Analysis: NATO has promised a spending blitz. Can its European members afford it?
But it's a splurge that some European members of NATO, grappling with huge and ballooning debt burdens, can ill-afford.
'It's something unprecedented in peacetime to have such a massive increase in spending on any item – in particular, on defense,' Marcel Fratzscher, president of the German Institute for Economic Research or DIW, told CNN.
Last month, NATO members agreed to boost their respective defense spending targets to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035 – more than double the current 2% target and the sort of major increase that US President Donald Trump has been demanding for many years.
The pledge came as Europe's NATO members have to contend with an aggressive Russia and an America that has backed away from its long-standing role as the guarantor of the region's security.
Governments have three options to meet the new spending target – cut other expenses, raise taxes or borrow more – but analysts told CNN that each is either politically unpalatable or unviable in the long term for heavily indebted European NATO countries.
'Many (European Union) countries face hard fiscal constraints,' analysts at Bruegel, a Brussels-based think tank, wrote earlier this month. 'It is unrealistic to expect countries that have struggled for decades to reach a 2% defense spending target to embrace credibly an ill-justified, much higher target.'
Many NATO countries have failed to meet the previous, 2% target, set in 2014. Most have increased spending in recent years in response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 – so much so that the European Union's executive arm expects its 23 member states belonging to NATO to meet that target this year, based on their combined GDP.
But they now need to go further.
The new, 5% target includes a commitment by NATO member states to spend the equivalent of 3.5% of their annual GDP on so-called 'core' defense requirements, such as weapons, with the remaining 1.5% allocated to areas supporting defense like port infrastructure. For some nations, that will mean finding tens of billions of extra dollars a year.
Frank Gill, a senior sovereign credit ratings analyst for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at S&P Global Ratings, thinks that meeting the 3.5% target alone will require European countries, including the United Kingdom, to borrow huge sums of money. Some nations may also cut or reallocate government spending to reduce the amount they need to borrow, he said, but that could prove difficult.
'A lot of (European governments) are facing other fiscal pressures… not least aging populations, which are essentially leading to even higher pension spending,' Gill told CNN. 'Politically, (that) is very challenging to cut.'
Fratzscher at DIW in Germany agrees.
For most NATO countries, he argued, cutting spending is 'utterly impossible.' 'Europe is aging quickly,' he said. 'It's completely illusionary to believe that… governments in Europe could save on public pensions, on healthcare, on care more generally.'
The only sustainable way to finance the 'kind of magnitude of extra (defense) spending' now pledged by NATO is to hike taxes, he argued. Yet there exists neither the political will nor the public support to spend 'in such a dramatic way in this direction… and actually accept the consequences.'
Simply borrowing more is a similarly tricky option in Europe where a number of governments are already saddled with debts close to, or larger than, the size of their country's entire economy.
All else remaining equal, meeting just the 3.5% 'core' defense spending target could add roughly $2 trillion to the collective government debt of NATO's European members, including the UK, by 2035, according to a recent analysis by S&P Global Ratings. That compares with combined GDP of $23.1 trillion for the EU – a proxy for European NATO members – and Britain, based on World Bank data for 2024.
The extra debt would be particularly hard to swallow for countries such as Italy, France and Belgium. These NATO members had some of the highest public debt-to-GDP ratios at the end of 2024, at 135%, 113% and 105% respectively, according to the EU's statistics office.
Those are already heavy burdens. On Tuesday, French Prime Minister François Bayrou said the EU's second-largest economy risks a 'crushing by debt.' He warned that, should nothing change, just the interest France pays on its debt will swell to €100 billion ($117 billion) in 2029, becoming the government's largest single expense. He still supports splashing the cash on defense, while reining in other government spending.
The EU is trying to make it easier for member states to invest in their security. Brussels has exempted defense expenditure from its strict rules on government spending and pledged to create a €150 billion fund from which countries can borrow, at favorable interest rates, to invest in their defense.
However, there is another option for EU NATO members, according to Guntram Wolff, a senior fellow at Bruegel.
'Just not doing it. Not spending more,' he told CNN.
Already, Spain has said it will not meet the 5% target, arguing that doing so would compromise its spending on welfare. Last year, the southern European nation spent only 1.28% of its GDP on defense, based on NATO estimates.
