3 young peregrine falcons on Pitt's Cathedral of Learning fledge the nest
Something Good: Carla, the peregrine falcon laid her first egg of the year
Something Good: Carla, the peregrine falcon laid her first egg of the year
The three young peregrine falcons that hatched on top of Pitt's Cathedral of Learning this spring have fledged the nest.
The National Aviary says the three siblings will continue to hang around the nest as they grow comfortable flying and hunting on their own. Before the juveniles fledged, viewers of the National Aviary's FalconCam could see them taking turns on the edge of the nest box, exercising their wings as they prepared for their first flights.
Later this year, after they've gained all the skills they need to survive on their own, the young falcons will take off.
Since the birds were recently banded by the Pennsylvania Game Commission, scientists will be able to track their next moves.
"Whether they remain local or move to another bridge, cliff, or skyscraper rooftop in Pennsylvania or another nearby state, we should be able to tell where they end up, when they mate, and if they are surviving and thriving in their new homes," the National Aviary said on its website.
(Photo: Mike Faix)
Viewers of the FalconCam have been watching Carla and Ecco's chicks since they hatched at the end of April. While Ecco has been at the Cathedral of Learning since 2020, Carla first appeared in 2023, and the couple had their first brood last year. Those two chicks were also banded.
Peregrine falcons were formerly endangered in Pennsylvania because of the use of the agricultural pesticide DDT. Banding the chicks helps scientists study the behavior of falcons while determining the current status of their populations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Loved Ones Wear Photos of D.C. Plane Crash Victims While Attending Emotional NTSB Hearing
There were 64 people on American Airlines flight 5342 and three people on a U.S. Army Blackhawk helicopter when the two collided over the Potomac River on Jan. 29NEED TO KNOW Loved ones of Washington, D.C., plane crash victims wore photos of their late friends and family members at this week's NTSB hearing Officials previously said 67 people died after an American Airlines plane and U.S. Army Blackhawk helicopter collided over the Potomac River on Jan. 29 Some loved ones were seen wiping tears from their eyes during the hearing, while at least one attendee left the room while cryingLoved ones of Washington, D.C., plane crash victims wore photos of their late friends and family members as they attended the latest hearing about the fatal collision. Officials said 64 people on American Airlines flight 5342 and three crew members in a U.S. Army Blackhawk helicopter were killed when the two aircraft collided over the Potomac River near Ronald Reagan National Airport on Jan. 29. This week, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) held a fact-finding hearing about the plane crash as they continue their probe into the incident. Friends and family of the victims were visibly emotional as they watched the hearing, which included photo and video evidence from the crash that claimed 67 lives. Many of them were seen with images of their loved ones strung around their necks in remembrance of the victims. Gwen Duggins, whose daughter Kiah Duggins was on the American Airlines plane, was one of many seen wiping tears from their eyes while listening to the audio of the flight radio transmissions. Duggins was among the family members wearing an image of their lost loved one at the emotional NTSB hearing. Christina Stovall, whose son Mikey Stovall was on the American Airlines plane, was seen weeping as she left the boardroom in the middle of the hearing. Doug Lane's wife Christine and son Spencer were killed on the regional jet while returning from an elite training camp for figure skaters. Doug, who also wore photos of Christine and Spencer around his neck while attending the hearing, told PEOPLE that he's found a community among other relatives of the victims. "There are over a hundred of us and we have online calls once a week,' he said. 'We are on [a] online messaging platform all day, every day. We have people that are focused on advocacy work. We have people who are more looking out for people's birthdays, checking in on people, and providing more emotional support.' The NTSB has spent months examining what caused the fatal crash in Washington, D.C. In a preliminary report released on March 11, investigators stated there were thousands of close encounters at the airport in recent years, the "vast majority" of which occurred during landings. There were 15,214 reported instances of planes and helicopters being less than 400 feet apart between October 2021 and December 2024, the report found. Additionally, the crew members aboard the helicopter reportedly did not seem to know how high it was in the sky, and the aircraft was told to turn away from the passenger jet prior to the crash. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. It was also reported that there was a long-established pattern of military craft flying around the D.C. airport in very close proximity to commercial flights, even when it was not possible for them to be detected. Read the original article on People
Gizmodo
26 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Hibernation's Hidden Healing ‘Superpowers' Could Be Locked in Our DNA
