Social organisations launch signature campaign in support of Puducherry's demand for Statehood
Representatives of the organisations under the leadership of Independent legislator Nehru alias Kuppusamy on Wednesday met Chief Minister N. Rangasamy in his cabin and obtained his signature in support of the Statehood campaign.
Mr. Nehru said they would collect around 1 lakh signatures to press for the Statehood status for Puducherry. 'The Chief Minister has agreed to support the signature campaign. The campaign will be held in Karaikal also. We are planning to hold a demonstration in New Delhi on June 27 to highlight our demand for Statehood,' he said.
In the recently concluded Budget session of the Assembly, the House had adopted a unanimous resolution urging the Central government to accord Statehood for Puducherry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Govt wrongly blaming Oppn for House disruptions, says Sangrur MP
A two-time legislator and former cabinet minister, Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer, was fielded by the AAP from Sangrur in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. He won back the seat, previously represented by the present chief minister, Bhagwant Mann, by trouncing SAD (Amritsar)'s sitting MP Simranjit Singh Mann. As the 18th Lok Sabha completes its first year, here's a look at the first-time MP's performance in the lower House of the Parliament and his plans for his constituency. Sangrur MP Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer How do you look at your experience in the first year of the 18th Lok Sabha? As the name suggests, the Lok Sabha is truly the House of the people, representing citizens from all walks of life. I feel honoured to represent the constituents of Sangrur, a region known for its political awareness and spirit of experimentation. Having been a two-time MLA and a cabinet minister in Punjab, I have been working at the grassroots level for a long time, but my tenure as an MP has brought a new kind of energy, motivating me as well as testing the best in me at times. I am fully committed to my role and thoroughly living every moment. What was the high point of the year for you personally or your party in the House? Being an MP offers no dull moments – each day is engaging and unique in its own right. However, I do feel that the BJP government's legislative agenda has been heavily influenced by select interest groups, often neglecting the concerns of the common man. My focus has been to raise the demands and concerns of the common people. I have consistently upheld the promise I made to my voters of being the voice of the common man in Parliament. I am using my MPLAD funds for projects that drive long-term development rather than for short-term optics. A key initiative involves Sansarpur, a historic village known for producing numerous hockey Olympians, which lacked an astroturf due to administrative delays. This issue has been taken up with the central government. Are you satisfied with the number of sittings of the Lok Sabha, and why or why not? We are the world's largest democracy, where every voice deserves to be heard. In the 1980s and 1990s, parliamentary sessions were longer and often included double sittings. BJP's politics is such that anyone who seeks accountability from them is dubbed as anti-national. While the government blames the Opposition for disruptions, it is their responsibility to ensure the House functions. The BJP has two to three leaders who make remarks that cause chaos and adjournments. If India wishes to achieve the aspirations of its youth, their representatives and institutions need to work in mission mode. What is the most effective way to raise issues of public importance in the House? I have been a student of politics and Parliamentary procedures since my teenage years. Over time, I have adopted core values — maintaining parliamentary decorum, avoiding personal attacks, and showing respect to individuals across political ideologies. At the same time, I remain clear and assertive in expressing my ideological beliefs and in advocating for the public's agenda. This balanced approach has helped me ensure the effective resolution of constituency matters, even from the opposition benches. What difference have you made to your constituency in the last one year, and what do you plan to do in the remaining term as MP? Unlike the previous MP from Sangrur, Simranjit Singh Mann, I have remained constantly active on the ground, regularly engaging with my constituents regularly. When I resigned from the post of cabinet minister after winning the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, there were ongoing infrastructure projects in Barnala, Dhanuala and other areas. These projects have been my top priority. A new sports stadium complex is underway in Dhanaula. One major achievement has been the approval of the long-pending Malwa-Chandigarh rail link, which was delayed due to a legacy political family in Punjab. Through constant persuasion and use of parliamentary tools, I, along with a few other MPs, have succeeded in getting its approval from the Railways. In Parliament, I have consistently raised issues related to central funds for Punjab, a national-level educational institution for Sangrur, and support for farmers and agro-based industries. I am using my MPLAD funds for projects that drive long-term development rather than for short-term optics. A key initiative involves Sansarpur, a historic village known for producing numerous hockey Olympians, which lacked an astroturf due to administrative delays. This issue has been taken up with the central government.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
6 years of abrogation of Article 370: Why it matters and what has changed?
