logo
Congress' budget aims to target Medicaid fraud. In Massachusetts, the reality is more complicated.

Congress' budget aims to target Medicaid fraud. In Massachusetts, the reality is more complicated.

Boston Globe20-05-2025
Locally, the cost of MassHealth, the state's Medicaid administrator, grew almost 50 percent in inflation adjusted dollars from 2014 to 2023, according to the
'The growth that we've seen, that line item year over year, that has to flatten,' said State Representative Marc Lombardo, a Billerica Republican.
Related
:
Advertisement
The proposal passed Sunday by the House Budget Committee would make it more difficult for people to apply for Medicaid, such as by requiring some beneficiaries to be employed and requiring the state to more frequently confirm MassHealth members' eligibility. The proposal could cut the national deficit by $625 billion over 10 years, according to a
by 2034, according to the CBO.
Advertisement
It's a myth that there are hordes of people fraudulently receiving Medicaid benefits, experts said.
'These are right-wing rhetorical covers for kicking people off Medicaid,' said Jonathan Gruber, an MIT economics professor who specializes in health care.
Many of those who could end up uninsured are people who are eligible for Medicaid but would struggle to overcome barriers, such as additional paperwork and record keeping, which the Congressional proposal would likely create, he said.
MassHealth officials offered a 'high estimate' that the budget proposal could make Medicaid inaccessible to hundreds of thousands and could cost the state $1 billion. More people participate in MassHealth than they did a decade ago, but the increasing cost of the program is also attributable to the increasing cost of health care and because MassHealth recipients tend to have more serious health needs.
At the heart of Congressional Republicans' budget priorities are trillions in
The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services reported about 5 percent of Medicaid payments nationally, about $31 billion, were
About three-fourths of those improper payments are attributable to paperwork or record-keeping errors, not intentional fraud, said Timothy Hill, senior vice president for Health at the American Institutes for Research, a nonprofit that works with providers to improve health care delivery, in a recent discussion about Medicaid fraud and abuse hosted by the health policy analysis organization KFF.
'It doesn't mean a service wasn't provided, it doesn't mean somebody didn't get care,' Hill said. 'What it does mean is that the rules that the agency established for getting payment weren't followed. All those errors could be corrected.'
Advertisement
When it comes to spotting true fraud, Massachusetts has a complex, overlapping screening process that involves the Office of the State Auditor, the Office of the Inspector General, the Attorney General's Office, the federal government, and MassHealth itself. They run algorithms that spot questionable billing patterns and assign state investigators to pore over records and interview MassHealth recipients, doctors, and care providers. What they find accounts for far less than one percent of the state's $20 billion MassHealth budget.
Gina Cash, a lawyer who runs the state auditor's Bureau of Special Investigations, described the process her team uses to investigate fraud. Their focus is usually on individuals improperly receiving benefits, and the work starts with hundreds of tips, reports of people whose spending habits have raised questions about whether they are eligible for the MassHealth benefits they receive. About half of those warrant investigations, including scrutiny of people's circumstances and medical conditions.
Her office identified close to
Cash received public assistance to help pay for child care when she was a young mother just out of law school and has empathy for those who need such services.
Related
:
'The solution is not to cut, it's to continue to make oversight reforms,' she said.
Experts noted fraudulent billing from providers, not individuals seeking benefits dishonestly, accounts for the vast majority of Medicaid fraud. Such cases can be prosecuted by the state Attorney General's Office Medicaid fraud unit. One recent case includes indictments against a
Advertisement
Massachusetts reported 13 Medicaid fraud convictions and 21 settlements in fiscal year 2024, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The state Office of the Inspector General focuses on specific aspects of the health insurance system, primarily looking for improper practices from providers.
In a review of MassHealth services for children with autism from 2022 and 2023, the inspector general identified more than $17 million in
'We put a decent web together with the oversight agencies in the Commonwealth,' said Jeff Shapiro, the state's inspector general.
Health policy experts noted that fraud has a specific definition: intentional deception to obtain an undeserved benefit. Waste and abuse are more subjective. Waste can involve a provider taking advantage of billing rules, but it's harder to identify. What may look like a glut of unneeded tests, for example, could turn out to be warranted after a deeper investigation into a person's medical needs.
What qualifies as abuse can also be a matter of policy preferences.
Almost all states use revenue from taxes on health care providers to support Medicaid expenses, and in the process boost their federal reimbursements. Some federal legislators say it's a way to
Advertisement
Massachusetts is expected to raise $2.3 billion through these taxes in fiscal year 2025, according to the
Gruber, the MIT economist, said he generally doesn't like loopholes, but states wouldn't be able to afford coverage for poorer populations without taking advantage of this one.
'They are dramatically cutting the ability of states to take advantage to help Medicaid pay for underfunded programs,' he said.
He is infuriated, he said, about the hypocrisy of public officials who are outraged by the idea of taxpayer money wasted through Medicaid. He contrasted the rhetoric around Medicaid fraud with the decision to cut staff at the
'Catching one or two rich tax cheats would raise so much more money than we can save with these provisions,' he said.
Jason Laughlin can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alaska Gov. Dunleavy asks some lawmakers to stay away from special session he called
Alaska Gov. Dunleavy asks some lawmakers to stay away from special session he called

