Trump threatens to arrest man favored to be NYC mayor and strip his citizenship
Zohran Mamdani, 33, a democratic socialist, hours after officially winning the Democratic primary for mayor on Tuesday, defied Trump after amid a series of warnings from the Republican president.
'The President of the United States just threatened to have me arrested, stripped of my citizenship, put in a detention camp and deported,' wrote Mamdani on Instagram.
'Not because I have broken any law but because I will refuse to let ICE terrorize our city.'
Got a story? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk. Or you can submit your videos and pictures here.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
Follow Metro.co.uk on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news updates. You can now also get Metro.co.uk articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here.
MORE: Inside 'Alligator Alcatraz', the abandoned airport turned Trump's migrant detention facility
MORE: Donald Trump launches new Victory 47 fragrance so you can smell like a patriot who never backs down
MORE: Donald Trump's new 'Victory' fragrance needs to come with a warning label
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
7 minutes ago
- NBC News
Student loan borrowers will have fewer repayment options under GOP megabill
The Senate narrowly passed its spending megabill on Tuesday night. The House is aiming to vote on the bill and send it to President Donald Trump by July 4, but it's unclear whether Republicans have the votes to pass the bill in its current form. Among numerous provisions aimed at reducing federal spending and increasing tax revenue, the bill lays out some major changes for federal student loan borrowers. Most of the changes to student borrowing, such as lower limits on graduate loans, won't impact borrowers who are out of school and currently in repayment. But those taking out loans next summer and after, as well as an estimated 8 million borrowers awaiting further action on the Saving on a Valuable Education income-driven repayment plan, can expect fewer repayment options if the House passes the bill as is. The change to repayment plans could be one of the most impactful provisions of the bill for current and future federal student loan borrowers. Two years to choose from two plans The Senate's bill narrows the number of repayment options currently available to federal student loan borrowers down to just two plans: a standard repayment plan and a new income-driven plan known as the Repayment Assistance Plan. Borrowers on any of the currently existing repayment plans, except the SAVE plan, will be able to keep their plans and monthly payments the same. Borrowers whose loans are dispersed on or after July 1, 2026 and those currently enrolled in the SAVE plan — who are in an administrative forbearance since federal courts blocked the plan from going into effect in July 2024 — will have only the two repayment plan options. Borrowers on the SAVE plan would likely have to choose another plan anyway if federal courts retain the temporary injunction against it. Under the Republicans' legislation, those borrowers will have between July 2026 and July 2028 to choose a new plan. After July 1, 2028, borrowers will automatically be moved into the income-based repayment plan. The new standard plan will give borrowers a fixed monthly payment to have their loans paid off between 10 and 25 years, depending on the size of their loans. The current standard plan has a loan term of 10 years, regardless of the amount borrowed. The Repayment Assistance Plan will calculate monthly payments as between 1% and 10% of a borrower's discretionary income, down from the current offerings that set payments at 10%, 15% or 20% of a borrower's income.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
AOC blasts Trump's bill as ‘a deal with the devil' as she gives emotional floor speech trying to stop its passage
New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez slammed President Donald Trump's domestic megabill as a 'deal with the devil' in an emotional speech on the House floor. The House of Representatives returned to business on Wednesday to take up the Senate's version of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' In her speech, Ocasio-Cortez referred to one of Trump's top campaign promises included in the legislation, no taxes on tips, as a 'scam' as she referenced her own past work as a bartender. 'On this point of tax on tips, as one of the only people in this body who has lived off of tips, I want to tell you a little bit about the scam of that text, a little bit of the fine print there,' said Ocasio-Cortez, before going on to note that the provision has a limit of $25,000 per year. The legislation doesn't include the tax break for those earning more than $150,000 a year. The congresswoman argued that the bill would be 'jacking up' taxes for lower-income Americans. The legislation extends tax cuts initially passed in 2017 during Trump's first stint in the White House. 'The cap on that is $25,000 while you're jacking up taxes on people who make less than $50,000 across the United States, while taking away their SNAP, while taking away their Medicaid, while kicking them off of the ACA and their health care extensions,' she said. 'So if you're at home and you're living off tips, you do the math. Is that worth it to you? Losing all your health care, not being able to feed your babies, not being able to put a diaper on their bottom in exchange for what? This bill is a deal with the devil.' According to a poll of 800 voters in Ocasio-Cortez's home state by Siena College, New York voters believe, by a 52 to 28 percent margin, that Trump's legislation would make life worse for a majority of Americans. Meanwhile, 61 percent supported removing income taxes on tips, while 21 percent opposed the measure. Empire State voters also backed requiring healthy adult Medicaid recipients to work to get benefits by a margin of 48 to 32 percent. They are also strongly opposed to cutting corporate taxes and cutting SNAP benefits for the poor. Ocasio-Cortez told members of the GOP on Wednesday that they should be 'ashamed.' 'It explodes our national debt. It militarizes our entire economy and it strips away healthcare and basic dignity of the American people — for what?' she added. 'To give Elon Musk a tax break and billionaires the greedy taking of our nation. We cannot stand for it, and we will not support it. You should be ashamed.'
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
US judge blocks Trump asylum ban at US-Mexico border, says he exceeded authority
WASHINGTON, July 2 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump's asylum ban at the U.S.-Mexico border, saying Trump exceeded his authority when he issued a proclamation declaring illegal immigration an emergency and setting aside existing legal processes. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss said in a 128-page opinion that Trump's January 20 proclamation blocking all migrants "engaged in the invasion across the southern border" from claiming asylum or other humanitarian protections went beyond his executive power. The ruling is a setback for Trump, a Republican who recaptured the White House promising a vast immigration crackdown. Since Trump took office, the number of migrants caught crossing illegally has plummeted to record lows. The American Civil Liberties Union brought the challenge to Trump's asylum ban in February on behalf of three advocacy groups and migrants denied access to asylum, arguing the broad ban violated U.S. laws and international treaties. Trump's border restrictions went beyond a similar ban put in place by former President Joe Biden, a Democrat, in 2024. Key parts of the Biden ban were blocked by a separate federal judge in May in a lawsuit also led by the ACLU. Moss said he would stay the effective date of a related order for 14 days to allow the Trump administration to appeal. The decision applies to migrants who were subject to Trump's ban or could be in the future, part of a certified class in the litigation. Such class certifications remain unaffected by last week's Supreme Court decision reining in nationwide injunctions. Moss ruled that neither federal immigration law nor the U.S. Constitution gave Trump the authority to disregard existing laws and regulations governing the asylum process even if stopping illegal immigration presented "enormous challenges." "Nothing in the [Immigration and Nationality Act] or the Constitution grants the President or his delegees the sweeping authority asserted in the Proclamation and implementing guidance," wrote Moss, an appointee of former President Barack Obama. "An appeal to necessity cannot fill that void." The White House, Justice Department and U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
