Implications of money laundering for GCC economies
One of the most high-profile cases involved the Fourth Criminal Court in Dubai, which recently convicted a prominent Indian businessman known as "B.S.S." or "Abu Sabah." He was sentenced to five years in prison for laundering money through a criminal gang. In addition to a fine of AED 500,000, the court ordered the confiscation of AED 150 million and ruled that he be deported after serving his sentence. Several others, including his son and 32 co-defendants, were also convicted.
The case was referred to the Public Prosecution on December 18, 2024, and the first court session was held on January 9, 2025. The verdict was delivered in under six months. The court also seized electronic devices and documents for further investigation, highlighting how the Gulf region has become increasingly vulnerable to money launderers who manipulate local economies.
Money laundering poses a serious challenge for any country, and in the Gulf, it raises concerns that some commercial activities are exploiting regulatory loopholes to conduct illicit operations.
GCC countries have strong banking systems, large financial flows, and substantial remittances—especially from expatriate workers—some of whom are unwittingly used in money laundering schemes. Nonetheless, anti-money laundering efforts in the region continue to identify and prosecute perpetrators.
According to both international and local reports, a wide range of crimes are associated with money laundering in the GCC. These include predicate offenses that generate illicit funds, which are then laundered. Examples include financial and economic crimes, banking fraud (such as stock manipulation and loan fraud), corruption, and bribery. These developments have intensified the need for regulatory authorities to enhance oversight and enforce international disclosure agreements.
The region also faces cases of embezzlement of both public and private funds, as well as cross-border crimes such as human trafficking, illegal labor practices, smuggling of prohibited goods (including weapons and contraband), cybercrime, online fraud, bank data theft, and terrorist financing—the most dangerous form of money laundering.
GCC countries are placing increasing emphasis on monitoring and controlling these issues, particularly in response to international expectations and Financial Action Task Force (FATF) requirements. Shell companies and luxury real estate investments are frequently used as fronts for laundering illicit funds.
Exchange houses and money transfer companies are also common conduits, with multiple bank accounts often employed to fragment transactions and avoid detection. In many cases, accounts are opened in the names of expatriates or shell entities to obscure the origins and destinations of funds.
This raises a final, critical question: how many expatriate traders and investors, operating in sectors such as food, retail, and services, are also running money transfer companies? Some exploit low-wage expatriate labour while channeling funds through both legitimate and illegitimate means. Shouldn't the financial records of such operators be audited to determine the annual volume of remittances—and to identify any links to money laundering?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
3 hours ago
- Observer
Crude holds strong amid OPEC+ hike
Brent crude prices held steady above $68 per barrel on Tuesday after a three-day decline, while WTI hovered around $65.25, with both benchmarks slipping 0.25%, according to Vijay Valecha, Chief Investment Officer, Century Financial. This recent bearish trend reflects mounting fears of a potential supply surplus due to OPEC+'s decision to increase output, even as uncertainties persist over Russian oil agreed to raise production by 547,000 barrels per day in September, reversing the 2.2 million bpd cut implemented by eight member states in 2023. This move has added downward pressure on prices amid heightened geopolitical tensions. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump announced plans to significantly increase tariffs on Indian exports, citing India's continued purchases of Russian oil, a proposal that would raise tariffs above the current 25% and further strain global trade relations, contributing to oil market volatility. Nevertheless, seasonal summer demand continues to lend short-term support. Technically, WTI crude is testing a key upward trendline, with a decisive close below this level potentially opening the way for further declines toward the 100-day SMA at $64.40. If support holds, a rebound toward the 21-day SMA at $66.30 is possible. Brent faces resistance near its 21-day SMA at $69, with support at the 100-day SMA around $67.35. These technical levels will be pivotal for determining the near-term direction, but overall, crude oil may remain under pressure for now.
Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
"Safe Investment Environment" meeting discusses developing business environment in Dhofar
Salalah: An introductory meeting titled "Safe Investment Environment" was held on Monday in the Wilayat of Salalah in Dhofar Governorate. Organised by the Public Prosecution and the Oman Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OCCI), the event aimed to enhance the business environment through integrated institutional efforts and to establish principles of transparency and legal compliance. This is meant to contribute to creating a safe and attractive investment environment. The meeting was attended by a number of ministers and officials, members of the Oman Chamber of Commerce and Industry's Board of Directors, investors, business owners, company representatives, and those interested in legal and economic affairs. Nasr Khamis Al Sawai, the Public Prosecutor, explained that the Public Prosecution seeks to expand its partnership with national institutions to spread legal awareness within the private sector and protect the business environment from any unlawful practices. This, he noted, strengthens justice and enhances economic stability. Faisal Abdullah Al Rowas, Chairman of Oman Chamber of Commerce and Industry's Board of Directors, affirmed that the meeting is part of a strategic partnership with the Public Prosecution to enhance a legislative environment that stimulates investment in Oman and supports efforts to attract local and foreign capital. Naif Hamed Fadhil, Head of the Chamber's branch in Dhofar Governorate, pointed out that the meeting serves as a platform for institutional dialogue on ways to develop the investment environment in the governorate. He affirmed that Dhofar is rich with promising potential, making it an attractive destination for investors in various sectors. Assistant Public Prosecutor Khalfan Said Al Maawali presented a working paper that reviewed criminal liability under the Commercial Companies Law, the Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Law, and the compliance mechanisms that companies must adhere to. The meeting included a dialogue session with the Public Prosecutor and the Chairman of Oman Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The session addressed key legislative challenges facing the private sector and discussed practical proposals for developing the legal environment and boosting Oman's investment appeal. This meeting is part of a series of initiatives aimed at embedding the principles of governance and transparency and strengthening institutional partnership. This aligns with the aspirations of Oman Vision 2040 to empower the private sector and support the national business environment.
