Houthis say launched missiles, drones on Israel in response to Yemeni port attack
Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Sarea said in a statement aired by Houthi-run al-Masirah TV that the group launched eleven missiles and drones, with missiles targeting Ben Gurion Airport, the Ashdod Port, a power station in Ashkelon, and eight drones targeting the Eilat Port.
Sarea claimed that "the missiles and drones successfully reached their targets, and that the interceptor systems failed to intercept them".
The Houthi spokesperson said the group is "fully prepared for a sustained and prolonged confrontation," reaffirming that its attacks against Israel would continue until the "war on Gaza stops and the blockade is lifted".
The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) said that the Houthis launched two missiles toward Israel early Monday, triggering sirens in Jerusalem, the Judean Desert, the Dead Sea area, and several settlements in the occupied West Bank.
Israel's Magen David Adom emergency service reported no injuries.
"Attempts were made to intercept the missiles, and the results of the interception are under review," said the Israeli military.
The retaliation attack came hours after Israeli fighter jets struck Houthi-controlled sites in Yemen, including the ports of Hodeidah, Ras Isa, and As Salif, and the Ras Qantib power station.
The strikes also targeted the Galaxy Leader Vessel, seized by the Houthis in November 2023. The IDF accused the Houthis of installing radar on the vessel to monitor ships in the Red Sea and claimed that the Houthis used those three civilian ports to smuggle Iranian missiles and drones that the Houthis fired against Israel.
Iran and the Houthis have repeatedly denied such allegations.
According to the IDF, about 20 jets fired more than 50 bombs and missiles in the operation.
Also on Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei strongly condemned Israel's strikes on Yemen, describing them as "flagrant crimes" against Yemen's people and the Arab state's economic and public infrastructure, Xinhua news agency reported.
Israel has carried out several airstrikes on strategic targets in Yemen in recent months. The Houthi group, which controls much of northern Yemen, has been targeting Israeli cities and ships in the Red Sea since November 2023 to show solidarity with the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
US to seal major trade deal with India soon, announces Trump
President Donald Trump has announced that the United States is close finalising a trade agreement with India. Speaking to reporters on Monday ahead of a dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, Trump said, 'We've made deals with the United Kingdom and China. We're close to making a deal with India.' "Now, we've made a deal with the United Kingdom, we've made a deal with China. We're close to making a deal with India. Others we met with and we don't think we're going to be able to make a deal, so we just send them a letter. If you want to play ball, this is what you have to pay," Trump said. On Monday, the Trump administration began sending formal notifications outlining new tariffs on products imported into the U.S. from a number of nations. Countries that received these letters include Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Laos, Malaysia, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, and Tunisia. "We're sending out letters to various countries telling them how much tariffs they have to pay," Trump said. He added that the countries were 'ripping' the US and were charging us tariffs at levels that nobody's ever seen before. We have some countries that were charging 200% tariffs and making it impossible to do business. And what the tariffs are doing is they're driving people in and companies into the United States," he said.
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Remaking the nuclear order in West Asia
There is hardly any political leader who understands the laws of political survival better than Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Realising that he is in a morass with respect to Gaza, as Hamas has not yet been dismantled even though its leaders have been killed, and all hostages have not been brought home resulting in growing domestic pressure, Mr. Netanyahu employed an old tactic — distract attention from an ongoing crisis by creating another one. Israel's surprise strikes on Iran, launched on June 13, created a new and larger crisis. The military action has been successful, with the U.S. finally coming on board. For the moment, PM Netanyahu is firmly back in the driver's seat. But this has also opened a Pandora's box of what next. Israel's calculations Mr. Netanyahu wants to keep Israel as the only nuclear power in the region. He is convinced that the Libyan model, where the nuclear programme was completely dismantled, is the only acceptable option, preferably with a change of regime. In 2015, he opposed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) primarily because it conceded a limited uranium enrichment right to Iran. Since mid-April, five rounds of talks took place between U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, with a sixth round due on June 15 in Muscat. After stumbling over the issue of Iran insisting on its right to enrichment as a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), some progress was registered on the idea of a regional nuclear fuel consortium to provide fuel for the reactors in the region. Its location remained under discussion, making Mr. Netanyahu nervous. On June 11, Mr. Netanyahu barely survived a motion in the Knesset tabled by the opposition seeking to dissolve parliament, leading to early elections that are currently due in October 2026. PM Netanyahu has been facing domestic opposition since early 2023 due to his attempts at pushing though controversial judicial reforms that were widely seen as curbing judicial independence. The Hamas attack on October 7 had provided him a reprieve that has lasted nearly two years. Given Mr. Netanyahu's multiple domestic legal