Fact check: Aree France's working conditions are among Europe's worst?
"In a study carried out at the end of 2021 and published in 2022 (...) France is in 36th position, right at the bottom with Albania, in terms of working conditions," Delgènes told Public Sénat, the official TV channel of the upper house of the French Parliament.
His statements have prompted a flood of reactions on social media.
It comes as the issue of precarious working conditions comes to the fore in France.
Over the past two and a half months, five young workers and trainees aged between 15 and 19 have been killed in workplace accidents, raising questions about the country's labour conditions.
We took a closer look at the data to verify the claims made by Delgènes.
France trails most European counterparts
The claims are based on a 2021 study by Eurofound, a Dublin-based agency that conducts research into living and working conditions in European countries.
Its most recent survey into European working conditions, known as EWCS, dates from 2021. Updated fieldwork from 2024 is expected to be made public later this year.
The research looks at working conditions in 36 European countries, including all 27 European Union member states.
It includes a 'job quality index', which combines data points on aspects such as health, safety, work satisfaction and more to measure the degree to which workers are strained in the workplace.
The results suggest that more workers in France are exposed to 'extremely strained' or 'highly strained' conditions than in most other countries.
Only in Serbia, Montenegro, Slovakia and Poland do more workers have 'extremely strained' or 'highly strained' conditions, according to the findings.
France not in 36th position 'with Albania'
When we also consider those who cited 'moderately strained' conditions, France ranks penultimately, with only Slovakia scoring worse, and Albania faring slightly better.
The research therefore does not place France "right at the bottom, with Albania in terms of working conditions" as Delgènes asserts.
When we look only at workers citing "extremely strained", or the most severe conditions, France ranks 30th, above other EU member states such as Croatia and Cyprus as well as the United Kingdom.
Concerns over health and safety
The data, however, does place France behind most of its European counterparts when it comes to labour conditions.
Data provided by Eurostat, the EU's statistical office, confirms the trend.
According to the latest estimates, only Malta ranks worse than France in terms of the incidence of fatal accidents recorded in the workplace.
These concerns have been augmented recently with the tragic deaths of five young workers in their place of work in the space of just two and a half months. According to estimates, two people die in the workplace in France every day.
The French government is examining a proposal to sanction employers responsible for workplace issues, such as through fines and criminal prosecutions, according to a document recently seen by French media, including Le Monde.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
26 minutes ago
- Local France
France's top court annuls arrest warrant against Syria's Assad
The Court of Cassation ruled there were no exceptions to presidential immunity, even for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. But its presiding judge, Christophe Soulard, added that, as Assad was no longer president after an Islamist-led group toppled him in December, "new arrest warrants can have been, or can be, issued against him" and as such the investigation into the case could continue. Human rights advocates had hoped the court would rule that immunity did not apply because of the severity of the allegations, which would have set a major precedent in international law towards holding accused war criminals to account. They said that, in this regard, it was a missed opportunity. "This ruling represents a setback for the global fight against impunity for the most serious crimes under international law," said Mazen Darwish, the head of the Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression, a civil party to the case. French authorities issued the warrant against Assad in November 2023 over his alleged role in the chain of command for a sarin gas attack that killed more than 1,000 people, according to US intelligence, on August 4 and 5, 2013 in Adra and Douma outside Damascus. Assad is accused of complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity in the case. Syrian authorities at the time denied involvement and blamed rebels. Universal jurisdiction The French judiciary tackled the case under the principle of universal jurisdiction, whereby a court may prosecute individuals for serious crimes committed in other countries. An investigation -- based on testimonies of survivors and military defectors, as well as photos and video footage -- led to warrants for the arrest of Assad, his brother Maher who headed an elite army unit, and two generals. Advertisement Public prosecutors approved three of the warrants, but issued an appeal against the one targeting Assad, arguing he should have immunity as a head of state. The Paris Court of Appeal in June last year however upheld it, and prosecutors again appealed. But in December, Assad's circumstances changed. He and his family fled to Russia, according to Russian authorities, after Islamist-led fighters seized power from him. In January, French investigating magistrates issued a second arrest warrant against Assad for suspected complicity in war crimes for a bombing in the Syrian city of Deraa in 2017 that killed a French-Syrian civilian. 'Great victory' The Court of Cassation said Assad's so called "personal immunity", granted because of his office, meant he could not be targeted by arrest warrants until his ouster. But it ruled that "functional immunity", which is granted to people who perform certain functions of state, could be lifted in the case of accusations of severe crimes. Thus it upheld the French judiciary's indictment in another case against ex-governor of the Central Bank of Syria and former finance minister, Adib Mayaleh. Advertisement He has been accused of complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity over alleged funding of the Assad government during Syria's civil war. Mayaleh obtained French nationality in 1993, and goes by the name Andre Mayard on his French passport. Darwish, the Syrian lawyer, said that part of the court's ruling was however a "great victory". "It establishes the principle that no agent of a foreign state, regardless of the position they hold, can invoke their immunity when international crimes are at stake," he said. Syria's war has killed more than half a million people and displaced millions from their homes since its eruption in 2011 with the then-government's brutal crackdown on anti-Assad protests. Assad's fall on December 8, 2024 ended his family's five-decade rule.
