
Are farmers being taxed for water usage? Union government answers
Recent social media posts claimed that the Centre planned to tax water usage for farming. The Union Government has denied these claims. The Ministry of Jal Shakti called the reports inaccurate. PIB Fact Check confirmed the claim is false. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the M-CADWM scheme. The ministry clarified that agriculture and water are state subjects.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
PIB Fact Check confirms claim is false
Clarification from the Ministry
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Recently, several social media posts have gone viral, claiming that the Centre intends to impose a tax on water usage for farming activities. These claims have sparked concerns within the farming community and resulted in huge confusion.The Union Government has officially denied any such plan to impose a tax on water usage for agricultural purposes. The Ministry of Jal Shakti issued a clarification on June 27, 2025, labelling such reports as "inaccurate and misleading".Setting the record straight, the official PIB Fact Check account confirmed that the claim is false. The Ministry of Jal Shakti has also intervened to provide clarity on the matter. Union Jal Shakti Minister C.R. Patil, in a recent press conference, reiterated that no such tax or user fee has been mandated by the central government.According to the Jal Shakti Ministry, the confusion seems to stem from a misinterpretation of the Modernization of Command Area Development and Water Management (M-CADWM) scheme, which is being implemented under the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY).This pilot scheme aims to improve irrigation efficiency, ensure equitable water distribution, and introduce modern technology, like pressurised pipeline networks, IoT devices, and SCADA systems for better water management. More importantly, there is no provision in this project requiring farmers to pay user charges for water usage, the ministry said in the statement released on June 27, 2025.The ministry, in the statement, also emphasised a constitutional point: "agriculture" and "water" are both state subjects. This means any decision about levying water usage fees for farming lies entirely with individual state governments, not the Centre. If Water User Associations (WUAs) or other bodies eventually decide to impose charges, it would be at the discretion of the respective state governments, not due to a central directive.The ministry also urged the public and media to confirm information before disseminating it, since it can cause needless fear among farmers. Misinformation campaigns only hurt the interests of the farming community, the administration stressed, and transparency is a top concern.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
Madhya Pradesh CM to unveil water conservation works of Rs 1,518 crore as Jal Ganga Samvardhan Abhiyan concludes today
Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) [India], June 30 (ANI): Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Mohan Yadav has renewed his appeal for water conservation as Jal Ganga Samvardhan Abhiyan, which has been running for three months across the state, will conclude on Monday. The closing ceremony of the campaign will be held in Khandwa district today and Yadav will inaugurate and lay the foundation stone of water conservation works worth over Rs 1,518 crore in the programme. Before leaving for Khandwa, the Chief Minister said that the campaign was held due to inspiration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has initiated several programmes for water conservation. 'From Gudi Padwa (March 30) to June 30, we ran Jal Ganga Samvardhan Abhiyan across the state for three months with the inspiration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Under the campaign, I am going to Khandwa to lay the foundation stone and inauguration of various works related to water conservation worth over Rs 1518 crore,' he said. 'Khandwa district has done the best work in water conservation across the country and it has been recognised by the Ministry of Jal Shakti,' he added. He said 57,207 water conservation works done under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in Jal Ganga Sanvardhan Abhiyan, worth around Rs 578 crore, will be inaugurated today. 'Additionally, 888 water conservation works done under Watershed Development Component-Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana, at a cost of Rs 63.46 crore, will also be inaugurated. For Khandwa district too, various water structures, including wells, ponds, especially farm pond schemes, Amrit Sarovar schemes, will be dedicated,' the Chief Minister said. 'Awareness about water conservation has also increased across the state. The old Bawadis (stepwells) have improved. We have also given different types of awards under the campaign,' he added. Yadav also emphasised the importance of water in human life. 'No work can be done without water, neither we will be able to worship nor be able to live a day or a moment of life. Let us all come together, save water, and save lives ahead. Madhya Pradesh is home of rivers and it has its own importance. After this, we will lay more emphasis on planting trees under 'Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam' which will maintain the natural beauty of water bodies and play a life-giving role in water conservation. Plantation work will be started,' he said. (ANI)


