PHC seeks replies in oath challenge
A two-member bench comprising Justice Ejaz Anwar and Justice Faheem Wali presided over the hearing. During proceedings, the judges raised serious constitutional questions and expressed skepticism over the maintainability of the petitions, especially that of the Chief Minister. Justice Ejaz Anwar remarked that the matter primarily concerns the Speaker of the Assembly and not the Chief Minister, stating, "The Speaker is the affected party here. The Chief Minister is not an aggrieved person." Justice Faheem Wali also questioned Gandapur's legal standing, asking, "In what capacity has the Chief Minister filed this petition? He already fulfilled his role."
The hearing saw the presence of K-P Advocate General Shah Faisal Utmankhel, Additional Attorney General Sanaullah, Speaker's counsel Waqar Khan, and other legal representatives. Justice Ejaz Anwar, while addressing the Advocate General, noted that had the oath not been administered, the members would not have been able to vote in the Senate elections. "The fact that they voted shows the oath was essential," he observed.
Speaker Swati and CM Gandapur, through their respective counsels, contended that the oath-taking held at Governor House was unconstitutional. They argued that Article 65 of the Constitution clearly stipulates that members must take oath within the Assembly, and that the Speaker had not refused to administer the oath - the session was simply adjourned due to a lack of quorum.
The petitions further claim that Article 255(2), which allows for alternative oath-taking arrangements in case of impossibility, was misapplied. "There was no refusal from the Speaker or the Chief Minister. A session had already been convened. Therefore, the conditions for invoking Article 255(2) were not met," the petitioners argued. They maintained that the Chief Justice's administrative directive instructing the Governor to administer the oath was a constitutional overreach.
The oath-taking ceremony, held at the Governor House on a Sunday, followed a request made to the Chief Justice by newly elected members on reserved seats. In their letter, they expressed concerns over being denied the opportunity to vote in the upcoming Senate elections. Acting on this letter, the Registrar of the High Court issued an official directive, authorizing the Governor to administer the oath under Article 255(2)".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Govt urged to urgently decide PSM's fate
Steam rolls off a slab of steel as it rolls down the line at the Novolipetsk Steel PAO steel mill in Farrell, Pennsylvania, US. PHOTO: REUTERS Members of a Senate panel have urged the government to expedite its decision on the future of the Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM), which has been non-functional for years. The Senate Standing Committee on Industries and Production visited the PSM on Saturday under the chairmanship of Senator Aon Abbas Buppi. The committee toured various plants within the PSM and reviewed the organization's current debt challenges, payment delays and expenditures, and listened to the concerns of employee unions. They held discussions with PSM Chairman Asad Islam Mahni and other officials on major issues facing the PSM. During a briefing, Mahni informed the committee that by 2024, the mill had accumulated a total loss of Rs600 billion and was paying Rs20 billion annually in interest on current loans. He said the mills owes Rs89 billion to the National Bank of Pakistan (NBP) as most of the loans from the NBP have been used to cover expenses, including salaries for 934 current employees. The officials told the committee that the government is simultaneously considering two projects: One involves the revival of the mill using Russian firm Industrial Engineering LLC, which would utilize arc and blast furnaces for restoration. The other project considers winding down the mill after appointing a review firm to evaluate its viability. The committee also met with representatives of the workers' union, who apprised them of the hardships faced by both current and laid-off employees. To address their concerns, the committee formed a subcommittee tasked with holding talks with management over workers' complaints. The Senate committee appreciated the current management's efforts to reduce PSM's expenditures. However, it expressed anger over the continued incidents of theft within the organization and instructed authorities to assess the losses incurred from such activities. It also recommended accelerating the disposal of non-functional or expired assets that are no longer operational. The committee was briefed on the arbitrary allotment of PSM land by the Sindh government a few years ago. It expressed concern over the allotment of 1,370 acres and 400 acres of undisputed land to local villages, stating that such allotment cases should be referred to the Council of Common Interests (CCI). The committee toured various plants within Pakistan Steel Mills and recommended that the government expedite its decision on the future of the institution.
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Unjust police certificates stigmatise acquitted citizens: LHC
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has recently observed that issuing a police character (PS) certificate reflecting a criminal history of an accused despite his acquittal by a court of law in an FIR violates the individual's constitutionally protected right. The court said such a practice not only violates the individual's protected right to human dignity but also imposes a lasting and unjust stigma upon a citizen who has been exonerated through due judicial process. The court said, once an accused has been acquitted by a competent court of law, he is to be considered, treated and regarded as innocent person under the law. Despite a conclusive acquittal of an accused any continuous reference or inclusion of the relevant FIR in official documents like police character certificate is unwarranted, the court observed. The court passed this order in a petition of Abdur Rehman Faryad challenging issuance of a PC certificate mentioning his name in the FIR despite his acquittal by a competent court of law. The court said the petitioner is entitled to a PC certificate that reflects his acquittal and the absence of any subsisting criminal liability. The court said the allegations levelled against the petitioner do not involve moral turpitude, nor do they relate to any offence against the State. The court said it would be legally unjustified to draw any adverse inference or attach any stigma to the petitioner merely based on the registration of an FIR. The court; therefore, directed the Home Secretary Punjab to ensure the issuance of a PC certificate in favour of the petitioner, which accurately reflects his present legal status. The said certificate shall exclude and omit any reference whatsoever to FIR registered at Police Station Nawan Kot, Lahore, in the light of the petitioner's lawful acquittal and the absence of any existing criminal liability, the court added. The court noted that law enforcement agencies have the administrative authority to maintain internal records of reported incidents, including FIRs, for various legitimate purposes. The court said the retention of such data, so long as it is confined to lawful administrative use and is not disclosed or misused in a manner prejudicial to the rights of the individual and cannot be construed as a violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The court; therefore, directed the office to transmit copy of the court order to the Inspector General of Police Punjab and the Chief Secretary Punjab, to ensure its strict implementation in light of the court's directions and observations. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FY25 audit report: Concerns voiced over non-independence of AGP Office
ISLAMABAD: The Audit Report for 2024–25 has raised serious concerns over the continued non-independence of the Office of the Attorney-General for Pakistan (AGP), despite explicit directives issued by the prime minister nearly seven years ago. The report highlights that the AGP, a constitutional office under Article 100 of the Constitution, continues to operate as an attached department of the Ministry of Law and Justice rather than as a separate division, as mandated. According to the report, the Prime Minister's Office, via Letter No 658/SAPM/2018 dated May 30, 2018, approved in principle the reorganisation of the AGP's office as an independent division. The directive also sought to provide legal cover to the AGP's role in the appointment of law officers. However, auditors found that these orders have yet to be implemented, which, they noted, undermines the constitutional status of the Attorney-General's office. The audit report termed this continued subordination of the AGP to the Law Division a violation of the prime minister's order and recommended immediate corrective measures to ensure compliance with both the Constitution and the PM's directive. In its response to the audit, the AGP Office acknowledged that a similar observation was made in the 2018–19 and 2019–20 audit cycles. It stated that the matter was taken up with the Law and Justice Division and subsequently, referred to the Cabinet Division for a final decision. The case remains pending. A Departmental Accounts Committee (DAC) meeting held on February 6, 2025, directed that the issue be referred to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) for further deliberation. The auditors have recommended that immediate steps be taken to formalise the AGP's independent status in line with constitutional provisions and the prime minister's instructions. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
