Speaker vows to oust 'rowdy' MPAs
Addressing a press conference, he said he would not politicise disqualification, but if a reference is received under Article 63(2) of the Constitution, it must be decided accordingly.
He said that under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution, it is the right of the petitioners to have their applications decided within 30 days. He made it clear that if these applications are not resolved within the stipulated time, they will automatically be forwarded to the Election Commission.
The speaker said that the opposition had been given every possible democratic space in the past - from chairing standing committees to leading the Public Accounts Committee - but unfortunately the opposition had turned the assembly into a forum for constant disruption.
Speaker Khan said the opposition is portraying disorder as a political right, but there is no such provision in the Constitution.
He said parliament is meant for legislation, not protest.
He stated that he does not believe in the politics of disqualifying anyone, as practised by PTI. However, if anyone violates constitutional boundaries or undermines the discipline of the house against party decisions, he will not hesitate to take action, he added.
He added that he holds no grudge against any party or leader but is committed to upholding the sanctity of the house. Any member who violates their constitutional oath will inevitably face action.
The speaker stated that such actions in the past laid the foundation for undermining democracy. He said he would not politicise disqualification, but if a reference is received under Article 63(2) of the Constitution, it must be decided accordingly.
He also expressed hope that the government and opposition will engage in meaningful dialogue in the coming days to improve the atmosphere of the house, so that the Punjab Assembly can truly serve as the representative forum of the 120 million people of the province.
The speaker appears to be facing a new front of criticism in attempting to counter censure from treasury lawmakers accusing him of favoring the opposition.
He had also faced accusations of failing to maintain order during Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's speeches.
Speaker Khan had been accommodating opposition lawmakers in the house proceedings by granting them sufficient time and allowing them to speak on points of order. Sometimes he was also witnessed adopting a harsh tone with some treasury members.
An impression had bene gaining strength among the treasury benches that that the speaker was favouring the opposition. But he was of the view that he should take along the opposition and the treasury side by side and it was not appropriate to take strict action over petty issues.
At one stage, the treasury members had stopped bothering about the opposition's protests, but called for silence during the speeches of the chief minister. The opposition members also often remained confined to their chairs rather than protesting in front of the speaker's dais.
The opposition admired the speaker's conduct but also tried to create maximum disruption during the CM's speech.
When CM Maryam Nawaz spoke on June 27, the opposition appeared more aggressive, perhaps in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision on reserved seats. This led to the preparation of the reference.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Disrupting the two-party system: Can Elon Musk spark a US political reboot like Imran Khan did in Pakistan?
The dispute between Republican President Donald Trump and his main campaign financier Elon Musk took a fractious turn this weekend with the announcement of the 'America Party' - looking to upend the long-reigning two-party system in the United States, not quite unlike what Pakistan's Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) did in 2018. The announcement is already stirring anxieties within America's entrenched political class, where Musk, with his growing influence and vast capital could upset the Republican-Democrat duopoly, which has reigned for 160 years. What Musk is proposing isn't entirely new. Third-party bids in the US have historically fizzled due to structural constraints like ballot access, the Electoral College, and winner-take-all voting. But what's different now is the context: rising polarization, a generation of disillusioned voters and a growing appetite for disruption. Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40%, despite often divisive policies, the US dollar dropped to its lowest valuation in a decade and the fiscal deficit is set to climb to $2.5 trillion. Who is Zohran Mamdani, New York's presumed next mayor? To understand the potential of such a political moment, analysts are increasingly looking abroad – to Pakistan, where a two-party order collapsed in 2018 under the weight of youth frustration and populist momentum. PTI's disruption and the youth vote For decades, Pakistan's politics revolved around two dominant forces: the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N). This duopoly, characterized by dynastic leadership and rotating tenures in power, left many voters - particularly the young and those in urban city centres - disillusioned. Enter Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), led by former cricket captain Imran Khan. Founded in 1996, the party remained on the fringes for over a decade before gaining traction through a combination of populist messaging, anti-corruption rhetoric and savvy digital campaigning. By the 2018 general elections, the landscape had changed. Pakistan's youth, which makes up over 64% of the population, played a decisive role. According to the Election Commission of Pakistan, 45% of voters aged 18–35 participated, with PTI capturing a dominant share of that demographic –particularly in urban centres like Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, and Peshawar. 'PTI's message resonated with young voters who were tired of family politics and business-as-usual governance,' said analyst Ayesha Siddiqua. 'It was a party that spoke their language - literally and digitally.' PTI's campaign leaned heavily on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, broadcasting rallies live and bypassing traditional media gatekeepers. A parallel movement in the US Back in the US, the political landscape appears similarly fatigued. Gallup polling in 2025 shows that over 42% of Americans now identify as independents, while just 27% identify as Democrats and 26% as Republicans. Among voters under 35, support for a third-party or independent alternative is rising sharply. It's in this environment that figures like Elon Musk, Bernie Sanders, and Zohran Mamdani are gaining attention - albeit from vastly different parts of the ideological spectrum. While Sanders, a democratic socialist, has mounted two powerful challenges to the Democratic establishment, his influence has reshaped the party's internal debates. Mamdani, the progressive New York lawmaker recently nominated as the Democratic candidate for mayor, represents a growing class of insurgent politicians willing to openly criticize party orthodoxy. 'People are increasingly rejecting the binary,' Mamdani said during his nomination speech earlier this year. 'They want a politics that reflects reality - not party lines.' Observers note that while Sanders and Mamdani are working within the Democratic Party, their popularity reveals how far removed the establishment has become from younger, more diverse, and more economically anxious voters. In contrast, Elon Musk's ambitions remain ambiguous. He has previously endorsed both Republican and Democratic candidates, often on contradictory grounds. But his ability to command attention, resources, and followers - he has over 180 million followers on X - gives him a unique base of political leverage. A global shift? From Pakistan to the U.S., from France's Emmanuel Macron to Italy's Five Star Movement, the last decade has shown that political duopolies are not as unshakable as they once seemed. Youth-driven movements - often organized online and outside traditional party structures - have reshaped political possibilities across the globe. But the obstacles in the U.S. remain formidable. Third-party candidates face significant ballot restrictions in key states. The Electoral College system inherently favours the two main parties. And media coverage often dismisses outsiders as spoilers. Still, Musk's timing may be strategic. The 2024 and 2028 US elections exposed deep voter dissatisfaction with both major parties, and rising digital activism has created new tools for political organization - much like PTI's use of WhatsApp groups and YouTube in the 2018 election. While such efforts have historically fizzled, the mood is different now. A generation disillusioned with establishment politics, a fractured media ecosystem, and growing polarization have opened up new space for outsiders.
