U.S. regulators are circling after Tesla's Robotaxi launch included unexpected behavior and potentially broken traffic laws
Tesla's Robotaxi launch event in Austin Sunday got rave reviews from analysts, but also led to several attendees posting videos of Tesla vehicles behaving unexpectedly. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reached out a day later, and said it 'will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.'
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) contacted Tesla a day after its Sunday Robotaxi launch after videos online showed the company's autonomous vehicles acting erratically and possibly violating traffic laws.
The launch, which was mostly limited to invited Tesla investors, analysts, and influencers, gave the public its first look at Tesla's Robotaxi technology, which is an 'unsupervised' version of its already available Full Self-Driving (Supervised) tech.
Tesla first revealed the company's Cybercab and larger Robovan in a splashy event at the Warner Bros. studio in Burbank, Calif. last October. But Sunday's launch in Austin, Texas, was the biggest development in nearly a year (and arguably a decade) of Tesla CEO Elon Musk touting Tesla's Robotaxi ambitions, reportedly despite internal warnings claiming the Cybercab may never be profitable.
The event garnered rave reviews by some Tesla analysts, including Wedbush's Dan Ives.
'Going into it, we expected to be impressed but walking away from it, all there is to say is that this is the future,' he wrote in a note.
Still, videos taken by attendees Sunday showed Tesla's vehicles driving erratically and in some cases violating traffic laws and safe traffic practices, despite the presence of a 'safety monitor' in the front seat.
In one video taken by Tesla investor Rob Maurer, the vehicle he is traveling in hesitates at an intersection and enters a lane meant for cars traveling in the opposite direction. The car then appears to break traffic laws by crossing a double solid yellow line before entering a left turn lane. A honk can be heard in the video.
In another video posted to YouTube by Ed Niedermeyer, author of Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors, one of the Robotaxis 'brakes hard' after passing stopped police vehicles that weren't in its immediate path.
'The fact that it came nearly to a stop twice on public roads is downright unsafe,' wrote Niedermeyer in the video description.
These incidents, along with others posted to social media, led the NHTSA to reach out to Tesla Monday, the federal agency confirmed.
'NHTSA is aware of the referenced incidents and is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information. NHTSA will continue to enforce the law on all manufacturers of motor vehicles and equipment, in accordance with the Vehicle Safety Act and our data-driven, risk-based investigative process,' the agency wrote in a statement to Fortune.
The agency clarified that it does not 'pre-approve new technologies or vehicle systems,' but rather certifies that vehicles meet its safety standards and follows up on possible safety defect incidents.
'Following an assessment of those reports and other relevant information, NHTSA will take any necessary actions to protect road safety,' the agency wrote.
The NHTSA has a separate existing investigation open into crashes involving Tesla vehicles using Full Self-Driving (Supervised) technology.
Tesla did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. Tesla has not responded publicly to the Sunday incidents, but prior to the launch, Tesla responded to NHTSA's questions about its Robotaxi program, reported electric transportation and sustainable energy outlet Electrek. The company has reportedly asked the NHTSA to keep its responses confidential, according to the outlet.
The NHTSA's most recent reach out to Tesla does not mean it has opened an investigation, said Jason Turchin, a Florida-based product liability lawyer who has previously worked with vehicle cases. Still, the company should be on alert following the incidents. If the issue escalates further, Turchin said the NHTSA has broad authority to enforce a recall or impose fines on the company.
'What it sounds like is that they're in the phase right now, of like, 'we're watching you. We're aware of this potential, and we need reassurance that this is not the case,'' he told Fortune.
Turchin said he hopes the NHTSA and federal government take advantage of the recent Tesla incidents as well as the general increase in self-driving vehicles to craft regulations that deal with their production and use.
Still, Craig Melrose, a former vehicle production engineer at Toyota and now global managing partner of advanced technologies and mobility at consulting agency HTEC, said the NHTSA reach out to Tesla may be a positive development.
