
Why the Name ‘Operation Sindoor' Must be Examined Closely
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Opinion
Why the Name 'Operation Sindoor' Must be Examined Closely
Sangeeta Barooah Pisharoty
34 minutes ago
India's ruling party narrative had been hurt in Pahalgam, especially as PM had cast the Opposition as mangalsutra-snatchers less than a year ago.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Donate now
Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri addresses a press conference regarding 'Operation Sindoor', in New Delhi. Photo: PTI
New Delhi: Not many Indians would remember that the Indian government's deadly strike at the Karachi airport which broke the back of the Pakistan Navy in the 1971 war, was called Trident — named after the deadly weapon, the Trishul, carried by Lord Shiva.
If you can't recall the name of that decisive Indian operation from the 1971 war against Pakistan which India won decisively, and which altered the course of history for the sub-continent, the answer is that the government of the day had then treated it as a national security operation — not to wield the 'trident' to its domestic constituency for political messaging. Let alone establish prime minister Indira Gandhi as the leader of a muscular government; the 'Durga' who could teach Pakistan a lesson at will.
Fifty-five years later, on the morning of May 7, Indians across the country woke up to another Indian operation in Pakistan, code-named 'Operation Sindoor.' This Indian operation that struck at nine strategic locations within Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK) to hit terrorist dens across the border, is not comparable to 'Operation Trident' — not in terms of its effect, certainly not in terms of its aim. That's because unlike Operation Trident, Operation Sindoor is also expected to deliver dividends in domestic politics to the government of the day, or rather the Prime Minister.
The BJP's impromptu slick video making the PM and not the armed forces the hero of the moment bears ample witness to that.
Indian military operations against Pakistan, thus far, have been named variously; mostly to signify valour and national resolve — Operation Vijay was to take back Kargil during the Prime Ministership of Atal Vihari Vajpayee; Operation Meghdoot to secure the Siachen glacier from Pakistan army in 1984; and Operation Parakram was to flush out terrorists during the 2001 attack on the Indian Parliament. The security operation against the Pakistan-backed terrorists striking Mumbai in 2008 was named Operation Black Tornado. That was the last big civilian attack in India by Pak-backed terrorists before the horrific Pahalgam terror attack took place.
But Operation Sindoor would likely stand apart from all these previous Indian operations against Pakistan or Pak-backed terrorists, primarily because it has been named specifically to send out a political message to the domestic constituency.
Prior to Operation Sindoor, the political benefit of the 2019 Balakot airstrike against a Jaish-e-Mohammad training camp was reaped by the Modi government in the 2019 general elections, but let's not overlook that the name, Balakot, was drawn from a Pakistani town where the air strikes were carried out by India. Such a name also has its uses. That strike had since popularised the term then used by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) — ghar me ghus ke margenge (We will enter your homes to kill you). The May 6-7 operation is also an extension of that political term utilised against Pakistan by the ruling party but Sindoor, in coming times, can be way more potent than Balakot from the Hindutva lens. The protector has finally risen to the occasion to protect the honour of the Hindu women?
As expected, by 10 am on May 7, the Modi government's first political messaging to its domestic constituency through the specificity of the name of the military operation was made visible. Two women officers were strategically picked to address the first press briefing in New Delhi on the post midnight operation with a carefully designed logo also officially displayed.
Media reports at once highlighted that their presence was to signify a revenge taken by the widows of those killed in that horrific attack in Baisaran on April 22 whereby their 'sindoor' (the Hindu vermilion mark signifying their married status) was wiped out.
No sooner did the news about the operation break, BJP social media handles began highlighting the name of the military operation in Pakistan to feed the notion of raw, brawn power of the Modi government. Pro-government news channels have begun taking that political messaging forward. A Times Now headline said: ' Behno ka chheena thaa sindoor, Ab chatai dhool (Those who snatched away our sisters' vermilion have now been taught a lesson).'
Simultaneous to the press briefing, hundreds of phones pinged across the country, carrying messages from various BJP leaders celebrating Modi for carrying out Operation Sindoor. One such WhatsApp message sent out by senior party leader Sunil Deodhar said — ' Ghar me ghus kar mara hai, kabar tumhari khodi hai; Bharat ki gaddi par betha, baap tumhara Modi hai. Operation Sindoor.' (We have entered your homes to kill you; we have dug your graves; your grand daddy Modi is sitting on the chair that rules Bharat).
The messages sent out by the ruling party through media and social media celebrating Operation Sindoor is understandable considering the military operation was also to have some control over the huge pressure that had built up domestically since the terror act; many had rightly questioned whether there was any security lapse leading to so many deaths of innocent people.
