logo
Little dairy intensification since changes: papers

Little dairy intensification since changes: papers

If dairy effluent discharge permits are used as a proxy for dairy farms in Canterbury authorised prior to January 1 this year, the numbers of new conversions and dairy farm expansions are less than 1%.
In the same week the government released consultation papers on changes to freshwater regulations, statistics show there has been little dairy intensification throughout Glenavy and South Canterbury over the five months since the previous government's regulations ended.
The National Environmental Standards for Freshwater temporary agricultural intensification regulations controlling the conversion of land to dairy farmland expired on January 1 this year.
Since then, the government introduced restrictions on plan changes that would have given effect to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020, meaning consent was no longer needed for a change in land use to dairying.
Responding to questions from the Oamaru Mail, Environment Canterbury (ECan) regulatory implementation general manager Paul Hulse said while the council no longer processed applications for "dairy conversions", since January 1, four consents had been granted to discharge dairy effluent on farms that were not previously operating as dairy farms.
"If dairy effluent discharge permits are used as a proxy for dairy farms in Canterbury authorised prior to January 1, 2025, the numbers of new conversions and dairy farm expansions are less than 1%," he said.
However, the council still recognised a problem in farming contributing to declining water health in the area.
"As a regulator, our role is to manage the region's natural resources sustainably.
"We need to follow the consenting process set by the RMA and the direction of our own plans established through public consultation.
"Our science work gives us a picture of the kinds of plans, regulations and restrictions we need to put in place.
"These in turn tell us the kind of consent conditions, compliance and land management work that is required," Mr Hulse said.
"Our plans and regulations are shaped by long-term trends.
"Currently, our science is telling us that nitrate concentrations are high and getting worse in some parts of Waitaha/Canterbury.
"We know that intensive farming is contributing to this.
"This is vital information for guiding our on-the-ground action now and setting new regulations."
A replacement National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management now under consultation gives new national directions on managing water quality, but a spokesperson for Agriculture Minister Andrew Hoggard confirmed to the Oamaru Mail that the freshwater package did not include anything to replace the expired intensification regulations.
"So consenting requirements for dairy conversions or dairy extensions will continue be managed by regional councils," the spokesperson said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government Moves To Further Weaken Freshwater Protections As New Report Highlights Poor State Of NZ Drinking Water
Government Moves To Further Weaken Freshwater Protections As New Report Highlights Poor State Of NZ Drinking Water

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

Government Moves To Further Weaken Freshwater Protections As New Report Highlights Poor State Of NZ Drinking Water

Greenpeace says it is deeply disturbed by the findings of the latest Taumata Arowai report, which shows that seven registered water supplies exceeded levels of nitrate associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. The organisation says it is also concerning that this news comes while the Government is consulting on proposals that would further weaken freshwater protections in Aotearoa. Greenpeace spokesperson Will Appelbe says, "This Government wants to weaken freshwater protections at the worst time, allowing polluting corporations like Fonterra to profit from the contamination of rural communities' drinking water. This latest data from Taumata Arowai shows that, as we already know, water quality in New Zealand is poor. Now, Luxon's Government wants to make it worse." "Everyone, no matter where they live, deserves to have access to clean, safe drinking water. We should all be able to take a dip in the local lake or river without getting sick. But these basic freedoms that all New Zealanders should be able to enjoy are being taken away for the sake of making a few individuals even more wealthy." During 2024, Taumata Arowai received 4 notifications of samples from registered supplies that exceeded the maximum allowable value of 11.3 mg/L for nitrate. Two were for Waimate District Council's Lower Waihao supply, which supplies Glenavy, and two for Te Kowhai School, a rural school near Hamilton. Seven supplies exceeded 5.56 mg/L - the level of nitrate which international studies have shown is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. "Rural communities are most at risk of contaminated drinking water because of their proximity to intensive dairying - a major source of freshwater pollution in New Zealand," says Appelbe. "Right now, this Government is consulting on a host of Resource Management Act changes that will, in practice, put corporate interests ahead of the health of people and the environment, especially when it comes to freshwater. "These changes will give more prioritisation to corporate uses of water, like intensive dairy. This would enable dairy expansion, which means more effluent, nitrate and pathogens like E. coli polluting New Zealand's rivers and drinking water. "People across the country want change. They want clean, healthy rivers and water that's safe to drink. In Canterbury, one of the hotspots of Aotearoa's freshwater crisis, water protection is set to be a key issue in the upcoming Environment Canterbury elections. Politicians who aim to pollute freshwater should expect resistance."