After spending months without eating, drinking, or moving, hibernating mammals must rebound from extreme physiological changes. Two new studies suggest that the genetic 'superpowers' underlying this incredible resilience may also be present in the human genome. For these studies, published Thursday, July 31, in the journal Science, researchers at the University of Utah honed in on the specific DNA regions that help hibernators rapidly recover from muscle atrophy, insulin resistance, and brain damage. They found strong evidence to suggest that the human genome shares these genetic regions, which function as control switches for hibernator adaptations. Finding and harnessing them could lead to new treatments for type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, and other disorders, the researchers say. 'Humans already have the genetic framework,' said Susan Steinwand, a neurobiology and anatomy researcher at U of U Health and first author of one of the studies. 'We just need to identify the control switches for these hibernator traits.' During hibernation, mammals enter a state of torpor, or physiological dormancy. This allows them to survive months without food and water, but at great cost to their health. Their muscles deteriorate due to lack of nutrition and movement, Christopher Gregg, a professor of neurobiology at U of U and senior author on both studies, told Gizmodo. Proteins associated with Alzheimer's disease build up in their brains, and upon awakening, the sudden reperfusion of blood can cause further neurological damage, he explained. What's more, they become insulin resistant due to the amount of fat they gain to sustain them during months of starvation. Hibernating mammals have evolved remarkable adaptations to reverse this extensive physiological damage. The genes that underlie these adaptations are likely also present in humans and other non-hibernators, Gregg explained. The fact that hibernation has evolved independently in multiple animal species suggests that its basic genetic ingredients are present across the mammalian genome. Therefore, non-hibernators may still carry them. 'We mostly all have the same genes across species,' Gregg said. 'The big change is in the 98% of the genome that does not encode for genes.' Non-coding DNA is largely responsible for gene regulation. In hibernators, specific regions of non-coding DNA act as 'master switches' for controlling functional gene responses to starvation and refeeding, he explained. Finding these master switches in the mammalian genome is like searching for needles in a DNA haystack. To accomplish this, the researchers made whole-genome comparisons across mammals to identify conserved DNA regions that are stable in most species but show accelerated change in hibernators. These hibernator-accelerated regions are regulators that turn genes on in specific cells at specific times, Elliott Ferris, a data analyst in Gregg's lab at U of U and first author of one of the studies, told Gizmodo. To understand the biological processes that may be linked to these hibernator-accelerated regions, the researchers identified genes that get turned up or turned down during fasting in mice. Hibernation is an adaptation to survive food scarcity, so fasting triggers similar metabolic changes. This led them to 'hub genes' that act as master regulators for fasting-induced changes to gene activity. 'The really surprising discovery that was very exciting was that the hibernation-linked elements are disproportionately affecting those key hub genes,' Gregg explained. 'The implication is that hibernators changed the regulation and activity of these core hub genes to have big downstream effects on the whole program for responding to food scarcity and food deprivation. That's important as we think about translating this knowledge into the real world.' Gregg is co-founder of Primordial AI, a Utah-based biotech startup that leverages AI to uncover master regulator gene drug targets. Through this company, he aims to develop drugs that mimic the genetic advantages hibernators have, such as boosting neuroprotection in Alzheimer's patients or reversing insulin resistance in type 2 diabetics. 'Those hub genes are the ones that we think are a really good starting point to design medicines to affect those genes,' Gregg said.
E&E News
26 minutes ago
- E&E News
EPA research cuts stoke fears over scientific independence
Despite losing an EPA research grant this May, Jane Clougherty feels relatively sanguine about her individual situation. She's not as optimistic about the future of EPA-funded research, though. 'I'm lucky enough to be tenured and secure in my position at the moment,' Clougherty, an environmental health scientist at Drexel University in Philadelphia, said in an interview early this month. But as the Trump administration slashes funding for university-based inquiry, Clougherty said, 'I think a lot of public health schools are going to be in a lot of trouble.' Advertisement Her project, which was examining the combined impact of extreme heat and air pollution and air pollution on children's health in New York state, was one among many axed midstream this spring on the grounds that they no longer meshed with administration priorities. It's part of the piecemeal dismemberment of EPA's science initiatives that has only gathered steam. Earlier this month, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has since confirmed plans to dissolve the agency's Office of Research and Development, which last year had more than 1,500 employees and is described by supporters and former officials as an irreplaceable engine of innovation in fields like chemical safety and the risks posed by pollution exposure. Under the plan, ORD will lay off some researchers through a reduction in force while shunting others to a new Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions as well as existing wings of the agency. In all, the restructuring will save almost $750 million, Zeldin said in a news release, adding that the reduction in force (RIF) will ensure that EPA can better fulfill its mission of protecting human health and the environment 'while being responsible stewards' of taxpayer dollars. Apart from that one-page release, EPA has been stingy with details about the plan, which last week encountered its first institutional pushback. In an explanatory report accompanying a draft fiscal 2026 spending bill, members of the Senate Appropriations Committee said they were 'appalled' by the research office's imminent dissolution and demanded an immediate halt to 'all actions related to the closure, reduction, reorganization, or other similar such changes.' Asked this week whether EPA will comply with that directive, press secretary Brigit Hirsch cited 'longstanding practice' in declining to comment on pending legislation. One union leader, however, said the agency appears to be pressing ahead unfazed. 