What you eat may impact your lung cancer risk, according to a new study
Ultraprocessed foods contain ingredients 'never or rarely used in kitchens, or classes of additives whose function is to make the final product palatable or more appealing,' according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Those ingredients — found in items such as sodas, chips, packaged soups, chicken nuggets and ice cream — can include preservatives against mold or bacteria, artificial coloring, emulsifiers to stop separation, and added or altered sugar, salt and fats to make food more appealing.
People who eat the most ultraprocessed foods are 41% more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer than those who eat the least, even after accounting for other factors such as smoking, according to the study published Tuesday in the journal Thorax.
For this study, researchers analyzed data from more than 100,000 people who completed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey's Food Frequency Questionnaire on their dietary habits and compared the information with medical records for lung cancer diagnoses.
On average, people had nearly three servings a day of ultraprocessed foods, most commonly lunch meat, diet or caffeinated soft drinks, or decaffeinated soft drinks, the study authors wrote.
'Industrial processing alters the food matrix, affecting nutrient availability and absorption, while also generating harmful contaminants,' the researchers added. They specifically highlighted acrolein, which can come from burning tobacco, wood, plastics and gasoline and from cooking fats and oils at high temperatures, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Packaging materials also may be part of the problem, they suggested.
The study is observational, meaning that while the methods were clear and strong, the research still can't definitively prove that the foods cause lung cancer –– just that there is a connection between the two, said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine and founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine. He was not involved in the research.
'This study strongly suggests that (ultraprocessed foods) may contribute to lung cancer risk,' he said.
Lung cancer isn't just about smoking
Lung cancer is a common form of cancer, with an estimated 2.4 million new cases worldwide in 2022, according to the World Health Organization.
Smoking is the main contributor to lung cancer risk, but people who don't smoke can still get it, which suggests other factors are at play, Katz said.
The authors adjusted for factors, meaning that they accounted for other possible things that could increase lung cancer diagnoses, including whether or not a person smoked, but it's important to note that the measurements were not nuanced, said Dr. Fang Fang Zhang, The Neely Family Professor and chair of the division of nutritional epidemiology and data science in the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University in Boston. She was not involved in the research.
'Because smoking is a very important risk factor for lung cancer, adjusting smoking in a crude way could leave a large room for residual confounding,' she said in an email. 'It will be important to adjust for the intensity (e.g., cigarettes/day) and duration (e.g., years of smoking) or the cumulative exposure of smoking (e.g., pack-years). However, the authors found that the association between ultra-processed food consumption and lung cancer risk was stronger among never-smokers.'
Why foods impact lung cancer
There hasn't been a lot of research into ultraprocessed foods and lung cancer risk, but a lot of existing evidence shows how important diet quality is for predicting premature death from all causes in the United States, Katz said.
Often, ultraprocessed food consumption is associated with a lower diet quality, such as a higher intake of saturated fats, chemicals, salt and sugar, as well as higher calorie consumption, he added.
These factors 'can drive inflammation –– a primary pathway in the development and progression of cancer –– and damage the microbiome, impairing immune system function,' he said in an email. 'This combination of excess inflammation and impaired immunity gives rogue cells the upperhand. … This scenario is where cancer begins.'
Ultraprocessed foods tend to be low in omega-3s, said Dr. Tom Brenna, professor of pediatrics, human nutrition and chemistry at Dell Medical School of the University of Texas at Austin. Omega-3s are essential, healthy fats that the body can't produce on its own, according to the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements.
'Omega-3s limit shelf life, so if you're going to ultraprocess something … then you kind of want to get rid of omega-3s,' said Brenna, who was not part of the research.
Additives in ultraprocessed foods, carcinogens formed during processing or chemicals from food packaging might also be at play, Zhang said.
'However, these pathways are not well understood and warrant further investigations,' she said.
Ultraprocessed foods vs. whole foods from nature
The study adds lung cancer risk to the list of reasons to avoid ultraprocessed foods and increase diet quality, Katz said.
