US trade 'almost impossible' in case of Trump tariffs — EU – DW – 07/14/2025
EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said on Monday that he believed the US was ready to continue ongoing trade negotiations despite an announcement by President Donald Trump that he would impose 30% trade tariffs on imports from the EU and Mexico from August 1 if no deal was reached.
His remarks come amid divisions within the bloc on how to confront the threat, with notably France calling for a hardball approach, while others call for caution with a mind to Europe's continued reliance on the US for defense.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Sefcovic, who as trade commissioner has been representing the EU's 27 member states during more than four weeks of talks between the two sides, said a deal was still the favored outcome, even while he acknowledged calls from countries like France for the bloc to toughen its stance.
In remarks made on arrival for talks in Brussels with bloc ministers, he said the 30% tariff threatened by Trump would make it "almost impossible to continue" trade with the US, which is currently worth €4.4 billion ($5.15 billion) a day.
Sefcovic said he and his negotiating team had felt a deal was imminent during the trade talks.
"The feeling on our side was that we are very close to an agreement," he said.
But he said the turmoil created by the tariff threat should be ended, adding that the bloc was prepared for "all outcomes."
"The current uncertainty caused by unjustified tariffs cannot persist indefinitely," Sefcovic told reporters, adding that "well-considered, proportionate countermeasures" were still on the table if no deal could be reached.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday delayed — as a sign of good will — a package of retaliatory measures over previous US tariffs on steel and aluminium that was due to kick in on Monday.
But diplomats said another set of reprisal measures that could be launched if the 30% tariffs go ahead will be presented to trade ministers on Monday.
France's trade minister. Laurent Saint-Martin, said there should be "no taboos" in any retaliatory plans, adding that Trump's announcement meant that the bloc had to reconsider its tactis.
"If you hold anything back, you are not strengthening your hand in negotiations," he said at the Brussels talks. "Obviously, the situation since Saturday requires us to change our strategy."
Denmark's foreign minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, whose country currently holds the EU presidency, also called for a firmer approach.
"We want a deal but there's an old saying: 'if you want peace, you have to prepare for war'," he said ahead of the talks.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has said the 2 1/2 weeks remaining till the August 1 deadline had to be used to reach a deal.
"I will be working on this really intensively," he told German public broadcaster ARD in an interview on Sunday.
He said that he, like French President Emmanuel Macron, was in favor of massive countertariffs if Trump's threat became reality, but "not before August 1."
Merz gave an urgent warning about the consequences for the German economy if no deal was reached.
"If that happened, then we could forget about much of our effort with regard to economic policy, because it would overshadow everything and hit Germany's export economy in its core."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
33 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Geoeconomics 2.0: The Real War Is In Chips, Currencies And Control
The world is no longer negotiating peace through treaties or posturing with missiles. Instead, it's wielding tariffs, technology bans, and resource chokeholds as weapons. From Washington to Beijing, New Delhi to Brussels, economic leverage has become the new language of global power. In this new era of geoeconomics, trade routes, tech supply chains, and financial systems are being redrawn—not by markets, but by strategy. And as nations scramble to protect sovereignty and secure advantage, companies and consumers are being pulled into the frontline of an invisible war. What makes this development significant is its departure from the traditional notion of globalization. Trade is no longer just about economic efficiency; it has become an arena of ideological and strategic alignment. As reported by the Financial Times, the current U.S. trade policy under Donald Trump's renewed influence is less about balancing imports and exports, and more about leveraging tariffs as geopolitical tools. Trump has recently announced sweeping new tariffs—30% on imports from the European Union and Mexico, and up to 35% on Canadian goods—framing them not as economic adjustments, but as assertions of national strength. In response, the European Commission is preparing over €70 billion in countermeasures while also seeking to maintain diplomatic engagement. Strategic Supply Chains and the New Resource Wars Parallel to the trade frictions is the reconfiguration of global supply chains, especially in critical sectors like semiconductors, rare earth elements, and artificial intelligence. The U.S. has accelerated its efforts to reshore chip manufacturing, investing heavily in domestic fabrication facilities under the CHIPS and Science Act. These investments are driven less by efficiency and more by the growing sense that technological dependence—particularly on China—presents a national security threat. Meanwhile, China has responded with its own countermeasures, including tighter export controls on rare materials such as gallium and germanium, both crucial to the production of semiconductors and green technologies. According to the Financial Times, these measures are not merely retaliatory but part of a broader strategy to gain leverage in the global technology race. Multinational firms are adapting by shifting operations toward more geopolitically stable manufacturing hubs such as India and Vietnam. As explained by the World Economic Forum, artificial intelligence tools are now central to managing these increasingly complex global supply chains—helping businesses anticipate risk and adjust logistics in real time. The Rise of Economic Blocs The increasing use of economic tools for strategic ends is also driving the formation of geoeconomic blocs. A tighter U.S.