How to talk to your boomer parents about retirement
Money is always stressful, but between on-again, off-again, on-again tariffs, inflation, and a general sense of uncertainty, all things finance have been especially anxiety-inducing lately.
Much of the advice given is geared toward people who have time to make up losses in the stock market. But what if you're retired or close to retirement age? That's the matter at hand on this week's episode of Explain It to Me, Vox's call-in podcast where we answer the questions that matter to you most.
Washington Post personal finance columnist Michelle Singletary knows that worry firsthand. She's on the edge baby boomer and Gen X and is looking ahead to when she's no longer working. 'Like many people, I'm stressed to the max,' she says. 'So I am punching a lot of pillows and crying and screaming and doing a little cussing, but trying to not let the fear dictate moves. And that's the key.'
Today, Explained
Understand the world with a daily explainer plus the most compelling stories of the day, compiled by news editor Sean Collins. Email (required)
Sign Up
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
What other advice does she have for people looking to retire soon? And how should those of us who have more time talk with our older loved ones about their retirement plans? Below is an excerpt of our conversation, edited for length and clarity. You can listen to the full episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get podcasts. If you'd like to submit a question, send an email to askvox@vox.com or call 1-800-618-8545.
What should people who are approaching retirement age be doing right now in this economic moment?
You want to do a retirement budget. Figure out what it would take if you retired to live in retirement. And if you have a shortfall, then there are some things that you need to do.
Try to boost your savings. Try to look at your housing situation. Can I cut housing? Can I have a roommate? Do I need to move someplace that is more affordable? So you have to do some forward thinking before you retire to make sure that your finances are as secure as possible.
Related The best financial advice right now is the most counterintuitive
I have to admit something: I was particularly interested in this episode because my parents are boomers. What advice do you have for listeners that are like me?
It's understandable that you're concerned about your parents because if they're not prepared, then that burden may fall on you. I say burden, not in a sense of you don't want to do it, but certainly when you are in your 30s, 40s, and early 50s, you're trying to get ready for your own retirement.
But I think this is a good opportunity to have open conversations. This is a window to say, 'Hey, How are you positioned? Are you worried? Is there anything I should be concerned about? Is there something I can do differently to help you?' And maybe that'll open up a conversation where they say, 'No, we're fine. We're really worried, but we got things in control. Here's what's happening.'
It's a very difficult conversation to have, especially if you've grown up in a household where money wasn't talked about a lot. For a younger adult to try to come to their parents and say, 'Hey, you got any money? What's going on?' — that's a hard conversation. But the roles aren't reversed. You are not their parents. You are now an adult friend who happens to be their child.
How do you recommend that listeners start that conversation with the retirement-age folks in their lives?
Start with yourself and your own feelings. Say, 'I'd love to talk to you about this because I'm a little worried. I'm saving for retirement and this is what's concerning me.' And then you say, 'How about you?' What you don't want to do is say something like, 'Do you have any money? What's going on?' You don't want to come at them in a more adversarial way. You should see each other as companions and accountability partners.
What should people prioritize when they look at their finances right now?
In this moment, cash is king. If you got a tax refund, I would be saving that. If you were already just getting by — maybe you weren't living paycheck to paycheck but there wasn't much left over — I would be stockpiling cash in a high-yield savings account in case you lose your job, in case the economy really does go into a recession, if it gets worse than it is now.
The prudent thing right now is to not get into any kind of debt or use a lot of cash that you might need if you lose your job.
If I was a federal employee, a federal contractor, anybody whose income is derived from the federal government in a significant way, I would be canceling vacations. I would not be doing major home improvement projects. I don't want to make people panic — although it's perfectly fine if you're scared because that's just human nature. But I will say the prudent thing right now is to not get into any kind of debt or use a lot of cash that you might need if you lose your job.
What are the different ways people can help their parents financially without getting behind on their own goals?
Do your own budget, and make sure that you have a cash cushion for yourself. Make sure that you are saving in a way that will hopefully help you have a secure retirement. Get rid of all your debts: If you got credit card debt, student loan, car note — everything except for your mortgage. Then, if all of that is taken care of, if you want to create an account where you put some money in every month to say, 'This is the money that I'm gonna designate to help my parents or maybe another relative.' My husband and I do that. We have a family and friends fund so that if somebody loses their job or has some difficulty, this is where we pull the money to help them out.
What advice do you have for people who are at retirement age but haven't been able to save as much? How do they prepare for this moment?
