logo
Texas Floods: How Climate, Terrain and Inaction Converged

Texas Floods: How Climate, Terrain and Inaction Converged

The Wirea day ago
"There's no such thing as a natural disaster," geographers like to say – a reminder that human choices turn hazards into tragedies.
The Texas flash floods this weekend that left more than a hundred dead, including many children, offer a stark illustration.
Here is a look at the intertwined forces that amplified this storm's impact.
'Flash Flood Alley'
Texas's Hill Country sits in an area known as "Flash Flood Alley," explains Hatim Sharif, a hydrologist at the University of Texas at San Antonio.
Warm Gulf air rushes up the Balcones Escarpment – a line of steep hills and cliffs that arcs southwest down from near Dallas – cools, and dumps torrents onto thin soils that quickly give way to bedrock.
Runoff then funnels through a dense web of creeks.
"Water will rise very, very quickly, within minutes or a few hours," Sharif told AFP.
The early hours of July 4 proved that.
Around 3 am, a gauge near Camp Mystic in Hunt showed the Guadalupe River rising nearly a foot (30 centimetres) every five minutes; by 4.30 am the river had surged more than 20 feet, National Weather Service data show.
That's enough water to sweep away people, vehicles and buildings.
An urgent NWS warning went out shortly after 1 am, but most campers were asleep; phones are banned, coverage is patchy, and darkness makes escape routes hard to judge.
Sharif urges the use of hydrologic forecasts that convert rainfall into likely river levels.
"Rainfall needs to be translated into runoff," he said. "If you have 10 inches, what will happen?"
Summer camps have long been drawn to the region for its natural beauty. But with increasing risks, Sharif warns that treating these sites as safe or permanent is unwise.
'We need to adapt'
A warmer atmosphere holds more moisture, loading the dice for heavier downpours.
A new analysis by ClimaMeter finds that the meteorological conditions preceding the floods, which delivered more than twice the monthly average rainfall in a single day, could not be explained by natural variability alone.
"Climate change is already affecting us, so we need to adapt," said Mireia Ginesta, a climate scientist at the University of Oxford who co-authored the research, which is funded by the European Union and the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS).
"We also need to cut our emissions, and make sure that proper funding is provided to the forecast services and research in general on climate change."
The call comes as the National Weather Service, like other agencies, has experienced deep staffing cuts under President Donald Trump's administration.
Experts stress, however, that NWS forecasters performed admirably under the circumstances.
The real failure, wrote climate scientist Daniel Swain on Bluesky, "was not a bad weather prediction, it was one of 'last mile' forecast/warning dissemination."
No warning system
For years, commissioners in Kerr County, where the camps lie, considered flood sirens and digital alerts to replace the informal practice of summer camp staff getting on the radio and warning fellow camps.
Minutes from a 2016 meeting show officials labelling even a feasibility study "a little extravagant," suggesting sirens would mainly help tourists, and vouching for the word-of-mouth system.
"The thought of our beautiful Kerr County having these damn sirens going off in the middle of night, I'm going to have to start drinking again to put up with y'all," Commissioner H.A. Buster Baldwin said in a transcript.
The debate rolled on. Residents during meetings in 2021 expressed strident opposition toward relying on federal funds tied to the Biden administration.
After the disaster, San Antonio mother Nicole Wilson – who almost sent her daughters to Camp Mystic – launched a petition on Change.org urging Governor Greg Abbott to approve a modern warning network.
"Five minutes of that siren going off could have saved every single one of those children," she told AFP.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cloud seeding in New Mexico? Theory spreads amid flash floods in Lincoln, Ruidoso, and Hollywood
Cloud seeding in New Mexico? Theory spreads amid flash floods in Lincoln, Ruidoso, and Hollywood

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Cloud seeding in New Mexico? Theory spreads amid flash floods in Lincoln, Ruidoso, and Hollywood

Several homes were swept away and multiple people reportedly trapped as flash floods hit parts of New Mexico on Tuesday afternoon. The affected areas include Lincoln County, Ruidoso, and Hollywood, where a flash flood emergency remains in effect. New Mexico witnessed flash floods, days after Texas saw catastrophic flooding. (AP) Videos circulating on social media show the Rio Ruidoso River rising rapidly. According to a NOAA river graph, the Rio Ruidoso rose 20 feet in just 30 minutes around 4 p.m. Tuesday. The river is located roughly 150 miles southeast of Albuquerque. The National Weather Service wrote in an alert, 'Homes starting to be moved by water.' This marks the third major flash flood event in the US in less than a week. Over the Fourth of July weekend, central Texas saw catastrophic flooding that claimed over 100 lives. Then, on Monday, flash floods struck parts of North Carolina. Following these back-to-back disasters, some social media users have begun speculating about cloud seeding as a possible cause. The unproven theory suggests that artificial weather modification may be triggering extreme rainfall. One person wrote on X, 'Domestic terrorism with cloud seeding? Just an idea. Texas. North Carolina. New within a week.' Another added, 'New Mexico is one of the states doing cloud seeding. This isn't a coincidence. It's all being done on purposes.' A third person wrote, 'Just like Texas, New Mexico has cloud seeding and weather modification as well. Oh wait… y'all think this is just one of those coincidence things and I'm a conspiracy theorist… got it!' Another user wrote, 'Wow, this is North Carolina and now New Mexico all in a week's time? Something is not right! If this has anything to do with cloud seeding, then there needs to be an immediate halt on the weather modification!" New Mexico's 2024 Pilot Project In February 2024, the New Mexico House of Representatives passed a bill establishing a pilot cloud seeding project in southeast New Mexico. Cloud seeding is a method of weather modification intended to enhance precipitation by introducing substances such as silver iodide into clouds. However, there is no evidence linking the ongoing pilot project to the flash flooding that struck New Mexico on Tuesday.