It is noteworthy that during the 2024 Lok Sabha election campaign, PM Modi specifically made another marker of HIndu matrimony, the mangalsutra, a political message, by telling crowds first in Rajasthan and then in other towns that the opposition Congress 'was after their women's mangalsutras.' After the Pehalgam attack, some satirists remarked on the irony of the Modi government's security failure having cost 26 women their mangalsutra.
Many from within the right wing ecosystem also wanted Modi to be seen taking punitive action against Pakistan at once. Not having seen it coming, the frustration was growing. Hours before Operation Sindoor, former Jammu and Kashmir governor Satya Pal Malik had told The Wire that Modi 'won't do anything'; he is a 'darpok' (coward). Malik had, in fact, held up the opinion of the domestic constituency that had wanted to see Modi act on his strong words against Pakistan too; and thereby continue to live up to his muscular image.
In the days to come, the Modi government naming a military operation after sindoor, the hallmark of a devoted Hindu wife in a patriarchy, may likely come under academic scanner too, considering it is the first time a gender related nomenclature has been appended to an Indian security operation. But what must be attached to it is also the fact that some brave widows of the Pahalgam terror act did feel abandoned by the same forces who are now celebrating a revenge supposedly taken in the name of their 'Sindoor'.
Those women were heavily trolled and shamed simply because what they had said publicly even after suffering huge personal losses seemed to have not quite matched the dominant narrative that the ruling party had hoped from the Pahalgam episode. No top leader of the party or the Sangh Parivar came forward in the support of those widows who chose to speak up against communalising their personal loss.
Today's rejoicing within the Sangh Parivar ecosystem is another example of the use of a message which has been handed over to them by the Modi government. The purpose is to once again try and dominate the public narrative over the more pertinent questions of the serious internal security lapse and loss of 26 lives that had cast a long shadow over the public conversation.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Pahalgam Shows Why 'Over-Propaganda' Can Send a Leader Riding the Tiger
'Pahalgam Attackers Communicating With Pakistan-Based Handlers, Our Response Proportionate': Govt
'Firm and Decisive Action': Modi Reiterates Pahalgam Stand After Meeting With Angola President
The PM Has Vowed To Make Pakistan Pay. But What About Those Who Foment Communal Hostility at Home?
'We Will be the First to Die': Uri Residents Voice Fears as India-Pakistan Tensions Escalate
Of All the Responses Modi Can Come Up With to Pahalgam, Plunging India Into War is the Worst
'They Called Me a Terrorist': Kashmiri Students in Punjab Face Assault After Pahalgam Attack, Forced to Flee
Live | Pakistan Says it 'Reserves the Right to Respond' to Indian Military Action
Kashmir Youth Picked Up By Army After Pahalgam Found Dead; NC, PDP Allege Foul Play
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sports minister Mandaviya to meet Usha, EC members to resolve IOA impasse
New Delhi: Union sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya will meet the Indian Olympic Association president PT Usha and executive committee members to discuss ways to end the long-standing governance crisis in the apex sports body, it has been learnt. Delhi CM Rekha Gupta, sports minister Mansukh Mandviya and IOA President PT Usha. (PTI) Usha and the EC members have been at loggerheads and that has severely impacted IOA's functioning. The EC has not ratified the appointment of Usha-backed CEO Raghuram Iyer. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) raised the governance issue with the Indian delegation that went to the IOC headquarters in Lausanne recently to discuss India's bid for the 2036 Olympics. Due to the governance issues, IOC has suspended its Olympic Solidarity grants to IOA. In the last few days, Mandaviya has made attempts to bring Usha and EC members to the negotiating table. He has held informal meetings with the EC members. It has been learnt that Usha too has reached out to a few EC members in her bid to break the ice. As reported by HT, the IOA truce started with Usha including treasurer Sahdev Yadav and EC member Bhupender Bajwa in a panel to set a roadmap for the delayed Boxing Federation of India (BFI) elections. Iyer, too, has spoken to some EC members. An official said his appointment is likely to be ratified now with certain renegotiations. 'A middle way is being worked out to break the deadlock,' the member said.