Health and diet quality improve when people eat mostly whole, unprocessed foods and largely plants such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, lentils, nuts and seeds, he added.
If you want to make a change, Zhang recommends starting by reading food labels.
'Avoid foods with long ingredient lists with unfamiliar names — these are more likely to be additives, preservatives, and artificial flavors,' she said. 'Prioritize whole food and prepare meals using whole or minimally processed ingredients whenever possible.'
Instead of focusing on what you won't eat, try prioritizing adding foods directly from nature into your diet, Katz added.
'If you are used to eating a lot of UPFs, transition to less of them, more 'real' foods one better choice at a time,' he said in an email.
It may take a minute for your taste buds to adjust to more wholesome foods, but if you give yourself a couple of weeks to get used to it, you can come to prefer the taste of more natural ingredients, he said.
'Once that happens, maintaining a healthier diet becomes much easier,' Katz added.
Sign up for CNN's Eat, But Better: Mediterranean Style. Our eight-part guide shows you a delicious expert-backed eating lifestyle that will boost your health for life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Your heart could be aging faster than you are
The research team theorizes that telling folks their heart age might help spur them to healthier lifestyles and treatment. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay July 31 (UPI) -- Researchers who have developed a new "heart age" calculator say many Americans have unhealthy hearts that are physiologically older than their chronological age, with men faring worse than women. The research team theorizes that telling folks their heart age might help spur them to healthier lifestyles and treatment. "Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk for heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not on these medications," explained study senior author Dr. Sadiya Khan in a news release. "We hope this new heart age calculator will help support discussions about prevention and ultimately improve health for all people." The new heart age calculator, which is free to the public, is available online. Study findings were published Wednesday in JAMA Cardiology. Khan, a professor of cardiovascular epidemiology, and her colleagues at Northwestern University in Chicago, note that the calculator is based on the American Heart Association's PREVENT equations, which talk about a patient's heart risk in terms of percentages. For example, a doctor might use the equation to tell a patient, "8 out 10 people with your [cardiovascular] profile may have a heart event in the next 10 years." Khan's group hoped that expressing the heart's condition as an age might be easier for folks to grasp. To test the new heart age tool, they applied it to data on 14,000 nationally representative U.S. adults, ages 30 to 79, who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2011 and 2020. None of the participants had any prior history heart disease at the time of the analysis. In most cases, people's heart age was older than the number of candles on their birthday cake. For example, over the whole cohort, women had an average heart age of 55.4 years, compared to an average chronological age of 51.3, the study found. The news was worse for men: Their average heart age was 56.7, compared to an average chronological age of 49.7. Certain demographic factors were in play, Khan's group noted. Among men, for example, nearly a third of those who had achieved a high school education or less had a heart age that was 10 years or more older than their chronological age, the study found. For men and women alike, being Black or Hispanic also tended to widen the gap between heart age and chronological age. "Black men had a heart age 8.5 years older than their actual age, compared to 7.9 years for Hispanic men, 6.7 years for Asian men and 6.4 years for white men," a Northwestern University news release said. "The gaps were 6.2 years for Black women, 4.8 years for Hispanic women, 3.7 years for white women and 2.8 years for Asian women." The key to shrinking these health gaps is prevention, Khan said. She hopes the new tool can help motivate people. "We hope this tool helps doctors and patients discuss risk for heart disease more effectively so we can better inform what therapies can prevent heart attacks, stroke or heart failure events from ever happening," Khan said in the news release. "The important thing is that we have very good options available in our toolbox to help slow that aging down if we can identify it," she added. "This may be even more important in younger people who don't often think about their risk for heart disease." More information Find out more about keeping your heart healthy at the American Heart Association. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the tomato created the potato
