor's independence heroes remain in government. While Mr. Gusmão fought in the jungles, Mr. Ramos-Horta spent decades in exile, lobbying for freedom. He has served as foreign minister, prime minister and is now in his second term as president.
'People feel obligated to them, they liberated the country from a horrendous military occupation,' said Charles Scheiner, a researcher at La'o Hamutuk, a local advocacy group. 'Everybody in this country has family who was killed by the Indonesian military, and many of them are survivors of torture and rape.'
But winning sovereignty is different from running a country.
Analysts say that instead of using the revenues from oil and gas to improve decrepit schools and develop fishing and farming industries, officials channeled them into creating an inflated bureaucracy and paying those involved in the post-independence violence big pensions to 'buy peace.' The World Bank has warned that East Timor is heading toward a 'damaging fiscal cliff' by 2035.
'The underlying premise of the democracy is that it would lead to better policymaking,' said Guteriano Neves, an independent policy analyst based in Dili. 'But it has not.'
Mr. Ramos-Horta is counting on developing an offshore gas field, called Greater Sunrise, to bring in much-needed revenue. While coffee remains a major export, Mr. Ramos-Horta speaks effusively of developing East Timor as an air cargo or pharmaceuticals hub. He also hopes to join the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to make regional trade easier.
The odds are long. Negotiations for the Greater Sunrise field are continuing, and it is expected to take at least five years of development before generating any revenue. Tourism remains untapped because of few commercial flights. Internet speeds still crawl.
About 25 minutes away from Dili, in the village of Ulmera, Alda Bisoi Correia, 74, recalled why she voted for independence. She was terrified of pro-Indonesia militias but said it was 'our last opportunity' to take a stand. Today, she wonders what it was all for.
'Independence hasn't made a difference to us,' she said.
Ms. Correia said the government does not supply water. Her family cannot afford a fridge. Her son is a security guard. His adopted daughter, Sandra Correia Lopes, 12, weighs just 12 kilograms, or 26 pounds, and falls sick frequently.
As dusk turned to night, Sandra sat down to dinner. It was a plate of rice and vegetables that her aunt had cooked over firewood. It will be nearly a month before her family can afford to serve meat.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

International law includes climate-change obligations, UN court says
International law includes climate-change obligations, UN court says

Axios

time43 minutes ago

  • Axios

International law includes climate-change obligations, UN court says

The United Nations' judicial arm — citing "severe" effects and "existential" risks — ruled Wednesday that multiple international agreements require countries to battle climate change and cut emissions under international law. Why it matters: While non-binding, advocates hope the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion adds new weight to global courtroom and diplomatic efforts to win tougher climate policies. It specifically calls out the responsibility of industrialized nations to take the lead in limiting emissions. It's also rich in symbolism, the culmination of a campaign by the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu and other countries that are facing massive climate harms. Driving the news: The ruling explicitly holds that countries should face legal requirements for breaching obligations under agreements including the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. This includes ceasing activities that are in violation and providing compensation to harmed parties in some cases. The ruling is expansive, spanning obligations under human rights law and multiple environmental agreements, including marine protection. The court is "unanimously is of the opinion that the climate change treaties set forth binding obligations for state parties to ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions," Judge Iwasawa Yuji, the court's president, said in reading the decision in the Hague. Reality check: The opinion is a big deal — but only to a point. The Trump administration in particular is moving the U.S. away from working with UN-affiliated bodies, and is again leaving the Paris Agreement. Ignoring the ICJ opinion could further isolate the U.S. in the world's eyes. Industrial nations' on-the-ground work to check emissions — or not — is rooted in domestic economic needs, politics and market realities. Global venues like the ICJ or the UN climate summits are more secondary influences, but they do create pressure for stronger policies. Catch up quick: The court, at the behest of the UN General Assembly in 2023, considered two big questions. What are nations' obligations under international law to protect the environment for present and future generations? What are the legal consequences under these obligations for countries that have caused "significant harm" to the climate and environment? What they're saying: " When a court like the ICJ recognizes new connections between conduct and legal norms, like the idea that failing to curb fossil fuels-related emissions can violate international legal obligations, it does not stop there," said Sebastien Duyck, senior attorney with the Center For International Environmental Law "That recognition opens the door for further legal claims," Duyck said in a statement. Adds Tasneem Essop, executive director of Climate Action Network International: "Governments and corporations now face clearly defined legal obligations to prevent climate catastrophe and make reparations for decades of reckless pollution." The liberal Center for American Progress think tank said on X: "The ICJ ruling is a major indictment against the Trump administration's climate denial and their efforts to let polluters off the hook."

