Friends of Irish Environment bring High Court challenge against Shannon LNG permission
High Court
action seeking to quash
An Bord Pleanála
's (ABP) decision to grant planning permission for a liquefied natural gas (
LNG
) terminal in north
Co Kerry
.
The planning authority in March granted permission to Shannon LNG for the proposed development of a 600-megawatt power plant on a 255-hectare (630-acre) site between Tarbert and Ballylongford on the Shannon estuary.
On Monday, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys gave permission to John Kenny, appearing for Friends of the Irish Environment (FIE) and instructed by FP Logue solicitors, to bring judicial review proceedings against ABP, Ireland, the Attorney General and the Minister for Housing. Shannon LNG is a notice party in the action.
Last September, following proceedings brought by Shannon LNG, Mr Justice Humphreys overturned the board's refusal of planning permission for the proposed power station. In its reviewed decision, the board said it was satisfied that the plant was consistent with national climate ambitions.
READ MORE
[
Why are environment activists so divided on the issue of liquefied natural gas?
Opens in new window
]
In its court documents, FIE claims ABP breached Irish and European law in granting permission for the proposed development.
FIE claims ABP failed to adequately consider statutory carbon budgets and sectoral emissions ceilings set out in the Government's Climate Action Plan 2024 in its decision, and its related obligations under the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015.
FIE says the board did not engage on how the proposed development was consistent with carbon budgets and sectoral emissions ceilings, other than to justify the granted permission because of Government policy support for constructing gas-fired power stations deemed necessary for achieving the target of a 50 per cent reduction in carbon emissions by 2030.
FIE says the calculated greenhouse gas emissions arising from the proposed development is 'manifestly incorrect and significantly underestimated' in an environmental impact assessment report submitted to the board by the developer.
Based on these 'underestimated' calculations, the proposed development will account for one third of all budgeted emissions – based on limits set out in 2024 Climate Action Plan – from the entire electricity sector in 2030, FIE claims.
FIE also says the board was wrong to find the proposed development constitutes a sustainable development, and its decision to grant permission is invalid as it constitutes a material contravention of the Kerry County Development Plan 2022-2028 and Listowel Municipal District Local Area Plan 2020-2026.
FIE says ABP breached obligations under the European Union's environmental impact assessment directive.
The environmental group claims the board could not and did not make a valid decision on the impact of proposed development under the EU's Habitats Directive.
The case returns to court in two weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
26 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Mother and baby home survivor upset by absence of 1,090 infants from key report
A survivor of the Sean Ross Abbey mother and baby home at Roscrea, Co Tipperary, has expressed shock that a recently published report made 'no mention' of 1,090 babies who died there, with 'no call for excavations, no investigation into where these babies are buried'. Ann Connolly said the religious order that ran the home 'handed over 269 death certificates, but we know that at least 1,090 babies died. What happened to the rest?' Her open letter to 'every TD, senator and media outlet in Ireland' referred to the first report from special advocate for survivors of institutional abuse, Patricia Carey, published on June 24th. Ms Carey was appointed in March 2024 as part of the Government's response to the final report of the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation, published in January 2021. READ MORE Ms Connolly, recalling how she and survivor advocate Michael Donovan had met Ms Carey at Sean Ross Abbey, said they had asked her to raise 'the need to excavate anomalies found on the grounds' there with Norma Foley , who was then minister for education, and the Government. They had spoken to her about 'the existence of an underground tank in the Angel's Plot, and the urgent need to lift its cover and examine it for possible human remains. Council maps that don't match what's on the ground and must be rectified', she said. 'Yet none of this is mentioned in Patricia Carey's report. That silence speaks volumes,' Ms Connolly said. 'How is something so heartbreaking and urgent left out of her official report? 'There are women now in their 70s and 80s who are coming to the end of their lives. They still don't know where their babies are. This should have been the number one priority in any report written on behalf of survivors.' [ Exclusion of some survivors from mother and baby redress scheme 'causing anger, distress and retraumatisation' ] She also described as 'tokenism' a recommendation in the report that four survivors be appointed to a steering group for the proposed National Centre for Research and Remembrance. 'If this centre is going to mean anything, it should be shaped, staffed and run by survivors,' she said. On redress, Ms Connolly said the public had been led to believe 'that survivors received large sums of compensation' whereas 'if you were in a mother and baby home for 180 days you qualify for just €5,000' while 'one missing day means you're excluded from redress'. Emphasising that the issue was not about money, she said 'this is about being recognised. About being treated with dignity. About not being dismissed and disqualified yet again'. The State and religious orders 'tore us from our mothers and stripped us of our identities, now they are denying us even the basic recognition of our suffering', Ms Connolly said. In response, Ms Carey said she was in full support of survivors who were calling for dignified burial and memorialisation. 'I agree with the concerns raised in respect of the immediate and urgent need for dignified burial and the sensitive treatment of mass graves, unmarked graves and sites of burial across institutions in Ireland. I am in full support of survivors who have been calling for this to be addressed by the State for decades,' she said. In her report Ms Carey recommended the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme should be extended 'to those currently excluded from redress'. The present 'restrictive eligibility requirements' enforced a 'hierarchy of suffering' according to 'arbitrary criteria' that perpetuated 'the harm caused by the State and the church', it said It called for survivors to have full, unredacted access to all their records and for legislation to compel religious orders and church authorities to hand over all records related to institutions and forced family separation The report also called for an independent investigation into vaccine trials 'conducted without consent' on thousands of children. There should also be greater ease of access to Irish passports for those trafficked abroad for adoption, with more supports and resources made available for survivors living overseas, particularly in the UK and US , it said.
