Air India plane crash: Surat grandfather buries son, daughter-in-law; heads back to Ahmedabad to collect 4-year-old granddaughter's body
The Gloucester couple was buried around 2 am Wednesday, after which their relatives returned to Ahmedabad to collect the remains of Sara, their four-year-old daughter.
Akeel (36), his wife Hannaa (31), and daughter Sara had flown from London to Ahmedabad and reached Surat on June 6, a day before Bakri Eid, to surprise Akeel's father Abdulla Nanabawa, a resident of the Haripura area.
A huge crowd of mourners — clerics, social workers, relatives, friends and members of the Bohra community — from different parts of Surat city assembled at Haripura on Wednesday early morning to pay their last respects.
Akeel's younger brother, Hamza, and their mother, Sajeda, also flew to Surat from London to participate in the final rites. Abdulla (62) had been in Ahmedabad since June 12 to receive the bodies of his son Akeel and his family. On June 16, the DNA test results for Akeel and Hanna were confirmed, while Sara's DNA test report arrived early on Wednesday morning.
Abdulla was inconsolable as his friend Rashid Shaikh, a social worker, and a few others tried to speak to him.
Talking to The Indian Express, Abdulla Nanabawa said, 'There are no words to express my feelings about my son and his family. We all enjoyed the Bakri Eid festival fully. We celebrated it with all the rituals. I dropped him at Ahmedabad on June 12 for his return flight back to London. His trip was short, but his company was memorable to me and will remain so forever.'
On the early morning of June 12, Abdulla Nanabawa booked a car from Surat to Ahmedabad, carrying Akeel, Hannaa, and Sara. After dropping them at the Sardar Vallabhbhai International Airport (SVPIA), Abdulla headed to Surat, where he learnt of the plane crash.
When Akeel and Hannaa were being laid to rest, Abdulla received a call from Ahmedabad Civil Hospital informing him that Sara's DNA had been matched. He and his friends left for Ahmedabad Civil Hospital at 7.00 am on Wednesday and received Sara's body; they are now on their way back to Surat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Being a boss isn't for everyone but is there any escape path?
Next Story Devina Sengupta Career success is typically seen as a leadership role, but this can create a rickety escalator of responsibility that serves neither companies nor their employees well. Remember the Peter Principle? It's alive and kicking. A boss often needs to act as a buffer and a pulley at the same time. Gift this article A widely accepted yardstick of success in India Inc and around the world is boss-hood and the number of work 'colleagues' one can count as subordinates. A widely accepted yardstick of success in India Inc and around the world is boss-hood and the number of work 'colleagues' one can count as subordinates. It is fair to assume that one starts off as part of the general crowd in the initial years of a career, but after that phase is over, going up the order means being asked to lead a team. It is a sign of progress. The faster a team is latched under you, the more meritorious you are. But I can lay a wager that most bosses hate being bosses. Peel off the status tags and ask them if they enjoy the administrative and often thankless work that they are made to do in the name of 'management,' and they will holler a 'nay' if there is no one around to judge them. Of course, this does not mean they will give up their higher pay packets and other perks, but they may want to give up boss-hood. There are more leaders than one cares to admit who accepted their managerial roles because that was the only path to career success available to them. A quick internet search throws up a paragraph on the etymological journey of the word 'boss.' It has Dutch roots and comes from the word 'bass,' meaning 'master.' In the 19th century, the word travelled from the Netherlands across the Atlantic along with the other linguistic baggage of settlers in North America. In the new land, the word was adopted quickly and eventually came to edge out its British equivalent 'master.' More than a century later, we now have bosses who were never trained to become mentors or leaders. They were chosen because they were found to be better than others in a team or were elevated because they threatened to quit or simply had more work experience than the rest. None of this prepares a boss for the demands of a new role, which could involve a painstaking understanding of how to handle the highs and lows of a team, the eccentricities and fears of subordinates, or the pushes and shoves that could come from the top. A boss often needs to act as a buffer and a pulley at the same time. It is a tall ask because while performing these tasks, a corporate boss also gets measured by the output of an entire team, whether it is about signing up new clients, closing a deal or meeting a stiff sales target. Also read: How to talk politics at work when you disagree The result of the pressure is felt most acutely at the middle-management level, which is often stuffed with disgruntled bosses who are trapped in their designations without a way out. Quitting the role could get one labelled as someone unable to handle 'responsibility,' on which companies tend to place a high premium, whereas the individual may be best equipped for specific but valuable tasks that do not involve management. Before I became a journalist, I was a recruiter for nearly a year. My job was to hire senior call centre and business-process-outsourcing employees for their rival firms. The outsourcing sector was at its peak around 2005-06 and I was surprised to see people in their early 20s with barely two years of work experience being awarded boss roles. They suddenly had dozens of other workers under them and the pressure of chasing call-quality targets and working across time zones led to rampant drug abuse, most of which went unreported. This problem is sector agnostic and is visible in companies that are in a rush to promote young talent and reward recruits with rapid career escalation. In such businesses, skill-set mapping and leadership coaching starts only in the later stages as people reach the CXO level. As this is often time-consuming and expensive, a short-cut is to put people prematurely into team management roles, letting them run small fiefdoms on the assumption that they can be hauled up if things go awry and replaced pronto if need be. This creates a low-cost but high-churn cycle that many firms seem okay with. Newly appointed bosses take time to learn the art of boss-hood, but much damage can potentially be done in the interim before the company's higher-ups recognize that some appointees were not meant to be leaders and were probably better off as individual performers. An acceptance of this is tough for decision-makers, even if the obvious stares them in the face. Misaligned escalation does not do any favours to those who benefit from it (at least in salary terms). When misfit bosses look back at their careers, they may find very few people whose careers they shaped for the better, while they may have had to bear the blame for staff attrition and many a crisis. Also read: Companies must act to check toxic behaviour in office The next time someone argues that 'people leave managers and not companies,' call it out. It is people leaving companies that failed to spot the right managers. 'The Peter Principle,' meant as a wry observation, has been around since the 1960s. In a hierarchy, it states, employees tend to rise to their level of incompetence. This has long been one of the most ignored warnings on the way companies are structured. Yet, there still seems no escape from it. The author writes on workplaces and education at Mint Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