Failing to protect planet from climate change ‘could violate international law'
Failing to protect planet from climate change ‘could violate international law'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Failing to protect planet from climate change ‘could violate international law'

The UN's top court has announced that if countries fail to take measures to protect the planet from climate change they could be in violation of international law. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered an advisory opinion in a landmark case about nations' obligations to tackle climate change and the consequences they may face if they do not, calling it an 'urgent and existential' threat to humanity. 'Failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system… may constitute an internationally wrongful act,' court president Yuji Iwasawa said during the hearing. The court also said countries harmed by climate change could be entitled to reparations for the damage they have suffered from rising global temperatures, but what they are owed should be determined on a 'case by case' basis. The non-binding opinion, which runs to more than 500 pages, is seen as a potential turning point in international climate law. The court said a 'clean, healthy and sustainable environment' is a human right. Enshrining a sustainable environment as a human right paves the way for other legal actions, including states returning to the ICJ to hold each other to account as well as domestic lawsuits, along with legal instruments such as investment agreements. The case is led by the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu and backed by more than 130 countries. All UN member states including major greenhouse gas emitters such as the United States and China are parties to the court. Outside the court, climate activists gathered with a banner that read: 'Courts have spoken. The law is clear. States must act now.' The courtroom, known as the Great Hall of Justice, was packed. After years of lobbying by vulnerable island nations who fear they could disappear under rising sea waters, the UN General Assembly asked the ICJ in 2023 for an advisory opinion, an important basis for international obligations. A panel of 15 judges was tasked with answering two questions: What are countries obliged to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions? Second, what are the legal consequences for governments when their acts, or lack of action, have significantly harmed the climate and environment? 'The stakes could not be higher. The survival of my people and so many others is on the line,' Arnold Kiel Loughman, attorney general of the island nation of Vanuatu, told the court during a week of hearings in December. In the decade up to 2023, sea levels rose by a global average of around 4.3cm, with parts of the Pacific rising higher still. The world has also warmed 1.3C since pre-industrial times because of the burning of fossil fuels. Vanuatu is one of a group of small states pushing for international legal intervention in the climate crisis, but it affects many more island nations in the South Pacific. 'The agreements being made at an international level between states are not moving fast enough,' Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu's minister for climate change, told the Associated Press. Activists could bring lawsuits against their own countries for failing to comply with the decision. 'What makes this case so important is that it addresses the past, present, and future of climate action. It's not just about future targets – it also tackles historical responsibility, because we cannot solve the climate crisis without confronting its roots,' Joie Chowdhury, a senior lawyer at the Centre for International Environmental Law, told the Associated Press. The United States and Russia, both of whom are major petroleum-producing states, are staunchly opposed to the court mandating emissions reductions. But those who cling to fossil fuels could go broke doing it, the UN secretary-general told the Associated Press in an exclusive interview this week. Simply having the court issue an opinion is the latest in a series of legal victories for the small island nations. Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights found that countries have a legal duty not only to avoid environmental harm but also to protect and restore ecosystems. Last year, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that countries must better protect their people from the consequences of climate change. In 2019, the Netherlands' Supreme court handed down the first major legal win for climate activists when judges ruled that protection from the potentially devastating effects of climate change was a human right and that the government has a duty to protect its citizens.

