
It's my goal to live to 100 – and it's not just diet and exercise that will help me achieve it
For much of the past century, life expectancy continually increased. In most countries in the world, children could hope to live, on average, longer, healthier lives than their parents. This expectation is still true of the mega-wealthy. In fact, tech billionaires and multimillionaires have recently been fixated on finding the secret to longer life, convinced that with enough money, technology and cutting-edge science, they can stave off the inevitable for a few more decades to reach 120 or even 150 years old.
But their efforts aren't trickling down to the rest of us. The world's health crises are getting worse, with life expectancy going backwards in several high-income countries, such as the UK and US. In Britain, stagnation started before the Covid pandemic and has decreased by six months, and in the US by 2.33 years. Obesity rates are rising – not just in wealthy countries, but also in places like Ghana, which has experienced a 650% increase in obesity since 1980. Not 65%; 650%. Clean air is a rarity in most places in the world. Mental health conditions like depression are on the rise, worsened by financial precarity and stress.
We've been told for decades that if we just optimise ourselves, we can live longer, healthier lives. So how can we explain the gap between our growing knowledge about living longer and our collective health going backwards? Personally, I've set myself a suitably ambitious goal: to live to 100 with good health and to help others to do the same. According to the ONS life expectancy calculator, I have a 9.3% chance of making it that long (although even more challenging is to have a quality life during this time).
As someone who has a strong interest in and passion for health, I follow the latest research on superfoods and what to eat. I've tried sugar-free diets; I went vegan for a period. I've tried all kinds of different exercise regimes from running long distances to intervals to HIIT (high intensity interval training) to Hyrox, outdoor bootcamps, spin, hot pilates, barre and paddleboard yoga. In my mid-30s, I decided to become a personal trainer to combine my interest in fitness, nutrition and wellbeing.
However, every time my mind goes down the 'optimisation' route, I'm reminded of my main job and lifelong career as a public health scientist, looking into the factors that affect how long we will live. Most of these are out of individual control and have to do with the country and community we live in. The truth is, this 'self-help' narrative doesn't reflect the reality of how health works. In fact, the focus on personal responsibility and self-improvement has distracted us from the real issue –the impact that public policy, infrastructure and community make in affecting our health chances and longevity.
In public health, research projects have studied places where people live significantly longer, healthier lives – think of Japan or South Korea, or within Europe, Zurich, Madrid or Sardinia. In these places, chronic diseases like heart disease and obesity are far less common. Take Japan, which has 80% less breast and prostate cancer than North Americans and half the risk of hip fractures.
Much work has gone into analysing the behaviours of people living within these cities and regions. Based on this, we get lists of changes we could be making at an individual level to live longer, such as moving to a largely plant-based diet, sleeping seven to nine hours a night and exposing yourself to a certain amount of sunlight each day. These are of course helpful, but I suspect that hardly anyone in the areas above has read a self-help book or has a daily health 'to do' list.
What stands out about these places is that the people living there don't just make individual choices that lead to better health – they live in places where healthy lives are normalised by government and culture.
Take the issue of obesity: the UK isn't fatter than Japan because it is a country filled with fundamentally different people who choose to be overweight or are lazy or stupid – that kind of logic is not only naive, but it stigmatises overweight people. In fact it seems like at the level of choice, the UK is more interested in dieting, with a diet industry estimated to be worth £2bn annually and diet books selling millions of copies each year. In contrast, Japan's diet industry is tiny, worth only $42.8m. The main difference is actually in the food environment – including affordable fruit and vegetables, nutritious school meals and support from the government – meaning that it's far easier for an individual to stay within a healthy weight living in Japan. The odds are stacked against you in Britain.
You can become the healthy 'outlier' or bubble yourself off from larger societal challenges if you have wealth, time and resources. You can carry an air purifier, drink a matcha latte, swim in expensive leisure centres, even hire a chef to bake you fresh bread and prepare nutritious meals. There's a reason that being a royal or marrying into royalty is one of the surest ways to live a long and healthy life. But for those of us who are commoners, there's no fully opting out of the societal factors completely: we have to go outside to breathe air, walk and cycle the streets, drink tapwater and eat the foods available near where we live or at school.