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Alaska Gov. Dunleavy asks some lawmakers to stay away from special session he called

Gov. Mike Dunleavy discusses proposed education legislation at a news conference on Jan. 31, 2025. (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon) In a meeting with Republican members of the Alaska House of Representatives on Wednesday, Gov. Mike Dunleavy had what he called an 'unorthodox' request. He asked that the 19 members of the House's Republican minority caucus stay away from the first five days of a special legislative session he called for Aug. 2 in Juneau. Under the Alaska Constitution, the Legislature must vote to override or sustain a governor's vetoes in the first regular or special session following the vetoes. If those Republicans are absent, it increases the odds that his vetoes will be sustained. An absence is as good as a 'no' vote when it comes to getting the 45 votes needed to override a veto of line items in a budget bill or the 40 votes needed to override a veto of a policy bill. In May, lawmakers voted 46-14 to override Dunleavy's veto of a policy bill that permanently increases the state's public-school funding formula. Eight of the 19 House minority members voted for the override. Now, they're being asked whether to override the governor's decision to only partially fund that formula. The governor's opponents will have a difficult task. Some lawmakers, including Sen. Forrest Dunbar, D-Anchorage, are expected to be unavailable for the special session. Dunbar has been deployed with the National Guard in Poland. Others may have family commitments that are obstacles to attending. If minority-caucus legislators heed the governor's request and avoid the special session, they will be largely immune to last-minute lobbying by their colleagues or members of the public. 'If you want the veto override to fail, when we're talking about less than $50 million here on a multibillion-dollar budget, I guess you pull out every stop, and this is a stop that I've not seen pulled out by any governor,' said Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham and a supporter of the override. Reporters were not invited to the meeting between the governor and the House minority, but Jeff Turner, the governor's communications director, confirmed the details, first reported by KTUU-TV. 'Governor Dunleavy asked house minority members to not show up for the first five days of session because like any governor, he does not want his vetoes overturned,' he said by email. Dunleavy has designated education policy and the creation of a Department of Agriculture as the subjects of the special session. Turner said the governor planned to introduce an education bill for lawmakers to consider during the session. 'Arriving on the sixth day also means legislators begin the session with a clean slate for conversations on public education reform policies. The Governor is also willing to reinstate the $200 BSA increase, if he and lawmakers can reach an agreement on the education bill he will introduce next month,' Turner said. House Minority Leader Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, did not return a call seeking comment, but other members of the minority spoke freely about the governor's request. 'I will use the governor's exact word: Unorthodox. It was definitely an unorthodox request that took me by surprise,' said Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna. While the governor's official special session proclamation lists education and a proposed Alaska Department of Agriculture on its agenda, 'he was very clear that a big portion of the strategy for him was, he did not want to be overridden on anything: bills, budget, all of it.' Ruffridge voted in favor of the prior override and indicated that he's willing to vote the same way in a special session. 'I've taken the approach sort of since day one, that if I vote yes on something, that my yes means something, I know that probably doesn't always align with the political winds that might blow, but I think that's something that my constituents at least respect,' he said. Ruffridge said he absolutely intends to show up at the special session. 'If a special session is called, I think all representatives and senators have an obligation to attempt to be there, if at all possible,' Ruffridge said. 'I think that's part of what we signed up for when we signed up to do the job. And I mean, if you're not going to show up, I think essentially, you're just afraid of taking hard votes at that point.' Rep. Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River, has a different perspective. 