Irish Times
41 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Eir seeks £67m in damages from rival BT relating to dispute over NI public sector contract
Irish telecoms giant Eir was kept 'unlawfully in the dark' by its rival BT when tendering for the biggest public sector contract in Northern Ireland, the High Court in London has heard. On the opening day of the hearing, in which Dublin-based Eir is seeking damages from BT of £67 million (€78 million), the background to the long-running dispute was outlined, with Eir's barrister arguing that BT had a 'wealth' of secret information that led to it winning the £400 million contract in 2018. 'Eir went from being one of Northern Ireland's largest public sector players to being marginalised completely from the market ... and BT effectively stepping into their shoes in what was a role reversal,' Eir's barrister, Robert O'Donoghue, KC, said on Thursday. The tender process for the lucrative nine-year Northern Ireland Public Sector Shared Network (NIPSSN) contract ran between April 2016 and March 2018. READ MORE Schools, Stormont departments, health trusts and councils were among 150 organisations who would avail of the service. In 2020, Ofcom, the UK telecoms regulator, fined BT £6.3 million for unlawful anticompetitive practices during the procurement process. During his opening submission, Mr O'Donoghue referenced the Ofcom ruling and 'turbocharged' legal obligations it had previously placed on BT to ensure a level playing field for its competitors. 'Interestingly and prophetically BT objected to this additional obligation at the time,' he told the court. Eir, which is controlled by the French billionaire Xavier Niel, claims that Openreach (the network arm of BT) discriminated against it by failing to provide it with key information on costs and BT's fibre-to-the-premises on-demand product (FOD). BT and Eir were the only two bidders for the contract. For BT to portray its bid team as 'mavericks' in using FOD was 'self-serving nonsense', claimed Mr O'Donoghue, as the product 'is just another type of fibre that has been around many years'. 'The issue was that BT made it difficult to get a handle on costs ... Eir were kept unlawfully in the dark while BT had access to secret information on costs ... and the notion that the BT bid team had uniquely stumbled across some Holy Grail or secret source of FOD is obviously untrue.' The case is listed to run for four weeks. Some 14 witnesses, a 'considerable quantity' of expert material and complex technical background will be detailed, the court heard. 'It must be like staring at the foothills of the Matterhorn at the start of a climb,' Mr O'Donoghue told Judge Adam Johnson. 'But we submit that the points of this case are not actually that complicated, and to a material extent, not actually in dispute. 'The long and the short of it is, that everything matters, is admitted by BT. The starting point is that BT admitted the infringements to Ofcom.' The case continues.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Leslie Buckley questions way that corporate enforcer investigated INM saga
Former Independent News & Media (INM) chairman Leslie Buckley has hit out at the State's corporate watchdog after it quietly closed the file on long inquiries into the governance scandal in the company. The Corporate Enforcement Authority (CEA), led by chief executive Ian Drennan, on Thursday ended 12 months of silence on a High Court report into INM, now Mediahuis Ireland , by saying it had resolved not to take enforcement action over the affair. At issue was an unlawful breach of company data relating to 19 named individuals, among them journalists and former company officials. Some had come into conflict with the main INM shareholder at the time, Denis O'Brien. Mr Buckley was a close business associate of Mr O'Brien and represented his interests as chairman of INM. Mr Buckley said there were 'serious questions' over the investigation because the CEA's predecessor – the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) – heard only one side of the story before seeking the High Court inspection. READ MORE 'It is regrettable that the director did not offer me the opportunity of a meeting or an interview prior to initiating the High Court inspection process,' Mr Buckley said in response to questions from The Irish Times about the CEA decision. [ Leslie Buckley files court action against Allianz Opens in new window ] 'This is a highly questionable approach, to say the least, from an organisation that holds itself out as a custodian of good corporate practice.' INM was the publisher of the Irish Independent and Sunday Independent, among other titles. The affair was highly damaging to its reputation, culminating in IMM's takeover by Mediahuis of Belgium in 2019. INM blamed Mr Buckley for the affair and started court action against him but he always denied any wrongdoing. His statement said the then ODCE never met him before seeking the inspection, but met with former INM chief executive Robert Pitt and former chief financial officer Ryan Preston. The CEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mr Buckley's remarks. 'I was not afforded an opportunity to meet with the ODCE in relation to that or any other matters, so the ODCE did not hear both sides of the story,' Mr Buckley said. 'Had the director done so, that may have given him pause for thought. The ODCE may well have received advice not to proceed with a High Court-appointed inspection process and in doing so, saved the taxpayer in excess of €5.6 million and €40 million overall in legal costs.' Senior counsel Seán Gillane and UK solicitor Richard Fleck were appointed in 2018 by then High Court president, Mr Justice Peter Kelly, to investigate INM after confidential disclosures from Mr Pitt and Mr Preston. The court was told INM backup computer tapes went to third parties for 'data interrogation' relating to 19 people. Among them were journalists Sam Smyth, Brendan O'Connor and Maeve Sheehan, and former INM chief executive Vincent Crowley. The 19 also included two Moriarty Tribunal barristers during its investigation into the award to Mr O'Brien of the State's second mobile phone licence 30 years ago. The inspectors made their final report last July, saying 'technical breaches of the Data Protection Acts by INM were established' and that inside information was disclosed to Mr O'Brien by Mr Buckley. However, they found such matters did not amount to the affairs of INM being conducted in breach of the Companies Acts. They said it would not be appropriate to 'speculate' on how the interrogation of data came to include the 19 names. Mr Drennan's office published the report on July 31st, 2024. But in the months since then it repeatedly declined to say what action, if any, would be taken on foot of the conclusions. The CEA finally set out its stance on Thursday in its 2024 annual report: 'Having considered the matter with great care and deliberation, the CEA ultimately determined that enforcement action will not be taken arising from the report.' There was no comment from Mediahuis Ireland. Mr O'Brien's spokesman also declined to comment.