challenges, a continuing war is his 'get-out-of-jail' card. During the 20-month war, the leadership of Hamas and Hezbollah has been decapitated, and a change of regime in Damascus last December has doused Iran's 'ring of fire.' On two occasions in 2024, Israel directly engaged with Iran and, in the process, knocked out its air defences around Tehran and other critical installations. Having buried the two-state-solution, and with Iran at its weakest, Mr. Netanyahu must have felt that this was the ideal time to neutralise Iranian nuclear and missile threats. The Iranians are known for their frustratingly convoluted negotiating style and given U.S. President Donald Trump's impatience, Mr. Netanyahu was able to convince him that a little military pressure would make them more accommodating. Iran's miscalculations As recently as March 26, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard in her annual intelligence threat assessment to Congress stated, 'the Intelligence Community continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003'. This gave Iran's leadership a misplaced confidence that as long as the negotiations continued on the idea of a regional enrichment facility, the U.S. would block any military strike by Israel. However, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report in May criticising 'Iran's general lack of cooperation' and the near doubling of its stockpile of 60% enriched uranium to over 400 kgs since February proved to be more damaging that Iran anticipated. This heightened Iranian concerns about the threat of a sanctions-snapback by the UN Security Council, which was waived in 2015 following the adoption of the JCPOA. Iran knew that given its ageing air force, it was dependent on its stocks of drones and missiles. Despite the debacles with Hamas and Hezbollah leaderships, Iran underestimated the extent of Mossad's penetration of its systems, evidenced by the targeted assassinations of its key military leaders as well as nuclear and missile scientists. The entry of the U.S. When the U.S. began to withdraw non-essential staff from its embassies in the region in early June, it was anticipating Israel's likely military action. In the past, U.S. reluctance to get involved had prevented Israel from military strikes but this time, Mr Netanyahu took a gamble and it paid off. Impressed with the success of Israel's military actions, Mr. Trump ordered supportive strikes on June 22, with B-2 bombers dropping GBU-57 'bunker-busters' on Fordow and Natanz, and Tomahawk cruise missiles on Isfahan. Following the token retaliation by Iran the following day, Mr. Trump declared an end to the '12-day-war'. Israel thus claimed victory, Mr. Trump declared the underground sites 'obliterated,' the Gulf states heaved a sigh of relief, and for Iran's Supreme Leader, regime survival was a victory. Iran suffered over 600 casualties, and all its air defences and half its stock of missile launchers, were destroyed. It failed to take down a single Israeli aircraft though it did bring down some drones. Of the 500 missiles that Iran fired, over 30 were able to get through causing 30 casualties. While Mr. Netanyahu's suggestion that sustained military pressure may bring about a regime change in Tehran has some support from Iran-hawks in Washington, it is anathema to Mr. Trump's MAGA support base, who are wary of entanglements abroad. The U.S. interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2001 and 2003 respectively, were messy and costly, leaving behind a legacy of instability. Iran is three times larger, and Iranians are a people with a deep sense of nationalism based on their civilisational history. The current theocratic regime may be weak and its replacement may be less religious, but not less nationalist, and it would therefore push ahead with the nuclear deterrent. Mr. Netanyahu may not be averse to a forced regime change but the U.S. and the Gulf Arabs would not want to open this Pandora's box. Iran's nuclear capability Iran has had an ambitious civilian nuclear programme going back to the 1950s. It joined the NPT in 1970. Initially, the Islamic regime was uninterested in the nuclear programme, seeing it as a part of Western influence. This changed after the Iran-Iraq war and in the 1990s, it began developing a clandestine enrichment capability. The 2002 disclosures by a group of Iranian exiles, followed by the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, led the Supreme Leader to shift direction and aim for threshold status rather than develop a full-fledged nuclear weapon. The centrifuges and higher levels of enrichment also provided for bargaining space as Iran could negotiate for sanctions relief with the U.S. Today, the situation has changed. Iran's proxies (except for the Houthis) have been decimated and its missile and drone capabilities found wanting. The threshold state is no longer a safe place. Therefore, a nuclear deterrent assumes greater importance, even if there is a change of regime. Questions remain about the extent of damage to the underground centrifuge sites as well as the fate of the 400 kg of the 60% enriched uranium stockpile. While the scale of the attacks makes resumption of Iran-U.S. talks tricky, Iran has raised the stakes by terminating the IAEA inspector's access to its nuclear sites. Mr. Trump would like to conclude a deal with Iran to build on his success with the ceasefire. He would do well to remember the U.S. scholar Thomas Schelling's advice that successful coercion requires both a credible threat as well as credible reassurance, if Iran is to be 'persuaded' during any future talks. There has always been a difference between the U.S. and Israeli positions. While both agree that Iran cannot be allowed to have a bomb, Mr. Netanyahu goes one step forward to deny Iran any nuclear capabilities. However, since Mr. Trump has obliged him with the June 22 strikes, he may find it difficult to deny Mr. Trump his Iran deal provided the Iranians play the game. Rakesh Sood is a former diplomat and is currently Distinguished Fellow at the Council For Strategic and Defence Research.
Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘We stopped a lot of fights': Trump reiterates claim of brokering ceasefire between India and Pakistan
United States President Donald Trump on Monday (July 7) once again reiterated his claim of brokering a truce between India and Pakistan, stating that his administration's diplomatic efforts helped avert a potential war between the two countries. While speaking to reporters as he hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump emphasised he warned the nations that he would not engage in trade deals if they continued to fight, claiming credit for brokering the ceasefire. 'We stopped a lot of fights, very, very big one was India and Pakistan. We stopped that over trade,' Trump said. 'We are dealing with India and Pakistan. We said that we are not going to be dealing with you at all if you are gonna fight. They were maybe at a nuclear stage… Stopping that was really important,' he added. Trump's claims came as Netanyahu said that he nominated the US president for the Nobel Peace Prize, an honour the American leader has long coveted after one of his predecessors, Barack Obama, received it in the year 2009. Netanyahu handed a copy of the nomination letter to Trump during their dinner at the White House and said, 'The President has already realised great opportunities. He forged the Abraham Accords. He's forging peace as we speak in one country, in one region after the other. So, I want to present to you, Mr. President, the letter I sent to the Nobel Prize Committee. It's nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well deserved, and you should get it.' Trump, who appeared to be surprised by the nomination, thanked the Israeli prime minister and said that he wasn't aware of it. 'Thank you very much. This I did not know. Wow, thank you very much. Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful,' said Trump. The US president has repeatedly claimed credit for brokering a ceasefire in the 4-day India-Pakistan conflict, despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi telling Trump that India neither requested United States' mediation nor discussed any trade deal. #WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, '…We stopped a lot of fights, very, very big one was India and Pakistan. We stopped that over trade. We are dealing with India and Pakistan. We said that we are not going to be dealing with you at all if you are gonna fight. They were… — ANI (@ANI) July 7, 2025 Modi reminds Trump no trade talk or US role in Operation Sindoor pause After the US president left the G7 Summit in Canada early, cutting short a planned in-person meeting, PM Modi spoke to him via a phone call and told Trump that at no point was there any discussion, at any level, on an India-US trade deal or any proposal for mediation by the US between India and Pakistan. Detailing the 35-minute phone conversation between Modi and Trump, their first since Operation Sindoor, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said, 'President Trump enquired if Prime Minister Modi could stop over in the US on his way back from Canada. Due to prior commitments, Prime Minister Modi expressed his inability to do so. Both leaders agreed to make efforts to meet in the near future.' Underlining that a discussion on ending military action took place 'directly between India and Pakistan through the existing channels of communication between the two armed forces' and had been initiated 'at Pakistan's request', Modi said, 'India does not and will never accept mediation.' He also said there was 'complete political consensus' in India on this issue. 'Prime Minister Modi clearly conveyed to President Trump that at no point during this entire sequence of events was there any discussion, at any level, on an India-US trade deal, or any proposal for a mediation by the US between India and Pakistan. The discussion to cease military action took place directly between India and Pakistan through the existing channels of communication between the two armed forces, and it was initiated at Pakistan's request. Prime Minister Modi firmly stated that India does not and will never accept mediation. There is complete political consensus in India on this matter,' Misri said. (With inputs from agencies)
