Power struggles, but still power surging: MK Party confident of victory despite ongoing tensions
Image: MK Party/Facebook
Despite ongoing internal spats, the Umkhonto Wesizwe (MK) Party continues to punch above its weight, as party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela asserts.
He further expressed that the party has shelved its plans to become the official opposition party in, and is rather focused on its course to being the ruling party in South Africa.
Speaking to Newzroom Afrika this week, Ndhlela said if there's one thing that the MK Party, established in December 2023, needs to be commended on, it is that in the space of six months, it has received an overwhelming response from South Africans.
Nhlamulo Ndhlela
Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers
Fastest-growing
"South Africans believe in us. South Africans continue to believe in us. Now, our party status is that we are the fastest-growing political party in the country, let's not forget that.
"Secondly, the majority of the Members of Parliament are below the age of 50, and the majority of them have never been in Parliament. We are, in fact, punching above our weight, contrary to whatever other people may be saying," he said.
Ndhlela said the party welcomes the scrutiny by the public because it's that what helps them grow.
"No one can say that Umkhonto Wesizwe's presence is not felt in Parliament," he said.
Floyd Shivambu
Image: Facebook / MK Party
Recent incidents
This week, Eugene Ndlangamandla, regional coordinator of the MK Party in the Umkhanyakude district in northern KwaZulu-Natal, reportedly tendered his resignation.
In a letter to the party, he stated that he has observed unfair treatment.
"MKP seems to operate more like a family and friends business rather than a political party to liberate black people. I have noticed a lack of discipline among members," he said.
Ndlangamandla said he will be joined Shivambu's Mayibuye Consultation Team.
In recent weeks, the party has been hit with several challenges, including the alleged use of its Parliamentary leader, John Hlophe's electronic email signature to issue a letter removing Ndhlela from the party's whippery, and referring to the party president's daughter, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla, as rude.
Ndhlela has also reportedly filed a R3 million defamation lawsuit against former MK Party Secretary-General Floyd Shivambu who accused Ndhlela of using drugs and alcohol.
On Wednesday, IOL reported that while Shivambu remains a member of the party, his actions will be reviewed.
There have also been calls for the party's Parliamentary Whip, Colleen Makhubele's, removal. IOL reported that the party's Parliamentary caucus wants the newly-appointed chief whip to be shown the door amid claims that she makes unilateral and undemocratic decisions, betrays party ideology - particularly in relation to her stance on Israel - and demonstrates poor leadership.
Last month, nine new MPs were sworn in following axing of several MPs last year.
Instability
Speaking to IOL, independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego, said the turnover within the party's senior leadership centred around Zuma's whims. He added that Zuma was looking for a SG of a particular calibre.
"It's not the party's membership that determines that. Skills and popularity with members don't matter; what matters is who Zuma wants."
Political analyst Ntsikelelo Breakfast said conflict is natural.
"These problems are not going to grow legs and go away by itself," he said in an interview with eNCA.
Breakfast added that a strategy that the MK Party can employ, is to have democratic processes in place that will help to de-escalate some of the tensions within the party.
Path to power
Responding to a question about the strength of the party, Ndhlela shrugged off the question about 'bad sentiments' about the party.
Instead, he said that if there are changes made within the MK Party, it is to make the party stronger.
"We can't be stopped from doing that. Changes are changes; there is nothing wrong with changes.
"It is important that we adapt to the pulse of the nation. That is what is important: being able to adapt and be flexible. We are focusing on our work. We are the incoming government. We are not focusing on being the official opposition. We are focusing on being in government. It's a path to power," he said.