'I think that's fine,' she said of the governor's request. 'It costs a lot of money. It's $300 per diem per day. You have to pay for flights and hotels. I think it's a good idea. Those who do want to continue to override, they could go ahead and go down there, and those of us who don't, it's an automatic no vote for us when we don't go there to vote.' 'My job is to make sure we save as much money as possible,' she said. 'And again, if we're not in Juneau, it's an automatic no vote. If you show up in Juneau, then I believe those individuals are going to be voting yes or wasting taxpayer dime.' Jeremy Bynum, the Republican representative from Ketchikan, said he intends to show up in Juneau on Aug. 2, even though it means missing Ketchikan's largest annual celebration, the blueberry festival. He's interested in attending the special session because he hopes that legislators will take up education policy, even though he doubts that will happen. The multipartisan House majority caucus controls the legislative agenda, and it isn't clear that there is sufficient common ground between the majority and the governor to enable progress. Rep. DeLena Johnson, R-Palmer, said she's still considering her options and is undecided about whether to travel to Juneau. Before the House minority's meeting with the governor, Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, said he doesn't see the governor's call for a special session as significantly different from legislative committees' attempts to advance or derail legislation by using legislative procedures or schedules. He pointed to the way that the Senate Finance Committee has used take-it-or-leave-it tactics with regard to the state budget. Rep. Elexie Moore of Wasilla said she's likely to attend in order to vote against an override and to sustain the governor's veto. Earlier this year, she was absent from the Capitol on a day that unexpectedly brought a key vote on the Permanent Fund dividend. She was dragged on social media for three weeks afterward, she said by phone. People expect their legislators to be in the Capitol, she said, and most people aren't able to follow the maneuvering that might explain an absence. 'I think that's the perspective of somebody who doesn't understand what it means not to go,' Allard said when told about Moore's thinking. '(Not attending the session) means that you're a no vote. But if she wants to go and spend, you know, $5,000 to $10,000 in taxpayer money, that's fine. I understand she was dragged on social media, but those were some bad decisions that were made — not necessarily by her — but on information about what she was doing. But I would recommend that she stay with the caucus and don't go down there.' 'I think it's a good idea,' said Rep. Mike Prax, R-North Pole, about the governor's request. Prax supports the governor's position and said he believes the special session is a good idea, because it settles the school funding issue early. Without a special session, lawmakers would have to wait until January to decide whether to override or sustain the governor's decisions. The Fairbanks North Star Borough school board voted in June to finalize a budget that expects lawmakers to override the governor. If an override fails, Prax said, it's better that it fails early, so the district can change its budget before school begins. While members of the House and Senate majority caucuses have indicated that they intend to take up only the veto overrides during the special session, Prax said he hopes lawmakers will stay and consider education policy. While lawmakers have convened an education task force to discuss future changes, he doubts the effectiveness of that group, given the Legislature's failure to adopt the recommendations of a prior fiscal policy working group. The task force deadline to make recommendations is January 2027, after the next election. 'I am not at all optimistic that there's even any intention, frankly, of the task force coming up with something,' he said. Edgmon, the House speaker, said that his recommendation 'to any legislator, is to show up to Juneau, get their work done and make the tough vote whether they are a yea or a nay.' Legislative rules allow any lawmaker to issue a 'call on the House' that compels legislators to attend. Edgmon said that might be deemed dilatory and out of order in this case. In the end, will absences even matter? Lawmakers who stay away are likely to be those most likely to support the governor. 'That could be the case for sure,' Edgmon said, 'and it'll be the voters in their districts that will judge whether or not they're doing the right thing.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

