Border Patrol seizes fake Rolex watches and sunglasses in Pittsburgh
June 26 (UPI) -- U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents have seized a cache of counterfeit Rolex watches and designer sunglasses with a street value of more than $573,000, the agency announced Thursday.
The items were headed to Pittsburgh and were intercepted by local CBP agents there.
"The international trade in counterfeit consumer goods is illegal," a release from the CBP said. "It steals trademark holders and tax revenues from the government, it funds international criminal organizations, and the unregulated products can threaten the health and safety of American consumers."
The label on the shipment, from the United Arab Emirates, was marked "Empty Poly Bag Ladies Hand Bags," but instead contained a half dozen counterfeit Rolex Perpetual Cosmograph Daytona watches, a pair of counterfeit Rolex Diamond iced-Out watches and counterfeit Burberry, Chanel, Gucci, Miu and Valentino sunglasses.
Agents suspected that the watches and sunglasses were counterfeit and detained them for further inspection when they arrived in Pittsburgh.
CBP sent photos and documentation to the Center of Excellence and Expertise and worked with trademark holders, which determined that the items were counterfeit and subject to immediate seizure by Border Patrol agents.
"Unsuspecting consumers could be victimized twice by counterfeit products," a statement from James Hindes, CBP's acting port director in Pittsburgh, said, "such as these fake Rolex watches, because they may end up paying close to authentic prices for cheaper knockoffs, and they'll learn that the product isn't warrantied should it need repair."
The seizure of the counterfeit Rolex watches and sunglasses in Pittsburgh comes just days after CBP intercepted 5 shipments of fake jewelry over 2 nights in Louisville, Ky. that would have been worth more than $25 million had it been authentic.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Testimony against Sean Combs was shocking and graphic. But was it enough to convict?
One of the most sensational celebrity trials in decades is expected early this week to go to jurors, who must decide whether music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs is responsible for a shocking series of alleged sex crimes and conspiracies dating back years. The trial in New York has been marked by graphic testimony from inside Combs' music empire, alleging a pattern of violence, threats and cover-ups that prosecutors have likened to a mob-like criminal enterprise. A key question posed in the case is whether Combs — who was once worth more than $1 billion — used his power and money to conceal alleged crimes, often with the help of his sprawling organization. Prosecutors hammered home this alleged conspiracy in closing arguments. Assistant U.S. Atty. Christy Slavik told jurors Combs 'counted on silence and shame' to enable and prolong his abuse and used a 'small army' of employees to harm women and cover it up, according to the Associated Press. Combs 'doesn't take no for an answer,' she added. But legal experts have said the case may not be quite the slam-dunk that the tabloid headlines suggest. Combs' defense has freely acknowledged that the mogul behaved badly. They claim, however, that the charges against him are overblown and pointed out that some key witnesses did not report Combs' misdeeds at the time. 'The theory of the defense seems to be that Diddy did really horrible things, but they don't meet the elements of the crimes charged," said legal expert Jeff Chemerinsky, a former federal prosecutor. Read more: Inside Diddy's Bad Boy empire of threats, violence and bribes. What court revelations expose On Friday, Combs' attorney labeled the prosecution's case "exaggerated" and hammered some of his accusers. Marc Agnifilo claimed Combs enjoyed a "swinger" lifestyle and was addled by drugs. He admitted Combs committed domestic violence, but that the racketeering and sex trafficking charges were trumped up. "He is not a racketeer," he said. 'He is innocent. He sits there innocent.' There is no question the trial painted a damning portrait of Combs, the hip-hop star who built a massive music, fashion and lifestyle empire and mingled with the elites of American society and power. But Dmitry Gorin, a former L.A. County sex crimes prosecutor, said jurors will have to determine whether the sheer volume and seriousness of federal charges match the evidence. Gorin questioned whether federal prosecutors overcharged in the high-profile case. The federal indictment alleges that Combs and his associates lured female victims, often under the pretense of a romantic relationship. Combs then allegedly used force, threats of force, coercion and controlled substances to get women to engage in sex acts with male prostitutes while he occasionally watched in gatherings that Combs referred to as 'freak-offs.' Combs gave the women ketamine, ecstasy and GHB to 'keep them obedient and compliant' during the performances, prosecutors