Bosses want you to know AI is coming for your job
SAN FRANCISCO - Top executives at some of the largest American companies have a warning for their workers: Artificial intelligence is a threat to your job.
CEOs from Amazon to IBM, Salesforce and JPMorgan Chase are telling their employees to prepare for disruption as AI either transforms or eliminates their jobs in the future.
Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post.
AI will 'improve inventory placement, demand forecasting and the efficiency of our robots,' Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said in a Tuesday public memo that predicted his company's corporate workforce will shrink 'in the next few years.' He joins a string of other top executives that have recently sounded the alarm about AI's impact in the workplace.
Economists say there aren't yet strong signs that AI is driving widespread layoffs across industries. But there is evidence that workers across the United States are increasingly using AI in their jobs and the technology is starting to transform some roles such as computer programming, marketing and customer service. At the same time, CEOs are under pressure to show they are embracing new technology and getting results - incentivizing attention-grabbing predictions that can create additional uncertainty for workers.
'It's a message to shareholders and board members as much as it is to employees,' Molly Kinder, a Brookings Institution fellow who studies the impact of AI, said of the CEO announcements, noting that when one company makes a bold AI statement, others typically follow. 'You're projecting that you're out in the future, that you're embracing and adopting this so much that the footprint [of your company] will look different.'
Some CEOs fear they could be ousted from their job within two years if they don't deliver measurable AI-driven business gains, a Harris Poll survey conducted for software company Dataiku showed.
Tech leaders have sounded some of the loudest warnings - in line with their interest in promoting AI's power. At the same time, the industry has been shedding workers the last few years after big hiring sprees during the height of the coronavirus pandemic and interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve.
At Amazon, Jassy told the company's workers that AI would in 'the next few years' reduce some corporate roles like customer service representatives and software developers, but also change work for those in the company's warehouses.
IBM, which recently announced job cuts, said it replaced a couple hundred human resource workers with AI 'agents' for repetitive tasks such as onboarding and scheduling interviews. In January, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggested on Joe Rogan's podcast that the company is building AI that might be able to do what some human workers do by the end of the year.
'We, at Meta as well as the other companies working on this, are going to have an AI that can effectively be sort of a mid-level engineer at your company,' Zuckerberg said. 'Over time we'll get to the point where a lot of the code in our apps … is actually going to be built by AI engineers instead of people engineers.'
Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, maker of the chatbot Claude, boldly predicted last month that half of all white-collar entry-level jobs may be eliminated by AI within five years.
Leaders in other sectors have also chimed in. Marianne Lake, JPMorgan's CEO of consumer and community banking, told an investor meeting last month that AI could help the bank cut headcount in operations and account services by 10 percent. The CEO of BT Group Allison Kirkby suggested that advances in AI would mean deeper cuts at the British telecom company.
Even CEOs who reject the idea of AI replacing humans on a massive scale are warning workers to prepare for disruption. Jensen Huang, CEO of AI chip designer Nvidia said last month, 'You're not going to lose your job to an AI, but you're going to lose your job to someone who uses AI.'
Google CEO Sundar Pichai said at Bloomberg's tech conference this month that AI will help engineers be more productive but that his company would still add more human engineers to its team. Meanwhile, Microsoft is planning more layoffs amid heavy investment in AI, Bloomberg reported this week. Other tech leaders at Shopify, Duolingo and Box have told workers they are now required to use AI at their jobs, and some will monitor usage as part of performance reviews.
Some companies have indicated that AI could slow hiring. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff recently called Amodei's prognosis 'alarmist' on an earnings call, but on the same call chief operating and financial officer Robin Washington said that an AI agent has helped to reduce hiring needs and bring $50 million in savings.
Despite corporate leaders' warnings, economists don't yet see broad signs that AI is driving humans out of work. 'We have little evidence of layoffs so far,' said Columbia Business School professor Laura Veldkamp, whose research explores how companies' use of AI affects the economy. 'What I'd look for are new entrants with an AI-intensive business model, entering and putting the existing firms out of business.'
Some researchers suggest there is evidence AI is playing a role in the drop in openings for some specific jobs, like computer programming, where AI tools that generate code have become standard. Google's Pichai said last year that more than a quarter of new code at the company was initially suggested by AI.
Many other workers are increasingly turning to AI tools, for everything from creating marketing campaigns to helping with research - with or without company guidance. The percentage of American employees who use AI daily has doubled in the last year to 8 percent, according to a Gallup poll released this week. Those using it at least a few times a week jumped from 12 percent to 19 percent.
Some AI researchers say the poll may not actually reflect the total number of workers using AI as many may use it without disclosing it.
'I would suspect the numbers are actually higher,' said Ethan Mollick, co-director of Wharton School of Business' generative AI Labs, because some workers avoid disclosing AI usage, worried they would be seen as less capable or breaching corporate policy. Only 30 percent of respondents to the Gallup survey said that their company had general guidelines or formal policies for using AI.
