logo
Ex-Colombian president Álvaro Uribe found guilty of witness-tampering

Ex-Colombian president Álvaro Uribe found guilty of witness-tampering

BBC News5 days ago
Álvaro Uribe has become the first former Colombian president to be convicted of a crime.A court in Bogotá found the 73-year-old, who was president from 2002 to 2010, guilty of witness-tampering and a fraud charge. He was convicted of attempting to bribe witnesses in a separate investigation into allegations that he had ties to right-wing paramilitaries, responsible for human rights abuses.Each charge carries up to 12 years in prison. Uribe is expected to appeal the verdict, having always maintained his innocence.
Uribe is best known for mounting an aggressive offensive against leftist guerrilla group the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) during his tenure. He has always denied ties to right-wing paramilitaries.The former president sat shaking his head as the verdict was read out, AFP reported, in the trial that has seen more than 90 witnesses testify.US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has condemned the court's decision, accusing the country's judiciary of being weaponised.The former president's "only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland," he wrote on the social media site, X.The result comes more than a decade after Uribe was first charged in 2012. At that time, he accused a left-wing senator, Ivan Cepeda, of a plot against him. Uribe claimed Cepeda wanted to falsely link him to right-wing paramilitary groups involved in Colombia's internal armed conflict.But the country's Supreme Court dismissed the former president's claims against Cepeda, instead investigating Uribe for the ties. The former president was then accused of contacting jailed ex-fighters and bribing them to deny connections to the paramilitary groups - tampering with key witnesses.Uribe said he had wanted to convince the ex-fighters to tell the truth.
Paramilitary groups emerged in Colombia in the 1980s with the stated goal of taking on poverty and marginalisation. They fought the Marxist-inspired guerrilla groups that had themselves battled the state two decades prior. Many of the armed groups developed in the standoff made an income from the cocaine trade. Violent and deadly fighting between them and with the state has produced lasting rivalries for trafficking routes and resources.Uribe was praised by Washington for his hard-line approach to Farc rebels – but was a divisive politician whose critics say did little to improve the inequality and poverty in the country.Farc signed a peace deal with Uribe's successor in 2016 though violence from disarmed groups persists in Colombia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rescue crews searching for five trapped Chilean miners find body
Rescue crews searching for five trapped Chilean miners find body

Sky News

time4 hours ago

  • Sky News

Rescue crews searching for five trapped Chilean miners find body

Rescue crews searching for five trapped Chilean miners have discovered a body. A section of the copper mine had collapsed on Thursday following a strong, 4.2-magnitude tremor. The remaining four miners are still missing - and rescuers are vowing to continue their search with "strength and hope". Andres Music, general manager of El Teniente mine, said: "This discovery fills us with sadness, but it also tells us that we are in the right place, that the strategy we followed led us to them." Crews are trying to drill through 90m (295ft) of rock to reach the trapped miners, but Mr Music said they had not yet made contact with the workers. Just over a fifth of the blocked underground tunnels have been cleared, with teams hoping to get through about 15m to 20m (49ft to 66ft) every 24 hours using heavy machinery. He said rescue efforts would continue with increased caution, which could slow progress. Two people are now known to have died as a result of the collapse. Another miner, Paulo Marin Tapia, was found dead on Thursday shortly after the incident. Codelco, which owns the mine, said the identity of the second man is yet to be confirmed. Nine other miners were injured.

Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory
Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory

The Guardian

time6 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory

The New South Wales parliament has a problem with men behaving badly. But more to the point, it seems to have an inability to deal with it. On Tuesday, the parliament will try to deal with two very different cases that share a common consequence: damage to its reputation as an institution. Despite being a convicted rapist in custody awaiting sentence, Gareth Ward, the MP for Kiama, remains a member of the Legislative Assembly, drawing a base salary of more than $170,000 courtesy of NSW taxpayers. Labor plans to move a motion to have him expelled when parliament resumes on Tuesday and the opposition has said it will support it. Expelling Ward will almost certainly lead to more litigation, especially as the government will probably try to call a byelection in his south coast seat soon after. Sign up: AU Breaking News email But first to backtrack a little. Most politicians being investigated or facing criminal charges choose to resign, or their parties put the pressure on the MP to draw a line under their faltering political career. But Ward has toughed it out and continues to claim his innocence, despite being convicted for serious sex offences against two young men. He was suspended and left the Liberal party in 2022 after being charged with sex offences. He then ran as an independent in the 2023 state election and was returned by the voters of Kiama. Now that he has been convicted, he faces a potential sentence of more than five years. Under section 13A of the NSW constitution, a person is ineligible to be an MP if they are convicted of an offence punishable by five years or more. But it's only counted as a conviction once the person has reached the end of the appeals process and has not had their conviction overturned, constitutional expert Prof Anne Twomey says – and Ward has confirmed he plans to appeal the verdict. The appeals process could take years. The other route is expulsion. The NSW constitution does not give a specific power to expel a member, but Twomey says there is an inherent power for the NSW parliament to expel an MP to protect itself and its proper functioning. This appears to be where the premier, Chris Minns, is headed – but it is relatively untested territory. The courts have ruled that expulsion must not be as punishment, but it can be done to protect public confidence in the integrity of the parliament. If Ward is expelled, a byelection would need to be held to replace him, which only adds to the complications. Would Ward seek an injunction to prevent the byelection while he appeals both the expulsion and the criminal conviction? Understandably, there are few cases to guide the way – the last time an MP was expelled from the NSW lower house was in 1917. But what is certain is that unless Ward resigns voluntarily, litigation appears inevitable. The first stop will be the supreme court, followed by a possible high court appeal. For those who want a deeper dive, Twomey's podcast, Constititional Clarion, explores all the twists and turns that could emerge over coming weeks. The controversial independent upper house member Mark Latham is also under the microscope but for entirely different reasons. The former One Nation MP is under scrutiny over his use of privilege within the chamber and his general standard of behaviour, which Labor has been calling out of late. Has the Minns government suddenly found a new moral rectitude? Or is the premier motivated by more base political considerations? Latham has been working with the opposition and crossbench to block changes to workers compensation legislation that the government dearly wants passed. In parliament, Minns has called him 'one of the most shameful bigots in NSW' who has an 'odious Twitter account', which he deployed for a 'disgusting homophobic attack' on independent MP Alex Greenwich. More recently prurient allegations about Latham's personal life have spilled into the public domain due to a relationship breakdown, which have added fuel to the fire of outrage. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion These are the subject of a case seeking a domestic violence order that he is vehemently contesting. As the relationship degenerated, allegations from court filings including leaked texts about female MPs and other unsavoury exchanges have found their way into the public domain. Latham's behaviour raises questions of respect for the parliament and female MPs, and whether the behaviour is appropriate in any workplace. Latham allegedly covertly photographed female workmates and shared the images with derogatory commentary. If true, in any other workplace, that would at the least prompt counselling, a warning or possibly dismissal. Then there is Latham's use of parliamentary privilege. Privilege exists to allow politicians to speak freely without fear of defamation, but Latham arguably pushes its limits. He is a blunt, borderline-rude interrogator of witnesses before committees. In the chamber he has used privilege to attack his enemies, such as Greenwich, who won a $140,000 defamation settlement against Latham in 2024, and domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty. Last month Latham outraged colleagues by talking about Greenwich's medical records, which had been produced as part of a separate case Greenwich has brought against Latham in the NSW civil and administrative tribunal. But can the upper house actually mete out a punishment or persuade Latham to alter his behaviour? The answer is probably no. Labor plans to move two motions in the next sitting period, which starts on Tuesday: one relating to a specific breach of privilege and another more general censure. Labor will allege that Latham breached privilege in relation to certain documents about the former police commissioner Karen Webb and investigations into gifts of gin that were produced on the basis that only parliamentarians could view them. Labor wants Latham referred to the privileges committee for breaching the order, something he disputes. The allegations of exposing medical records, taking covert photos and perhaps other actions are likely to be wrapped up into a censure motion condemning his behaviour. But as for meaningful outcomes, don't hold your breath. The privileges committee could recommend an apology or perhaps a suspension, but that is rare. Labor lost control of this powerful committee a month ago after a dispute with the crossbench and the opposition. They combined to cut a Labor member so control of the now seven-member committee is out of Labor's hands. And what of a censure? It is likely to be little more than a slap on the wrist for Latham, while he enjoys the notoriety and attention that this latest saga will bring. The problem for the NSW parliament is that its rules to set and enforce appropriate standards of behaviour are hopelessly outdated, its processes are archaic and it has failed to implement many of the recommendations from a report by Liz Broderick completed two years ago. The federal parliament has moved to establish a standards commission with real teeth to fine or even suspend parliamentarians for poor behaviour outside the chamber. It is still to be tested but it is a start. Instead, in NSW, we will spend weeks on the immediate crises that will further lower the parliament's standing in the public eye, without dealing with the real problem of cultural change that is sorely needed.