say. Combs' alleged 'criminal enterprise' threatened and abused women and used members of his enterprise to engage in sex trafficking, forced labor, interstate transportation for purposes of prostitution, coercion and enticement to engage in prostitution, narcotics offenses, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice, prosecutors said. In bringing so-called RICO charges, prosecutors in opening statements said Combs was helped by a cadre of company employees, security staff and aides. They allegedly helped organize the freak-offs and then covered up the incidents. Combs is charged with one count of racketeering conspiracy, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison; two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison and a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in prison; and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. Read more: 'Horrible and disgusting': Cassie's graphic testimony of abuse leaves Sean 'Diddy' Combs' fate hanging in balance Jurors heard from 34 witnesses, who provided six weeks of brutal and graphic testimony. At the heart of the case are three women who described graphic sexual assaults, including Combs' onetime lover Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, who the defense acknowledged was a key witness for prosecutors. It was Ventura's lawsuit in 2023 that set off the unraveling of Combs' enterprise with its details of sex, violence and freak-offs. Witnesses testified that Combs gave the women ketamine, ecstasy and GHB to keep them compliant during the performances. His last former girlfriend, referred to only as Jane in court, described how the freak-offs and coerced sex continued even after the lawsuit and a raid by Homeland Security Investigations in 2023 until his arrest last year. A former employee, testifying under the pseudonym Mia, also testified that she was sexually assaulted. The federal indictment alleges that Combs and his associates lured two of the women under the pretense of a romantic relationship. Combs then allegedly used force, threats of force, coercion and controlled substances to get women to engage in sex acts with male prostitutes. R&B singer Ventura, who had a long relationship with Combs, testified early in the trial. Ventura told jurors she felt 'trapped' in a cycle of physical and sexual abuse, and that the relationship involved 11 years of beatings, sexual blackmail and a rape. She said Combs threatened to leak videos of her sexual encounters with numerous male sex workers while drug-intoxicated and covered in baby oil as he watched and orchestrated the freak-offs. Read more: Rapper Kid Cudi says his car was set on fire after Sean 'Diddy' Combs broke into his Hollywood Hills home One of those alleged freak-offs led to an infamous hotel beating, Ventura testified. Video from that March 2016 night shows Combs punching and kicking Ventura as she cowers and tries to protect herself in front of an L.A. hotel elevator bank. He then drags her down the hall by her hooded sweatshirt toward their hotel room. A second angle from another camera captures Combs throwing a vase toward her. She suffered bruising to her eye, a fat lip and a bruise that prosecutors showed was still visible during a movie premiere two days later, where she donned sunglasses and heavy makeup on the red carpet. A cover-up then ensued, according to prosecutors. Ventura stated that the police visited her apartment. She answered a few of their questions, but told the jury she still wanted to protect Combs at the time. 'I would not say who I was talking about,' she told the jury. 'In that moment, I did not want to hurt him in that way. There was too much going on. It was a lot.' Eddie Garcia, the InterContinental Hotel security guard, testified that Combs gave him a brown paper bag containing $100,000 in cash for the video. Garcia said that after his supervisor agreed to sell the video recording, he met with Combs, Combs' chief of staff, Kristina Khorram, and a bodyguard. After Garcia raised concerns about the police, he said Combs called Ventura on FaceTime, handed him the phone and told Ventura to tell Garcia that she also wanted the video 'to go away.' After that, Garcia said he took the money and split it with co-workers, according to reporting from inside the courtroom. Prosecutors allege this shows the conspiracy. In her closing argument, Slavik said racketeering law applies when someone commits crimes as part of a group, and in Combs' case, 'the defendant was a powerful man, but he became more powerful and dangerous because of his inner circle, his businesses — the enterprise,' she told jurors, according to AP. Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, known as RICO, there are 35 specific offenses, including murder, bribery and extortion, and federal prosecutors need to show a pattern involving at least two overt acts as part of a criminal enterprise. People typically think of the mob, street gangs or drug cartels. But any loose association of two or more people is enough, like Combs' entourage, said Neama Rahami, a former federal prosecutor and defense attorney. While the testimony against Combs was graphic and detailed, Rahami said the defense hopes jurors will question why those on the stand did not report the behavior to authorities at the time and in some cases stayed in Combs' orbit. Rahami said she found parts of the prosecution's case underwhelming, especially given the complex and serious charges they filed. "I still think Combs is guilty, but the defense has a good chance of securing not guilty verdicts, especially on the sex trafficking counts," she said. The defense was aggressive in cross-examination, hammering witnesses about why they did not report Combs at the time or simply leave him. They also presented text messages of support and love after the alleged attacks. The defense also focused on the money and other things they got from Combs. 'This isn't about a crime. This is about money. It's about money,' Agnifilo said, according to the AP. But the level of graphic testimony might be hard for jurors to ignore. Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Ventura, testified that Combs dangled her over a 17-story balcony and tossed her onto balcony furniture in September 2016. Capricorn Clark, a former assistant to Combs, told jurors Combs forced her from her apartment at gunpoint to go with him to musician Kid Cudi's home in December 2011. Once there, Combs and Clark entered the empty house, and then Cudi, whose real name is Scott Mescudi, showed up. To avoid getting law enforcement involved, Clark testified, Combs ordered her to call Ventura, who was at that time Combs' ex-girlfriend, and said they needed to convince Cudi not to snitch to the cops. 'If you guys don't convince him of that, I'll kill all you m—,' Clark quoted Combs saying. Cudi testified that his Porsche was later firebombed in his driveway with a Molotov cocktail. Prosecutors got the last word Friday before the jury went home for the weekend, reminding them of the Cudi car explosion. "He delegated and his inner circle handled the dirty work for him," prosecutor Maurene Comey said, according to CNN. "He said he was going to blow up the car, and lo and behold, it blew up. 'For 20 years, the defendant got away with his crimes. That ends in this courtroom,' Comey added. 'The defendant is not a god. He is a person." Associated Press contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A mistake by ICE put her husband in jail. She got him back 3 weeks later.
In the early morning light outside O'Hare International Airport, Cynthia Myers was dressed like a bride. Her long white dress seemed curiously out of place Friday on the curb outside Terminal 3, but Myers didn't seem to notice; the man in the slightly loose black suit had her full attention. After three weeks in a Louisiana jail — because of an apparent error by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — Cheikh Fall had finally come home to his wife. On his overnight flights from Monroe, Louisiana, to Dallas and then Indianapolis, he wore the same suit he'd had on when immigration authorities wrongfully arrested him outside his asylum hearing in the Chicago Immigration Court on June 4. It took more than $12,000 and 23 sleepless nights, but Myers got her husband back. She knew he would be wearing the suit so she dressed up like his newlywed bride to celebrate the reunion she gleefully dubbed their 'remarriage.' Myers couldn't stop laughing. 'I'm so happy,' she said, over and over again. For three weeks, she hadn't been. She and her children have become one of the thousands of families in the United States affected by the Trump administration's intensified deportation efforts. Last week, ICE was holding close to 59,000 detainees nationwide, CBS reported, almost half of them with clean criminal records — stretching its system to 140% of capacity. The day of Fall's routine asylum hearing, Myers was nervous. She said she was well aware of recent ICE activity and asked her husband if he thought it was the right move to go to an immigration hearing. Fall was adamant that he attend, she said, and confident that he was not at risk of arrest. After all, he had never broken the law. In fact, the June 4 hearing in Chicago's immigration court went well. The judge, encouraged by Fall's marriage to an American citizen, moved up Fall's asylum merits hearing — which will decide his refugee status — from 2029 to July 2026. So when federal immigration authorities seized Fall as he and his wife walked out of the courtroom, Myers said confusion was the first feeling that hit her — not least because the agents were out of uniform. She tried to grab hold of her husband, but an agent told her to back away. 'Don't interfere with a federal crime,' she remembered him saying. Myers, a mother of three and a full-time solar panel electrician who grew up navigating and surviving the state's foster care system, felt helpless. 