Trove of ancient whale bones discovered under melting Arctic glacier, photos
The centuries-old skeletal remains were found during an expedition on Wilczek Island, part of a Russian archipelago known as the Franz Josef Land, located about 550 miles from the North Pole.
Using satellite imagery, researchers with the the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) determined the island's ice cap had split in half, revealing a large surface area measuring several square kilometers.
In this newly exposed area, whale bones were found strewn across the barren landscape.
In photos, researchers can be seen posing with the cetacean remains, some of which appear to measure several feet in length. It's not clear what species they belong to.
Some of the skeletons were well-preserved, particularly those nearest to the receding glacier, according to a news release July 21 from AARI, which describes itself as the world's foremost research center for the study of the Earth's poles.
The findings indicate a period of rapid sea level change that took place sometime in the last few thousand years.
Over the years, numerous biological remains and artifacts have been found as a result of melting glaciers and permafrosts, including Stone Age tools and well-preserved baby mammoth.
Google Translate was used to translate a news release from AARI.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Researchers make stunning discoveries after tracking massive sharks' movements for full year — here is what they found
Researchers make stunning discoveries after tracking massive sharks' movements for full year — here is what they found While uncovering the mysteries of one of the ocean's largest residents in a year-long project, researchers have discovered some concerning details. What's happening? The basking shark is the second-largest fish in the world, second only to the whale shark. However, until recently, little was understood about its migratory habits. As Forbes noted, it was once unknown where these plankton-feeding giants went after they slipped beneath the surface. A team of researchers tagged and tracked several basking sharks in a wide-ranging study. Two female basking sharks showed vastly different behavior after the summer feeding season in the Arctic. One made a round trip from the Arctic to the Azores, a distance spanning thousands of miles. Another stuck around the area before traveling to the North Sea in the spring. Why are basking sharks important? The basking shark is a gentle giant that poses no threat to people. Once abundant, they were heavily fished to near extinction for their oil and meat until commercial fishing was prohibited in 1995. As the Shark Trust noted, they're currently protected under several international treaties. The research demonstrates the adaptability of basking sharks, which can tolerate vastly different ocean temperatures. While this can be encouraging for the long-term prospects of the endangered species, it is also a worrying sign about the health of the ocean. Basking sharks and other megafauna, such as gray whales, play a vital role in the ocean's ecosystem. Filter feeders control plankton populations and cycle nutrients wherever they are present. If they are removed or displaced from their normal ranges, the balance of the food web is disrupted. Warmer ocean temperatures, particularly in the Arctic, are forcing the basking sharks and whales to forage elsewhere. What's being done to protect marine megafauna? The study represents an important starting point for forming effective conservation strategies for the basking shark. Because the sharks travel over such a vast distance, it can complicate matters. Do you worry about air pollution in your town? All the time Often Only sometimes Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Ultimately, it's a matter of continuing to raise awareness and protecting the ocean by reducing single-use plastics and supporting clean-up efforts. The research also emphasizes the need to limit human-caused production of planet-warming pollution, which leads to higher ocean temperatures and melting polar ice caps. With rapidly changing temperatures, it's more difficult to track the behavior of creatures like the basking shark and provide effective protection for them. Positive, planet-focused lifestyle changes, such as driving gas-guzzling cars less frequently and supporting eco-friendly brands, can have significant ripple effects that can benefit even the most elusive of creatures. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Massive Russian earthquake struck on 'megathrust fault'
Massive Russian earthquake struck on 'megathrust fault' By David Stanway SINGAPORE (Reuters) -The 8.8 magnitude quake off Russia that triggered tsunami warnings across the Pacific occurred on what is known as a "megathrust fault", where the denser Pacific Plate is sliding underneath the lighter North American Plate, scientists said. The Pacific Plate has been on the move, making the Kamchatka Peninsula area off Russia's Far East coast where it struck especially vulnerable to such tremors - and bigger aftershocks cannot be ruled out, they said. With its epicentre near the city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, it was the biggest earthquake since the devastating Tohuku event in 2011, which caused a tsunami that sent Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant into meltdown. "The Kamchatka seismic zone is one of the most active subduction zones around the Pacific Ring of Fire, and the Pacific Plate is moving westwards at around 80 mm (3 inches) per year," said Roger Musson, honorary research fellow at the British Geological Survey. "Subduction" events, in which one plate pushes under another, are capable of generating far stronger earthquakes than "strike slips", such as the one that hit Myanmar in March, where plates brush horizontally against one another at different speeds. The Kamchatka area is particularly vulnerable and experienced a magnitude 9 event in November 1952, wiping out the town of Severo-Kurilsk and causing extensive damage as far away as Hawaii, Musson told Reuters. Shallow "megathrust" events are more likely to cause tsunamis because they burst through the sea floor and displace huge volumes of water. TSUNAMI RISKS With a relatively shallow depth of 20.7 km (13 miles), Wednesday's earthquake was always going to create such tsunami risks, experts said. "It is an offshore earthquake and when you have offshore earthquakes there is the potential for tsunamis," said Adam Pascal, chief scientist at Australia's Seismology Research Centre. "If you have a relatively shallow earthquake it is more likely to rupture the surface of the ocean floor," he told Reuters. "We've seen in some cases you can have large earthquakes like this and not cause a tsunami because they are too deep and the shearing doesn't express itself at the surface." Tsunami waves of around 1.7 metres (5.5 feet) reached as far as Hawaii, less high than originally expected, but scientists warned that such waves do not have to be especially big to do damage to the relatively low-lying coastlines of Pacific island nations. Parts of French Polynesia were told to brace for waves as high as 4 metres (13 ft). The impact of a tsunami depends on its "run-up" as it approaches coastlines, Pascal said. "If you have a very long, shallow run-up to the coast, a lot of the energy can be dissipated over that run-up, but if it is a very steep shelf before you get to the coast, the wave height can be higher," he said. FORESHOCKS AND AFTERSHOCKS Wednesday's quake has already triggered at least 10 aftershocks above magnitude 5, and they could continue for months, said Caroline Orchiston, director of the Centre for Sustainability at the University of Otago in New Zealand. "This demonstrates that large-magnitude earthquakes generate aftershock sequences that start immediately, and some of these can be damaging in their own right," she said. The 8.8 magnitude event on Wednesday came less than two weeks after a magnitude 7.4 earthquake in the same area, which has now been identified as a "foreshock". "Earthquakes by their nature are unpredictable," said Pascal. "There are no precursors that are scientifically consistent in earthquake sequences. Before this morning, those other ones were the main shocks." Bigger aftershocks cannot entirely be ruled out, he added, but their magnitude and frequency normally tend to decrease over time. "You can expect large aftershocks to continue for some time, but the frequency of large, damaging events will reduce as time goes on," he said. "There is always a chance of a larger event, but that larger event will usually occur relatively soon after, within days or weeks."
