logo
How did the Senate change the GOP tax and spend bill?

How did the Senate change the GOP tax and spend bill?

Here are some of the changes the Senate made to the bill:
Not making it easier to ignore court rulings
Senate Republicans removed a provision in the House version of the bill that would have restricted judges' ability to hold people accountable for violating court orders.
In recent months some judges have considered contempt rulings against the Trump administration for ignoring court orders that restricted the administration's actions.
The legislation would bar judges from enforcing such contempt rulings if they didn't first order a bond, which is commonly set at zero or not ordered in cases when people are claiming the government did something unconstitutional.
Democrats say it's an attempt to limit the power of the courts, while Republicans say it was an incentive to stop frivolous lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to pay in.
Who is eligible for the child tax credit?
The Senate version allows mixed-status immigration status families to quality for the child tax credit for American citizen children.
Currently, children with Social Security numbers, the vast majority of whom are American citizens or legal permanent residents, are eligible for the Child Tax Credit, even if their parents lack Social Security numbers, according to the Center for Migration Studies.
The Senate version, requires at least one parent to have a Social Security number to qualify. The House version required both parents to have valid Social Security numbers to qualify, which would have kept millions of children from getting the benefit. The Center for Migration Studies estimated this would have impacted 4.5 million citizen and legal permanent resident children.
A ban on regulating AI
Senate Republicans stripped out a provision in the House bill that would have blocked states from creating new regulations to shape how artificial intelligence is used or developed for the next 10 years.
It would have also blocked dozens of states from enforcing AI regulations and oversight structures already in place. There is now no federal AI regulation to take the place of state policies, which are likely to vary across the country.
Tax-free gym memberships
Senators removed a portion of the bill qualifying sports and fitness expenses as qualified medical care, which would have allowed people to pay for them tax-free through a Health Savings Account.
The benefit, worth $500 for an individual or $1,000 per couple, could not have been used at "a private club" owned by members, or a facility that offers golf, hunting, sailing or riding facilities. The health and fitness part of the business also couldn't be "incidental to its overall function and purpose."
Purple Heart benefits
Senators also removed a provision that would have created a new income tax credit for some people who earned a Purple Heart - the decoration for service members who were wounded or killed in action.
Purple Heart recipients who lost a portion of their Social Security disability benefits because they got a job could have also gotten a higher Earned Income Tax Credit to make up those lost Social Security benefits.
Pell grants
The Senate also pulled out a change to the Pell Grant program, which provides federal aid to low-income students to attend colleges and universities. Right now, students are considered full time and qualify for the maximum amount of aid if they take 12 credits a semester.
The House version of the bill would have changed that to 15 credits a semester, which the National College Attainment Network estimated would result in a nearly $1,500 cut in benefits for students who can't increase their courseload because of work or caretaking responsibilities. The Senate left the 12-credit requirement intact.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk urges release of Epstein files weeks after accusing Trump of being named in them
Elon Musk urges release of Epstein files weeks after accusing Trump of being named in them

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Elon Musk urges release of Epstein files weeks after accusing Trump of being named in them

Elon Musk has again urged the release of the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files, weeks after accusing President Donald Trump of being in them. The tech billionaire issued a one-word reply to MAGA activist Scott Presler on X on Thursday, who wrote: 'Release the unredacted Epstein files.' 'Yes,' Musk responded. Renewed calls to release files related to the disgraced financier's sex-trafficking case come just weeks after the explosive fallout between Musk and Trump, during which the Tesla CEO claimed the 'real reason' the documents remained sealed was because the president was implicated. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk tweeted on June 5. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' He followed up shortly after: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' About six weeks later, Musk said he regrets some of the posts about Trump, claiming they 'went too far.' On Monday, Trump reignited his feud with Elon Musk, threatening to unleash the Department of Government Efficiency against the world's riechest man and suggesting he might have to 'go back to South Africa.' The veiled threat was in response to Musk escalating his anti-Republican rhetoric and his scathing criticism of the president' showpiece tax bill. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump said. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' This is a breaking story. More to follow.

Trump said he told the New York Times about Musk's alleged drug use, presidential biographer claims
Trump said he told the New York Times about Musk's alleged drug use, presidential biographer claims

The Independent

time38 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump said he told the New York Times about Musk's alleged drug use, presidential biographer claims

President Donald Trump said he 'dropped a dime' on Elon Musk's alleged drug taking to the New York Times, according to biographer Michael Wolff. As the feud between Trump and Musk reignited this week, Wolff claimed the president has been calling contacts to badmouth his former 'first buddy.' 'I was tracking some Trump phone calls on Monday night. And it's sort of worth explaining here that over a long period of time, I've gotten to know and cultivated a lot of people who Trump regularly speaks to,' Wolff told the Daily Beast Podcast host Joanna Coles during Thursday's episode. Wolff, who did not speak to the president himself, claimed Trump made the comments on Monday after Musk threatened to form a new political party if the Big, Beautiful Bill passes. 'And he's like calling people to say, 'Do you think Elon is crazy? I think he's crazy,'' Wolff said. 'He was on about, you know…how many drugs [Musk] takes, you know…He takes drugs all the time. The New York Times wrote about it. They said he takes drugs,'' Wolff continued. 'And then [Trump] went on to say…you know, actually, we dropped a dime to The New York Times on Elon for taking…on Elon's drug taking.'' Wolff said that Trump is 'claiming credit' for the report. White House communications director Steven Cheung dismissed the claims and fired back with one of his signature takedowns of the Trump biographer. 'Michael Wolff is a lying sack of s*** and has been proven to be a fraud,' Cheung said in a statement to The Independent. 'He routinely fabricates stories originating from his sick and warped imagination, only possible because he has a severe and debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his peanut-sized brain.' Musk denies claims that he takes drugs and was high while in the White House. 'To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their a** off,' he said in a post on X at the time. 'I tried *prescription* ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then.' Tensions between Musk and Trump have boiled over once again after the Tesla CEO launched fresh attacks on the president on his social media platform. The president even said he would 'take a look' at deporting Musk after his renewed criticism of the tax and spending megabill. ​​His threats followed Musk's promise to bankroll primary challenges against Republican lawmakers who vote to pass legislation. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk wrote on X. Trump also hinted he might also turn the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which Musk spearheaded, on his former friend. 'We might have to put Doge on Elon,' he said. 'You know what Doge is? Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.'

The obscure Senate functionary whose word is law
The obscure Senate functionary whose word is law

Economist

time42 minutes ago

  • Economist

The obscure Senate functionary whose word is law

God's vicar in the Senate Illustration: The Economist/U.S. Senate S ENATORS , ALAS , are not much like nuns. But the Senate itself bears a certain resemblance to a convent, with its hushed halls, arcane rituals and air of separation from real life. Above all, it has a Mother Superior, who is a stickler for the rules. She is immune to criticism and flattery. Her work is dull and thankless. In theory she answers to a higher power. In practice she is almighty. She is the Senate parliamentarian. This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline 'Fiat lex' → The obscure Senate functionary whose word is law Republicans battle to pass a profligate but insubstantial law Industrial capacity in peacetime is no longer necessary for success during war Assessments vary wildly and it is impossible to know for sure But its impact is uncertain Much hinges on the stubborn supreme leader and America's mercurial president If it fails the regime could make a frantic dash for a bomb

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store