News18
31 minutes ago
- News18
BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament
Last Updated: Despite not receiving government funding, the BCCI, like other national sports bodies, will have to comply with regulations set out by the sports ministry once the bill is enacted Union sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya is set to introduce the highly anticipated National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The legislation, focused on athlete welfare and systemic reform, represents a significant step towards transparency and accountability in Indian sports governance. A key provision of the bill is to bring all national sports bodies, including the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. This long-debated and previously resisted move is expected to finally become law, ending years of delay and political pushback. A previous attempt during the UPA era by then sports minister Ajay Maken failed due to opposition within his own party. Despite not receiving government funding, the BCCI, like other national sports federations, will be required to comply with the regulations set out by the sports ministry once the bill is enacted. This is particularly significant as the Indian cricket team prepares to compete at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, which will place the BCCI within the framework of a national sports federation. 'It wasn't easy to bring the BCCI on board, but extensive dialogue was held between lawmakers and the BCCI top brass to ensure their cooperation," a source involved in the legislative process told CNN-News18. 'The government's intent is clear: to instill accountability and transparency across all sports federations in the country." Once enacted, the bill will mandate all recognised sports bodies to comply with the RTI Act, opening up access to decision-making processes, financial records, and governance structures to the public. The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, aims to overhaul the Indian sports ecosystem through a series of structural reforms, including legal clarity, gender equality, athlete empowerment, and enhanced public oversight. More than just a legal framework, the bill signals the dawn of a new era where athletes are not just competitors but active stakeholders in India's sporting future. India's sports sector has long been plagued by controversies such as mismanagement, opaque elections in sports federations, and poor athlete representation. With over 350 court cases pending across federations, the judiciary has consistently urged the government to legislate a comprehensive governance structure. Efforts to introduce such a bill date back to 2011, but progress was repeatedly blocked by legal challenges, shifting political priorities, and unresolved court interventions. The Delhi High Court's endorsement of the 2011 Sports Code and pending litigations around the 2017 draft further stalled momentum. Officials believe that beyond governance reform, the bill will also contribute to employment generation, better protection for athletes—especially women and minors—and a more ethical, competitive, and globally aligned sporting culture in India. First Published: July 23, 2025, 01:42 IST Latest News Bangladesh Air Force's F-7 BGI that crashed was a Chinese copy of the MiG-21 Breaking News Sports BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament Cricket Harmanpreet's Century, Gaud's 6-Fer Help IND Beat ENG, Clinch ODI Series 2-1 Hollywood Benny Blanco Posts Selena Gomez's Sleeping Pics On Her Birthday: 'Never Waking U Up' news DOJ Seeks Meeting With Epstein's Ex Ghislaine Maxwell, Donald Trump Calls It An "Appropriate" Move latest news


NDTV
33 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Mistake...": Maharashtra Goes To Top Court Against Train Blasts Acquittals
The Maharashtra government has filed an appeal in the Supreme Court challenging yesterday's Bombay High Court's decision to acquit 12 persons who were accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts. The plea was mentioned on Tuesday before a bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai by Solicitor General of India (SGI) Tushar Mehta, who requested that the plea be taken up urgently by the top court. The Court listed the matter for hearing on Thursday. Nineteen years after seven train blasts that killed more than 180 persons, the high court on Monday acquitted all the 12 accused, saying the prosecution utterly failed to prove the case and it was "hard to believe the accused committed the crime". The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), said the high court, failed to prove the offences beyond a reasonable doubt. The high court set aside a September 2015 judgment of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA) court that had imposed the death penalty on 5 of the 12 accused persons and had sentenced the remaining 7 to life. In its damning indictment of the prosecution's case, the high court declared all confessional statements of the accused as inadmissible and suggested "copying". The Maharashtra government argued in its petition that the high court has recorded a "very peculiar observation in disbelieving the confession" of the fifth accused. The government has called it a mistake to not trust the important evidence on the recovery of RDX and detonator. "The High Court has disbelieved the recovery of 500 gms of RDX from Accused No 1on a hyper technical ground that the RDX which was seized was not sealed with a lac seal. It is worth noting that it was not sealed with Lac because RDX is a flammable high court has erred in disbelieving the recovery of RDX," said the government in its petition. Investigators said the bombs, made of RDX and ammonium nitrate, were placed inside pressure cookers and concealed in bags. The attacks were attributed to Pakistan-backed Islamic militants. The High Court, argued the state government, has committed a grave error in not accepting the arguments advanced by the trial court for sentencing the accused. "It has erred in acquitting the accused of all the charges including the UAPA," it said. The Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) filed charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The prosecution relied heavily on confessions, alleged recoveries, and circumstantial evidence - none of which stood up under the high court's scrutiny. "It is necessary to see that the accused were continuously engaged in activities prohibited by law, which are cognizable offences punishable with imprisonment for 3 years or more and in respect of which more than one charge sheet has to be filed in the competent court within the preceding period of 10 years and which have been tried by the competent court cognizance should have been taken," it said. Former Mumbai police commissioner A N Roy today expressed shock over the high court's acquittal of all 12 accused in the case, saying the probe into the case was conducted by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) in a professional manner where evidence was collected "honestly and truthfully". On the evening of July 11, 2006, bomb blasts took place at seven different places in the Mumbai local trains within just 11 minutes. In this incident, 189 people died, while more than 827 passengers were injured. The bombs were placed in first-class compartments of trains from Churchgate. They exploded near the stations of Matunga Road, Mahim Junction, Bandra, Khar, Jogeshwari, Bhayandar, and Borivali. A trial court in 2015 convicted 12 people in the blasts' case.