As I talk about in my new book, if I'm going to live to 100, I need more than fastidiously counting my calories and posting pictures of myself exercising on Instagram (which I am guilty of). I need to live in a world where health is a collective responsibility, not an individual one. This means supporting policies that make us all healthier – and politicians who prioritise the conditions for good health such as nutritious food especially for children, active cities, clean air policies, preventive healthcare and public provision of water, which should be at the core of what a government provides its citizens. There are lessons in how to improve life in all of these areas across the world: these are places where good health is built into daily life.
If we think of Ponce de León's quest for immortality in the 16th century – at a time when life expectancy in his native Spain was just 25 to 30 years, perhaps the lesson is that the answer for longer, healthier lives wasn't in a fountain of youth but in the rise of stable government, public services, science and community. Tech billionaires could take note.
Prof Devi Sridhar is chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh, and the author of How Not to Die (Too Soon)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It really shouldn't be radical to expect the NHS to put patients first
SIR – Sir Jim Mackey, the new NHS boss (The Saturday Interview, June 28), states that the service is deaf to criticism, has wasted a lot of money and sees patients as an inconvenience. The general public has known all this for far too long. One truly hopes that Sir Jim's insight will bring about some real changes, and that he will have the strength to see them through. Peter Rosie Ringwood, Hampshire SIR – Sir Jim Mackey says 'it feels like we've built mechanisms to keep the public away because it's an inconvenience'. I do find that, when I am able to see a doctor, I tend to start the conversation with the words: 'I am sorry to bother you, but …' If I were receiving any other service for which I was paying (as we do for the NHS through our taxes), it would never occur to me to say that. Felicity Guille London SW6 SIR – Sir Jim Mackey acknowledges the failure of the NHS and hopes that this bureaucratic Titanic might avoid its fatal iceberg. He identifies the walls erected by the NHS to obstruct access – not least the high one in front of primary care, which is the point of first contact for patients who choose not to abuse A&E departments. Large general practices, often the result of mergers, should create a daily, open-access morning clinic for patients who perceive their problem to be urgent; after receiving a ticket, they would be seen in order. Each GP would take turns to run the clinic. The early weeks would overwhelm, but demand would start to settle down. Some patients, after waiting for several hours, would realise their problem was not urgent, and opt for an arranged appointment. Remote consultations can never compete with the doctor-patient chemistry in the consultation room. Dr Adrian Crisp Weston Colville, Cambridgeshire SIR – Your Leading Article (' Reform the NHS, not our shopping baskets ', June 29) discusses Labour's plan to introduce yet more heavy-handed measures. Forcing shops to promote fruit and vegetables will not address the causes of obesity. Better education, for instance, could genuinely help to combat it, but piling more regulations on to shops will only push prices higher – something no one wants. Charlie Temple Billericay, Essex SIR – The plan for cutting the calorie content of the average shopping basket is a step in the right direction, but does not go far enough. I suggest recruiting food police to stand at checkouts and fine us £5 for each non-government-approved item in our trolleys – reduced to £2.50 if we return the item to the shelves. Fines for bottles or cans of alcoholic drinks would, naturally, be much higher. Max Sawyer Stamford, Lincolnshire


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Drug shortages causing ‘unprecedented' issues for patients
Medicine shortages are now a "distressing new normal" for patients, posing a significant risk to public health, pharmacists have warned. A new report from Community Pharmacy England (CPE), which represents over 10,000 community pharmacies, highlighted the "unprecedented" issues patients are facing due to a lack of available drugs. The organisation's survey, which polled more than 4,300 pharmacy owners and 1,600 pharmacy workers across England, found the situation to be worse than when a similar assessment was conducted three years ago. It found: Some 95 per cent of pharmacy workers said patients are still being inconvenienced by ongoing shortages, while 73 per cent said supply issues are putting patient's health at risk; Many are faced with frustrated patients, with 79 per cent reporting incidents of patient aggression when medicines were unavailable or delayed; Some 86 per cent of pharmacy owners said shortages are leading patients to visit multiple pharmacies in search of medicines; Looking for medicines is time-consuming for staff, with 39 per cent of pharmacy staff now spending one to two hours every day trying to get hold of drugs, with more than a quarter (26 per cent) spending longer than two hours; Almost half (49 per cent) of pharmacy owners said patient