'It's the uncertainty that's super devastating,' said Myers, 43, of the South Shore neighborhood. In an online bond hearing Tuesday, Fall's lawyer, Carla Casas, convinced a judge that immigration agents were never supposed to arrest Fall. The judge ordered that he be released from Richwood Correctional Center on a $2,000 bond. The minimum for his release was $1,500. Immigration experts said that procedural errors from ICE are not uncommon, but the sheer volume of recent arrests has amplified them. In March, the U.S. charged 4,550 defendants with criminal immigration charges, the immigration data center known as TRAC reported, indicating a 36.6% increase from February. And while incidents of errors are increasing, the opportunity to catch them is becoming more limited, experts said. 'When you're trying to do anything on a massive scale, you're going to make mistakes,' Nicole Hallett, director and scholar at the Immigrants' Rights Clinic, said. Casas said she sees plenty of immigration cases where ICE agents get things wrong on I-213 forms — or 'records of inadmissible aliens,' documents on which the the Department of Homeland Security bases deportations. But even she was surprised by the magnitude of the error that detained Fall: She said the basis of his arrest and three-week detention was his I-213, prepared by ICE, indicating his asylum case had been dismissed. It never had been. 'The shock is the fact that they got something so big so wrong,' Casas said. A spokesperson for ICE said he could not immediately comment on the case. Wednesday morning, Myers paid the bond and was trying to figure out how to get Fall out of jail. She called the correctional center and was told to fill out a form online and await an email response. After three weeks of waiting, she had to wait some more. He was finally released Thursday night. 'I've never been through anything like this,' Myers said. 'They don't give you any information … so I'm just at a loss.' Myers said she's never been good at waiting around. She's the kind of woman who drives her three children around in an electrician's truck and clambers onto rooftops to repair solar panels singlehandedly. She doesn't like to ask for help either, she said, and rarely needs to. Until she met her husband, Myers was good on her own. But finding Fall, Myers said, was like 'finally finding a home.' Myers doesn't usually go to the gym; her job at Windfree Solar keeps her active enough. Yet in October 2023, on one of the rare days Myers found herself at the Kenwood Planet Fitness, she met the man she would marry. Fall was working as a bodyguard for a politician in Senegal when he was shot and kidnapped by his boss's political opponents. After narrowly escaping, Fall fled Senegal to seek asylum in the United States. 'He came to America because we're supposed to be a welcoming country,' Myers said. In April 2023, Fall arrived in New York City, where he lived in a shelter for six months. In October of the same year, he moved to Chicago. Within a month of arriving, he saw Myers working out at the Planet Fitness and asked her to go on a date. They went to a popcorn shop down the street. The couple were married Feb. 1, 2024. Her independence never waned, but Myers got used to having someone else to rely on. Fall worked as a security guard for Narrow Security and started his own small company, too. As Myers' partner, he lightened her load: Fall helped run errands, pick up her kids and pay bills. Her children love him — especially her two sons, 8 and 10, who — until June 4 — hung out and played video games with their stepfather all the time. 'He's literally the best person I know,' Myers said of her husband. 'He's selfless. He'll go out of his way to help people, even when he can barely help himself.' Fall and Myers have spent most Friday nights since they got married preparing food for the homeless at a shelter in Indiana. Before June 4, Myers said she almost never cried. But 12 days after Fall was taken from her, Myers' left eye was rubbed raw. She was exhausted from a lack of sleep and had barely eaten in days. Her daughter, 17, started helping with her little brothers' meals. Though it was hard to focus, Myers said she stayed busy with work, needing her steady income now more than ever. Windfree Solar took on some of Myers' financial burden, including Casas' $3,000 flat rate. Some of Myers' colleagues set up a GoFundMe for continuing legal fees and Fall's bond; the site had raised $1,336 as of Wednesday. But even with all the help from her colleagues, Myers said she is floundering to find the rest of the money she needs for Fall's case. For an asylum lawyer, bond and myriad procedural fees from the last three weeks — with Casas' bill — it's a $12,000 ordeal, she said, and all to pay for someone else's error. Fall's three weeks in custody meant sharing a room with approximately 50 other men in beige prison suits, he said. They were in one room where they not only slept but also ate and used the bathroom in it. Fall suffers from asthma, and the lack of fresh air made it hard for him to breathe. He was let outside for just minutes a day. 