The latest Musk-Trump feud is a 'nail in the coffin' moment for Tesla, investor Ross Gerber says
The latest Musk-Trump feud is a 'nail in the coffin' moment for Tesla, investor Ross Gerber says

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The latest Musk-Trump feud is a 'nail in the coffin' moment for Tesla, investor Ross Gerber says

Tesla is threatened by Musk's fight with Trump, longtime investor Ross Gerber says. Gerber said he thinks Elon Musk's feud with the president is a "nail in the coffin" for the EV maker. Gerber said he had already sold most of his personal stake in Tesla. Elon Musk has returned to bashing the GOP budget bill in recent days, and in doing so, has reignited his fight with President Donald Trump. In one long-time investor's view, it's bound to create even more challenges for the company, which just reported another quarter of weak vehicle deliveries. Ross Gerber, the CEO of Gerber-Kawasaki Wealth Management and an early backer of Musk's car company, said he believed the Tesla CEO's fight with President Donald Trump was another overhang for the company. Tesla shares are down 22% year-to-date. Gerber thinks that while the feud is bad news, the company is also struggling against a lofty valuation and uncertainty in its various business units, including core auto sales, but also initiatives like robotaxis. Gerber speculated that the stock could fall as much as 50% if the market revalues Tesla. The stock was trading around $316 on Wednesday. "People are just, you know, done with it," Gerber said, speaking to Bloomberg about the Musk-Trump feud on Wednesday. "So this is just another, like, nail in the coffin — which I tweeted — that really is going to hurt Tesla, and I'm very upset about it," he added, referring to a post on X where he called Musk's shots at Trump on social media an "absurd attack." Musk reignited his fight with Trump over the Republican tax and spending bill this week. Tesla shares dropped more than 5% on Tuesday after Trump suggested DOGE should look into canceling contracts with Musk's companies. Gerber added he believed Musk had "destroyed" his image. "You're at this kind of point where it's like, 'What is this guy doing?' You know? You're supposed to be selling cars and robotaxis, and instead we're fighting with the President of the United States. Which he enabled and helped empower, but, I'm sorry Elon, President Trump is way more powerful than you." "he said. "So it's just — quite frankly, it's stupid." The damage is coming at a critical time for Tesla. The EV maker reported on Wednesday that its vehicle deliveries dropped 14% year-over-year in the second quarter. Sales have also plunged 45% in the European Union from January to May so far this year, according to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association released last week. Recent price increases on Tesla vehicles have also likely weighed on sales, Gerber said, adding he believed there was a "severe" supply-demand imbalance for Tesla cars. "Making the car more expensive means less people will buy it. It's as simple as that. And they already have a hard time selling the car," Gerber said. Gerber said he believed Tesla's stock price wasn't justified. The company is trading around 150 times earnings, around three to four times the price-to-earnings ratio of other mega-cap tech firms, like Nvidia and Google, Gerber said. Gerber said his firm's exchange-traded fund completely sold its position in Tesla stock this week, though Gerber-Kawasaki Wealth Management still has around $60 million invested in Tesla among accounts it manages for its clients. The firm has been steadily selling its position in Tesla for more than two years, according to regulatory filings. Gerber said he also continued to hold a small personal stake in Tesla, due to the stock being "one of the best trades" of his life as an early investor. "What's the justification for this valuation? Robots and a robotaxi that doesn't really work. It just seems like there's a big disconnect there, and eventually this reckoning will come," he said. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

US Supreme Court to weigh transgender athlete bans
US Supreme Court to weigh transgender athlete bans

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Supreme Court to weigh transgender athlete bans

The US Supreme Court agreed on Thursday to wade into the hot-button issue of transgender athletes in girls and women's sports. The court said it would hear cases next term challenging state laws in Idaho and West Virginia banning transgender athletes from female competition. More than two dozen US states have passed laws in recent years barring athletes who were assigned male at birth from taking part in girls or women's sports. The conservative-dominated Supreme Court's decision to hear the cases comes two weeks after it upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical treatment for transgender minors. The Supreme Court also recently backed a move by President Donald Trump, who campaigned on the issue of transgender athletes, to have transgender troops dismissed from the military. Trump issued an executive order in February aimed at banning transgender athletes from girls and women's sports. "From now on women's sports will be only for women," Trump said. "With this executive order the war on women's sports is over." The executive order allows federal agencies to deny funding to schools that allow transgender athletes to compete on girls or women's teams. In a high-profile case, the University of Pennsylvania agreed this week to ban transgender athletes from its women's sports teams, settling a federal civil rights complaint stemming from the furor around swimmer Lia Thomas. The Department of Education said that UPenn had entered into a resolution agreement vowing to comply with Title IX, the federal law which prohibits sex-based discrimination in any educational program. It follows an investigation by the department's Office for Civil Rights which found the university had violated Title IX by allowing transgender swimmer Thomas to compete in women's competitions. Thomas became a lightning rod around the debate over transgender athletes in women's sport after competing in female collegiate competitions in 2022. She had earlier swum on UPenn's men's team while undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Critics and some fellow swimmers said she should not have been allowed to compete against women due to an unfair physiological advantage. - 'Discriminatory laws' - The Idaho case accepted by the Supreme Court stems from the Republican-led state's 2020 "Fairness in Women's Sports Act." It was challenged by a transgender athlete at an Idaho university and lower courts ruled that it violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. West Virginia's 2021 ban on transgender athletes was challenged by a middle school student who was not allowed to compete for the girls' track team. An appeals court ruled that the ban was a violation of Title IX. "We believe the lower courts were right to block these discriminatory laws, and we will continue to defend the freedom of all kids to play," Joshua Block, a senior counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. "Like any other educational program, school athletic programs should be accessible for everyone regardless of their sex or transgender status," Block said. The Supreme Court will hear the cases during the term beginning in October and issue a ruling next year. cl/bgs

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store