'From what we can see, there has been no change of course inside EPA in response to that language,' said Holly Wilson, president of the American Federation of Government Employees local that represents research office staff who work at the agency's campus in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Hirsch also declined to give the size of the office's current workforce or confirm the number of employees so far reassigned to EPA branches that handle chemical regulation, water protection and other programs. Current and former staffers, however, put the total number of transfers in the hundreds. Some 75 ORD employees have been moved to the Office of Air and Radiation alone, newly installed air chief Aaron Szabo told participants in an introductory town hall meeting Wednesday, according to people familiar with his remarks. 'It seems like they're making sure the program offices get first crack at people, then absorbing some in OASES, then RIF'ing the rest,' said one employee, who was granted anonymity for fear of reprisal. 'Eliminating scientific independence' Research office alums are meanwhile watching in dismay at the dismantling of a scientific hub that took decades to build. 'It is heartbreaking to see what's being proposed and the actions that are being taken,' said Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, who served as a top ORD career staffer before retiring in 2021. 'It's really putting American lives at risk.' Christopher Frey was EPA assistant administrator for research and development under the Biden administration. | Francis Chung/POLITICO | Francis Chung/E&E News 'More than just a research office, ORD is EPA's scientific core, a central hub with spokes reaching into every aspect of public health, technological innovations, and environmental protection,' three former employees wrote in a paper published last month in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences. The breadth of its work is outlined in a series of long-term research strategies last updated in 2022 during President Joe Biden's administration. Among the hundreds of projects listed there: meeting demand for clean water, especially in regions drying out because of climate change; tracking airborne concentrations of the 'forever chemicals,' also known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS; and managing the risks posed by toxic waste sites. Those strategies are scheduled to run until next year. Under President Donald Trump, EPA has so far taken no public steps to revisit them. It also has yet to stand up the Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions (OASES), which will be run out of Zeldin's office with the goal of aligning research and putting science 'at the forefront of the agency's rulemakings and technical assistance to states,' according to EPA. Besides two scientists who have since moved on to posts outside of EPA, the paper's authors included Chris Frey, a North Carolina State University environmental engineering professor who headed ORD during much of Biden's administration. In an email exchange, Frey expressed misgivings about the administration's plan to put OASES directly under the EPA chief, saying that step would mingle research and political policy goals, thereby 'eliminating scientific independence.' Sending former ORD scientists to work on water, air and other individual programs, Frey added, 'is highly inefficient administratively, since the science leadership and support that ORD provided would either not convey to those offices or would be wastefully duplicated, inconsistent, and inefficient. ' 'It's about time' Some industry allies, however, have embraced the Trump administration's agenda. Even before Zeldin confirmed the breakup of ORD this month, EPA was shutting down its human studies lab, housed in leased space at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Steve Milloy, a former coal company executive, has criticized EPA's human studies lab. | Heartland Institute/YouTube 'It's about time,' Steve Milloy, publisher of the blog, said in an interview this week. In 2012, Milloy helped bring a federal lawsuit that likened the lab's use of paid volunteers in exploring soot inhalation's health effects to Nazi medical experiments. The suit was thrown out within months on procedural grounds. A review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine later found a low likelihood of long-term harm to participants and that human studies yielded valuable data not obtainable through other means. While EPA maintains that all of the lab's functions are being transferred to the Research Triangle Park campus, Orme-Zavaleta said the large, mechanically complex chambers where the inhalation research is conducted cannot be moved. The lab's work, she said, is now idled 'and it would take a very long time to get it back up and running.' In a column last month on a conservative website, Milloy hailed the facility's closure as 'a great start' that could further the administration's goal of rolling back key Clean Air Act regulations. A former coal company lobbyist, he dismisses the mainstream scientific consensus that soot — more technically known as fine particulate matter, or PM 2.5 — is a dangerous pollutant that contributes to tens of thousands of deaths and illnesses each year. EPA has relied on that evidence to help justify tougher emission standards on coal-fired power plants and other industries that rely on fossil fuels. 'But EPA's PM2.5 claims were all lies,' Milloy wrote, adding that the Trump administration 'should apply the results of the human experiments controversy to shut down the EPA's many PM2.5-based regulatory abuses.' 'This is a very baffling moment in time,' said Clougherty, the Drexel University scientist who was interviewed at an event organized earlier this month by Democrats on the House Science, Space and Technology Committee to highlight federal grant cuts across a variety of agencies. 'I never would have thought we had to advocate for science.' Asked why she thought the administration was pursuing the research cuts, 'We can't really know something until we look at it carefully,' she said. Clougherty added, 'If we're not doing the science that documents the impacts of climate change or environmental pollution on health, then who's to know it has an effect?'
