U.K. May Drop Plans To Break Apple's Encryption To Please Trump
The U.K. government is reportedly backtracking on plans to force Apple to create a backdoor into encrypted communications.
In January, the U.K. issued a technical capability notice to Apple, demanding that it create a backdoor in encrypted communication systems that would allow law enforcement and security services to read customers' messages.
Apple resisted the move and has launched a legal challenge, as well as removing the Advanced Data Protection encryption from some of its services in the U.K. market. Apple has subsequently been joined in its legal challenge by the Meta-owned WhatsApp.
Now, according to a report in the Financial Times, the U.K. government is seeking ways to avoid a confrontation with the tech companies, through fear of upsetting Donald Trump's U.S. administration.
'This is something that the vice-president is very annoyed about and which needs to be resolved,' a 'senior official' in the UK's technology department told the newspaper. 'The Home Office is basically going to have to back down.'
Attack On Free Speech?
The vice-president has been repeatedly critical of what he views as attacks on free speech by European governments. The officials who spoke to the Financial Times said the U.K. government is keen not to be drawn into anything that the vice-president may regard as a free-speech issue.
Donald Trump has also publicly stated his opposition to breaking encrypted communications, publicly urging the prime minister Kier Starmer not to introduce such measures.
Aside from being a free speech issue, it's also one of communications security. Apple and other tech companies have long argued that it's not possible to create a backdoor for the security services alone, that once encryption has been compromised it becomes a potential attack vector for anyone.
'Apple has never created a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services,' the company claims in a statement on its website regarding government security requests. 'We have also never allowed any government direct access to Apple servers. And we never will.'
The company does co-operate with governments and law-enforcement agencies around the world, when legally required to hand over details of customers' devices or accounts. Apple publishes a transparency report to show how many of these requests it deals with on a country-by-country basis.
For example, between January and June 2024, the company dealt with 2,925 device requests in the U.K. and 2,550 requests for details of customers' accounts. In the U.S. those figures are 12,043 and 12,812 respectively for the same period. Apple's transparency data shows that the number of such requests has grown sharply in recent years in both countries.
Tech Companies Threaten To Walk
It's not only the U.S. administration that the U.K. government might be mindful of upsetting, but the tech companies themselves. Aside from Apple and WhatsApp leading a legal challenge, other communications firms have threatened to leave the U.K. altogether if they are forced to break encryption.
Signal president Meredith Walker told the BBC in 2023 that her company 'would absolutely, 100% walk' if it were forced to weaken the privacy of its messaging system in the U.K.
Signal is, of course, the encrypted messaging system that was the center of a U.S. government security scandal earlier this year when senior members of the administration were revealed to be discussing battle plans in a conversation in which a journalist was accidentally added to the group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Labour Peer Divides The Internet's With Her Exacerbated Response To Reform's Zia Yusuf
A Labour peer has drawn both praise and criticism online after her rather expressive display on BBC Newsnight last night. Thangham Debbonaire, a former shadow cabinet minister who lost her Bristol West seat to the Greens in the last election, made it very clear how she feels about Reform UK's Zia Yusuf's views while they were sharing the BBC sofa. As Reform's head of DOGE which aims to cut down on government waste, Yusuf attacked the government's new Online Safety Act, warning: 'This act makes children less safe!' Debonnaire just leaned back on the sofa, closed her eyes and rested her head in her hand while he talked about how children could circumvent the new restrictions. When presenter Matt Chorley said he wanted to hear from Debonnaire, she replied: 'Why? I think he's fine on his own. Why don't we just him talk?' Her angry response came after they had already argued several times over the legislation. Debonnaire called out Yusuf when he claimed anti-government tweets had been censored on Elon Musk's social media platform X. 'Last time I looked, I'm not in charge of X, that'll be your friend Elon Musk,' she said, encouraging Yusuf to actually read the legislation. 'I have not censored X. I think you'll find if X has taken something down, that'll be down to X.' When their conversation returned to Musk later in the programme and the problems with his platform, Yusuf claimed any problems were caused by the AI algorithms. The Labour peer replied, 'oh, dear lord,' and then pointed out how, moments before, Yusuf had been blaming Debonnaire for problems with X. Her frustration quickly sparked a response on – where else? – X, with several people praising her for being so candid... But not everyone appreciated the peer's reaction to Yusuf, with some accounts suggesting she was rather rude... While a few complained she did not get enough air time at all... Related... Tory Peer Slams Reform Over 'Misinformation' Around Epping Protests With Thinly-Veiled Dig 'Ask Me Another Question': Reform MP Fumes At Journalist Over Afghan 'Sex Offenders' Row Reform UK MP Given Brutal Reality Check By BBC Journalist After On-Air Bust-Up
CNBC
24 minutes ago
- CNBC
Luxury carmakers flag combined costs of $889 million as U.S. tariffs bite
Luxury automakers Porsche , Mercedes-Benz Group and Aston Martin on Wednesday each laid out the painful impact of U.S. President Donald Trump 's trade war — to the tune of a combined $889 million blow. German sportscar manufacturer Porsche said U.S. import tariffs resulted in a 400-million-euro ($462 million) hit in the first six months of the year, while domestic peer Mercedes-Benz Group warned of a tariff effect of roughly 370 million euros in the second quarter. British luxury carmaker Aston Martin also issued a profit warning, citing the impact of U.S. tariffs and weak Chinese demand. The London-listed company, famed for both featuring in the iconic James Bond movies and for its history of financial ups and downs, said the "evolving and disruptive U.S. tariff situation was unhelpful to our operations" through the June quarter. Collectively, the luxury carmakers warned of combined costs exceeding 770 million euros, or $889 million, from U.S. tariffs. The flurry of corporate earnings has been reaffirming the impact of the Trump administration's trade measures on Europe's auto giants. The White House in April raised tariffs to 27.5% on European Union auto imports, seeking to protect and strengthen the U.S. automotive sector. Several carmakers have since sounded the alarm , particularly given the high globalization of supply chains and the heavy reliance on manufacturing operations across North America. European auto industry groups welcomed news of a U.S.-EU framework trade agreement earlier in the week, while simultaneously expressing deep concern about the costs linked to the new tariff reality. 'Not a storm that will pass' The agreement brokered on Sunday means the Trump administration will impose a blanket tariff of 15% on most EU goods. It represents a significant reduction from Trump's threat to levy charges of 30% from Aug. 1 and almost halves the existing tariff rate on Europe's auto sector. "We continue to face significant challenges around the world. And this is not a storm that will pass," Oliver Blume, chairman of the executive board of Porsche, said in a statement out Wednesday. "The world is changing dramatically – and, above all, differently to what was expected just a few years ago. Some of the strategic decisions made back then appear in a different light today." Shares of Porsche rose 2.4% on Wednesday morning, while Mercedes-Benz Group dipped 1.5% and Aston Martin fell more than 2%.
Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Passed the One Big Beautiful Bill to Secure Our Borders—Here's What We Must Do Next
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act was the product of many months of hard work by Congress and the unwavering leadership of President Donald Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson. The legislation stands as a landmark achievement, and it represents a sea change for border security and immigration enforcement. That change is long overdue, particularly as we work to undo the devastation of the Biden-Harris border crisis. President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speak to members of the media at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speak to members of the media at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025, in Washington, the turnaround are historic investments in Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Among other achievements, Republicans approved more than $46 billion to finish construction of the strategic border barrier system, $45 billion to expand ICE's ability to detain illegal aliens, and approximately $35 billion to recruit, hire, and retain thousands more CBP and ICE officers, agents, and support personnel. But the work to ensure long-lasting border security and interior enforcement is far from over. While Republicans maintain majorities in Washington, we must advance the ball even further. There are three key areas in which we still have a long way to go—but the path is clear. First, we must act quickly to codify President Trump's executive orders. As we learned when President Joe Biden took office and ended essentially every effective border security and enforcement policy of the first Trump administration, executive actions can be undone—sometimes with devastating consequences. If we want the policy wins of the second Trump administration to be guaranteed for future generations, we must turn those executive orders into law. The reconciliation process allowed us to secure many key victories, but the rules of that process also prevented us from enacting policy changes without a clear fiscal impact. That means there are numerous reforms still on the table demanding our attention and action. For starters, to prevent future abuse of our immigration laws and protect our families and communities from the scourge of the fentanyl crisis, we must advance and expand upon the policies put forward in H.R.2, the Secure the Border Act, a historic border security and immigration reform bill that passed the House last Congress but was ignored by the Democrat-led Senate. Some of those reforms include explicitly prohibiting mass parole and nationality-based parole programs, closing asylum and catch-and-release loopholes, expanding expedited removal, cracking down on visa overstays, and expanding grounds for inadmissibility. The American people support such strong measures. They resoundingly endorsed these policies in the 2024 election after President Trump ran on a platform of mass deportations. Poll after poll shows continued support for that platform, despite increasingly outrageous Democrat rhetoric. Second, Republicans need to ramp up our investigative and accountability efforts, starting with looking deeply into the Biden-era officials who crafted, implemented, and defended the unlawful open-borders policies that caused untold harm to our nation. The burgeoning "auto-pen" scandal of the Biden administration—which casts into doubt whether President Biden was of sound mind and personally responsible for many of the policy decisions of his administration, even from its earliest days—sparks some troubling questions. Chief among these is how many of the radical policy decisions on border security and immigration enforcement were driven not by the president, but by others in the White House who saw the opportunity to systemically undermine longstanding U.S. immigration law in pursuit of open-borders, anti-enforcement policies? We have already identified a number of individuals involved in the Biden transition team and the administration that played a role in this crisis, and we must aggressively expand our investigation into them and pursue accountability where we can. Third and finally, we need to hold accountable the nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that helped facilitate the Biden-Harris administration's border crisis. The House Committee on Homeland Security has devoted substantial time and effort into uncovering how these NGOs served as a conduit for illegal immigration under the previous administration, often to their own substantial financial benefit. A few weeks ago, we sent a letter to more than 200 NGOs suspected of providing services and benefits to illegal aliens, seeking information about how these groups have used federal taxpayer dollars. We need to expand these probes, and as chairman of the Committee's Border Security and Enforcement Subcommittee, I fully intend to do so. No organization should be allowed to subvert or undermine U.S. laws, and they most certainly should not be doing so with taxpayer money. Unfortunately, that is exactly what happened under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, and we need to not only prevent further abuse via legislative solutions but also demonstrate that those who do will answer for their actions. This is a bold agenda for the House Republican conference and the House Committee on Homeland Security. But the American people have spoken unequivocally. Just like President Trump, they want the border secured, illegal aliens removed, and their communities made safe. They also want accountability for the harm caused to our country and a firm commitment to advancing President Trump's proven border security agenda. We must show that we are up to the task. Congressman Michael Guest is the chairman of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement and is currently serving his fourth term as the U.S. representative for Mississippi's 3rd Congressional District. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