Billionaire fraudster Elizabeth Holmes seen enjoying facilities at Ghislaine Maxwell's cushy new prison
Billionaire fraudster Elizabeth Holmes seen enjoying facilities at Ghislaine Maxwell's cushy new prison

Daily Mail​

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Billionaire fraudster Elizabeth Holmes seen enjoying facilities at Ghislaine Maxwell's cushy new prison

Blood tech fraudster Elizabeth Holmes was spotted enjoying some leisure time at the same cushy Texas prison Ghislaine Maxwell has just been moved to. The disgraced Theranos founder became jail mates with Maxwell at Federal Prison Camp Bryan after the notorious madam was moved to the facility Thursday. Barring a longshot pardon from President Donald Trump, Maxwell will spend about seven years incarcerated at the same time as Holmes, who is scheduled to be released on April 3, 2032. Maxwell, who was convicted in June 2022 recruiting underage girls into Jeffrey Epstein 's sex trafficking ring, had been serving her sentence at a more restrictive prison in Florida. But she was moved after complaining to authorities that she was fed up of listening to transgender prisoners having loud sex. On Saturday, Holmes was seen taking a leisurely jog in a grassy area of the minimum security Texas prison. She was wearing a gray T-shirt and matching gray shorts with black sneakers. She also appeared to be wearing a watch. She was notably without fellow high profile inmate Jen Shah, the former Real Housewife of Salt Lake City who is also incarcerated at the facility. Shah pleaded guilty to fraud charges related to a telemarketing scheme she ran targeting the elderly. Photos have also shown Holmes and Shah running at the same time while engaging in cozy chats. Maxwell, who herself has been pictured running at her Florida prison, will likely soon run into both women. Camp Bryan is an all-female prison, unlike the Tallahassee prison, which housed men and women. The camp is also a much more comfortable prison that holds primarily white-collar criminals and not people convicted of violent crimes. Maxwell's sudden removal to Texas from a low-security prison in Tallahassee outraged Epstein's victims and their families. 'This is the justice system failing victims right before our eyes,' said sisters Annie and Maria Farmer and members of Virginia Giuffre's family in a statement obtained by Daily Mail. 'Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency. 'Yet, without any notification to the Maxwell victims, the government overnight has moved Maxwell to a minimum security luxury prison in Texas.' Prison consultant Justin Paperny told Daily Mail he had never seen anyone convicted of a sex offense serve time in a minimum security prison such as Camp Bryan. 'She was in a low security prison, that looks like prisons on TV or in the movies. You're fenced in, razor wire, women serving typically 10 years or longer, more violent crime, sexual offenses,' Paperny said. Paperny runs White Collar Advice, which advises future inmates on what to expect inside. 'She will feel incredibly free. There is a very low staff to prisoner ratio and camps like Bryan, no fences or barbed wire,' he said. 'You can literally walk off and nobody will stop you. It's a cushy country club and looks like a corporate office park or a junior college.' Maxwell will also be able to purchase beauty and leisure items from the commissary, including make-up and crochet and sewing kits. There is even a softball field and pickleball courts at the facility. It is undoubtedly a huge upgrade for Maxwell, who was previously dealing with transgender prisoners having loud sex out in the open, a source told Daily Mail. The source also said Maxwell was bitter and frequently complained about the conditions at the Tallahassee prison. 'There was inadequate food. Ghislaine is a vegetarian and each prisoner is supposed to get 8oz of protein a day, but she was getting 2oz or less. The food was moldy. Everyone, not just Ghislaine, complained about the food,' the source said. Maxwell's lawyer David Oscar Markus confirmed to Daily Mail that she was moved from the Tallahassee prison on Thursday. The Bureau of Prisons confirmed the transfer on Friday. Neither Markus or the BOP have offered any reason for why Maxwell was moved. This comes the Trump administration struggles to contain the fallout of its decision not to release the unredacted Epstein files. Maxwell has promised to testify about what she knows about the Epstein case in exchange for immunity or a presidential pardon. House leaders have roundly rejected giving her immunity, while people close to Trump have insisted a pardon is not in the works.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store