What came first, the potato or the tomato? A new genetics study says the answer is that juicy, fragrant tomatoes were the first to arrive on planet Earth, and eventually helped starchy spuds do the same. About 9 million years ago, a natural inbreeding in the wild between tomato plants and a potato-like plant species in present-day South America gave way to what we know as the potato. This new (and nutritious) plant arose from an evolutionary event that triggered the formation of the tuber–the underground structure that plants like potatoes, yams, and taros use to store food. The findings are detailed in a study published July 31 in the journal Cell. 'Our findings show how a hybridization event between species can spark the evolution of new traits, allowing even more species to emerge,' Sanwen Huang, a study co-author and agricultural genomicist at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, said in a statement. 'We've finally solved the mystery of where potatoes came from.' A puzzling plant Potatoes are one of humanity's most important crops. Spuds provide basic nutrients including carbohydrates, dietary fiber (found in their skin), and vitamins and minerals like potassium, magnesium, and iron. They are also considered a climate-friendly crop by the United Nations, due to their low greenhouse gas emissions compared to other crops. They can also grow in areas where some natural resources are limited and expensive. Potatoes are versatile and can grow in a wide variety of conditions, making them a good crop choice for several regions. Despite being such a staple crop, the origin of this starchy staple has puzzled scientists. Modern potato plants physically look almost identical to three potato-like species from Chile called Etuberosums. However, Etuberosums do not have the signature tubers that allow potatoes to store nutrients and easily reproduce. This is part of why Etuberosums are considered 'potato-like' and not full spuds. Phylogenetic analysis also shows that potato plants are actually more closely related to tomatoes than Etuberosums. To look closer, the research team from this new paper studied 450 genomes from cultivated potatoes common on farms and 56 wild potato species. 'Wild potatoes are very difficult to sample, so this dataset represents the most comprehensive collection of wild potato genomic data ever analyzed,' added Zhiyang Zhang, a study co-author and biologist at the Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, part of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Every potato species contained a mix of genetic material from both Etuberosum and tomato plants. According to the team, this suggests that modern potatoes originated from a hybridization event–when individuals from two different species successfully reproduce–between these plants millions of years ago. While Etuberosums and tomatoes are distinct species, they do share a common ancestor that lived about 14 million years ago. Even after diverging for about 5 million years, both could interbreed. This interbreeding is what gave rise to the earliest potato plants with tubers roughly 9 million years ago. [ Related: Scientists finally figured out why tomatoes don't kill you. ] A model of survival The researchers also traced the origins of the key tuber-forming genes within the potato. The gene that tells the plant when to start making tubers (called SP6A) came from the tomato side of the family and not the potato-like plants. A separate important gene which helps control growth of the underground stems that form tubers (called IT1) came from the Etuberosum side. Without either of these genetic pieces, it would be impossible for the resulting hybrid offspring to produce tubers. Additionally, this evolutionary innovation overlapped with the rapid uplift of the Andes mountains. New ecological environments were emerging with all of this upheaval. Early potatoes were able to respond with a tuber that stores nutrients underground–a very helpful trait for surviving harsh mountain weather conditions. Tubers also allow potato plants to reproduce without pollination or seeds. Buds sprout right from the tuber to grow new plants, so this trait helped potatoes rapidly spread. They eventually filled diverse ecological niches from the mild lower-lying grasslands up to high and cold meadows in Central and South America. 'Evolving a tuber gave potatoes a huge advantage in harsh environments, fueling an explosion of new species and contributing to the rich diversity of potatoes we see and rely on today,' Huang said. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Medical Consequences of Starvation