'I need air,' he said on a phone call from Richwood Correctional Center two weeks ago. 'That's why I'm scared here.' Still, like Myers, Fall knows how to endure. His job as a security guard often puts him in dangerous situations — he was stabbed in November while working security at a Walgreens. Like many people arrested by ICE, Fall was held at the Broadview Detention Center in Illinois — where he slept on the floor for a night — before being transferred briefly to Texas and then Louisiana. Illinois' 2021 Way Forward Act means there are no detention centers in the state, which is why detainees are almost always transferred to neighboring states. Texas and Louisiana, however, aren't exactly close to Chicago. According to Hallett, Chicago residents like Fall are being transferred so far out of state because the 5th Circuit — where Richwood Correctional Center is — has more immigrant detention facilities than most other parts of the country. Louisiana alone has 12 to Illinois' zero. 'ICE has very broad authority to move people wherever they want, whenever they want,' Hallett said. Additionally, judges in the 5th Circuit tend to refuse relief more than judges in the 7th Circuit, which includes Illinois, according to TRAC data. For a long time, Fall had no idea how long he would be in jail. Casas had to call the 5th Circuit court multiple times before Tuesday to remind them to put his case on the docket. It was finally scheduled for June 24, but ICE did not make Fall's I-213 available until the morning of the hearing. Casas was left to speculate how the Department of Homeland Security would argue for Fall's deportation, until Tuesday, when she realized that the document included false information. The judge presiding over the bond hearing, Allan John-Baptiste, ruled in Fall's favor, though he did not grant Casas' request for minimum bond. John-Baptiste also rescheduled Fall's master asylum hearing from July 2026 to this coming November, and moved it from the Chicago Immigration Court to one in Jena, Louisiana. If Fall does not petition for his case to be moved back to Chicago, John-Baptiste will hear his asylum case, rather than Gina Reynolds, the judge who moved up his Chicago hearing. Between 2019 and 2024, Reynolds granted asylum to defendants far more frequently than John-Baptiste did, data shows. In some ways, Fall is lucky — at least, compared with other detainees. Thousands of people arrested by ICE don't get an attorney, because unlike in criminal court, defendants don't have a right to appointed counsel. Many of them are given higher bonds that they can't afford to pay. Some will unwittingly sign the self-deportation form that Myers warned her husband against. Most people don't have a Cynthia Myers on their side. 'I'm still sad, because other people are going through it,' Myers said Friday. If it weren't for her, ICE's mistake might have led to a worse fate for Fall. Even now, the freshly reunited couple is wary this could happen again.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Erin Patterson trial: Jurors begin deliberation in case of deadly mushroom meal
Jurors on Monday began deliberations in the trial of Erin Patterson, who is accused of serving deadly mushrooms to a group of guests at a meal that ultimately killed three people. File Photo by James Ross/EPA-EFE June 30 (UPI) -- Jurors in the murder trial of Erin Patterson, an Australian woman who served a meal containing poisonous mushrooms that killed three guests, began deliberations on Monday. The final 12 jurors were decided by a ballot, and then the judge gave the remaining seven men and five women a summary of both the prosecution and defense cases. The group was then sequestered to supervised accommodations where they will mostly stay until a decision has been reached. The prosecution accused Patterson of having invited her estranged husband Simon Patterson's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt and uncle Heather and Ian Wilkinson, over to her home in Australia in August of 2023 for a lunch of beef Wellington. Don and Gail died later that week, as did Heather, from the ingestion of poisonous death cap mushrooms. Ian was sickened and hospitalized but survived. The prosecution claimed Patterson knowingly put the toxic fungi into the home-cooked meal, then lied to police about doing so and disposed of related evidence. The defense maintains the poisoning was accidental, that Patterson had no reason to purposefully kill her guests and had originally lied because she panicked after hurting people she loved. Prosecutors have further accused Patterson of not only inviting the victims over to kill them with a lethal meal but had furthermore prepared an extra poisoned serving in case Simon, who had declined his invitation to dine that day, changed his mind and came to eat. Patterson has testified that she had only eaten a small portion of the beef Wellington lunch and later had vomited up the food because she also ate cake and has a history of binging and purging. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder in the case.