The first thing I would say is don't beat yourself up. You are where you are. Accept that, but do something about it. If you are getting close to retirement, then you've got to make some hard decisions. Look at your housing situation. You might have to say, 'You know what? Those young adults that were asking me about my money? Maybe I have to move in with them or they move in with me.' And so you look at the big parts of your budget and how you might change that.
Financial advice can admittedly be a little frustrating because we hear the same thing over and over again. 'Sit tight, stay the course, don't make any rash decisions.' What do you say to people who feel antsy right now? Who want a different answer than what they usually hear?
Listen, good advice is good advice, no matter what. Good advice is timeless. And people want a microwave answer to a problem that needs to be baked in the oven. You can't microwave your way away from this situation. You just can't.
There is no secret recipe or secret anything. We know by history. The market eventually returns historically. Could it change in the future? Sure it can. But we have decades and decades of data that show that when we go into an economic downturn, we come out because it's in everybody's interest to make sure that happens. And so while you may be tired of us saying, 'Hold tight,' you might be tired of us saying, 'Don't make rash decisions,' that is the best advice. We know that when you make decisions in haste, when you make decisions based on your emotions, you make bad decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
Crypto is about to get even bigger thanks to millennials
How the Boomer wealth transfer could reshape global finance. Born too late to ride the wave of postwar prosperity, but just early enough to watch the 2008 financial crisis decimate some of their first paychecks. Old enough to remember dial-up. Young enough to buy Bitcoin on their phones. They've lived through tech booms, housing busts, meme stocks, student debt, and five different definitions of 'retirement planning.' Now, as trillions in wealth begin to change hands, this generation stands to serve as a bridge between old capital and new code, traditional finance and the blockchain future. If handled wisely, this moment won't just shape the portfolios of younger investors—it could reshape the architecture of global finance itself. The $46 Trillion Handoff Roughly $124 trillion in wealth is expected to pass from baby boomers to younger generations by 2048, with millennials set to inherit the largest share: approximately $46 trillion over the next two decades. While Gen X is expected to inherit slightly more than millennials in the next 10 years, by the 2040s, millennials will take over as the dominant inheritors—and primary stewards of global capital. This isn't just a generational milestone. It's a once-in-history opportunity to redefine how capital is allocated, what assets are prioritized, and what financial frameworks endure. Millennials aren't inheriting a set playbook—they're writing a new one. Digital Assets Have Grown Up The timing couldn't be more significant. After years of growing pains, the digital asset space is undergoing a profound transformation. Following the collapse of FTX in 2022, the ecosystem began maturing rapidly. By 2024, a major inflection point arrived: The Securities and Exchange Commission approved the first spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), marking a formal bridge between traditional finance and crypto. The ETFs shattered records —underscoring just how much pent-up demand existed among retail investors, registered investment advisers (RIAs), and institutions that had previously been locked out of the asset class. So far, nearly $41 billion has flowed into these products, a staggering figure for any ETF, let alone one tied to an asset recently dismissed as fringe. Additionally, North America's crypto market is now dominated by large transfers over $1 million—about 70% of transaction volume —reflecting deep institutional involvement. And it's not just about ETFs. Major institutions are integrating crypto into their offerings in tangible ways: Mastercard and Visa are experimenting with stablecoin settlements. Lyft is leveraging Hivemapper for road data. AT&T is offloading traffic onto the Helium network. This isn't the Wild West anymore. Regulation is clarifying. Infrastructure is stabilizing. And serious capital is arriving. The Bridge Generation So, which generation is most naturally situated to carry digital assets into the financial mainstream? Not Gen Z (at least, not yet). While 42% of these young investors own cryptocurrency, only 11% have a retirement account, indicating a preference for immediate, high-risk investments over long-term financial planning. Not boomers, either, who have largely opted out—just 8% hold digital assets, while 64% have more traditional retirement accounts. Millennials, however, are fluent in both financial worlds. They're almost equally likely to invest in crypto as they are in retirement accounts —36% own cryptocurrency, and 34% have retirement plans. They understand ETFs and decentralized finance, spreadsheets and stablecoins. They grew up with the internet and came of age during the 2008 crisis. They're old enough to remember the dot-com bust, young enough to see blockchain's promise. In short: Millennials have a tech-native mindset and a healthy respect for risk. That balance matters. Surveys show that millennials are more comfortable investing in crypto than any older cohort. In fact, 62% of millennial ETF investors say they plan to allocate to crypto ETFs, making it the No. 1 asset class for that age group. And they're not just speculating— 12% believe crypto is the best place to invest for long-term goals, compared to just 5% of boomers. This makes millennials uniquely qualified to shepherd digital assets out of their adolescence and into legitimacy. Market-Wide Impact As nearly $85 trillion moves into the hands of Gen X and millennials combined, every asset manager, RIA, and financial institution will be forced to adapt. Catering to these investors won't just mean better digital UX or TikTok explainers. It'll mean rethinking allocations, product offerings, and frameworks that may have, until recently, assumed digital assets are fringe. They are not. Not anymore. The generation that straddled Web2 and Web3 is about to call the shots. They speak the language of blockchain and the cadence of capital markets. That dual fluency will define the next phase of global investing—and determine whether crypto becomes a credible pillar of the financial system or stalls as a misunderstood asset class, never realizing its broader potential. The opportunity isn't in betting on crypto. It's in building the institutions, tools, and strategies for a world where digital assets are simply part of the portfolio.
