'Need to be honest': Vance questions Biden's health as president after cancer diagnosis
Speaking to reporters on Air Force Two after meeting Pope Leo XIV in Rome, Vance said he wishes the best for Biden, adding that "hopefully he makes the right recovery." Vance then reflected on Biden's four years in the White House.
"Whether the right time to have this conversation is now or at some point in the future, we really do need to be honest about whether the former president was capable of doing the job," Vance said. "You can separate the desire for him to have the right health outcome with the recognition that whether it was doctors or whether there were staffers around the former president ‒ I don't think he was able to do a good job for the American people."
More: Former President Joe Biden diagnosed with 'aggressive form' of prostate cancer
"That's not politics. That's not because I disagreed with him on policy," Vance said. "That's because I don't think that he was in good enough health."
Biden, 82, was diagnosed on May 16 with prostate cancer that had spread to the bone after a nodule was discovered on his prostate following urinary symptoms, a spokesperson said. Biden has a Gleason score of 9 and a grade group 5, which is on the higher end of the scale, meaning the cancer is more likely to grow and spread quickly.
Biden's most recent annual physical as president took place in February 2024. The president's physician, Dr. Kevin O'Connor, did not identify any signs of cancer, describing Biden as a "healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency." The report cited Biden's sleep apnea treatment and stiffened gait from arthritis.
"I blame him less than I blame the people around him," Vance said of Biden. "Why didn't the American people have a better sense of his health picture? Why didn't the American people have more accurate information about what he was actually dealing with?"
More: After Joe Biden medical diagnosis report, here are risks and symptoms of prostate cancer
In February 2023, a skin lesion was removed from Biden's chest, but his doctor said no additional treatment was needed for what is known as basal cell carcinoma, a common form of skin cancer.
Biden, the oldest person ever elected as U.S. president, dropped out of the 2024 presidential election last July after he struggled to piece together coherent thoughts during a disastrous debate with President Donald Trump that exposed an aging president.
More: Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis and when illness strikes just as you finally retire
Multiple books published in the months after Biden's presidency have detailed efforts by the White House to conceal Biden's decline, forcing Democrats to answer whether they believe the octogenarian president should have passed the torcher earlier.
"This is serious stuff. This is a guy who carries around the nuclear football for the world's largest nuclear arsenal," Vance said. "This is not child's play, and we can pray for good health, but also recognize that if you're not in good enough health to do the job, you shouldn't be doing the job."
More: Trump still 'trusts' doctors after shocking Biden cancer diagnosis
Trump, in a May 18 statement, said he and first lady Melania Trump were saddened to hear about Biden's cancer and extended their "warmest and best wishes" to the Biden family.
The next day, Trump questioned why the "public wasn't notified a long time ago" about Biden's cancer, appearing to put his weight behind an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that the Biden White House knew about the former president's cancer but withheld it from the public.
"I think it's very sad, actually," Trump told reporters when asked about Biden's diagnosis. "I'm surprised that the public wasn't notified a long time ago because to get to stage 9 ‒ that's a long time."
Trump misstated Biden's diagnosis. Stage 9 cancer does not exist. Biden's cancer is considered stage 4, the most severe level, which is defined by the cancer spreading to other parts of the body.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on May 19 said Trump still has faith in the quality of health care being provided to him in the wake of his predecessor's cancer diagnosis. "He trusts his physicians," Leavitt said.
This story has been updated to include new information.
Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: VP Vance questions Biden's health as president after cancer diagnosis
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump speaks with GOP holdouts blocking his megabill in early-morning call
President Trump spoke on the phone with a handful of Republican lawmakers blocking his 'big, beautiful bill' in the early hours of Thursday morning, The Hill has learned, as GOP leaders race to coalesce the conference around the sprawling package. The phone call — which took place around 1 a.m. as holdouts huddled in a room off the House floor — came as a key procedural vote for the megabill remained open for almost four hours, with hardline conservatives and one moderate Republican hampering the legislation from moving forward. As of 2 a.m. on Thursday, the vote was 207 to 217, with five Republicans having voted 'no' and eight withholding their support. The combination has threatened to tank the rule, since Democrats are united against it, and a vote on the final package can't proceed without that rule. Trump spoke to some of those holdouts, including Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) and Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who were seen entering the room shortly before the call began. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) were seen leaving the room after the call. Massie and Spartz voted against the rule, while Burchett had been withholding support. During the conversation, Massie — who has been at odds with Trump over the megabill for weeks — suggested he was ready to drop his opposition and support the rule if Trump stops attacking him, The Hill has learned. Trump and those in his orbit have gone after Massie in recent months after the Kentucky Republican voted against the House version of the megabill in May, and said the president's strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities were 'not Constitutional.' A Trump-aligned super PAC, led by the president's 2024 co-campaign manager, has rolled out ads bashing Massie as those in Trump world vow a primary challenger. Trump also tore into Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who voted against the megabill in the upper chamber earlier this week. During an interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity late Wednesday night, Johnson said Trump was willing to speak to Republican holdouts. 'He has been, in fact, he called me most recently about an hour ago and said who else needs to have a discussion, I'm ready to get on the phone. And I said, 'Mr. President, you've done your job and we'll do ours here,'' Johnson told Hannity. The president had also fired off a series of late-night Truth Social posts, urging the GOP holdouts to drop their opposition to a procedural rule needed to advance the core of his domestic agenda, including tax cuts, tougher immigration rules and a boost in energy production. Rather than gaveling the vote closed, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has opted to leave it open as he and his leadership team race to convince the holdouts to support the rule.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Mike Johnson wages war of attrition against GOP rebels