[email protected]
IOL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
22 minutes ago
- IOL News
'Zionacity': The Audacity of Pretend Intellectualism
Tim Flack critiques Gillian Schutte's term 'Zionacity', revealing how it distorts historical truths and manipulates ideological narratives, ultimately challenging the legitimacy of Jewish self-determination. Image: IOL / Ron AI A reply to Gillian Schutte, by Tim Flack In the now all-too-familiar theatre of progressive thought, where victimhood is currency and language is weaponised to invert truth, we find ourselves confronted with a fresh absurdity. Gillian Schutte, self-styled decolonial thinker and social critic, has coined a term 'Zionacity'. A Frankensteinian mash-up of "Zionism" and "audacity," it is the sort of pseudo-intellectual graffiti one might find scribbled in the margins of a 1st years Marxist seminar notes, rather than in anything resembling serious journalism or moral philosophy. Yet here it is, published with no sense of shame or rigour, paraded as if it were a concept of gravitas, rather than a crude ideological club designed to bludgeon the world's only Jewish state. In just a few short paragraphs, Schutte manages to unravel any credibility she may have had by engaging in an extraordinary exercise in double standards, historical revisionism, and - dare we say it - a rather fashionable brand of antisemitism, cloaked, as always, in the language of virtue. Let us begin with her core assertion: that Zionism is not a political movement rooted in the self-determination of a historically persecuted people, but rather a "psychosis," a "global apparatus of control," a "death cult" feeding on the corpses of others. This is not criticism. This is incitement with adjectives. And it's precisely the sort of grotesque rhetorical overreach that reveals the intellectual poverty of her position. Zionism, for the uninitiated or the wilfully ignorant, is the belief that Jews - a people indigenous to the land of Israel, with a continuous presence there for over three millennia - have a right to national self-determination in their ancestral homeland. It is not imperialism. It is not colonialism. It is not conquest. It is return. That this simple truth must still be defended in 2025, and defended against supposed "anti-racists," is a mark of just how distorted our discourse has become. Schutte accuses Zionists of "elevating one group's trauma" above others. This, she says, is the moral disease of "Zionacity." But this is a malicious and cynical sleight of hand. Jewish trauma - pogroms, inquisitions, expulsions, ghettos, blood libels, forced conversions, and of course, the Holocaust - is not elevated. It is remembered. And it is remembered not to cancel out other people's suffering, but because forgetting it has proven time and again to be a luxury Jews cannot afford. To remember Auschwitz is not to diminish Gaza. But to accuse Jews of weaponizing memory is, in effect, to accuse them of having survived too visibly. She then asserts that Zionism, again, Jewish national self-determination has become a template for "settler-colonialism" globally. Here we enter the realm of hallucinatory projection. Are we seriously to believe that Afrikaner farmers in the Karoo are inspired by Herzl and Ben-Gurion? That global injustice, from Yemen to Donbas, is downstream from Tel Aviv? This is the sort of ideological derangement that used to be confined to fringe pamphlets and badly moderated message boards, not respectable publications. But such is the reach of post-colonial chic that anything, however ludicrous, can be published, so long as Jews are the villains. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Her most odious claim and let's not be coy here, is that Jewish grief is uniquely manipulative. That it is not just remembered, but "weaponised." That it is not just sacred, but enforced through guilt. In this framing, Jews do not mourn, they plot. They do not suffer, they scheme. This is the old libel, reheated for the Instagram era. Replace the word "Zionist" with "Jew" in her piece and one quickly realises the ideological lineage of her accusations. They are not new. They are not clever. They are simply more dangerous in an age that has forgotten its history. She laments that radical anti-Zionist Jews are "silenced." Nonsense. Anti-Zionist Jews are given front row seats at every anti-Israel protest, paraded as token 'as a Jews' for ideological antisemitism. The fact that they represent a minuscule sliver of global Jewry is irrelevant to Schutte. What matters is their usefulness as fig leaves for her project of demonisation. They are not prophets they are props. The linguistic trickery continues. Israel doesn't defend itself, it "bombs Gaza." It doesn't resist annihilation, it imposes siege. The flattening of language is complete. Hamas is nowhere to be found. The thousands of rockets aimed at Israeli cities are absent. The tunnels, the hostage-taking, the massacre of October 7 are all unmentionable. Because they disrupt the victim-oppressor binary Schutte so desperately needs to maintain. And then, as if to remind us of her seriousness, she expands her lens to the entire world. Venezuela, Yemen, Libya, Syria, Donbas. All tragic. All relevant. But none of them have anything to do with Zionism. Yet she drops them in like seasoning, hoping the reader won't notice the false equivalencies, or worse, will see Zionism as the root of all geopolitical evil. The move is transparent and it is also contemptible. And here lies the irony. The ideology Schutte claims to oppose, one that allegedly monopolises grief and dehumanises others, is, in fact, the one she practises. She demands selective empathy. She criminalises Jewish memory. She pathologizes Jewish self-defence. And she frames Palestinian suffering not as tragedy but as a cudgel to delegitimise an entire people's existence. It is not Zionists who dehumanise others. It is Gillian Schutte who denies the humanity of Israelis, and by extension, the Jewish people. It is she who insists that Jewish survival is inherently supremacist, that Jewish agency is inherently colonial, that Jewish statehood is inherently illegitimate. Let us be very clear, her vision ends with the dismantling of Israel. That is not justice, that is annihilation by another name.
