logo
Map Shows States That Could Redraw Congressional Districts Before Midterms

Map Shows States That Could Redraw Congressional Districts Before Midterms

Newsweek8 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A redistricting arms war sparked by Texas Republicans' efforts to redraw the state's Congressional maps, supported by President Donald Trump, could reshape the 2026 midterms.
Newsweek reached out to the DCCC and NRCC for comment via email.
Why It Matters
As the 2026 midterms approach, redistricting could play a major role in whether Republicans are able to keep their majority, or minimize their losses, in the House.
Historically, the party in the White House loses seats in the midterms, and Democrats are optimistic about their chances as President Donald Trump's approval rating continues to drop in recent polls. In Trump's first midterms, in 2018, Democrats made a net gain of 40 seats, surging to a majority.
Republicans currently have a narrow 219-212 majority in the House with four seats vacant heading into 2026.
What To Know
Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott called a special session to, in part, address calls for a redrawing of maps to thwart potential Democratic gains in the midterms.
Other GOP-led states have joined Texas in proposing to redraw their maps, hoping it could result in lost seats for Democrats next November. The moves have fueled calls for Democratic-run states to counter by redrawing their own maps. However, a number of states have legal restrictions that would make mid-decade redistricting a challenge.
Typically, redistricting happens once every 10 years following the census to adjust boundaries based on population changes. Mid-decade redistricting does happen from time-to-time, however, usually following legal challenges against maps accused of being gerrymandered. States like Florida and Virginia have seen this sort of redistricting in the last decade.
Texas Republicans are likely to eye seats held by Democratic Representatives Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez in South Texas, both of which were won by Trump last November. The region has quickly moved to the right over the past decade, turning these former Democratic strongholds into possible red turf.
Suburban seats in Dallas and Houston could also be considered during the redraw. Representative Lizzie Fletcher, a Houston Democrat whose districted could be targeted, described the efforts as "disrespectful to citizens" and a "betrayal of our democratic principle that all citizens should have a say in our government."
Ohio is another red state that has said it is considering redrawing its boundaries. Democrats in competitive seats, such as Representative Marcy Kaptur, whose Trump-won district includes Toledo, and Emilia Sykes, who represents Akron, would be the most vulnerable.
That redraw would come after the state Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that the current state map is unconstitutional. Last November, Ohio voters rejected a plan that would have established a citizen commission instead of allowing lawmakers to draw maps, meaning Democrats have little say in how the new maps can be redrawn.
How Democrats Plan to Counter Texas GOP Redraw
California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom responded to Texas' plans by suggesting his state could also redraw its map to give Democrats more advantages. But California has an independent redistricting commission, so any attempts at a mid-decade redraw could face legal challenges.
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in Florence, South Carolina, on July 8, 2025.
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in Florence, South Carolina, on July 8, 2025.Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, previously raised legal concerns about the redistricting plan to Newsweek, saying that it "has to go through a ballot measure."
Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon announced on X he is "introducing legislation to redraw Maryland congressional districts if any other state cheats & draws new maps outside of the census period." Democrats hold all but one of Maryland's eight districts and could target GOP Representative Andy Harris.
Meanwhile, Democratic New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy is also not ruling out a redraw, but mid-decade redistricting is not legal in the state, so any effort to do so would require a change to that law.
CNN reported that Democrats are also eyeing states like New York and Washington as states that could redraw their maps, but it's not clear Democrats in those states have the political appetite or legal ability to do so.
There are also legal challenges against current boundaries in Georgia, South Carolina and Utah, where Democrats have raised gerrymandering arguments. In Georgia, critics have argued that the current map diluted the power of Black voters, and the case is being appealed. A similar argument was made in South Carolina over the state's 1st Congressional District which includes parts of Charleston and is represented by GOP Representative Nancy Mace. The state Supreme Court has heard arguments in this case.
Democrats are also hoping for a positive outcome in Utah that would create a Democratic seat in Salt Lake City, as Republicans hold each of the state's four districts.
What People Are Saying
Democratic Representative Ro Khanna previously told Newsweek: "The governor, none of us, have that power. It's for the voters to decide, and the voters have an independent commission. What we need to do is make sure that we challenge what Texas is doing as unconstitutional. It's a violation of the Voting Rights Act. It's a violation of people having a fair vote, and it's gerrymandering districts."
Democratic Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin told Axios: "If they're going to go nuclear in Texas, I'm going to go nuclear in other places. I'm not going to fight with one arm tied behind my back. I don't want to do that, but if they're proposing to rig the game, we're going to get in that game and fight."
President Donald Trump told reporters earlier in July: "No, no. just a very simple redrawing. We pick up five seats. But we have a couple of other states where we will pick up seats also."
What Happens Next
Democrats are considering the best way to respond to Texas' redistricting plan as pressure grows from lawmakers to find a counter. Exact details on how the Texas map may change remains unclear at this point.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Philippines goods to face 19% tariff, Trump says
Philippines goods to face 19% tariff, Trump says