LeMonde
37 minutes ago
- LeMonde
The logic behind recognizing Palestine
French President Emmanuel Macron's historic commitment to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September has sparked polarizing and often irreconcilable reactions in France, as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict always does. This comes as no surprise, especially given the criticism from the right and far right. Some within those ranks have chosen to align with Israel's positions, even when the country is led by a coalition that advocates the destruction of Gaza, the annexation of the West Bank and ethnic cleansing. Since Hamas's terrorist attack on October 7, 2023, these three threats have ceased to be part of a dystopian scenario. The first threat is nearing completion before our eyes, despite the shameful media blackout imposed by Israel. The second threat is advancing inexorably, fueled by extremist settlers supported by an ultranationalist government where the right and far right are becoming indistinguishable. That same government is also actively working to normalize the third threat. Decades of Israeli fait accomplis demand that we take this seriously. This necessary reminder of the brutal reality is essential to understanding Macron's decision. France can no longer adhere to its previous position that recognition would come at the end of a territorial compromise negotiated by both sides. The door to such a prospect has long since closed, and responsibility is broadly shared. What is now at stake makes it impossible to accept inaction or further delay. The fact that some of France's allies are content with this resignation does not make it virtuous. It may already be too late to save the two-state solution. Waiting and doing nothing only ensures that, eventually, there will be nothing left to recognize – definitively. Even without the slightest guarantee of success, trying to halt this downward spiral is an argument in favor of recognizing Palestine. Staying true to the values France has proclaimed to uphold, including supporting the Palestinians' right to self-determination in land seized by Israel in 1967, also leads to this decision. The two-state solution would guarantee an irreversible defeat for Hamas by further strengthening the legitimacy of Israel following the Palestine Liberation Organization's (PLO) recognition of Israel in 1988 and 1993. The solution also safeguards against a shift that, if unchecked, will cause Israel to abandon its democratic nature and impose an apartheid regime on Palestinians confined to enclaves. Turning away from these values because upholding them is risky is, in fact, an endorsement of resignation – a point that makes such criticism all the more peculiar when it comes from people who often invoke Gaullism (a French doctrine of national independence and moral leadership inherited from former president Charles de Gaulle). Either Palestine represents an injustice and must be opposed, or Palestine is the only solution to save the Palestinians and to protect Israelis from themselves. In that case, it must be recognized.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Trump says immigration is 'killing Europe' during Scotland visit
Upon his arrival in Scotland for a five-day trip, US President Donald Trump declared that immigration is "killing Europe". Responding to a question from a reporter on migration, he said that "on immigration, you'd better to get your act together. You're not going to have Europe anymore." He continued to say, "You've got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe. Some people, some leaders have not let it happen. They're not getting the proper credit." He did not name the leaders he had in mind, however, in order not to "embarrass" the others. His words echoed the "Great Replacement" theory often posed by the far right, according to which the population of Europe was set to be replaced by immigrants from countries in Africa or elsewhere. The US president is set to meet with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during his visit, as well as UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Von der Leyen had said they would "discuss translatlantic relations", in a week when negotiations have intensified ahead of 1 August, a deadline set by Trump from when he said would impose 30% tariffs on EU imports. Meanwhile, EU member states approved a list of countermeasures of their own if no deal is reached. For his part, Trump said on Friday that reaching a deal with the EU on trade would be "the biggest deal of them all if we make it." 'Stop the windmills' The US president also took the opportunity to aim wind energy, saying Europe should "stop the windmills, you're ruining your countries ... ruining your beautiful fields and valleys, and killing your birds." Trump has on multiple occasions expressed an intense dislike for wind turbines, recently saying, 'I don't want windmills destroying our place.' Trump is a well-known climate change denier, often challenging views and scientific opinions alike that green sources of energy can offset the carbon footprint of major world economies, which has contributed to the planet's general warming, especially in recent times. There is no scientific evidence that wind energy can negatively affect the flora or fauna of a country. The Trump Organisation, whose assets are currently in a trust run by his children, was ordered to cover the Scottish government's legal costs after the golf course it owns in Aberdeenshire unsuccessfully sued over the construction of a nearby wind farm, arguing in part that it hurt golfers' views. While in Scotland, Trump will visit a golf course in Aberdeenshire ahead of its opening on 13 August, and another near Turnberry. His family owns both golf courses.
