AIADMK's Palaniswami Sparks Controversy With Temple Land Ownership Promise For Delta Residents
Palaniswami defended his proposal by highlighting the long-term residence of numerous families on temple-owned land, arguing that his previous administration had initiated steps toward regularizing their occupancy. During his tenure as Chief Minister, he had announced a comprehensive scheme whereby the government would conduct land assessments, compensate temples appropriately, and subsequently issue ownership documents to current residents.
The former Chief Minister acknowledged that legal challenges had previously derailed the initiative, with court interventions resulting in stay orders that prevented implementation. He expressed confidence that a future AIADMK government would successfully navigate these legal obstacles and complete the ownership transfer process for affected families.
However, the proposal has faced immediate pushback from political analysts who question both its legality and appropriateness. Sumanth Raman, a prominent political commentator, strongly condemned the plan through social media, emphasizing that temple lands remain outside government ownership and cannot be arbitrarily redistributed. He characterized Palaniswami's promise as fundamentally flawed and politically irresponsible.
The controversy extends beyond land ownership issues to broader questions about temple administration and fund utilization. During his ongoing statewide campaign, Palaniswami has consistently attacked the ruling DMK government's approach to temple management, accusing them of misappropriating religious institution funds for secular purposes.
Palaniswami has specifically criticized the DMK's practice of using temple revenues to establish educational institutions, arguing that such expenditures represent improper diversion of religious funds. He contends that the state government should finance educational infrastructure through its own budget rather than utilizing temple resources designated for religious purposes.
The DMK leadership has responded forcefully to these accusations, citing existing legal frameworks that explicitly permit such fund utilization. The HR&CE Act provides clear authorization for temple institutions to allocate surplus funds toward educational and charitable activities, making Palaniswami's criticism legally questionable.
Chief Minister MK Stalin has characterized Palaniswami's position as reflecting BJP ideological influence rather than traditional AIADMK policies. This accusation suggests that the opposition leader has shifted toward more religiously conservative positions that align with national BJP narratives about temple autonomy and Hindu religious rights.
Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin escalated the political rhetoric by labeling Palaniswami a "Sanghi," implying ideological alignment with RSS-BJP thinking rather than authentic AIADMK principles. This characterization represents an attempt to portray the opposition leader as abandoning his party's historical positions in favor of external ideological influences.
The temple land ownership promise reflects broader political calculations about rural constituency appeals and religious sentiment mobilization. Palaniswami's strategy appears designed to attract support from families currently residing on temple properties while simultaneously positioning his party as protective of religious institutions against alleged DMK mismanagement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
BC Quota Ordinance: BJP hits out at Cong, flags legal loopholes and ‘political gimmickry'
1 2 3 Hyderabad: The Congress govt's push for 42% reservation for Backward Classes is drawing sharp criticism from the BJP, which is accusing the ruling party of bypassing due legislative process and indulging in political theatrics. While the Congress aims to elevate the BC quota issue into a nationwide campaign, BJP leaders are cautioning that the move could trigger significant legal challenges, particularly as the proposal threatens to breach the Supreme Court-mandated 50% cap on reservations. BJP state chief N Ramchander Rao has alleged that the Congress govt is intentionally avoiding a direct amendment to the Panchayat Raj Act in the current assembly session. Instead, it has chosen to route the proposal through an ordinance sent to the governor, a move Rao claims is a calculated attempt to dodge legislative scrutiny. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Anticipating that the Congress may try to blame the Centre for any obstacles in the implementation of reservations, the BJP has sharpened its position. "We are not opposed to the 42% BC reservation," Rao clarified, "but we strongly object to the inclusion of 10% political representation for Muslims under the BC quota. Any increased reservation must benefit only the BC communities." Within party circles, leaders have been asked to question the Congress's sincerity, especially as the ruling party continues to make lofty promises without addressing the legal complexities involved. "If they try to pin this on us, we will respond firmly. We supported the bill in the assembly, despite our reservations on Muslim inclusion," BJP leaders reiterated. As the reservation debate heats up, the BJP appears poised to frame the Congress's move as symbolic and legally untenable, while reaffirming its support for genuine, constitutionally valid BC representation, sources said. The BJP is now closely tracking the Congress govt's next steps and the governor's decision on the ordinance. Party sources have raised concerns over the lack of clarity in the ordinance, pointing out that it fails to mention specific reservation percentages. "If they were truly committed to this issue, they would have amended the Panchayat Raj Act directly through the assembly instead of taking a vague, roundabout route," a senior BJP source said.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Hatred for Modi is being projected onto Hindi': Pawan Kalyan on language controversy