The Latest: Trump will reveal ‘AI Action Plan' shaped by his Silicon Valley supporters

time2 hours ago

The Latest: Trump will reveal ‘AI Action Plan' shaped by his Silicon Valley supporters

An artificial intelligence agenda formed on the podcasts of Silicon Valley billionaires is now being set into U.S. policy as President Donald Trump leans on the ideas of the tech figures who backed his election campaign. Trump plans on Wednesday to reveal an 'AI Action Plan' he ordered after revoking President Joe Biden's signature AI guardrails. The plan and related executive orders are expected to include some familiar tech lobby pitches: accelerating the sale of AI technology abroad and making it easier to construct the energy-hungry data center buildings that are needed to form and run AI products, according to a person briefed on Wednesday's event who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. It might also include some of the AI culture war preoccupations of the circle of venture capitalists who endorsed Trump last year. Here's the latest: The International Court of Justice is delivering an advisory opinion in a landmark case about every nation's obligations to tackle climate change and consequences they may face if they don't, calling it an 'urgent and existential' threat to humanity. 'Failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system ... may constitute an internationally wrongful act,' court President Yuji Iwasawa said during Wednesday's hearing. The case is led by the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu and backed by more than 130 countries. All U.N. member states, including major greenhouse gas emitters like the United States and China, are parties to the court. The United Nations' top court's advisory opinion Wednesday declares that a 'clean, healthy and sustainable environment' is a human right. The International Court of Justice's opinion describes the obligations of every nation to tackle climate change — and the consequences they may face if they don't. The non-binding opinion, which runs to over 500 pages, is seen as a potential turning point in international climate law. Enshrining a sustainable environment as a human right paves the way for other legal actions, including states returning to the ICJ to hold each other to account, as well as domestic lawsuits. 'The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is therefore inherent in the enjoyment of other human rights,' court President Yuji Iwasawa said. Artificial intelligence is largely unregulated and many parents have no idea how their kids are using AI tools and what personal information they are sharing. Here are some things experts say parents can do: 1. Start a conversation, without judgment. Listen and understand before being dismissive or expressing worries. 2. Help teens recognize that AI companions are programmed to be agreeable and validating — it's not how real friends can help. 3. Teach kids that this is a form of entertainment — it shouldn't replace relationships in real life. 4. Watch for signs of unhealthy attachments — like becoming emotionally distressed when they put their phones down. 5. Set rules about AI use, just like parents do for screen time and social media. 6. Have discussions about when and how AI tools can and cannot be used. 7. Get informed. Many AI companions are designed for adult use and can mimic romantic, intimate and role-playing scenarios. The tools are not equipped to handle a real crisis or provide genuine mental health support. 8. Forget about banning AI tools — the technology is becoming ubiquitous. Instead, embrace the challenge of this artificial world. Teenagers are increasingly interacting with AI as if it were a human companion, according to a new study and interviews with The Associated Press. 'Everyone uses AI for everything now. It's really taking over,' said Kayla Chege, who wonders how AI tools will affect her generation. 'I think kids use AI to get out of thinking.' Concerns about cheating at school have dominated the conversation around kids and AI, but artificial intelligence is suddenly playing a much larger role in many of their lives — as a go-to source for personal advice, emotional support, everyday decision-making and problem-solving. More than 70% of teens have used AI companions and half use them regularly, according to the study from Common Sense Media, a group that advocates for using digital media sensibly. China has announced that Vice Premier He Lifeng will travel to Sweden from Sunday to Wednesday for trade talks with the U.S. side. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also has said he will be in Stockholm for trade talks with his Chinese counterpart next week. Bessent has indicated that two sides are likely to extend the Aug. 12 deadline, set three months earlier in Geneva when Beijing and Washington agreed to walk back from sky-high tariffs. Bessent and He are taking the leads for their governments in the negotiations. The tech industry has pushed for easier permitting to get huge data centers connected to power and water — even if it means consumers losing drinking water and paying higher energy bills. On Tuesday, 95 groups including labor unions, parent groups, environmental justice organizations and privacy advocates signed a resolution opposing Trump's embrace of industry-driven AI policy and calling for a 'People's AI Action Plan' that would 'deliver first and foremost for the American people.' Amba Kak, co-executive director of the AI Now Institute, which helped lead the effort, said the coalition expects Trump's plan to come 'straight from Big Tech's mouth.' 'Every time we say, 'What about our jobs, our air, water, our children?' they're going to say, 'But what about China?'' she said Tuesday. She said Americans should reject the White House's argument that artificial intelligence is overregulated, and fight to preserve 'baseline protections for the public.' Sacks, a former PayPal executive and now Trump's top AI adviser, has been criticizing 'woke AI' for more than a year, fueled by Google's February 2024 rollout of an AI image generator that, when asked to show an American Founding Father, created pictures of Black, Asian and Native American men. Google quickly fixed its tool, but the 'Black George Washington' moment remained a parable for the problem of AI's perceived political bias, taken up by X owner Elon Musk, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, Vice President JD Vance and Republican lawmakers. 'The AI's incapable of giving you accurate answers because it's been so programmed with diversity and inclusion,' Sacks said at the time. Elon Musk's xAI, pitched as an alternative to 'woke AI' companies, had to scramble this month to remove posts made by its Grok chatbot that made antisemitic comments and praised Adolf Hitler. The All-In Podcast is a business and technology show hosted by four tech investors and entrepreneurs including Trump's AI czar, David Sacks. The plan and related executive orders to be announced late Wednesday afternoon are expected to include some familiar tech lobby pitches — including accelerating the sale of AI technology abroad and making it easier to construct the energy-hungry data center buildings needed to run AI products, according to a person briefed on Wednesday's event who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. It might also include some of the AI culture war preoccupations of the circle of venture capitalists who endorsed Trump last year. Global shares rallied on Wednesday, with Tokyo's benchmark Nikkei 225 index gaining 3.5% after Japan and the U.S. announced a deal on Trump's tariffs. The tariff agreement as announced calls for a 15% U.S. import duty on goods from Japan, apart from certain products such as steel and aluminum that are subject to much higher tariffs. That's down from the 25% Trump had said would kick in on Aug. 1 if a deal was not reached. 'This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it,' Trump posted on Truth Social, noting that Japan was also investing 'at my direction' $550 billion into the U.S. He said Japan would 'open' its economy to American autos and rice. Trump announced the U.S. will place a 19% tax on goods from Indonesia and the Philippines. A senior Trump official said Indonesia will charge no tariffs on 99% of its trade with the United States and drop its nontariff barriers on U.S. goods. Trump said the U.S. won't pay any tariffs in the Philippines, but they will pay 19%. 'President Trump has signed two trade deals this week with the Philippines and Japan which is likely to keep market sentiment propped up despite deals with the likes of the EU and South Korea remaining elusive, for now at least,' Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at Kohle Capital Markets, said in a report. House Speaker Mike Johnson rebuffed pressure to act on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, instead sending members home early on Wednesday for a month-long break from Washington after the week's legislative agenda was upended by Republican members who are clamoring for a vote. 'There's no purpose for the Congress to push an administration to do something they're already doing,' Johnson said at his last weekly news conference. The speaker's stance did little to alleviate the intra-party turmoil unfolding on Capitol Hill as many of Trump's supporters demand that the administration meet its promises to publicly release a full accounting of the sex trafficking investigation into Epstein, who killed himself in his New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. Under pressure from right-wing online influencers, as well as voters back home, rank-and-file Republicans are demanding House intervention. 'The public's not going to let this die, and rightfully so,' said Rep. Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican. The president told congressional Republicans at a Tuesday night dinner that European Union officials will be in town Wednesday for the talks. 'We have Europe coming in tomorrow, the next day,' Trump said after announcing a trade framework with Japan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store