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Philippines goods to face 19% tariff, Trump says

The US will levy a 19% tax on imports from the Philippines, US President Donald Trump has announced after meeting with the country's president at the White House. Trump wrote on social media on Tuesday that the new tariff was part of a wider pact, in which the Philippines would remove duties on US goods and the two countries would cooperate militarily. "It was a beautiful visit, and we concluded our Trade Deal," he wrote on social media, offering no further details about the apparent agreement. The plan, which was not confirmed by the Philippines, would leave the country facing a tax even higher than what Trump had threatened when he first announced sweeping global tariffs in April. At the time, Trump said his goal with instituting tariffs was to push countries to drop policies he saw as unfair to the US. His plans set off a flurry of trade talks with countries around the world. He has since announced a handful of deals, including with the UK, China and Indonesia. But the agreements so far have kept in place high tariffs, with key issues unresolved or unconfirmed by both parties. With Trump now threatening a new round of higher duties to go into effect 1 August, some of America's biggest and most important trade partners, including the European Union and Canada, remain in limbo. As hopes for a deal dim, officials in Europe are increasingly rallying around plans for potential retaliation. In Canada on Tuesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney said that "complex negotiations" were continuing but was noncommittal on the prospect of reaching a deal by Trump deadline next week. "We'll see," he told reporters after meeting with premiers in Ontario. "The Americans objectives are multiple, they change over time ... but what is clear is that the Canadian government will not accept a bad agreement. The objective is not to have an agreement at any cost." Trump's tariff plans sparked widespread financial turmoil when he announced them originally in April, putting forward a plan that would leave the US with its highest duties since the early 1900s. He subsequently suspended some of the plan's most aggressive measures, while leaving in place a universal 10% tariff on most goods and separately hitting certain items, such as cars, copper, steel and aluminium, with higher duties. But in recent weeks, as markets have calmed and the US economy held steady, Trump has returned to plans for higher duties, sending letters to countries outlining plans for new tariffs that he says will go into force on 1 August. In a letter to leaders in the Philippines this month, he had said he would charge a 20% tariff on the country's goods. That was up from 17% rate he had threatened in April. In a statement on Wednesday, the Embassy of the Republic of the Philippines said the reduction in the tariff from the most recent rate threatened was "encouraging". "We will continue to find other ways to enhance and deepen our economic partnership," it said. The Philippines is a relatively small trade partner with the US, sending about $14.2bn worth of goods to the America last year. That included car parts, electric machinery, textiles and coconut oil. Meanwhile for companies, the cost of the new tariffs is increasing. General Motors on Tuesday said tariffs had cost it more than $1bn over three months. That followed an earlier disclosure from rival Stellantis, maker of Jeep, which said the measures had cost it €300m (£259.6m, $349.2m). Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data

In new deal with Trump, Columbia will pay millions in fines
In new deal with Trump, Columbia will pay millions in fines

USA Today

time5 minutes ago

  • USA Today

In new deal with Trump, Columbia will pay millions in fines

The Ivy League school in New York City struck another deal with the Trump administration in an attempt to restore its federal funding. WASHINGTON – Columbia University, in hopes of restoring hundreds of millions of dollars in frozen funding, has struck another deal with the Trump administration, the university announced. The Ivy League school in New York City will pay a massive $200 million fine to the government, as well as some students and faculty, to settle allegations it violated federal civil rights laws and failed to protect members of its Jewish community from discrimination. It will also jointly appoint an independent monitor to update the federal government on its compliance with new policies, and pay an additional $21 million fine to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The agreement marks the second major concession from the prestigious university in its protracted negotiations with the government. Despite the drawn-out talks, and many compromises on Columbia's part, the Trump administration has yet to reroute hundreds of millions of dollars back to the school. Columbia's acting president, Claire Shipman, said in a statement that the agreement preserves the university's independence and will restore research funding on which the school depends. 'This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty,' she said. 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track.' The announcement also comes after the Trump administration pushed the University of Pennsylvania, another Ivy League school, to agree to a series of demands related to preventing transgender athletes from competing. Similarly, that deal was reached to restore massive amounts of federal money. Read more: Lia Thomas, Title IX and $175M: Why Penn struck a deal with Trump Meanwhile, Columbia is facing a separate battle over its accreditation status, which the school needs in order to distribute federal financial aid dollars to students. The Education Department has pushed Columbia's accreditor, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, to reevaluate its standing. Though Middle States has placed the university on warning, such a step would be virtually unprecedented, and a long and complex process would have to be followed before its accreditation could be revoked. Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @

Europe won't pay its NATO share, COVID tied to bioweapons work and other commentary
Europe won't pay its NATO share, COVID tied to bioweapons work and other commentary

New York Post

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Europe won't pay its NATO share, COVID tied to bioweapons work and other commentary

Defense beat: Europe Won't Pay Its NATO Share President Trump's call for Europe to pay 5% of GDP for its defense has been much 'ballyhooed,' notes Gerard Baker at The Wall Street Journal, but the 'math agreed to by all members except Spain is on closer inspection a little fuzzy.' While some Euro nations such as Poland and Finland are 'serious about their defense,' Germany, France and Britain 'face economic, demographic, political and cultural challenges' that will make real change unlikely because the 'fiscal positions of most European countries' are simply too ugly for them to pay more. 'Budget restraint' in Labour-run Britain is impossible to impose, and European 'climate policies are blowing even larger holes in budgets.' Only 'economic growth' can get these countries on the right footing to afford to pay more for their own defense. Foreign desk: COVID Tied to Bioweapons Work 'A bioweapons expert likely to head the Trump administration's top Pentagon post for countering weapons of mass destruction has charged in a new report that the Covid-19 pandemic was probably the result of a military-research-related accident in a Chinese laboratory, and that work at that lab may have been part of research China was conducting in possible violation of a treaty banning biological weapons,' reports City Journal's Judith Miller. The report, by Robert Kadlec, 'adds to the growing consensus' that COVID 'was the result of a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and not a naturally occurring outbreak of a deadly virus originating in animals.' But the report is strong grounds for Team Trump to start 'prioritizing U.S. intelligence efforts aimed at Chinese bioweapons research.' Mideast journal: Iran's Long Road Back to Nukes The '19 senior Iranian nuclear scientists' Israel assassinated during the 12-Day War had 'nuclear knowledge spanning decades' — much 'centered on explosives, nuclear coding, and ballistic missiles,' cheers Adam Kredo at The Washington Free Beacon, citing a new intelligence assessment by a leading nonproliferation organization. The scientists' 'average age was 60,' suggesting 'Israel targeted the most experienced crop of engineers.' Plus, the Jewish state 'successfully destroyed' Iran's nuclear 'technological blueprints.' Indeed, the attacks 'evaporated decades of nuclear know-how, striking at the heart of Tehran's weapons program in a way kinetic attacks could not.' The result: 'Recovering may be far more difficult and take far longer.' From the right: Poll Flags Border Ignorance A new CBS poll suggests 'significant numbers of Americans, even now, are not fully informed' about immigration under President Trump, marvels the Washington Examiner's Byron York. The poll found 56% of respondents disapprove of Trump's immigration approach, but it also asked a factual question: whether Trump's policies are making the number of migrants crossing the border 'go up, go down, or not change.' Only 64% 'gave the obviously correct response — Trump has made the number of migrants crossing' go down. 'And 8% said crossings have actually gone up, which was crazy wrong.' This reveals a 'lack of knowledge' of basic facts and 'could tell us something about the answers to all the other immigration questions in the CBS poll, and perhaps in other polls as well.' Education beat: Don't Use AI To 'Teach' The Computer Lab 'was that magical room' where students could experience 'the wonders of the Oregon Trail, Number Munchers, and Mavis Beacon,' reminisces Understanding America's Oren Cass. Back then, computers 'did not teach, they were a subject to be taught.' Yet 'the irresistible logic of technophilia determined that every child needed a computer' to 'compete in the global economy of tomorrow.' Today, the same is being said of AI: 'All students need to know how to use AI,' and 'AI should be integrated throughout the educational experience.' Trouble is, AI 'will offer counterproductive shortcuts for not only unengaged students, but also their teachers.' Kids need to understand that 'learning is not a technological function' but 'a habit of mind.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store