Wolff said the 'best predictor for the increase in defense spending is (a country's) distance to Moscow – much more than any pledges at the NATO summit.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU Diplomats See Progress Toward US Trade Deal With 15% Tariffs
(Bloomberg) -- The European Union and the US are progressing toward an agreement that would set a 15% tariff for most products, according to diplomats briefed on the negotiations. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Member states could be ready to accept a 15% tariff and EU officials are pushing to have that cover sectors including cars, the diplomats said. Steel and aluminum imports above a certain quota would face the 50% duty, one of the diplomats added. The diplomats said that while the EU is optimistic that a deal can be reached, they are also cautious that any final agreement will need sign off from US President Donald Trump and his ultimate decision is difficult to predict. Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and EU close in on 15% tariff deal
The EU and US are closing in on a trade deal that would impose 15 per cent tariffs on European imports, similar to the agreement Donald Sign in to access your portfolio


Newsweek
17 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States That Could Redraw Congressional Districts Before Midterms
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A redistricting arms war sparked by Texas Republicans' efforts to redraw the state's Congressional maps, supported by President Donald Trump, could reshape the 2026 midterms. Newsweek reached out to the DCCC and NRCC for comment via email. Why It Matters As the 2026 midterms approach, redistricting could play a major role in whether Republicans are able to keep their majority, or minimize their losses, in the House. Historically, the party in the White House loses seats in the midterms, and Democrats are optimistic about their chances as President Donald Trump's approval rating continues to drop in recent polls. In Trump's first midterms, in 2018, Democrats made a net gain of 40 seats, surging to a majority. Republicans currently have a narrow 219-212 majority in the House with four seats vacant heading into 2026. What To Know Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott called a special session to, in part, address calls for a redrawing of maps to thwart potential Democratic gains in the midterms. Other GOP-led states have joined Texas in proposing to redraw their maps, hoping it could result in lost seats for Democrats next November. The moves have fueled calls for Democratic-run states to counter by redrawing their own maps. However, a number of states have legal restrictions that would make mid-decade redistricting a challenge. Typically, redistricting happens once every 10 years following the census to adjust boundaries based on population changes. Mid-decade redistricting does happen from time-to-time, however, usually following legal challenges against maps accused of being gerrymandered. States like Florida and Virginia have seen this sort of redistricting in the last decade. Texas Republicans are likely to eye seats held by Democratic Representatives Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez in South Texas, both of which were won by Trump last November. The region has quickly moved to the right over the past decade, turning these former Democratic strongholds into possible red turf. Suburban seats in Dallas and Houston could also be considered during the redraw. Representative Lizzie Fletcher, a Houston Democrat whose districted could be targeted, described the efforts as "disrespectful to citizens" and a "betrayal of our democratic principle that all citizens should have a say in our government." Ohio is another red state that has said it is considering redrawing its boundaries. Democrats in competitive seats, such as Representative Marcy Kaptur, whose Trump-won district includes Toledo, and Emilia Sykes, who represents Akron, would be the most vulnerable. That redraw would come after the state Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that the current state map is unconstitutional. Last November, Ohio voters rejected a plan that would have established a citizen commission instead of allowing lawmakers to draw maps, meaning Democrats have little say in how the new maps can be redrawn. How Democrats Plan to Counter Texas GOP Redraw California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom responded to Texas' plans by suggesting his state could also redraw its map to give Democrats more advantages. But California has an independent redistricting commission, so any attempts at a mid-decade redraw could face legal challenges. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in Florence, South Carolina, on July 8, 2025. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in Florence, South Carolina, on July 8, Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, previously raised legal concerns about the redistricting plan to Newsweek, saying that it "has to go through a ballot measure." Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon announced on X he is "introducing legislation to redraw Maryland congressional districts if any other state cheats & draws new maps outside of the census period." Democrats hold all but one of Maryland's eight districts and could target GOP Representative Andy Harris. Meanwhile, Democratic New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy is also not ruling out a redraw, but mid-decade redistricting is not legal in the state, so any effort to do so would require a change to that law. CNN reported that Democrats are also eyeing states like New York and Washington as states that could redraw their maps, but it's not clear Democrats in those states have the political appetite or legal ability to do so. There are also legal challenges against current boundaries in Georgia, South Carolina and Utah, where Democrats have raised gerrymandering arguments. In Georgia, critics have argued that the current map diluted the power of Black voters, and the case is being appealed. A similar argument was made in South Carolina over the state's 1st Congressional District which includes parts of Charleston and is represented by GOP Representative Nancy Mace. The state Supreme Court has heard arguments in this case. Democrats are also hoping for a positive outcome in Utah that would create a Democratic seat in Salt Lake City, as Republicans hold each of the state's four districts. What People Are Saying Democratic Representative Ro Khanna previously told Newsweek: "The governor, none of us, have that power. It's for the voters to decide, and the voters have an independent commission. What we need to do is make sure that we challenge what Texas is doing as unconstitutional. It's a violation of the Voting Rights Act. It's a violation of people having a fair vote, and it's gerrymandering districts." Democratic Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin told Axios: "If they're going to go nuclear in Texas, I'm going to go nuclear in other places. I'm not going to fight with one arm tied behind my back. I don't want to do that, but if they're proposing to rig the game, we're going to get in that game and fight." President Donald Trump told reporters earlier in July: "No, no. just a very simple redrawing. We pick up five seats. But we have a couple of other states where we will pick up seats also." What Happens Next Democrats are considering the best way to respond to Texas' redistricting plan as pressure grows from lawmakers to find a counter. Exact details on how the Texas map may change remains unclear at this point.