–EU alignment is emerging, focused on joint export controls, digital infrastructure and AI regulation, largely in response to China's growing technological influence. At the same time, the BRICS+ alliance—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and new entrants—is working to establish alternative trade systems that reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar. Though still in early stages, this de-dollarization agenda could have significant implications for the global financial architecture. India, in particular, has become a key swing player in this new configuration. According to the Times of India, Goldman Sachs projects that India's economy will reach $10 trillion by 2035, bolstered by its booming digital services sector and expansion of global capability centers (GCCs). With Western firms eager to diversify out of China, India is increasingly becoming a preferred partner in tech, pharma, and manufacturing. Business on the Front Lines Corporations are no longer passive economic actors. Increasingly, they are becoming entangled in the national security concerns of their home governments. Export restrictions on chips and AI models, foreign investment screening, and cybersecurity compliance have made firms like Nvidia, TSMC, and Microsoft strategic assets—not just market players. A recent controversy involving proposed U.S. tariffs on imported copper illustrates the complexity of this environment. As reported by MarketWatch, industry leaders are warning that such measures could jeopardize America's ambitions in both artificial intelligence and clean energy, since copper is a critical input for electric vehicles, servers, and power grids. What once would have been a narrow industrial tariff now threatens to ripple across multiple sectors of national importance. The business environment has thus shifted from a focus on cost optimization to one of strategic positioning. Firms are being forced to consider geopolitical risk, regulatory friction, and even military escalation in their long-term planning. Markets and Consumers Caught in the Crossfire These global realignments are not just boardroom concerns—they're already impacting markets and consumers. Investors are seeing increased volatility in sectors sensitive to trade policy, such as energy, healthcare, and tech. According to Business Insider, UBS has advised clients to hedge exposure and focus on firms with deep government ties or strategic sector alignment. Meanwhile, consumers can expect to see higher costs in electronics, vehicles, and digital services. Cross-border regulations on data storage, content moderation, and cloud infrastructure are also reshaping how global digital services function, fragmenting the once-borderless nature of the internet. Strategy Over Efficiency What we're witnessing is a redefinition of economic globalization, where nations act like corporations and corporations act like states. Trade corridors are being redrawn, not just based on cost, but on security, ideology, and strategic trust. The new age of geoeconomics is not about who makes a product cheapest, but who can guarantee supply, protect intellectual property, and align with allies. In this environment, resilience and foresight are worth more than speed or scale. For companies, that means investing in intelligence—not just artificial, but geopolitical. For nations, it means viewing commerce not as an end, but as a powerful tool in a long-term game of influence.
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Pushes Fed To Slash Interest Rates To 1%, Sparking Inflation Fears
President Donald Trump is calling on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates to 1% , a move he says would ease federal borrowing costs and stimulate growth. However, economists warn such an aggressive cut could destabilize the economy and reignite inflation. "We need a 1% rate. The Fed is killing growth," Trump said during a campaign rally in Michigan on Monday. The current federal funds rate sits at 5.25–5.50%, held steady by the Fed to combat inflation and avoid overheating the economy. A shift to 1% would mark the most dramatic monetary loosening since the COVID-19 crisis. Economists Caution Against Panic Move As reported by Reuters, Trump's proposal was met with skepticism from leading economists. "Slashing rates that aggressively would be seen as a panic move," said Diane Swonk, Chief Economist at KPMG. "It would signal the Fed sees a severe downturn ahead, even if that's not the case." According to Yahoo Finance, business leaders are already warning that Trump's other proposed economic measures—particularly new tariffs—could fuel inflation, even if interest rates are slashed. Economists note that inflationary pressures remain persistent, especially in housing and energy. Lowering rates too quickly could send the wrong signal to markets and drive volatility in the bond market and U.S. dollar. Debt Pressure and Political Calculations The push comes as federal debt servicing costs approach historic levels. As noted by Reuters, a 1% rate could ease short-term interest payments on the national debt—but might spark long-term instability. Across the Atlantic, concerns are growing. According to The Guardian, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič warned that Trump's broader policy package, including proposed tariffs of up to 30%, could "eliminate" transatlantic trade as we know it. Fed Independence in the Spotlight The Federal Reserve, led by Chair Jerome Powell, has repeatedly stated its independence from political influence. The next FOMC policy meeting is scheduled for July 30–31, with most analysts expecting the Fed to hold rates steady. But the pressure is mounting. As reported by Fortune, market participants are increasingly watching for signs of political sway over Fed decisions as the 2024–25 campaign heats up.
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Obama Slams Democrats for Being in 'Fetal Positions' as He Calls for Left to 'Toughen Up' Against Trump
Former President Barack Obama urged Democrats to abandon their "fetal positions" and "get in there and do something" to fight back against the Trump administration. Speaking at a private fundraiser in New Jersey on Friday, Obama addressed frustration following President Donald Trump's re-election, calling on Democrats to "toughen up." "I think it's going to require a little bit less navel-gazing and a little less whining and being in fetal positions," Obama said at the fundraiser, as reported by CNN. "Don't tell me you're a Democrat, but you're kind of disappointed right now, so you're not doing anything. No, now is exactly the time that you get in there and do something." The former president called on Democrats to embrace "pragmatic, commonsense" candidates like New Jersey's Mikie Sherrill and Virginia's Abigail Spanberger and to focus less on ideological divisions. "I don't care how much you love working people. They can't afford a house because all the rules in your state make it prohibitive to build," Obama said. "I don't want to know your ideology, because you can't build anything. It does not matter." Obama's remarks, delivered at an event hosted by New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy and his wife, Tammy Murphy, come as Democrats wrestle with how to respond to Trump's return to power. The fundraiser brought in $2.5 million for the Democratic National Committee, with part of the funds directed toward upcoming governor's races in New Jersey and Virginia. Obama, who has issued occasional warnings about rising authoritarianism under Trump, reiterated the need to defend democratic values and fundamental rights. "What's being asked of us is make some effort to stand up for the things that you think are right," he said. "And be willing to be a little bit uncomfortable in defense of your values." "If we all do that... then I think we will rebuild momentum and we will position ourselves to get this country moving in the direction it should," he added. Originally published on Latin Times Barack obama Donald trump