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is fighting a battle of inches as he tries to secure the last few votes he needs to get President Trump's " big, beautiful bill" across the finish line. Why it matters: Johnson is racing against the clock to meet Republicans' self-imposed deadline to pass the marquee tax and spending bill, which they hope will get to the president's desk by July 4. That deadline is at threat of slipping as right-wing hardliners and moderates dig in against the bill over aspects they find unsavory. Republicans on Thursday broke the record for the longest House vote as they held open a procedural vote for an astonishing seven hours and 24 minutes as they tried to cajole GOP holdouts. Johnson continued to huddle with holdouts off the House floor past midnight, and Trump has been working the phones in coordination with Johnson, the speaker said on Fox News. State of play: Shortly after concluding their record-breaking vote, Republicans moved to advance the bill to a final vote on the House floor. But that key vote was being stymied by GOP defectors as of early Thursday morning, with nearly half a dozen Republicans voting with Democrats against advancing the bill — enough to kill it. Another group of around eight Republicans — mostly right-wing hardliners upset at how much the Senate version of the bill increases the deficit — hadn't voted yet as of Thursday morning. A group of key holdouts left the House floor just after 1:00am and headed back to their offices, including Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who told reporters "don't take a nap" yet. Burchett has still not voted on the rule. What they're saying: "There's no cracking of skulls ... this is part of the process. We're tying up loose ends," Johnson told Fox News host Sean Hannity in an appearance late Wednesday night. The speaker said he "might keep [the vote] open a little while" because "among those 'no' votes I've got a couple of folks that are actually off-site right now, had to attend family affairs or events this evening, and so some of them are on the way back." That includes Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), the sole centrist "no" vote on the procedural motion, who rushed out of the House chamber shortly after voting. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) who doesn't typically vote down the rule, switched his vote from yea to nay last minute, and has stayed firm in his opposition. Between the lines: Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) posted on X that she intends to support final passage of the bill, but voted against the procedural measure because of Johnson's "broken commitments." It's not typical for a member of the majority party to vote down the rule, and even more abnormal to vote down the rule but support final passage. Some members, like Spartz, are notorious for saying they're a no but voting yes.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Trump didn't just cut a deal with Vietnam — he was targeting China, too
On Wednesday, Trump announced a trade deal with Hanoi that would levy 20% on imports from Vietnam, down from the 46% rate Trump announced on "Liberation Day." In return, Vietnam has agreed to allow American goods to enter the country duty-free. What's also significant is that Trump announced a 40% tariff on goods shipped from another country via Vietnam to the US — a move that analysts say is aimed squarely at transshipments from China. "The 'China quotient' in US negotiations with other Asian economies is arguably evident in the deal with Vietnam," wrote Vishnu Varathan, Mizuho's macro research head for Asia, excluding Japan, in a Thursday note. "The US's intent is quite obviously to not disincentivize Vietnam's role as a substitute for China at a lower 20% tariff," he added. Vietnam has benefited from global supply-chain shifts away from China since Trump's initial trade war during his first term. In response to those tariffs, many multinational companies, including Chinese firms, moved manufacturing operations to lower-cost hubs like Vietnam to sidestep US duties. Last year, the US ran a $123.5 billion trade deficit with Vietnam, making it America's third-largest trade gap after China and Mexico, according to the US Trade Representative's office. A model for future trade deals? The move follows a temporary truce between Washington and Beijing in May, when both sides agreed to a 90-day pause in their tariff war. The US slashed duties on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China lowered its tariffs on American imports from 125% to 10%. Still, the transshipment tariff on Vietnam underscores the Trump administration's effort to close the backdoor for Chinese exporters seeking loopholes into the US market. "A tariff framework that targets transshipment while preserving the potential benefits of efficient cross-border commerce is a smart move— and a model for future trade deals — if enforced transparently and paired with clear rules of origin," wrote Eli Clemens, a policy analyst at Washington-based Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a nonpartisan research institute, on Wednesday. The move also shows that Washington can stop Chinese supply chains from extending themselves into Southeast Asia. "Future trade negotiations should also include targeted transshipment deterrents that level the playing field for US manufacturers and retailers," Clemens wrote. Asia in a bind Washington's focus on transshipment enforcement puts pressure on other Asian economies, which may find themselves forced to choose sides. "It would be remiss to ignore this critical pillar of US trade deals with the rest of Asia, which is trained on undermining China's economic reach and influence," wrote Varathan. The deal may also reinforce Beijing's view that US trade negotiations lacks "good faith." It could prompt retaliation — not just against the US, but also against Asian economies seen as siding with Washington. "Other Asian economies will be particularly vulnerable to a two-sided geoeconomic squeeze given that their reliance on both China and US are significant," Varathan added. Despite reservations about the deal, it still excited investors. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite soared to record highs on Wednesday, and US stock futures are extending gains early on Thursday. Vietnam's widely followed VN-Index also rose to its highest level since April 2022.
