logo
The ‘miracle' delay that saved student from Air India crash

The ‘miracle' delay that saved student from Air India crash

Independent15-06-2025
Bhoomi Chauhan, 28, missed the Air India flight that crashed, killing 241 people on board, due to a traffic jam, causing her to arrive at the airport ten minutes late.
Chauhan, a business administration student from Bristol, was turned away by airport staff and was initially frustrated about missing the flight and the possibility of a ticket refund.
After leaving the airport and learning about the crash, Chauhan described her survival as a "miracle," while her mother attributed it to the blessings of the Mother Goddess.
The Air India flight crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport en route to London Gatwick, killing 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese nationals, and one Canadian.
India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, along with teams from the US and UK, is investigating the crash, with the recently found black box expected to provide insights into the cause.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Substation fire that shut Heathrow Airport to cost it ‘tens of millions'
Substation fire that shut Heathrow Airport to cost it ‘tens of millions'

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Substation fire that shut Heathrow Airport to cost it ‘tens of millions'

The boss of Heathrow has revealed the chaotic closure of the London airport in March after a substation fire is expected to cost it tens of millions of pounds. Chief executive Thomas Woldbye told the PA news agency the financial impact of the temporary closure caused by a power outage was expected be in the 'low tens of millions'. The group is now waiting for a report from energy watchdog Ofgem to finalise its findings into the incident to see if it can claim compensation from National Grid Electricity Transmission (NGET). No flights operated at the west London airport until about 6pm on March 21 because of the blaze which started late the previous night. More than 270,000 air passenger journeys were disrupted by the incident. Mr Woldbye told PA the group had 'learnings' to take away from the incident. A report into events clarified that Mr Woldbye had been asleep with his phone on silent as the overnight decision to close the airport was taken. He said: 'That is one learning and that will not happen again. 'I would have liked to see my personal role play out differently. 'That said, we need to have procedures in place that ensures that this company can take the right decisions at the right time by the right people, no matter what the situation is.' 'An organisation like ours has to be able to manage, whether the captain's on the bridge or not,' he said. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, he denied misjudging what it meant to be the head of one of the world's busiest airports. Ofgem has launched an official enforcement investigation into NGET after a report found the fire that caused the shutdown of Heathrow was due to a preventable technical fault. The report by the National Energy System Operator (Neso) said an 'elevated moisture reading' had been found in oil samples at the North Hyde substation in west London in July 2018, but that action was not taken to replace electrical insulators known as bushings. The comments came as the airport revealed half-year profits fell by more than a third despite seeing passenger numbers soar to a record high. The group posted a 37.2% drop in pre-tax profits to £203 million for the six months to June 30 as its costs surged, partly driven by a higher wage bill after last autumn's budget measures.

India to resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese citizens
India to resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese citizens

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

India to resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese citizens

HONG KONG, July 23 (Reuters) - India will resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese citizens from July 24 this year, its embassy in China said on Wednesday, the first time in five years as both countries move to repair their rocky relationship. Tensions between the two countries escalated following a 2020 military clash along their disputed Himalayan border. In response, India imposed restrictions on Chinese investments, banned hundreds of popular Chinese apps and cut passenger routes. China suspended visas to Indian citizens and other foreigners around the same time due to the COVID-19 pandemic but lifted those restrictions in 2022, when it resumed issuing visas for students and business travellers. Tourist visas for Indian nationals remained restricted until March this year, when both countries agreed to resume direct air service. Relations have gradually improved, with several high-level meetings taking place last year, including talks between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Russia in October. India and China share a 3,800 km (2,400-mile) border that has been disputed since the 1950s. The two countries fought a brief but brutal border war in 1962 and negotiations to settle the dispute have made slow progress. In July, India's foreign minister stated that both countries must resolve border friction, pull back troops and avoid "restrictive trade measures" to normalise their relationship, he told China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

London-Berlin by direct train: minister says ‘yes', expert says ‘no'
London-Berlin by direct train: minister says ‘yes', expert says ‘no'

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

London-Berlin by direct train: minister says ‘yes', expert says ‘no'

'Working with Germany, we're building bridges between our people and paving the way for a more sustainable, connected future,' said the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander. She was announcing a plan for a direct train between London and Berlin. 'A new task force will bring our nations closer together and create new opportunities for tourism, business and cultural exchange,' the minister said. A laudable aim – but how feasible is it? Over to Mark Smith, the international rail guru who founded The Man in Seat 61 website. After years of experience as a front-line railwayman, he has devoted the past 24 years to encouraging and empowering people to switch from planes to trains. He (like me) desperately wants rail to succeed. You might expect Mr Smith to welcome the government's vision. But, he says bluntly: 'I don't think we'll see a direct London-Berlin train.' Thousands of people fly between the English and German capitals each day. From the 6.40am departure from Gatwick on easyJet to Ryanair 's 10.10pm arrival at Stansted, there are 17 flights each way, each day. That represents 5,400 passengers – the equivalent of three round-trips by rail. History shows that when capacity is added to an intercity link, the number of travellers increases. And Mark Smith is convinced 'the demand is there' for a London-Berlin link. He cites the new direct daytime express between Paris and the German capital. 'This eight-hour journey leaves heavily booked,' he says. 'Up to 75 per cent of tickets are for the whole eight-hour journey.' London to Berlin would take around nine hours, routed via Brussels and Cologne. With a journey only 60 minutes longer than the trip from Paris, and London being a much bigger travel hub than the French capital, it is fair to assume that much the same would apply. But the problem, says the Seat 61 founder, isn't demand – it's financial viability. The Paris-Berlin train stops in Strasbourg, Karlsruhe and Frankfurt, and is allowed to convey passengers between all those cities. Under present security and immigration rules, that would not be possible for international trains to and from London. In addition, a EU-UK border would be needed in Berlin – together with a serious, semi-airline security check. 'That French train doesn't need to pay all the UK border and security costs, and can happily carry passengers between intermediate stations as well as end to end,' says Mark Smith. 'With staff costs, track access costs, and rolling stock costs for London-Berlin being effectively double that for London-Cologne-Frankfurt, I can't see it being viable.' He estimates the proportion of high-spending business travellers on a London-Berlin run as close to zero – compared with perhaps 15 per cent on 'an airline-competitive four- or five-hour trip from London to Cologne or Frankfurt'. Eurostar says it aims to start running Anglo-German trains to Cologne and Frankfurt by 'the early 2030s'. Even among budget-focused travellers it is difficult to see London-Berlin succeeding – because the airline industry is so effective at offering cheap deals. Looking ahead to Monday 1 September, the first day back at work for lots of people, Ryanair wants £25 for its 1h45m flight from Stansted to Berlin. The lowest one-way rail fare (involving multiple changes) is £350. That's 14 times as much. The air fare looks too cheap, the train ticket way too expensive. But even in the course of a decade, I can't see that gap narrowing to the point where those London-Berlin trains become competitive. I hope I am proved wrong.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store