Andhra Pradesh deputy chief minister and actor Pawan Kalyan on Wednesday addressed the ongoing language controversy and the debate around the 'imposition of Hindi.' Responding to allegations that the Centre is forcing Hindi across states, Kalyan said the current discourse reflects how resentment against the BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is being redirected toward the Hindi language. Stating that English has become his language of thought, the Janasena founder expressed sadness that he could not find the same in Hindi or Kannada or Marathi.(@APDeputyCMO) Speaking to India Today, Kalyan stressed that no language should be forced on anyone, underlining his commitment to unity. 'No language should be imposed on anybody. I stand for national integrity,' he said. He criticised the anti-Hindi stance taken by some political leaders in Telangana, calling it politically motivated. 'It's surprising. I think this is more about the hatred towards BJP or Modiji, and that hatred is being transferred onto Hindi. That's how I see it,' he stated. His comments come amid ongoing tensions in states like Maharashtra and Karnataka, where heated debates have erupted over the use of Hindi and its role as a medium of instruction in schools and colleges. Kalyan, explaining his own experience with the language, noted its practical importance. 'We are surrounded by Hindi-speaking states. Hindi is a necessity for me,' he said. He also criticised how political entities manipulate the issue for their own advantage. 'Sometimes parties or people spark negativity,' he said, suggesting that the language issue is often politicised rather than driven by genuine cultural concerns. Reflecting on his own schooling, he recalled how Hindi was once just a regular part of the curriculum. 'When I was in school, Hindi was just a second language for all of us. I am able to read and write it today because I learned it then,' he noted. Pointing to the diverse linguistic identity of Telugu-speaking regions, he added, 'I don't know why suddenly it became such a big issue, even in Andhra Pradesh which shares borders with Chhattisgarh, Odisha and Karnataka. Telangana itself has a mixed culture — Urdu and Telugu coexist. Instead of saying 'hospital,' people say 'dawakhana'. What's wrong with that?' 'Like English, Hindi has become a practical necessity' Pawan Kalyan argued that Hindi, much like English, has become a practical necessity in today's world. 'No one taught me English by force. It became a necessity. Today we're speaking in English not because we love it, but because it has become essential. Similarly, Hindi is also necessary today,' he explained. Responding to criticism of inconsistency in his stance, Kalyan drew from his personal and professional background, citing his multilingual experience. 'I grew up in Chennai. I love Tamil. I learned it out of interest and necessity — not because anyone forced me. I do the same when I visit Karnataka or Maharashtra. I try to speak Kannada or Marathi. That is the approach we need. A multilingual perspective is important for national linguistic integration,' he said. When asked if he would maintain the same stand in Tamil Nadu, where opposition to Hindi is more pronounced, Kalyan said he already had. 'I have said this before and I will say it again. I love Hindi and respect it — it was my second language in school. Language should be for better communication and integration, not for division,' he said. Referring to Tamil poet Subramania Bharati, he highlighted the poet's example of embracing cultural and linguistic unity: 'Bharati grew up in Kashi. His attire resembled a Sikh turban. He embraced integration in thought, language and attire. There are great people in Tamil Nadu who welcome Hindi.' Kalyan cautioned that forcing any language would only backfire. 'Even a child resists when the mother forces something. You have to create awareness about why learning Hindi is important, not impose it. If you speak to people rationally and logically, you'll get results,' he noted. Earlier, speaking to PTI, Kalyan said, 'Majority of the people think they want to be multilinguistic (multilingual). Let us give them a fair chance and a fair opportunity,' in an interview with PTI Videos. He also shared his personal reflection on language and thought, expressing concern that Hindi and other Indian languages had not become his primary languages for thinking. 'My mother tongue is not Hindi. My mother tongue is not English. Sometimes I feel sad that my thinking language has become English or Telugu. Telugu is a natural way to think, but I could adopt English as a thinking language,' he said. Backing the need for multilingualism in a globalised society, Kalyan added, 'There is nothing wrong in a world where we are interacting with multiculturalism as multilingual skills are needed.' He also urged political leaders to consider the needs of future generations when it comes to language. 'Oncoming generations' must be taken into account, he said, suggesting space should be made for multilingual approaches.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mosque meeting row: Unlike BJP, SP stands with all, says Akhilesh
1 2 Lucknow: Hitting out at the BJP for trying to whip up a controversy over his meeting inside a mosque near the Parliament House, SP chief Akhilesh Yadav on Wednesday said he and his party stand with every faith that unites. "Since BJP is against uniting people, it will oppose our move," he said. The BJP had attacked the SP accusing party chief Akhilesh Yadav of holding "a political meeting" inside a mosque near Parliament complex and took on Mainpuri MP Dimple Yadav for her attire after photographs of their visit to the mosque surfaced on Wednesday. The SP functionaries had visited the mosque on the invite of party's Rampur MP Mohibbullah Nadvi who had earlier served as Imam of the mosque before he contested the 2024 Lok Sabha election. They claimed that no political meeting was held inside the mosque. "Faith unites people. We are with the faith that unites everyone. SP respects all religions. The problem with the BJP is that they cannot stand anything that talks of uniting people. They want people to remain divided. BJP is a congregation of people full of negativity. BJP indulges in discrimination and politics of hate," Akhilesh said. He said BJP's reaction on the issue only cemented the SP's charge that the party was against the PDA. "BJP govt has reversed all that the SP govt did for the weaver community and Pasmanda Muslims. If the BJP govt has any concern for the Pasmanda Muslims, they should immediately restore free electricity to weavers which was provided to them under the SP govt," he said. SP functionaries described the row as an attempt by the BJP to shift people's focus from the opposition's uproar against anomalies in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. "The way the govt officials in Bihar have been making a mockery of the revision of electoral rolls on social media, has left the BJP nervous. Now they want to divert everyone's attention," said an SP functionary in Lucknow. Rebutting allegations of BJP that SP MPs held a political meeting at the mosque, Prof Sudhir Panwar posted photographs in which top BJP brass, including the PM visited mosques in India. "Every time the BJP realises that people have started asking questions about poor governance, it resorts to politics of hate. When people started asking about Rs 15 lakh in bank accounts and 2 crore jobs annually, the BJP raised the 'Mandir Masjid issue'. Now people are asking about SIR, BJP is talking about faith. People will not fall in BJP's trap anymore," he said.
