&w=3840&q=100)
Bengaluru stampede: Retired HC judge to head probe, fix responsibility
As per the terms of reference to the commission from the government, it has also suggested precautionary measures that can be taken to prevent recurrence of such incidents in the future, among others.
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on June 5 announced that a one-man commission would be formed under Cunha to look into the procedural lapses in the issue, and the commission has been asked to give the report in 30 days.
The stampede occurred on June 4 evening in front of the Chinnaswamy stadium here, where a large number of people thronged to participate in the RCB team's IPL victory celebrations. Eleven people died and 56 were injured in the incident.
"...the Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-rule (1) of rule 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, has constituted a one-man inquiry commission under the chairmanship of John Michael Cunha, retired Judge of the Karnataka High Court, to conduct an inquiry into the incident," the official notification dated June 5 said.
"The inquiry commission shall have all the powers to conduct inquiries under the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 and Code of Civil Procedure, and the government expects the investigation to be completed and a report submitted within one month," it said.
The terms of reference in the notification include, to find -- whether the necessary permissions, rules and procedures were followed while organising the RCB team's victory felicitation ceremony at Chinnaswamy Stadium; the causes/causers of the rush and stampede that took place; the causes/causers of the incident that led to the death of 11 people and injury to more than 50 people based on the chain of events and circumstances.
Also, to inquire into the measures taken as a precaution regarding the incident and the omissions/deficiencies that may have occurred in this regard and to identify those responsible for this incident; and to inquire regarding other relevant aspects related to this incident.
As per the notification, the Director General and Inspector General of Police, Commissioner of Police - Bengaluru, and Deputy Commissioner - Bengaluru Urban district shall provide all the files/documents/etc that the Commission may require from time to time for the inquiry and shall be present during the inquiry and fully cooperate with the Commission.
This inquiry commission is separate from the magisterial inquiry that has been ordered, and shall conduct a parallel and comprehensive inquiry, it clarified.
The Chairman of the inquiry commission, if necessary, may take steps to obtain the services of one retired IPS officer and one retired IAS officer for technical and legal assistance. The salary/allowance expenses of the concerned officers shall be borne by the government. The Director General and Inspector General of Police, shall provide the necessary staff, materials, vehicles and office and furniture/telephone etc required for the commission of inquiry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Guiding principle to defend, not deny the right to vote
The worry is about electors at the bottom of the socio-economic pyramid, which comprises unorganised and migrant labour and the oppressed classes. Now is the time in Bihar, when the Kharif sowing and transplantation signal migration of labour looking for construction work outside the state. The SIR coincides with the monsoon when deprived sections are busy with the annual tedium of locating temporary homes to escape flooding. They possess Aadhaar and ration cards, but either they may not be available at their homes when the Commission's enumerators arrive, or they may not have the documents the Commission demands as proof of citizenship. The illiterate and poor majority cannot quickly acquire domicile or caste certificates and submit the filled forms before the deadline. In case of delayed submissions, SIR rules say 'the name of the elector cannot be included in the draft rolls'. The ECI subsequently said electors must submit enrolment forms in time and their accompanying documents can come in at scrutiny time also; that only defers the suspense. Are alternative mechanisms, such as witness testimony or affidavits, in place if a citizen can't provide documents or meet the deadline? In an abrupt, short exercise foisted on them, rigid systems and procedural obstacles cannot arbitrarily deny the right to vote. The State must play a facilitative role to enable the right. The default presumption must be of inclusion. In the long term, we must debate making the right to vote a fundamental right so that electors can seek direct judicial redressal, and disenfranchisement necessarily passes the test of reasonableness and proportionality, ensuring that it is never arbitrary or excessive. Democracy celebrates elections, more so, their participatory nature.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
National Commission for Minorities awaiting appointment of Chairperson, members