Fast Company
11 hours ago
- Fast Company
How gig economy thinking is transforming rental investing
Many real estate investors don't set out to build rental businesses. Rather, they stumble into them. Think of the Gen Xer who just inherited their parent's home, the professional who's moving out of state for a new job but is reluctant to sell their current home, or the empty nester who bought a townhome for their college student to live in and is renting extra rooms out to other students. We see many of these 'accidental investors' applying gig economy principles to manage their properties with the precision, efficiency, and professionalism of full-time operators, without traditional overhead. Instead of relying on manual processes, accidental operators are embracing a tech-forward, efficiency-driven approach that mirrors how gig workers treat rideshare, delivery, or freelance work: Generate income with maximum efficiency and minimal friction, while building flexible systems that scale. Embrace the gig economy blueprint The gig economy didn't just disrupt industries—it rewired expectations. Rideshare drivers, delivery couriers, and freelancers embraced flexible, app-enabled platforms that allowed them to monetize time, skills, and assets without needing to build infrastructure themselves. These platforms emphasized speed and user experience, qualities that became the gold standard across industries. Whether someone was delivering food, designing a logo, or driving someone to the airport, the mindset was the same: Use tech to accomplish more with less effort. That same logic is now being applied to real estate investing. A gig economy approach to rental operations Gig economy thinking favors systems over sweat. Instead of building massive operations, part-time rental investors prefer to think like gig workers, plugging into tools that do the heavy lifting. That means ditching time-consuming manual processes for technologies that simplify and streamline virtually all aspects of managing properties. Here's how they do that. Automation as infrastructure: Mirroring the way gig platforms consolidate multiple functions into one easy-to-use app, investors are turning to mobile-first platforms to handle everything. What used to take hours of work to manage property listings, tenant screening, lease signing, rent collection, maintenance coordination, and communication now takes just a few taps on a phone. Automation not only saves time but also ensures consistency. Rent reminders are sent automatically. Late fees are triggered when appropriate. Maintenance workflows keep tenants, vendors, and owners updated in real time. These tools create a seamless operating backbone that allows even part-time investors to run their portfolios like a professional business without needing a large back office, much like a rideshare driver operating solo but supported by enterprise-grade technology. Customer experience mindset: Similar to how gig platforms prioritize customer convenience, tenants benefit from more attention with less effort on the investor's part, thanks to tech that provides 24/7 access to services from convenient digital rent payment options to submitting and tracking maintenance requests any time of the day or night. Additional perks like credit-boosting features that report on-time rent payments help improve tenants' financial standing enhance satisfaction and retention, a dynamic common across gig platforms. Data-driven decision making: Inparallel to how gig workers use ratings, earnings dashboards, and performance data to refine their approach, real estate investors now have access to real-time insights that help them optimize key aspects of their portfolio without relying on spreadsheets or guesswork. Analytics such as rent collection trends, on-time payment rates, maintenance performance, expense breakdowns, and occupancy patterns provide a clear picture of what's working and where improvements can be made. These tools allow investors to fine-tune pricing strategies, manage turnover, forecast cash flow, and control repair costs with greater confidence and precision. In short, real estate investors are managing systems with the same mindset that defines successful gig economy operators. Turn passive income into a streamlined operation Real estate investing has always promised passive income—but in practice, the day-to-day demands of managing properties often told a different story. Now, thanks to automation and centralized platforms, today's investors are much closer to realizing the true potential of passive income. They can reduce the time, effort, and stress traditionally involved in managing rentals. Automated rent collection eliminates the need for paper checks and late-night accounting. Features like automatic reminders, late fees, and autopay help ensure payments come in on time without the investor needing to chase tenants or manually track balances. Maintenance coordination is now a seamless process. Tenants can submit requests through the app at any hour. Vendors can respond directly. Everything from work orders to invoices is logged automatically. This prevents after-hours disruptions and keeps all parties informed in real time. Pre-screening and leasing tools further reduce the time investment. Investors can quickly identify high-quality tenants using built-in scoring systems that evaluate applicants on key risk factors, offering an instant snapshot of whether a candidate is a strong fit, a