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
India reels from the shock of Trump's onslaught
NEW DELHI — President Donald Trump's new list of tariffs on half the world's countries sent the United States' trading partners scrambling to understand how their businesses will be affected. India got the bad news a day earlier — its goods face a tariff of 25% or more — but the extra time was hardly enough to adjust to the fresh chaos. Indian negotiators had not expected to conclude a meaningful deal in time to meet Trump's revised deadline of Aug. 1. But they did expect to be treated as well as their neighbors, and to keep haggling with U.S. officials until October or November, when Trump was invited to visit India as part of the Quad defense group, which brings together four big democracies — India, the United States, Japan and Australia — with a shared interest in standing up to China. Instead, they were fed a heap of insults and injuries. Along with the 25% rate, one of the highest in Asia and only a point lower than what was threatened on 'Liberation Day' in April, India was informed that its existing trade barriers are 'strenuous and obnoxious'; it will be charged an untold penalty for buying Russian oil; it is a 'dead economy.' It's archrival Pakistan was praised and promised an oil exploration deal. Hurt feelings aside, the results are confusing. Two of the biggest categories of exports to the United States from India are personal electronics, worth about $14 billion a year, and pharmaceuticals, worth $10 billion. Rajesh Sharma, executive director of India Cellular and Electronics Association, said smartphones were exempted from these tariffs; so did executives at pharmaceutical companies. But on Friday, after reading the executive order, the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi concluded the opposite. India's stock markets dipped on the news for two days running. Indian and international banks wrote notices warning that the country's generally hard-charging economic growth is likely to slow measurably as a result of the tariffs. Then there are the unknown tariffs. On July 6, Trump wrote that countries aligned with the BRICS group, of which India is a founding member, would incur an additional 10% penalty. Then on July 14, he said that, if Russia didn't make peace with Ukraine within 50 days, he would punish its trading partners with 'secondary tariffs' of 100%. That figure is making Indians worry anew. Trump added 'plus a penalty' to the 25% rate imposed on India, for buying Russian oil and weapons. Shashi Tharoor, a prominent member of the opposition, spoke to an Indian news agency about the possible impact. 'There's even talk of a 100% penalty,' he said, 'which will destroy our trade with America.' There is evidence that Indian buyers of Russian oil were already pulling back before the executive order. 'Indian refiners have reduced Russian crude purchases this week,' said Sumit Ritolia, an analyst at Kpler, which tracks shipping and commodities. They were already 'looking to further diversify, amid rising concerns over potential U.S. sanctions,' having spent years taking advantage of discounted Russian oil to reduce their imports from the Persian Gulf. Reducing the United States' trade deficit is one of the Trump administration's goals, so persuading India to buy more American oil and gas would make sense. Last year, India exported $45.7 billion more goods to the United States than it imported. It spent about three times as much importing oil. If a third of that were redirected to American sources, their bilateral trade would be evened out. Trump's angry barrage of social media has complicated further negotiations. The breakdown of trust between Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, whom Trump called his 'true friend,' the U.S. president is likely to make it harder to complete any deal, analysts say. Indian news outlets have reported that Trump wanted to iron out some outstanding issues, after four rounds of direct talks between the two sides, in a phone call with Modi. The Indian government was anxious to avoid any of his last-minute surprises. The U.S. commerce secretary accused India of 'slow-rolling' its trade negotiations. Indian officials and analysts say the friction is caused by a fundamental difference of approach. Trump has a penchant for quick, top-down dealmaking. India's bureaucracy moves at a methodical pace, especially when it comes to opening up the agriculture market, which is politically sensitive. India's recently concluded trade deal with Britain took three years of talks, under two British prime ministers. On Friday, India's Foreign Ministry released a statement that put on a brave face. 'India and the United States share a Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership,' established in 2013 between President Barack Obama and then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, 'anchored in shared interests, democratic values and robust people-to-people ties.' The ministry stuck to principles, revealing no plan for breaking through Trump's hard line. 'This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges,' the statement said. 'We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' This article originally appeared in