DGCA sends four show notices to Air India for violation of norms
NEW DELHI: India's aviation regulator on Wednesday issued four show cause notices to Air India for violations related to operational procedures, cabin crew training rules and their rest and duty norms. FILE PHOTO:A statement from Air India said it would respond to the notices within the stipulated two-week period. (REUTERS) The four notices were issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) on Wednesday, following the airline's voluntary reporting of the violations on June 20 and 21. A statement from Air India said it would respond to the notices within the stipulated two-week period. 'We acknowledge receipt of these notices from the regulator related to certain voluntary disclosures that were made over the last one year by Air India. We will respond to the said notices within the stipulated period. We remain committed to the safety of our crew and passengers,' the statement said. The airline has been given two weeks to respond to the notices. In all, the airline had reported 25 violations of norms. The violation of rules relating to the crew's duty and rest period, the notice stated, was in connection with flights operated on June 24, 2024, and June 15, 2025. Another notice was issued following voluntary disclosure on June 21 that reported three violations in cabin crew training and operational procedures. These were related to flights on December 1, April 10 and 11, 2024, and May 16 and 19, 2025. To be sure, the government has also started holding direct meetings with Air India management amid mounting safety incidents and ordered the carrier to maintain the highest safety standards. The first such meeting was held on Wednesday, in the midst of week in which an Air India aircraft caught fire at Delhi airport after landing from Hong Kong, a Kolkata-bound flight aborted takeoff due to technical issues, and a Kochi-Mumbai flight veered off the runway during landing in heavy rain. Air India has been facing enhanced surveillance after its flight from Ahmedabad following the June 12 crash of Air India Flight 171 that killed 260 people. The Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad marked one of aviation's deadliest tragedies in recent years and prompted comprehensive safety reviews. A preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Board (AAIB) has identified the fuel control switches, which were set to cut off during takeoff, as the main cause of the crash. Why the switches were flipped, or by whom, is now at the heart of the probe. Since that incident, at least 15 other operational issues and serious incidents have been reported involving Air India and its low-cost service arm Air India Express.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India operated flights violating pilot rest norms and training rules: DGCA
Civil Aviation regulator Directorate General of Civil Aviation have issued at least four show cause notices to Air India over multiple violation of pilot rest rules, not fulfilling training requirements and deploying inadequate number of cabin crew on ultra-long haul flights, according to documents reviewed by ET. While Air India voluntarily reported the violations to the DGCA , they were done two days before the regulator was supposed to inspect the airline's records as part of its annual surveillance of the airline's main base at Delhi. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Degree CXO Data Science Technology Others Leadership Data Science Product Management MBA healthcare Data Analytics Digital Marketing Healthcare Finance others PGDM Public Policy Project Management MCA Cybersecurity Operations Management Design Thinking Management Skills you'll gain: Data-Driven Decision-Making Strategic Leadership and Transformation Global Business Acumen Comprehensive Business Expertise Duration: 2 Years University of Western Australia UWA Global MBA Starts on Jun 28, 2024 Get Details In one of the cases, three Air India pilots operated beyond the mandated weekly duty hours. The regulator asked Air India's head of operations Pankul Mathur to explain the lapse. The regulator had earlier asked the airline to remove head of its operations control centre and two other senior officials after it found that the airline had operated two flights on the Bengaluru-London route where the pilots exceeded the stipulated duty limit of 10 hours. In another case, two Air India pilots underwent simulator training but did not start flying within the prescribed time limit, a lapse that requires them to undergo training again. While in another case 17 pilots flew flights in and out of Kathmandu without a mandatory training. To operate out of airports like Kathmandu which are situated in hilly areas pilots require extra training as there can be lack of navigation aids, inadequate en route weather information and sudden weather changes like turbulence due to strong winds blowing through the valleys. 'Despite repeated warnings and enforcement actions in the past, these violations demonstrated a continuing failure to implement effective training governance and compliance monitoring mechanisms. This constitutes a serious safety and regulatory concern,' an official of DGCA wrote in the show cause notice. In another instance the airline operated flights to North America without adequate cabin crew. These flights were operated soon after the Pahelgam terror attack following which Pakistan had shut its airspace for Indian carriers increasing flight time for flights between India and North America. DGCA had temporarily extend the maximum duty hours and rest period for pilots on long-haul routes to allow the airline to tackle Pakistan's airspace ban. "We acknowledge receipt of these notices from the regulator related to certain voluntary disclosures that were made over the last one year by Air India. We will respond to the said notices within the stipulated period. We remain committed to the safety of our crew and passengers," an Air India spokesperson said. The regulator has increased surveillance on Air India following last month's crash of a Boeing 787 aircraft at Ahmedabad killing 270 people. A preliminary assessment by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) said that they are focusing on movement of fuel switches seconds after take-off leading to shut down of engines.