conditional accept, or potentially high risk. This helps fill vacancies faster and with greater confidence, lowering turnover and vacancy rates. Gig economy thinking is about doing less, better. By setting up efficient systems, today's real estate investors are building flexible, resilient rental businesses that demand far less hands-on time than in the past. Technology not only reduces work—it empowers investors with greater control and visibility, without adding friction to the process. A growing segment with institutional-level ambition Many accidental operators start small, but today's tech makes it easier than ever to scale. With digital platforms and streamlined systems, these investors are closing the gap between independent and institutional players—not in size, but in sophistication. The same tools that help part-time investors operate like seasoned professionals are raising industry standards. In many cases, they now deliver faster service, stronger communication, and greater transparency than traditional operators. Just as Uber and Airbnb empowered individuals to transform entire industries, tech-enabled investors are reshaping the future of real estate, one property at a time.
Business Insider
16 hours ago
- Business Insider
What top people in media and politics are saying about Paramount's settlement with Trump
The worlds of media and politics are buzzing about Paramount's settlement with President Donald Trump. Media giant Paramount said late Tuesday that it had agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit brought by Trump over a "60 Minutes" segment that aired last fall. The lawsuit alleged the CBS News show had selectively edited an interview with Trump rival Kamala Harris. The proposed settlement, which did not include an apology from Paramount, will be allocated to Trump's future presidential library, the company said. Paramount is awaiting government approval of its planned merger with David Ellison's Skydance Media. The company said the settlement was "completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction." Paramount said companies often settle lawsuits to avoid costly, unpredictable legal battles, potential reputational or financial harm, and business disruptions, and move forward without prolonged uncertainty. A spokesperson for Trump's legal team called the settlement "another win for the American people." "CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle," the spokesperson said. (You can find the full statements from Paramount and the Trump team at the end of this story.) Here's what big names in media and politics have been saying in reaction to the Paramount-Trump settlement news: Tina Brown, former editor-in-chief of Vanity Fair and The New Yorker: "It's a shakedown, isn't it — it's on Shari Redstone's neck. She can't close the deal without it. It's a tragedy that something as important and serious and meaningful as CBS News is sort of being traded away for this shakedown. "I'd like to think [former Washington Post publisher] Katharine Graham wouldn't have done it. We don't know anything about Ellison. He might be a terrific supporter of newsgathering, but one has become pessimistic with these issues." Sen. Elizabeth Warren: "With Paramount folding to Donald Trump at the same time the company needs his administration's approval for its billion-dollar merger, this could be bribery in plain sight. Paramount has refused to provide answers to a congressional inquiry, so I'm calling for a full investigation into whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken. "This settlement exposes a glaring need for rules to restrict donations to sitting presidents' libraries. I will soon introduce new legislation to rein in corruption through presidential library donations. The Trump administration's level of sheer corruption is appalling and Paramount should be ashamed of putting its profits over independent journalism." Marty Baron, former Washington Post executive editor: "Assuming the merger gets approved, the bigger issue will be the posture of new owners toward '60 Minutes' and really all of CBS News. I would hope for respect for the network's heritage, as well as a pledge of journalistic independence and proof that they will honor it. The early indicators aren't all that encouraging." Tim Richardson, journalism and disinformation program director at PEN America: "Paramount's decision to settle a meritless lawsuit rather than stand behind its journalists at CBS News is a spineless capitulation. "This was a moment to defend press freedom and support reporters targeted by a frivolous legal attack. Instead, Paramount chose appeasement to bolster its finances, sending a dangerous message that media outlets can be pressured into submission if corporate parents find their profits at risk from government action in unrelated areas. "With two major network owners bowing to the president in quick succession, the danger is clear: emboldened politicians and powerful actors will feel more free than ever to weaponize lawsuits and bring regulatory pressure to bear to silence and censor independent journalism." Raymond James analysts Ric Prentiss and Brent Penter (in a note to clients): "Now with the lawsuit settled, we believe the FCC is poised to approve the PARA/Skydance deal, and we feel the deal can close within a couple of weeks after FCC approval. "Our expectation has been a closing (with no material changes to terms) after 1H25 but still in the summer, and