Little dairy intensification since changes: papers
Little dairy intensification since changes: papers

Otago Daily Times

time08-06-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

Little dairy intensification since changes: papers

If dairy effluent discharge permits are used as a proxy for dairy farms in Canterbury authorised prior to January 1 this year, the numbers of new conversions and dairy farm expansions are less than 1%. In the same week the government released consultation papers on changes to freshwater regulations, statistics show there has been little dairy intensification throughout Glenavy and South Canterbury over the five months since the previous government's regulations ended. The National Environmental Standards for Freshwater temporary agricultural intensification regulations controlling the conversion of land to dairy farmland expired on January 1 this year. Since then, the government introduced restrictions on plan changes that would have given effect to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020, meaning consent was no longer needed for a change in land use to dairying. Responding to questions from the Oamaru Mail, Environment Canterbury (ECan) regulatory implementation general manager Paul Hulse said while the council no longer processed applications for "dairy conversions", since January 1, four consents had been granted to discharge dairy effluent on farms that were not previously operating as dairy farms. "If dairy effluent discharge permits are used as a proxy for dairy farms in Canterbury authorised prior to January 1, 2025, the numbers of new conversions and dairy farm expansions are less than 1%," he said. However, the council still recognised a problem in farming contributing to declining water health in the area. "As a regulator, our role is to manage the region's natural resources sustainably. "We need to follow the consenting process set by the RMA and the direction of our own plans established through public consultation. "Our science work gives us a picture of the kinds of plans, regulations and restrictions we need to put in place. "These in turn tell us the kind of consent conditions, compliance and land management work that is required," Mr Hulse said. "Our plans and regulations are shaped by long-term trends. "Currently, our science is telling us that nitrate concentrations are high and getting worse in some parts of Waitaha/Canterbury. "We know that intensive farming is contributing to this. "This is vital information for guiding our on-the-ground action now and setting new regulations." A replacement National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management now under consultation gives new national directions on managing water quality, but a spokesperson for Agriculture Minister Andrew Hoggard confirmed to the Oamaru Mail that the freshwater package did not include anything to replace the expired intensification regulations. "So consenting requirements for dairy conversions or dairy extensions will continue be managed by regional councils," the spokesperson said.

Lake Hood's toxic algae levels drop - but not enough to re-open
Lake Hood's toxic algae levels drop - but not enough to re-open

RNZ News

time12-05-2025

  • RNZ News

Lake Hood's toxic algae levels drop - but not enough to re-open

Lake Hood remains under a toxic algae bloom health warning Photo: supplied/LDR Toxic algae levels have dropped at Lake Hood in Canterbury, but a health warning remains in place and the lake remains closed. Regional council testing showed the levels of cyanobacteria had dropped significantly, but there were recent signs of scums, which form at the surface of the lake. The popular recreation lake near Ashburton has been closed since 3 April, due to toxic algae. The threshold that triggers a health warning is a total biomass of all cyanobacteria higher than 10mm3/L. Environment Canterbury's test results showed levels dropped from 50mm³/L on 22 April to 40mm³/L on 29 April, before dropping significantly to 2mm³/L on 6 May. ECan water and land science manager Dr Elaine Moriarty said they didn't lift the health warning just when the worst areas dropped below 10mm3/L. "Two consecutive tests need to show cyanobacteria levels are less than 0.5mm3/L," Moriarty said. "Visible signs like scums can still trigger or prolong a warning." Cyanobacteria scums were observed at two locations on the lake during the 29 April testing, she said. The National Public Health Service issues or removes health warnings, with ECan only advising on its latest test results. Ashburton District Council chief executive Hamish Riach said the council was solely responsible for making the decision on when to reopen the lake. Moriarty said the heavy rain event at the start of May was probably not enough to impact the algal blooms. "Our data tells us that cyanobacteria for Lake Hood is highly dynamic and therefore difficult to predict. Water that flows into the lake from Carters Creek or the Ashburton River after heavy rain could push cyanobacteria away from the inflows, resulting in the accumulation of cyanobacteria and generate blooms in confined areas/ margins. "Rainfall and associated run-off can increase turbidity and nutrients, which could potentially increase cyanobacteria biomass and prolong blooms." As the main inflow from the Ashburton River was managed by the district council, it also meant the influence of rainfall was also managed. Moriarty said that, in terms of weather, "a cold snap with a good frost could be the best thing for the lake". Riach said that, as sediment build-up in the lake was one of the factors affecting its water quality, the intake was usually shut off when the river was in flood. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store