'Regulatory agencies like NHTSA exist to ensure standardization and the adoption of best practices across the industry, so their involvement can be a positive signal, especially if this is simply a proactive review,' Melrose told Fortune.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
35 minutes ago
- CNBC
France is betting Eutelsat can become Europe's answer to Starlink — but experts aren't convinced
For years, France's Eutelsat has been trying to build a European alternative to Elon Musk's Starlink satellite broadband service. The company merged with British satellite venture OneWeb in 2023, consolidating the region's satellite communications industry in an effort to catch up to Starlink, which is owned by SpaceX. Last week, the French state led a 1.35-billion-euro ($1.58 billion) investment in Eutelsat, making it the company's biggest shareholder with a roughly 30% stake. Europe largely lags behind the U.S. in the global space race. Starlink's constellation of over 7,000 satellites dwarfs Eutelsat's. Meanwhile, Europe's launch capabilities are more limited than the U.S. The region still relies heavily on America for certain launch services, which is a market dominated by SpaceX. Eutelsat currently has a market capitalization of 1.6 billion euros, much lower than estimates for Starlink owner SpaceX's value, which was pegged at $350 billion in a secondary share sale last year. In 2020, analysts at Morgan Stanley said that they see Starlink growing to $80.9 billion in their "base case valuation" for the firm. Luke Kehoe, industry analyst at network monitoring firm Ookla, said France's investment in Eutelsat shows the country "is now treating Eutelsat less like a commercial telco and more like a dual-use critical-infrastructure provider" and a "strategic asset" in the European Union's push for technological sovereignty. However, building a European competitor to Starlink will be no mean feat. Communications industry experts tell CNBC that, while Eutelsat could boost Europe's efforts to create a sovereign satellite internet provider, challenging its U.S. rival Starlink would require a significant increase in investments in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites. Eutelsat's OneWeb arm operates a total of 650 LEO satellites, which is less than a tenth of Starlink's 7,600-strong global satellite constellation. "To offer greater capacity and coverage, [Eutelsat] needs to increase the number of satellites in space, a task made more difficult due to the fact that many of OneWeb's satellites are nearing the end of their lifespan and will need to be first replaced before growing the constellation's size," Joe Gardiner, research analyst at market research firm CCS Insight, told CNBC via email. Ookla's Kehoe echoed this view. "Eutelsat's chances of achieving parity with Starlink in the mass-market satellite broadband segment within the next five years remain limited, given SpaceX's unmatched global scale in LEO infrastructure," he said. "Even with the latest injection of capital from the French state, Eutelsat continues to lag behind Starlink in several key areas, including capital, manufacturing throughput, launch access, spectrum and user terminals." Nevertheless, he thinks the company is "well positioned to succeed in European-sovereign, security-sensitive and enterprise segments that prioritise jurisdictional control and sovereignty over raw constellation capacity." The enterprise segment refers to the market for corporate space clients. That's certainly the hope. France's Emmanuel Macron has urged Europe to ramp up its investment in space, saying last week that "space has in some way become a gauge of international power." When Eutelsat announced its investment from France last week, the firm stressed its role as "the only European operator with a fully operational LEO network" as well as the "strategic role of the LEO constellation in France's model for sovereign defense and space communications." Earlier this year, Eutelsat was rumoured to be in the running to replace Starlink in Ukraine. For years, Starlink has offered Ukraine's military its satellite internet services to assist with the war effort amid Russia's ongoing between the U.S. and Ukraine soured following the election of President Donald Trump and reports surfaced that U.S. negotiators had raised the possibility of cutting Ukraine's access to Starlink. Germany set up 1,000 Eutelsat terminals in Ukraine in April with the aim of providing an alternative — rather than a replacement — for Starlink's 50,000 terminals in the war-torn country. Since then, U.S.-Ukraine tensions have somewhat cooled, and Starlink remains the primary satellite broadband provider to the Ukrainian military. Eutelsat's former CEO Eva Berneke has herself admitted that the company cannot yet match Starlink's scale. "If we were to take over the entire connectivity capacity for Ukraine and all the citizens — we wouldn't be able to do that. Let's just be very honest," she said in an April interview with Politico. Berneke was replaced as CEO in May by Jean-Francois-Fallacher, a former executive of French telecoms giant Orange. Meanwhile, even though Eutelsat has been ramping up investments in LEO satellite with its OneWeb unit, experts say its technical architectures and orbital designs are ultimately different from Starlink's. "The OneWeb constellation currently uses a bent-pipe architecture, which is not as capable as Starlink satellites; therefore, OneWeb will also need to invest in second-generation satellites," he added. The French firm's use cases also differ to Starlink's. Eutelsat operates a constellation of geostationary orbit (GEO) as well as LEO satellites. GEO satellites orbit the earth at a much higher altitude than their LEO equivalents and can typically cover more land with fewer satellites. "Eutelsat's higher altitude satellites are leveraged for specialized use cases, such as polar coverage for companies and research facilities in remote regions like Greenland and Alaska," said Joe Vaccaro, vice president and general manager at Cisco's ThousandEyes network intelligence unit. Looking ahead, Eutelsat said it plans to "build upon its operation improvements" with a "differentiated go-to-market model" and "strong European anchoring." It also noted that the U.K. government could also increase its investment in Eutelsat "in due course."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Has Big Plans in China