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
The Arctic Got So Warm in February, Svalbard's Ground Was ‘Like Soft Ice Cream'
The Arctic island of Svalbard is so reliably frigid that humanity bet its future on the place. Since 2008, the Svalbard Global Seed Vault—set deep in frozen soil known as permafrost—has accepted nearly 1.4 million samples of more than 6,000 species of critical crops. But the island is warming six to seven times faster than the rest of the planet, making even winters freakishly hot, at least by Arctic standards. Indeed, in 2017, an access tunnel to the vault flooded as permafrost melted, though the seeds weren't impacted. This February, a team of scientists was working on Svalbard when irony took hold. Drilling into the soil, they gathered samples of bacteria that proliferate when the ground thaws. These microbes munch on organic matter and burp methane, an extremely potent greenhouse gas and significant driver of global warming. Those emissions are potentially fueling a feedback loop in the Arctic: As more soil thaws, more methane is released, leading to more thawing and more methane, and on and on. Scientists can now dig with silverware in the Svalbard winter because the Arctic has descended into a crisis of reflectivity. Until recently, the far north had a healthy amount of sea ice, which bounced much of the sun's energy back into space, keeping the region cool. But as the planet has warmed, that ice has been disappearing, exposing darker water, which absorbs sunlight and raises temperatures. This is yet another Arctic feedback loop, in which more warming melts more sea ice, leading to more local warming, and on and on. Making matters worse, as temperatures rise in the far north, more moisture enters the atmosphere. For one, warmer seawater evaporates more readily, adding water vapor to the air. And two, a warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture. This leads to the formation of more low-level clouds, which trap heat like blankets—especially in the dark Arctic winter—amplifying the warming. That, combined with the loss of sea ice, is why the Arctic is warming up to four times as fast as the rest of the planet, with Svalbard warming even faster than that. During the winter, Svalbard's soils have historically frozen solid, and scientists assumed this made microbial activity grind to a halt. Reindeer could push through the snow to graze on vegetation. But February's heat and rain melted the snow, forming vast pools of water that froze once temperatures dropped again. That created a layer of ice that reindeer couldn't break through. 'What we encountered was just so powerful, to be in the middle of this event,' said James Bradley, a geomicrobiologist at the Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography and Queen Mary University of London and co-lead author of the paper. 'It really almost all melted over large, large, large areas of the ground. That ground remained frozen, so the water didn't have too many places to drain away to, so what we also saw was huge pooling of liquid water over the tundra.' This new climate regime could be profoundly altering the soil microbiome. Scientists assumed that methane-producing bacteria, known as methanogens, stopped proliferating when Svalbard's soils froze in the winter, just like food in your freezer keeps for months because it's in a hostile environment for microbes. But with warm spells like this, thawing could awaken methanogens, which could still produce that greenhouse gas even if it then rains and a layer of ice forms at the surface. In addition, that solid cap on the soil will stop the exchange of atmospheric gases into the ground, creating anaerobic, or oxygen-poor, conditions that methanogens love. 'In some areas, deeper layers might never freeze completely, which means the methanogens and microbes at depth remain active,' Giovannelli said. 'There's no real winter period.' Vegetation, too, is changing up there, a phenomenon known as Arctic greening. As temperatures rise, trees and shrubs are creeping north to conquer new territory. The good news is that those plants capture carbon as they grow, mitigating global warming to a certain extent. But the bad news is that dark-colored vegetation absorbs more of the sun's energy and raises temperatures, just like the exposed ocean does. And shrubs trap a layer of snow against the landscape, preventing the chill of winter from penetrating the soil and keeping it frozen. The speed of transformation in the Arctic is shocking, even for stoic scientists. And as nations keep spewing greenhouse gases, the feedback loops of the far north are threatening to load the atmosphere with still more methane. 'We call this the new Arctic—this is not something that is a one-off,' Giovannelli said. 'And on the other side, we've probably been a bit too cautious with our warnings regarding the climate. It's not something for the next generation. It's something for our generation.' This article originally appeared in Grist at Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at