On August 5, 2019, India's Parliament witnessed a moment of historic consequence. Home Minister Amit Shah rose in the Rajya Sabha to introduce a resolution to abrogate Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) of its special constitutional status under Article 370. Moving the resolution, Shah had then said, 'There should not be a delay of even a second to remove Article 370 from the Constitution.' Simultaneously, the government imposed a complete communication blackout in Kashmir — shutting down the internet and telephone services. There was a heavy deployment of security forces, political leaders were detained, and Section 144 was imposed. Tracing the origins of Article 370 Article 370 originated from the special circumstances after India's partition in 1947. J&K acceded to India by signing the Instrument of Accession, with Maharaja Hari Singh as ruler. At that time, Sheikh Abdullah was appointed as the head of an interim government. Later, intense discussions between Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah led to Article 370, which entered the Constitution in October 1949. What changed on August 5, 2019 On August 5, 2019, the government revoked Article 370 through a Presidential order and reorganised the state. J&K was split into two Union Territories (UTs): J&K (with legislature) and Ladakh (without legislature), effective October 31, 2019. The region was put under a strict security lockdown, with leaders from major political parties detained and communication suspended. As J&K was under President's Rule, the Centre acted through the Governor in the absence of an elected Assembly. Govt's justification for abrogation of Article 370 The union government justified the act on several grounds: • Security: To curb terrorism and separatism that plagued the valley. • The government believed Article 370 hindered Jammu and Kashmir's integration with the rest of India and limited its development. • Supporters argued its abrogation would promote socio-economic development. • They said it would help ensure equal rights and opportunities for the people of the region. • Better governance was another expected benefit cited by supporters. • The move was also seen as a way to apply national laws and programs that were earlier not fully enforceable in Jammu and Kashmir. Reactions and political fallout of the decision • Domestic: The ruling BJP and its allies celebrated the move as 'historic', while Congress, National Conference (NC), People's Democratic Party (PDP), and Left parties called it undemocratic. • International: Pakistan immediately condemned the move, calling it illegal and a violation of United Nations Security Council resolutions. The country argued that India's actions had 'no legal value' under international law, and insisted that Kashmir is an internationally recognised dispute, whose final status should be determined in accordance with UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people. China expressed its 'serious concern', particularly regarding the reorganisation of Ladakh as a Union Territory, saying that it undermined China's territorial sovereignty claims over parts of Ladakh. Legal challenges to abrogation of Article 370 Over 20 petitions challenged the Centre's move in the Supreme Court, raising critical questions: Can Article 370 be removed unilaterally by Parliament? Is the process under the President's Rule constitutional? The matter went to a five-judge Constitution Bench, which ultimately upheld the abrogation in December 2023, calling Article 370 a temporary provision. On the ground: What has changed? There have been both positive and negative developments. While the government claims improved law and order, incidents like targeted attacks in Pahalgam highlight ongoing security concerns. However, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has said that the region's infrastructure development is not connected to the abrogation of Article 370 on August 5, 2019. Speaking to India Today TV, he urged people not to politicise development, adding, 'Let's not link the infrastructure projects in Jammu and Kashmir to the politics surrounding Article 370.' He clarified that these initiatives were planned earlier and would have progressed regardless of the constitutional change. On security, Abdullah acknowledged a drop in terrorism and stone-pelting but attributed it partly to strict government actions, which he said, 'go against the principles of natural justice". The road ahead for J&K Restoration of J&K's statehood remains a major demand. The Modi government has promised to restore it 'at the right time', but petitions in the Supreme Court urge faster action for statehood restoration, emphasising the need to uphold federal principles. Article 370's abrogation marked a turning point in India's constitutional history, with its full impact still unfolding across J&K.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Fiscal deficit jumps to Rs 3.9K crore from Rs 416 crore since 2019-20, says CAG
NEW DELHI: The fiscal deficit of Delhi increased to Rs 3,934 crore in 2023-24 from Rs 416 crore in 2019-20, according to a Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) report tabled in the monsoon session of the Assembly by CM Rekha Gupta on Monday. The report also slammed the government for 1,313 outstanding Utilisation Certificates (UCs) of Rs 3,760.84 crore pending as on March 31, 2024. Lack of submission of the UCs means that although expenditure is incurred, the grantees have not explained as to how the funds were spent. There is also no assurance that the intended objectives of providing these funds have been achieved. According to the CAG report on the Finances of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi for the year 2023-24, the outstanding public debt has grown on an average rate of 1.98% annually between 2019-20 and 2023-24. Public debt GSDP ratio has decreased from 4.38% in 2019-20 to 3.19% in 2023-24. During 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24, though the Domar gap (expressed as g-r) was positive, the primary balance was in deficit during this period with exception of 2022-23. Revenue surplus dips The revenue surplus under AAP rule in 2023-24 declined by 55% as compared to the preceding fiscal, said CAG.