Eyewitness News
24 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Lamola denies ANC is imposing its own foreign policy on the GNU
CAPE TOWN - The foreign policy of the Government of National Unity (GNU) continues to be a thorny matter, with parties like the Democratic Alliance (DA) and Freedom Front (FF) Plus accusing the African National Congress (ANC) of foisting its own policy on the coalition government. When he delivered the budget for the Department of International Relations in the National Assembly on Thursday, Minister Ronald Lamola denied that this is the case. He added that the GNU stance was shaped by key national documents and the Statement of Intent of the coalition partners. Lamola said while the DA is free to travel abroad on independent international missions, it can only represent itself and not the country. ALSO READ | Lamola: Political parties have a duty not to distort govt policy when they're abroad The MK Party, Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), ActionSA and the African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP) are among the opposition parties that have called out government for what they view as hypocrisy in its foreign policy. The DA's Emma Powell said the country did not have a foreign policy that represents all South Africans. 'It is a foreign policy for the ANC's friends, and the ANC now need to make peace with the fact that their time is up.' But Lamola hit back, saying the DA cannot decide whether it wants to be part of the GNU and prefers being in opposition or somewhere in between. 'We are not doing anything that you did not sign for in the Statement of Intent, where we deal with our human rights outlook, whether it's in Gaza, it is part of the Statement of Intent. Whether it's in relation to Ukraine and Russia, where we have played a role to bring back the children.' Powell said the DA would continue on its missions abroad to shore up trust in the government, while Build One South Africa (BOSA) leader Mmusi Maimane said it was high time an ambassador to the United States was appointed.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Mbeki pens open letter to DA's Steenhuisen after party's decision to opt out of National Dialogue
JOHANNESBURG - Former President Thabo Mbeki has once again penned an open letter, this time to Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen, following his party's decision to pull out of the National Dialogue. In a blistering rebuke, Mbeki said it would have been more logical for the DA to walk away from the Government of National Unity (GNU) than withdraw from the dialogue. He said it was obvious that the DA has serious problems with President Cyril Ramaphosa and the African National Congress (ANC) over the GNU. Mbeki, who championed the National Dialogue, said opting out of it is misplaced and strange. READ: ANC calls on DA to clarify if it wants stay in GNU or return to opposition party role While some saw the DA's big announcement following its failed ultimatum to the president as nothing more than a damp squib, Mbeki did not take well to these comments by Steenhuisen about the dialogue. 'In the absence of a president who is prepared to take action against VBS looters and state capture-accused sitting around the Cabinet table, it's clear that the dialogue will be nothing more than a waste of time and money to distract from ANC failures.' This has resulted in a scathing attack, with the former president suggesting the DA's acts were against its very own direct interests. In typical Mbeki fashion, he painstakingly set out how the idea of the dialogue was born, its purpose, and those involved in the project. Mbeki said the dialogue would be the first time South Africans get an opportunity to engage one another in a detailed and comprehensive conversation about the country. Despite Steenhuisen's declaration to boycott the dialogue, his department is one of the interministerial committees tasked with overseeing the project.