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Not in favour of expelling any member: Punjab assembly speaker
LAHORE: Speaker of the Punjab Assembly Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan has said that he is not in favour of expelling any member from the House. However, under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution, it is the constitutional right of the petitioners to have their applications decided within 30 days. He made it clear that if these applications are not resolved within the stipulated time, they will automatically be forwarded to the Election Commission. Addressing a press conference at the Punjab Assembly Media Hall, S Malik Ahmad Khan said that he believes in the supremacy of the Constitution and has always strived to run the Assembly according to the rules and regulations. He emphasised that despite being one of the strongest critics of Articles 62 and 63, it is his constitutional duty to implement them in light of the Supreme Court's rulings. The Speaker said that the opposition had been given every possible democratic space in the past— from chairing standing committees to leading the Public Accounts Committee— but unfortunately, it turned the Assembly into a forum for constant disruption. He noted that the opposition is portraying disorder as a political right, but there is no such provision in the Constitution. Parliament is meant for legislation, not protest. If there is disruption during the Order of the Day, proceedings will move forward as per the law. He further said that the Leader of the Opposition, after consulting constitutional expert Salman Akram Raja, claimed that the Speaker does not have the authority to send a reference. However, the judgment by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa in the Panama Papers case clearly establishes that if members violate their oath, the Speaker must either make a decision or refer the matter to the Election Commission. The speaker categorically stated that he does not believe in the politics of disqualifying anyone, as practiced by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. However, if anyone violates constitutional boundaries or undermines the discipline of the House against party decisions, he will not hesitate to take action. He added that he holds no grudge against any party or leader but is committed to upholding the sanctity of the House. 'Any member who violates their constitutional oath will inevitably face action.' The Speaker stated that such actions in the past have laid the foundation for undermining democracy in Pakistan. 'I do not politicise disqualification,' he said, 'but if a reference is received under Article 63 (2) of the Constitution, it must be decided accordingly.' He hoped that the government and opposition will engage in meaningful dialogue in the coming days to improve the atmosphere of the House, so that the Punjab Assembly can truly serve as the representative forum of the 120 million people of the province. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
ANP denounces Jirga system restoration
PESHAWAR: Awami National Party (ANP) central spokesman Engineer Ihsanullah strongly denounced the federal government's decision to restore the Jirga system, calling it an unconstitutional and regressive step that undermines provincial autonomy, justice, and democracy. The party central spokesman Engineer Ihsanullah in a statement here on Monday stated that the decision was a direct attack on provincial autonomy and an attempt to impose a tribal system on the entire province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. He argued that the 25th Constitutional Amendment, which merged FATA with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, was a historic step towards integration and however, restoring the Jirga system undermined this integration. The ANP spokesman highlighted that the judiciary and judicial system were provincial subjects under the 18th Amendment. The federal government's move to impose Jirgas on Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was seen as a violation of these powers. The party's leader pointed out that Jirgas had historically been used to deny justice to women, children, and minorities, and to impose informal punishments, which was against the principles of justice and equality enshrined in the Constitution. He reminded that the Supreme Court had already declared Jirgas and their punishments illegal in a 2020 judgment. The party demanded that the federal government respect this ruling. ANP demanded immediate dissolution of the committee formed to oversee the restoration of the Jirga system. The party insisted that any reforms or changes in the judicial system should be done in consultation with the Provincial Assembly. ANP suggested modernizing district courts to provide timely justice to rural areas and establishing special judicial benches for women and minorities. ANP viewed the restoration of the Jirga system as a regressive step that would push Khyber Pakhtunkhwa back into a dark age. The party vowed to oppose this decision in every forum and reaffirmed its commitment to building a modern, just, and constitutional province. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