services are being negatively affected by pressures on their business, and 94 per cent link this directly to medicine supply problems. Community Pharmacy England said that, in the last year alone, the Government has issued serious shortage protocols (SSPs) for key medicines used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, angina, HRT, antibiotics such as cefalexin and clarithromycin, and medicines for cardiovascular disease and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. There are also ongoing shortages of drugs for ADHD, diabetes and epilepsy, it said. SSPs occur to identify alternative drugs or quantity that may be supplied if a medicine is out of stock. Janet Morrison, chief executive of Community Pharmacy England, said: 'Our survey shows that as medicine supply issues remain a daily reality across the country, the risk to patient health has become a distressing new normal. 'Delays in receiving medicines not only disrupt patients' treatment but can also cause unnecessary stress and potential harm to their health. 'The ongoing time and effort required to manage shortages also adds pressure on pharmacy teams, who are already working at full stretch. 'Our survey results suggest a system stuck that is stuck at breaking point.' She said the problems were caused by issues ranging from product discontinuations to global supply chain challenges. 'We also believe that consistently low medicine prices in the UK have made the market less appealing to manufacturers, further weakening the resilience of the supply system,' she said. 'The future is uncertain, with expected drug price inflation and potential knock-on effects across the NHS, but we welcome the Government's commitment to ongoing work to shore up supply chain resilience and will be monitoring the situation.' When compared with 2022, the 2025 survey found a worsening picture, with 51 per cent of pharmacy teams in 2022 saying patients were being negatively affected by supply delays, rising to 73 per cent in 2025. Supply issues were also more frequent, while teams are spending longer trying to sort them out. Fin McCaul, a community pharmacy owner in Greater Manchester, said: 'It's not just a matter of running out of stock: patients are rightly frustrated, and their health is being harmed. 'Our teams are caught in the middle, spending hours calling suppliers and contacting GPs, trying to find alternatives, while also trying to keep patients informed. 'The constant uncertainty is affecting both our staff and patients, and each year it only seems to get worse.' It comes as a Healthwatch England survey of more than 7,000 adults found one in four continue to report medicine shortages, while issues such as prescription delays, pharmacy closures, and affordability are on the rise. Some 18 per cent reported prescription errors, 5 per cent were worried about cost and 9 per cent reported unexpected pharmacy closures. The poll also suggested people are not always aware of the conditions that pharmacists can treat in order to avoid a trip to the GP. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'This government inherited ongoing global supply problems, but we have robust measures in place to mitigate disruption for patients. 'We are working to build the resilience of medicine supply chains and prevent future disruption as we get the NHS back on its feet. 'We have recently agreed an extra £617 million of funding over two years with Community Pharmacy England to help community pharmacies, support the sector and provide patients with greater services closer to home. 'Deliberate violence or abuse directed at healthcare staff is unacceptable and all staff, including pharmacists and their teams, deserve to work in a safe and secure environment.'


The Sun
29 minutes ago
- The Sun
Lucy Letby and Harold Shipman-style NHS killing sprees will be prevented in future with high-tech AI reforms
HI-TECH NHS reforms will help to prevent the next Lucy Letby or Harold Shipman, Wes Streeting has vowed. The Health Secretary has insisted his AI rollout will stop serious incidents slipping through the net. 2 He says he will introduce new measures to identify patterns of abuse, serious injury and deaths via an early alert system — part of a ten-year plan to be unveiled later this week. Mr Streeting last night said: 'Even a single lapse that puts a patient at risk is one too many. 'Behind every safety breach is a person — a life altered, a family devastated, a heartbreaking loss. 'By embracing AI and introducing world-first early warning systems, we'll spot dangerous signs sooner and launch rapid inspections before harm occurs.' Nurse Letby is serving 15 whole-life orders for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill seven more at the Countess of Chester Hospital. GP Shipman is thought to have killed more than 200 patients over two decades. He was convicted in 2000 and died in 2004. The technology, still in development, will flag safety issues in real time — allowing Care Quality Commission officials to investigate and take immediate action. Top NHS figure Prof Meghana Pandit said it would 'turbo-charge' the speed and efficiency of identifying patient concerns. It came as Mr Streeting last week ordered a national investigation into maternity services. Women and babies had been left at 'considerably higher' risk than what was necessary.