Tesla is moving forward with plans to develop new operations in China despite the ongoing trade war between the United States and China, and with uncertainty over tariffs. In June, Tesla signed an agreement to develop a grid-scale battery power plant in China to help provide the country with a stable supply of clean power for consumers and support its aims for a green transition. However, Tesla will be competing with some of the world's biggest battery manufacturers for a market share, as it strives to break into new territory, beyond electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing. The U.S.-based EV giant Tesla began as a Silicon Valley startup around two decades ago. Elon Musk joined the company as its chairman and principal funder in 2004, becoming its CEO in 2008. Tesla was viewed as a pioneer in the world of EVs, investing in a new way of driving when most automakers were only just beginning to float the idea. The EV firm dominated the U.S. and European EV market for several years, offering consumers a variety of wholly electric car models ahead of many of its much larger competitors. The Tesla Model S, which went on sale in 2012, had sports car performance and a range of over 250 miles, at a time when most competitors were offering far slower EVs with a comparatively low range. By 2020, Tesla held a 60 percent share of the U.S. EV market, a figure that fell to 38 percent in 2024, as hundreds of highly competitive EVs flooded the market. However, over time, Tesla has become more than just an EV manufacturer. The company has invested in the development of autonomous driving systems, aiming to deliver driverless 'robotaxis' to cities worldwide. It also has a burgeoning energy-storage business and is working on developing a humanoid robot, known as Optimus. While its EV business is faltering, as far more fully electric options enter the market, many from reputable automakers and at a lower cost, Tesla remains optimistic about its other projects. In June, Tesla announced it had signed a deal to develop the largest grid-scale battery power plant of its kind in China. The utility-scale battery storage system will be used to balance the supply and demand of energy to the grid, helping to deliver a stable supply of renewable electricity to consumers. The deal is thought to be worth $556 million. Tesla's first battery factory in Shanghai has produced over 100 Megapacks – the batteries used for utility-scale deployment – in the first quarter of the year, according to Tesla. One Megapack can provide up to 1 MW of power for four hours. The company stated, 'The grid-side energy storage power station is a 'smart regulator' for urban electricity, which can flexibly adjust grid resources.' The use of Megapacks is expected to boost energy security by ensuring that a stable supply of renewable electricity is delivered to consumers. China has invested heavily in its solar and wind energy sectors for several decades to become the biggest renewable energy power in the world. The Asian giant once again broke records last year when it installed huge quantities of green energy. China's installed solar and wind power capacity climbed 45.2 percent and 18 percent, respectively, in 2024, according to the National Energy Administration. There is now 886.67 GW of installed solar power, marking an increase from 609.49 GW in 2023, as well as a wind energy capacity of 520 GW. China hit its 2030 renewable energy capacity target in July last year, six years ahead of schedule. China's huge renewable energy capacity means that it is vital that the country install utility-scale battery storage at several of its major wind and solar farms to ensure that the clean energy supply is not limited only to the hours of the day in which the sun is shining and the wind is blowing. Battery storage will help China shift its reliance away from fossil fuels in the coming decades as it attempts to decarbonise the economy. Tesla is competing against China's CATL and the automaker BYD in developing battery storage. CATL currently holds around 40 percent of the global market share for battery manufacturing, and the firm was previously expected to provide the battery cells and packs used in Tesla's Megapacks. In addition, Tesla is taking a gamble as the project comes at a time when China is facing a trade war with the U.S., with President Trump having recently imposed high tariffs on Chinese imports. China now has a grid-scale battery capacity of around 40 GW. However, this will have to grow immensely in the coming years to help meet the country's green transition aims. In addition, other countries around the world will be looking to expand their utility-scale battery installations, which could lead Tesla to export more batteries from China. By Felicity Bradstock for More Top Reads From this article on Sign in to access your portfolio
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Can Agentic AI Bring The Pope Or The Queen Back To Life — And Rewrite History?