we feel that continues to be the case. We think companies, and especially CFOs, like to close deals on the first day of a month (with the first day of a quarter even more preferred, but missed 7/1 in this case). And we expect PARA to be ready to close this chapter of its story soon." Peter Kafka, Business Insider's chief correspondent: "This is the deal we thought we'd see back in January: A Trump-friendly media mogul agrees to pay him millions of dollars, so she can sell her company to a Trump-backing tech mogul. "On the one hand, you can squint and argue that Paramount is a winner here because it didn't have to give up more — like a public apology for something it didn't do. All it had to do is fork over the now-standard payment for media and tech companies that want to operate in Trump 2.0. "On the other hand: These corporate payoffs to the president of the United States should be shocking. My worry is that we're just a few months into this, and we've already accepted them as normal." Clayton Weimers, executive director of Reporters without Borders USA: "This is a shameful decision by Paramount. Shari Redstone and Paramount's board should have stood by CBS journalists and the integrity of press freedom. Instead, they chose to reward Donald Trump for his petty legal assault against both. A line is being drawn between the owners of American news media who are willing to stand up for press freedom and those who capitulate to the demands of the president. "Today, Paramount's leaders chose to be on the wrong side of that dividing line, but they'd be mistaken to believe appeasing Trump today will stop his attacks in the future. News media owners are much better off standing strong than acquiescing." Jeff Greenfield, former CBS senior political correspondent, on X: "Will this encourage politicians and others to file bogus lawsuits [a]s a way of intimidating news organizations and their corporate boards? Will the correspondents and producers of "60 Minutes" see this as a corporate betrayal of the program in service to a multi billion dollar merger? (Answers to both questions: YES.)" Sen. Bernie Sanders: "The decision by the Redstone family, the major owners of Paramount, to settle a bogus lawsuit with President Trump over a 60 Minutes report he did not like is an extremely dangerous precedent in terms of both the first amendment and government extortion. "Paramount's decision will only embolden Trump to continue attacking, suing and intimidating the media which he has labeled 'the enemy of the people.' It is a dark day for independent journalism and freedom of the press - an essential part of our democracy. It is a victory for a president who is attempting to stifle dissent and undermine American democracy. "It's pretty obvious why Paramount chose to surrender to Trump. The Redstone family is in line to receive $2.4 billion from the sale of Paramount to Skydance, but they can only receive this money if the Trump administration approves this deal. In other words, the Redstone family diminished the freedom of the press today in exchange for a $2.4 billion payday. "Make no mistake about it. Trump is undermining our democracy and rapidly moving us towards authoritarianism and the billionaires who care more about their stock portfolios than our democracy are helping him do it. That is beyond unacceptable." Jonathan Miller, chief executive of Integrated Media, which specializes in digital media investments: "The fact there was no apology was good, and it makes sense in the grand scheme of things in what they have to do. It's pretty hard to escape the idea that it's political. The Ellisons stayed away from any political statement during the whole process — now we'll see what they do. And there's obviously a job open at CBS News they'll have to fill." Rome Hartman, veteran former '60 Minutes' producer, including on the Kamala Harris segment: "This settlement is a cowardly capitulation by the corporate leaders of Paramount, and a fundamental betrayal of '60 Minutes' and CBS News. The story that was the subject of this lawsuit was edited by the book and in accordance with CBS News standards. Our corporate bosses know that; they know that this lawsuit is completely baseless. But they settled it in order to preserve Shari Redstone's payday. That is shameful." John Harwood, veteran White House correspondent: "It's hard to say which is worse: the craven surrender by a media company that did nothing wrong, the betrayal of one of our finest news outlets, or the lawless extortion by the President of the United States. that it all happened in broad daylight is an appalling measure of the damage Trump has inflicted." Full Paramount and Trump team statements: Here's Paramount Global's statement: "Companies often settle litigation to avoid the high and somewhat unpredictable costs of legal defense, the risk of an adverse judgment that could result in significant financial or reputational damage, and the disruption to business operations that prolonged legal battles can cause. Settlement offers a negotiated resolution that allows companies to focus on their core objectives rather than being mired in uncertainty and distraction." And here's Trump's legal team's: "With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit. CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle. President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American People as he continues on his singular mission to Make America Great Again."