The National Commission for Minorities (NCM), set up with the vision to safeguard and protect the interests of minority communities in India, is awaiting the appointment of a head, and members since the retirement in April 2025 of its previous Chairperson and member, Iqbal Singh Lalpura. Five members of the Commission, including the Chairperson, have retired since December 2024, with no new appointments made so far. The NCM, which works under the Ministry of Minority Affairs and has quasi-judicial powers, should have seven members, including the Chairperson, and the Vice-Chairperson. The National Commission of Minorities Act, 1992 mandates the appointment of one member from each of the six minority communities — Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Parsi, and Jain. This is not the first time that there has been a delay in filling vacancies at the NCM. In 2017, the Commission remain without a Chairperson and several members for months. In 2021, the Delhi High Court asked the Central government to fill up vacant posts in the NCM. 'I never fully subscribed the utility of these bodies,' former NCM Chairperson Tahir Mahmood, who authored Minorities Commission (1978-2015): Minor Role in Major Affairs after his tenure ended in 1999, told The Hindu. The condition of Muslims and Christians remained as it had been before the establishment of the Commission, he said in the book, terming the NCM a 'showpiece'; a 'stopgap placement for faithful politicians'; and a 'post retirement centre for committed bureaucrats'. Positions in the Commission have since long been occupied by people with connections to ruling parties, a former NCM member, who did not wish to be named, said. 'The last NCM Chairperson was Iqbal Singh Lalpura, who contested the Punjab Assembly election on a BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) ticket. Prior to that, the post was held by BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, who was also the Minister of Minority Affairs,' the former member said. Mr. Naqvi declined to comment on the delay in appointments, and said the NCM continued to function even in the absence of a Chairperson and some members. 'Obviously, when there is a Chairperson, and there are members, the efficiency gets enhanced,' Mr. Naqvi said. The positions in the NCM should be filled soon, Mr. Lalpura said, questioning the tenure of the Congress government at the Centre, which, according to him, had declared the NCM Chairperson's post 'void' by selecting a Prime Minister from the minority community (the late Dr. Manmohan Singh). The delayed appointments at the NCM have impacted the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (NCMEI), a quasi-judicial body that aims to safeguard the educational rights of minorities. The NCMEI is also an advisory body to the Union government on minority educational institutions. The NCMEI, which works under the Ministry of Education, should have three members, and a Chairperson of at least the rank of a retired judge from a High Court. The NCMEI has been functioning with a single working member, Sahid Akhtar, for about two years after its previous Chairperson, Justice (Retd.) Narender Kumar Jain completed his tenure in September 2023. Justice (Retd.) M.S.A. Siddiqui expressed displeasure over the long-pending vacancies at a Commission of national importance. Political leaders should question the delays in filling the posts in Parliament, he said. The BJP government had shown its disregard for human rights and minority rights organisations, including the NCM and the NCMEI, since 2014, John Dayal, a human rights activist and former member of the National Integration Council, said. 'Although the NCM and NCMEI are not statutory bodies on the lines of the National Human Rights Commission, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes, it is expected that they function at the national level, with counterparts in every State. Many States do not have a State Minority Commission even now, so many decades after the Parliament passed the National Commission of Minorities Act,' Mr. Dayal said. The two Commissions (NCM and NCMEI) now exist in name only, and are managed by secretarial staff, he said. 'The long delay in appointing a new Commission with a Chairperson and members clearly shows that the welfare of religious minorities is not high on the list of priorities of the government,' Mr. Dayal said, adding that the absence of these Commissions is gravely felt at a time when hate speech and hate crime are at their peak, as assiduously documented by Christian and Muslim human rights groups. Responses from both the Union Ministry of Minority Affairs, and the Union Ministry of Education, are awaited.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Collector told to investigate complaint on parking fees at Civil Station
Kochi: State human rights commission (SHRC) chairperson Justice Alexander Thomas said Ernakulam collector should investigate the complaint that parking fees are being unfairly collected from vehicles entering collectorate and make a decision within two months. The order states that complainant should submit the complaint and remedies to the collector. He should form a committee comprising sub-collectors and officials to examine the complaint. Committee should conduct a proper investigation after hearing the complainant and submit an objective report to collector. Commission also asked collector to make an appropriate decision in this regard without delay. Report submitted to SHRC by collector says that parking fee is being charged to ensure security of Civil Station. Parking fee is charged for vehicles staying in the compound for more than an hour. From the amount collected as parking fee, Rs 1,500 is being paid to govt every month. However, the complainant, civil activist Raju Vazhakkala, informed the commission that a fee is charged as soon as the vehicle is parked. Commission stated in its order that since charging fees is a policy decision, it cannot be said to be illegal.