The 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) warned in a July 29 alert, adding that 'access to food and other essential items and services has plummeted to unprecedented levels.' Widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths, the IPC, a United Nations-affiliated organization, added, calling for 'immediate action' to be taken to end 'catastrophic human suffering.' 'This is an incredibly important health catastrophe right now in Gaza, both in the short term and in the long term,' says Dr. Deborah Frank, a professor of pediatrics at Boston University's Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, assistant professor of community health science at the School of Public Health, director of the Grow Clinic for Children at Boston Medical Center, and founder of Children's HealthWatch, which monitors the health of young children globally. 'It is fixable, but it's not a quick or easy fix. You need to have skilled people, and you need to have the supplies.' According to the IPC, more than 20,000 children in Gaza were treated for acute malnutrition from April to mid-July, and more than 3,000 of them were severely malnourished. Gaza's health ministry said July 28 that nearly 150 people have died from malnutrition since the Israel-Gaza war began in October 2023, including at least 88 children. A desperate environment At the end of April, Dr. Aqsa Durrani, a physician and epidemiologist with a public health focus in humanitarian emergency response, returned to the U.S. after spending two months in Gaza with Médecins Sans Frontières, also known as Doctors Without Borders. She was there on March 2, when Israel reimposed a blockade on the Gaza Strip, preventing the entry of food, fuel, medicine, and other humanitarian aid. By the time she left, doctors, nurses, and patients at the trauma field hospital where she worked were eating one meal a day—a little bit of rice, she says, or maybe some lentils; certainly no substantial protein or significant amount of vegetables. 'We spent many of our days just trying to work with organizations to see where we could find more food sources and more nutrition sources for our patients,' she says. 'It was impossible. I had mothers and children sharing one portion of one meal every day.' Read More: The Malnutrition Crisis in Gaza Will Outlive the War, Experts Warn Starvation triggered "psychological torment,' Durrani recalls: 'I had mothers coming to me and taking me aside and saying, 'Do you have anything else you can give my child?'' The conditions have worsened since she left, and her colleagues tell her they're now having one meal every two or three days. 'They're performing surgeries while they're hungry and then going home to hungry children,' she says. 'It's quite harrowing.' How starvation affects children The impact of starvation varies from child to child and person to person, says Abyan Ahmed, global humanitarian nutrition advisor for CARE, an international humanitarian organization fighting global poverty and hunger. Factors like immune health and body fat play a role; if someone is already undernourished, their health will deteriorate quickly, after a few days without food. Children and adults who are a normal weight, or on the heavier side, meanwhile, might not experience the harshest effects of starvation for weeks or even months, especially if they're able to have intermittent meals. When there's very limited access to food, the body flips into survival mode, first shutting down non-vital functions: the digestive system slows down, the reproductive system (ovaries and testes) may shrink, and growth and development stall. Once the body has used up all its stored carbs, it will start burning fat reserves and seek energy from the organs, muscles, and bones. Heart rate slows; blood pressure drops; body temperature declines.'The body is eating itself up to try to stay alive,' Frank says. Broken bones are common for children in this state. Malnutrition also weakens kids' immune systems, increasing the risk of infections like pneumonia, diarrhea, measles, and sepsis. While people can and do die from starvation, deaths are often caused by an infection, she adds. In the short term, malnourished kids suffer mentally and behaviorally as well as physically. 'They're irritable, they're lethargic, and they're apathetic,' Frank says. 'They look miserable, and that's exactly how they're feeling. In fact, when you're slowly feeding a malnourished child, what we talk about is the smile sign: when they get to the point where they can smile, you're on the way up.' Frank has worked with malnourished children who she initially worried were deaf or blind. 'They were so unresponsive when they were starving,' she recalls. 'Then you feed them, and indeed, this kid can hear and see. As they feel better, they start to interact and act much more normal,' but that recovery can take weeks or months. Health effects in adults Malnutrition affects adults in many of the same ways as it does children. 'When we think about how the body works, the initial stages of starvation will be the same for both men and women,' says Don Thushara Galbadage, an associate professor with the Harris College of Nursing and Health Sciences at Texas Christian University. In the first few weeks, 'they will experience fatigue, they will have muscle loss and muscle wasting, and they will have impaired cognition. And if it goes longer, some of their organ systems can malfunction and shut down.' 'We have seen, from case studies of starvation, that it takes up to 60 days before the body fully shuts down if the person has access to water,' Ahmed says. 'If you don't have access to water, you can die as quickly as three to five days.' People experiencing starvation are often unable to concentrate and don't have the energy to complete basic tasks, like getting out of bed or taking care of their children. 