OpenAI's ChatGPT, one of the most popular chatbots, has more than 500 million weekly users around the globe, the company has said.
It is still unclear what benefits companies are reaping from employees' use of AI, said Arvind Karunakaran, a faculty member of Stanford University's Center for Work, Technology, and Organization.
'Usage does not necessarily translate into value,' he said. 'Is it just increasing productivity in terms of people doing the same task quicker or are people now doing more high value tasks as a result?'
Lynda Gratton, a professor at London Business School, said predictions of huge productivity gains from AI remain unproven.
'Right now, the technology companies are predicting there will be a 30% productivity gain. We haven't yet experienced that, and it's not clear if that gain would come from cost reduction … or because humans are more productive.'
The pace of AI adoption is expected to accelerate even further if more companies use advanced tools such as AI agents and they deliver on their promise of automating work, Mollick said. AI labs are hoping to prove their agents are reliable within the next year or so, which will be a bigger disrupter to jobs, he said.
While the debate continues over whether AI will eliminate or create jobs, Mollick said 'the truth is probably somewhere in between.'
'A wave of disruption is going to happen,' he said.
Related Content
3-pound puppy left in trash is rescued, now thriving
How to meet street cats around the world
'Jaws' made people fear sharks. 50 years later, can it help save them?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Report Reveals Who the Celtics Will Not Trade
New Report Reveals Who the Celtics Will Not Trade originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Boston Celtics have already checked off their biggest priority this offseason by trading Jrue Holiday and Kristaps Porzingis to get under the NBA's second tax apron. However, they may not be done dealing. For all the players who could be traded away, The Athletic's Jay King reported on Friday that there's one player Boston plans to keep. Advertisement "Speculation has surrounded Sam Hauser's future because it likely wouldn't be difficult to find a taker for his four-year, $45 million contract, ... but the Celtics are said to be more focused on avenues that would allow them to hold onto Hauser, who has proven himself as a valuable rotation piece and one of the NBA's best shooters," King wrote. Boston Celtics center Kristaps Porzingis (8) and forward Sam Hauser (30)© David Butler II-Imagn Images King also confirmed the Celtics' desire to keep Al Horford and Luke Kornet this offseason, which hypothetically could lead to trading Hauser's contract to make room to re-sign them without crossing the NBA's second tax apron. However, as King wrote, that doesn't appear to be the case. If that's not enough, Jake Fischer reported that there haven't been any rumbles about a potential Hauser trade while explaining why Boston wouldn't trade him. Advertisement "I haven't heard any credible buzz about Sam Hauser's inclusion in serious trade conversations," Fischer wrote. Fischer added, "The interest would surely be there given Hauser's perimeter prowess and the value contract he holds over the next four years, but the Celtics have largely achieved their financial goals by moving Holiday and Porziņģis. They don't have to trade Hauser." If Hauser's not up for grabs, but the Celtics want to save money, the most obvious trade candidates would be their newest non-rookie players: Anfernee Simons and Georges Niang. Related: NBA Fans React to Celtics Trade Report on Saturday Related: Knicks Could Pursue Celtics Champion After Recent Boston Trades This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 28, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Modern love: Gen Z turning to AI to do their dating dirty work — breakup texts and apologies
Artificial intelligence is now writing 'It's not you, it's me' texts for Gen Z. A new national survey from dating assistant Wingmate found that 41% of young adults have used AI to help end a relationship, with women slightly more likely than men to let the bots do the dirty work. The survey, which polled over 1,000 U.S. adults who've used AI for dating, shows just how deep AI has embedded itself in modern romance. Nearly half of 18- to 29-year-olds said they've turned to AI tools to write breakup texts, apologies or manage relationship conflict. The most common uses include dating-bio optimization, conversation starters, replying to messages and resolving conflict. Roughly one-third of users sought direct dating advice, and nearly half turned to AI for help writing apologies or other emotionally sensitive messages. For some, it's about simplicity: 29% said dating became 'simpler' with AI, and 21% said it helped them talk to more people. Others said it boosted their confidence — with more than half reporting better conversations when using AI. But when it comes to the end of a relationship, things can get . . . robotic. TikTok features a growing number of videos where users expose breakup messages they claim were clearly AI-generated. One viral post captioned 'When he sends a breakup text that looks entirely written by ChatGPT, em dashes and all' has racked up nearly 240,000 views. Another shows a woman running her breakup message through an AI detector, which immediately labels it 100% GPT-generated. Not everyone's convinced AI belongs in their love lives. While most respondents said it was useful or neutral, a few called it inauthentic and more than one in five admitted they use it but don't tell anyone. Dr. Jess Carbino, former in-house sociologist for Tinder and Bumble, said it can be depriving to outsource the task of breaking up with an individual to AI. 'Individuals might also mistakenly assume that what AI generates in this domain is valid or appropriate, when matters of the heart often are more delicate, require nuance and merit personalization,' Carbino told The Post. Still, many say it helps. With 57% claiming they'd trust AI over a friend for dating advice, the business of AI-powered romance is booming. Third-party services like YourMove AI and Rizz market themselves as full-on dating copilots — offering help with everything from flirty openers to awkward conversations. YourMove, which now claims over 300,000 users, promises to put your texting 'on cruise control.' For $15 a month, it generates text messages in seconds, rewrites bios, boosts photos and critiques dating profiles. Rizz takes a similar approach, offering 'personalized responses that are sure to impress your crush,' with weekly plans starting at $10 — and no clear limit on how much emotional heavy lifting the bot will do. Even ChatGPT offers breakup-specific tools, including a 'Breakup Text Assistant' where users can specify tone, relationship length and how much closure they want to give.

Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Last day of production arrives at Fairmont Novelis plant
FAIRMONT — At some point Friday evening, Novelis employees will hold a dinner amongst themselves. The mood will be somber. 'We have a dinner today to celebrate, but, you know, it's not really a celebration to me,' Novelis mill operator and Fairmont Deputy Mayor Josh Rice said. 'A lot of the other guys that were retirees came in there and just kind of wanted to give the guys a shoulder and let them know that they were there for them. And how sad it was that this place is ending.' Novelis stopped production at its Fairmont facility on Friday. The company announced it would close its Fairmont plant on March 31, with a final date set for June 30. The plant manufactured aluminum fin stock, which is used in heat exchangers for automotive radiators and heating and cooling equipment such as HVAC. For a while, however, plant employees held out hope the plant would be purchased by a different company. It was not to be. 'We thought we was going to get bought out by a company called Commonwealth,' Randy Hines, a 30 year employee, said. 'So we thought we was gonna still be here for a little bit, or they would just take over and resume as normal. But that deal fell through. It's kind of like being divorced and then getting back together and getting divorced again.' Hines said it was like being fired twice. Rice said the company called employees on Tuesday and told them to just stay home, and that the company would continue to pay through June 30. Rice and a few others kept working to make sure the last items were shipped out of the plant and everything was closed and powered off correctly. The power actually went off during an outage from a storm on one of the nights. Rice said there was a certain finality to it. While the plant has ceased operations and sent employees home, a skeleton crew is staying behind for final shutdown checks. They will ensure no oil leaks from the machines and that nothing hazardous is left in the building. Those employees will remain for an additional three months and are receiving bonus pay. The plant has been a mainstay in Fairmont for over 100 years. It's closure has also impacted longtime residents emotionally. 'We have said goodbye to so many other factories in Fairmont during my lifetime,' Marcella Yaremchuck said. 'But this last goodbye seems to be the hardest.' Emotions have run high at the plant. Rice said he saw some of the employees cry. He said all the equipment is still at the plant, some of it brand new that hasn't even been used yet. It's sitting there waiting for someone else to come in and take over. Hines said some employees applied to work at the Novelis facility in Alabama. Hines' nephew actually runs the place. However, uprooting family and relocating is hard, so those five employees are carefully considering if they want to make the move, Hines said. As for employees who have left completely, Hines said between 10 and 15 went underground, to work in a coal mine. Those employees lacked the longevity at the company to get good severance, so they got out when they could, Hines said. Hines said rumors the plant would shut down surfaced every few years. Hines didn't pay to much attention to them, since they never came to pass. Until one day they did. The Times West Virginian reached out to Novelis for comment but they couldn't provide comment by press time. Fairmont City Manager Travis Blosser said the city has seen an amazing outpouring of support for the families and employees that will be affected by the closure. 'Several organizations and local companies have held job fairs specifically for the workers who need to find new employment arrangements,' Blosser said. 'We at the City will continue to work with Novelis and the state development office to ensure that property gets back into productive use as soon as possible.' Blosser said the City is committed to making Fairmont an attractive place to do business. However, the City's business environment may also feel the downstream effects of the plant's closure. Rice pointed out that plant employees spent their wages in Fairmont, procuring goods and services for themselves and their families. Rice added the loss of health insurance will mean a lot of patients will lose coverage and medical providers will lose patients. Rice is cautious with hope these days. There's rumors of another interested buyer. But after having their hopes dashed, no one wants to risk having their hearts broken again, he said. 'It hurt harder the second time than it did the first time,' Rice said. 'So people don't have very high hopes that it's going to open back up. But I hope it will. I have faith in it. That plant can't sit there, as nice of a plant as it is. It's kept up. I just don't see it sitting there for too long, empty.'