The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
‘Not a decision that required a political stance': P. Jayarajan backs Kerala govt's DGP pick Ravada amid Koothuparamba firing row
Amid political chatter over the appointment of Ravada A. Chandrasekhar as the Kerala State Police Chief, senior Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] leader P. Jayarajan on Monday (June 30, 2025) said the decision was 'not one that required a political stance, though the government should explain its rationale.' He said the appointment was made based on merit and that it was the government's 'prerogative.' Mr. Chandrasekhar was one of the accused in 1994 Koothuparamba firing case but was acquitted in 2012. Mr. Jayarajan acknowledged Mr. Chandrasekhar's presence during the incident but clarified that he was part of a group of officers who jointly acted on the day of the firing, and 'not the sole person responsible.' 'From a political standpoint, many police officers have taken action at various times that were seen as antagonistic to the CPI(M) and the Left movement,' Mr. Jayarajan told the media in Kannur. He said the then Minister M.V. Raghavan had reached Koothuparamba under the protection of police officers, including DySP Hakim Bathery, and the firing took place after tensions escalated. Mr. Jayarajan also recalled another controversial figure in the running for the DGP post – Nitin Agarwal – against whom the CPI(M) had pursued legal action. He was accused of custodial violence against M. Sukumaran, now the party's area secretary, during a CPI(M)-RSS clash years ago. 'We took strong action against such behaviour in the past,' Mr. Jayarajan said. Govindan defends appointment CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan defended the appointment stating that Mr. Chandrasekhar had joined duty only days before the incident and was fresh out of IPS training. The court had exonerated him based on the findings of the inquiry commission, he noted. 'A person cannot be punished merely for being named in a case,' Mr. Govindan said, adding that the party supports the government's decision. He also downplayed Mr. Jayarajan's remark, saying this should not be seen as criticism but as 'a call for clarity.' The government reportedly considered three names for the top post, ultimately selecting Mr. Chandrasekhar based on professional credentials, he added. Mr. Govindan said efforts to stir a controversy were 'typical of the right-wing media', adding that the matter should not be politicised.


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Are farmers being taxed for water usage? Union government answers
Recent social media posts claimed that the Centre planned to tax water usage for farming. The Union Government has denied these claims. The Ministry of Jal Shakti called the reports inaccurate. PIB Fact Check confirmed the claim is false. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the M-CADWM scheme. The ministry clarified that agriculture and water are state subjects. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads PIB Fact Check confirms claim is false Clarification from the Ministry Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Recently, several social media posts have gone viral, claiming that the Centre intends to impose a tax on water usage for farming activities. These claims have sparked concerns within the farming community and resulted in huge Union Government has officially denied any such plan to impose a tax on water usage for agricultural purposes. The Ministry of Jal Shakti issued a clarification on June 27, 2025, labelling such reports as "inaccurate and misleading".Setting the record straight, the official PIB Fact Check account confirmed that the claim is false. The Ministry of Jal Shakti has also intervened to provide clarity on the matter. Union Jal Shakti Minister C.R. Patil, in a recent press conference, reiterated that no such tax or user fee has been mandated by the central to the Jal Shakti Ministry, the confusion seems to stem from a misinterpretation of the Modernization of Command Area Development and Water Management (M-CADWM) scheme, which is being implemented under the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY).This pilot scheme aims to improve irrigation efficiency, ensure equitable water distribution, and introduce modern technology, like pressurised pipeline networks, IoT devices, and SCADA systems for better water management. More importantly, there is no provision in this project requiring farmers to pay user charges for water usage, the ministry said in the statement released on June 27, ministry, in the statement, also emphasised a constitutional point: "agriculture" and "water" are both state subjects. This means any decision about levying water usage fees for farming lies entirely with individual state governments, not the Centre. If Water User Associations (WUAs) or other bodies eventually decide to impose charges, it would be at the discretion of the respective state governments, not due to a central ministry also urged the public and media to confirm information before disseminating it, since it can cause needless fear among farmers. Misinformation campaigns only hurt the interests of the farming community, the administration stressed, and transparency is a top concern.