Texas inspectors approved Camp Mystic's disaster plan 2 days before deadly flood, records show
Texas inspectors approved Camp Mystic's disaster plan 2 days before deadly flood, records show

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Texas inspectors approved Camp Mystic's disaster plan 2 days before deadly flood, records show

HUNT: Texas inspectors signed off on Camp Mystic's emergency planning just two days before catastrophic flooding killed more than two dozen people at the all-girls Christian summer camp, most of them children. The Department of State Health Services released records Tuesday showing the camp complied with a host of state regulations regarding "procedures to be implemented in case of a disaster." Among them: instructing campers what to do if they need to evacuate and assigning specific duties to each staff member and counselor. Five years of inspection reports released to The Associated Press do not offer any details of those plans at Mystic, raising new questions about the camp's preparedness ahead of the torrential July 4 rainfall in flood-prone Texas Hill Country. The National Weather Service had issued a flood watch for the area on July 3 at 1:18 p.m. That danger prompted at least one of the roughly 18 camps along the Guadalupe River to move dozens of campers to higher ground. The uncertainty about what happened at Mystic comes as local officials have repeatedly dodged questions about who was monitoring the weather and what measures were taken ahead of the flooding.

Texas inspectors cleared Camp Mystic's disaster plan 2 days before flood
Texas inspectors cleared Camp Mystic's disaster plan 2 days before flood

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Texas inspectors cleared Camp Mystic's disaster plan 2 days before flood

Texas inspectors signed off on Camp Mystic's emergency planning just two days before catastrophic flooding killed more than two dozen people at the all-girls Christian summer camp, most of them children. The Department of State Health Services released records Tuesday showing the camp complied with a host of state regulations regarding procedures to be implemented in case of a disaster. Among them: instructing campers what to do if they need to evacuate and assigning specific duties to each staff member and counsellor. Five years of inspection reports released to The Associated Press do not offer any details of those plans at Mystic, raising new questions about the camp's preparedness ahead of the torrential July 4 rainfall in flood-prone Texas Hill Country. The National Weather Service had issued a flood watch for the area on July 3 at 1.18 pm. That danger prompted at least one of the roughly 18 camps along the Guadalupe River to move dozens of campers to higher ground. Camp Mystic, established in 1926, did not do that and was especially hard hit when the river rose from 14 feet (4.2 meters) to 29.5 feet (9 meters) within 60 minutes in the early morning hours of the disaster. Flooding on that stretch of the Guadalupe starts at about 10 feet (3 meters). A wall of water overwhelmed people in cabins, tents and trailers along the river's edge. Some survivors were found clinging to trees. The uncertainty about what happened at Mystic comes as local officials have repeatedly dodged questions about who was monitoring the weather and what measures were taken ahead of the flooding. At least 27 campers and counsellors died during the floods, and officials said Tuesday that five campers and one counsellor have still not been found. Among the dead was Richard Dick Eastland, the camp's beloved director described by campers as a father figure. The potential for heavy rains had put precautions in motion as the state activated an emergency response plan and moved resources into the central Texas area. The state inspected Camp Mystic on July 2, the same day the Texas Division of Emergency Management activated emergency response resources ahead of the anticipated flooding. The inspection found no deficiencies or violations at the camp in a long list of health and safety criteria. The camp had 557 campers and more than 100 staffers at the time between its Guadalupe and Cypress Lake locations. The disaster plans are required to be posted in all camp buildings but aren't filed with the state, said Lara Anton, a spokesperson for the Texas Department of State Health Services. We do not have them, Anton wrote in an email. You'd have to get it from the camp. Camp Mystic did not respond to requests for comment on its emergency plan. In a statement on its website, the camp said it has been in communication with local and state authorities who are tirelessly deploying extensive resources to search for our missing girls. Camp Mystic notes that it is licensed by the state and a member of the Camping Association for Mutual Progress, which says its goal is to raise health and safety standards for summer camps. Leaders of that association didn't return messages. The American Camp Association said Tuesday that Camp Mystic is not accredited with that organization, whose standards focus on safety and risk management. Spokesperson Lauren McMillin declined to say whether the camp previously had been accredited with the association, which describes itself as the only nationwide accrediting organization for all year-round and summer camps. One rain gauge located about 1,500 feet (460 meters) from Camp Mystic recorded 9.5 inches (24 centimeters) of precipitation July 4, according to Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority data. Another of the agency's gauges further south and to the west recorded 12.2 inches (31 centimeters) of precipitation. The authority told the AP that a review of its equipment found both were functioning during the flood event. However, at least four United States Geological Survey gauges along the Guadalupe River experienced some level of failure July 4. The gauges, located near Hunt and Kerrville, stopped collecting both river levels and the flow rate of water in the early morning hours of July 4. One gauge, about 1 mile (1.6 kilometers) east of Hunt and 5 miles (8 kilometers) northeast of Camp Mystic, recorded a level of 29.5 feet (9 meters) at 4:35 a.m. on July 4, according to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data. It was the last recorded river level from the instrumentation until a USGS hydrologist installed a temporary gauge. At the time, the hydrologist measured the high water mark at 37.52 feet (11.44 meters), a preliminary estimate that could change. At that location, a river level of 32 feet (9.75 meters) could lead to disastrous life-threatening flooding, which could cover the roads of the lowest camps and resorts, according to NOAA.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store