'If a mother is malnourished, all those tasks become incredibly hard to do,' Ahmed says. 'That leads to depression and mental-health issues, which also affect malnutrition—because if you have mental problems, you're unable to look after yourself and eat properly, even if food is available.' Plus, she says, many women are overwhelmed and distressed by the sound of their children crying out of hunger. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding are especially vulnerable to the effects of starvation. Research suggests that expectant mothers in these situations are often unable to gain weight, and the risk of miscarriage and stillbirth increases. In one study, birth weight declined 9% during a famine, placental weight declined 15%, and length at birth declined 2.5%. 'In the third trimester, a lot of growth happens for the fetus, and when a mother is being starved, it has lifelong implications for the child,' says Ruth Gibson, a postdoctoral fellow in the department of health policy at Stanford University who specializes in global health, with a focus on improving maternal and child health in geopolitically complex regions. 'That includes things such as epigenetic modifications—so that's essentially when gene expression is changed—cardiovascular risks, chronic disease, and metabolic syndrome.' How starvation interferes with wound healing At the trauma field hospital in Gaza where Durrani worked, she mostly treated patients who had been injured by air strikes. Some had been burned by the resulting fires that rip through the region—and for their wounds to heal, they needed proper nutrition. If a child needs an amputation, for example, their surgical incisions may not heal because their body doesn't have enough protein to rebuild the tissue. In general, when wounds don't heal properly, the risk of infection increases. 'Very early on, I did have a baby die who developed an infection due to his nutritional status," Durrani says. 'If you think about a community that's being impacted by relentless air strikes—it's really just a layer of cruelty to add starvation to it.' A lifetime of consequences The effects of starvation can persist long after people regain access to food. 'What we can't see is the generational and intergenerational impacts' of the ongoing famine, Gibson says. Research suggests that kids who experience malnutrition are more likely to have poorer health—including an increased risk of diabetes, heart disease, and obesity, as well as muscular-skeletal deficiencies—and developmental delays that persist throughout their lives. They're also at heightened risk of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and mental illnesses like schizophrenia. 'Not only does it reduce their cognitive development, but malnutrition has been associated with poor educational attainment, with poor IQ scores, with a lack of income in later life, and not being able to keep jobs because of behavioral problems,' Ahmed says. 'It sets the person off to this cycle of poverty, which then gives birth to more malnutrition in their families.' Addressing the chronic problems associated with malnutrition requires a systematic approach that likely isn't possible in Gaza in the near future, Ahmed says. For now, it's crucial to make sure as many people as possible have access to therapeutic nutrition support to help quell the immediate effects of starvation.'The priority right now is to keep as many people alive and get them to flourish again and get them back to a normal immune system,' Frank says, which can take a couple months in optimal conditions. 'But there's going to need to be long-term work for the children who survive, to decrease the chances of school failure, psychiatric disorder, and cardiovascular illness as they become adolescents and young adults.' A looming threat: refeeding syndrome When a child or adult has adapted to consuming very little food, they can't suddenly start eating a normal amount, even if supplies become available. Doing so could lead to a condition called refeeding syndrome, which causes a shift in fluids and electrolytes that can trigger cardiac arrhythmia, organ dysfunction, and death. 'On a less catastrophic level, you can get horrendous diarrhea and vomiting, which sets hydration back,' Frank says. 'It isn't just a matter of handing someone a box of cereal and saying, 'Go to it.' You have to be careful.' It can take doctors who are working with malnourished children up to 10 days to establish safe, consistent weight gain, Frank says. Typically, doctors provide kids with only a small portion of the calories they actually need based on their weight, while monitoring their physiology and stomach tolerance for a couple days. 'You gradually build up over time, first to the normal caloric needs, and then to the needs for catch-up growth,' she says. 'People who are caring for these kids need to know exactly what they're doing. The idea that you can parachute boxes of food on the babies' heads and then expect them to grow—it doesn't work like that.' Contact us at letters@ Solve the daily Crossword