Can Agentic AI Bring the Pope or the Queen Back to Life — and Rewrite History? Elon Musk recently sparked global debate by claiming AI could soon be powerful enough to rewrite history. He stated on X (formerly Twitter) that his AI platform, Grok, could 'rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.' This bold claim arrives alongside a recent groundbreaking announcement from Google: the launch of Google Veo3 AI Video Generator, a state-of-the-art AI video generation model capable of producing cinematic-quality videos from text and images. Part of the Google Gemini ecosystem, Google Veo3 AI generates lifelike videos complete with synchronized audio, dynamic camera movements, and coherent multi-scene narratives. Its intuitive editing tools, combined with accessibility through platforms like Google Gemini, Flow, Vids, and Vertex AI, open new frontiers for filmmakers, marketers, educators, and game designers alike. At the same time, industry leaders — including OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft Copilot, and Mistral (Claude) — are racing to build more sophisticated agentic AI systems. Unlike traditional reactive AI tools, these agents are designed to reason, plan, and orchestrate autonomous actions based on goals, feedback, and long-term context. This evolution marks a shift toward AI systems that function much like a skilled executive assistant — and beyond. The Promise: Immortalizing Legacy Through Agentic AI Together, these advances raise a fascinating question: What if agentic AI could bring historical figures like the Pope or the Queen back to life digitally? Could it even reshape our understanding of history itself? Imagine an AI trained on decades — or even a century — of video footage, writings, audio recordings, and public appearances by iconic figures such as Pope Francis or Queen Elizabeth II. Using agentic AI, we could create realistic, interactive digital avatars capable of offering insights, delivering messages, or simulating how these individuals might respond to today's complex issues based on their documented philosophies and behaviors. This application could benefit millions. For example, Catholic followers might seek guidance and blessings from a digital Pope, educators could build immersive historical simulations, and advisors to the British royal family could analyze past decision-making styles. After all, as the saying goes, 'history repeats itself,' and access to nuanced, context-rich perspectives from the past could illuminate our present. The Risk: The Dangerous Flip Side — Rewriting Truth Itself However, the same technologies that can immortalize could also distort and manipulate reality. If agentic AI can reconstruct the past, what prevents it — or malicious actors — from rewriting it? Autonomous agents that control which stories are amplified or suppressed online pose a serious threat. We risk a future where deepfakes, synthetic media, and AI-generated propaganda blur the line between fact and fiction. Already, misinformation campaigns and fake news challenge our ability to discern truth. Agentic AI could exponentially magnify these problems, making it harder than ever to distinguish between genuine history and fabricated narratives. Imagine a world where search engines no longer provide objective facts, but the version of history shaped by governments, corporations, or AI systems themselves. This could lead to widespread confusion, social polarization, and a fundamental erosion of trust in information. Ethics, Regulation, and Responsible Innovation The advent of agentic AI demands not only excitement but also ethical foresight and regulatory vigilance. Programming AI agents to operate autonomously requires walking a fine line between innovation and manipulation. Transparency in training data, explainability in AI decisions, and strict regulation of how agents interact are essential safeguards. The critical question is not just 'Can we?' but 'Should we?' Policymakers, developers, and industry leaders must collaborate to establish global standards and oversight mechanisms that ensure AI technologies serve the public good. Just as financial markets and pharmaceuticals drugs are regulated to protect society, so too must the AI agents shaping our future be subject to robust guardrails. As the old adage goes: 'Technology is neither good nor bad. It's how we use it that makes all the difference.' Navigating the Future of Agentic AI and Historical Data The convergence of generative video models like Google Veo3, visionary leaders like Elon Musk, and the rapid rise of agentic AI paints a complex and compelling picture. Yes, we may soon see lifelike digital recreations of the Pope or the Queen delivering messages, advising future generations, and influencing public discourse. But whether these advancements become tools of enlightenment or distortion depends entirely on how we govern, regulate, and ethically deploy these technologies today. The future of agentic AI — especially when it touches our history and culture — must be navigated with care, responsibility, and a commitment to truth.
