Brendan Helmore pleads guilty to lighting fires at Ulupna island
A Bendigo miner lit more than 30 fires at a popular camping site near Tocumwal on the state's northern border after entering a 'psychotic state', believing he was dying of dehydration and stripping off his clothes.
Brendan Helmore, 45, pleaded guilty in Shepparton County Court on Wednesday to intentionally causing a bushfire and possessing methylamphetamine.
On the Easter weekend of 2024, Helmore was camping at Ulupna island, along with about 2000 others.
He was on personal leave from his job at a West Australian-based mining company, where he worked as an underground operator at the time.
After consuming methylamphetamine the night before, Helmore went for a walk on March 30 in the bush near his campsite when he started to become distressed and delusional.
The court heard he believed he was dehydrated to the point he was going to die and panicked when he could not find any water.
He stripped his jumper and shirt off wearing only his jeans.
Helmore saw an aircraft flying above him and in an attempt to be rescued he began setting fires with a black lighter.
Witnesses saw one of the fires and attempted to put it out before seeing more and calling emergency services.
It took four hours for the fires to be brought under control by the CFA, and a further seven days for the area to be deemed safe.
Helmore was arrested at the campsite and interviewed where he admitted to lighting at least three fires, however he denied he was in the fire area that has been reported.
The court heard he told police he did not try to put any of the fires out and kept lighting them because the first one didn't work in getting attention.
Helmore was in prison from his arrest to November 20 last year when he was granted bail.
The court heard he experienced a 'very uncomfortable' time in custody.
Defence lawyer Alex McLennan said Helmore accepted the seriousness of the offences and with his plea of guilty had accepted responsibility.
He said Helmore had good prospects for rehabilitation and had not experienced any relapses in his mental health, but would be best supported by continued treatment.
He will be sentenced on June 5 and assessed for a community corrections order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Psychologist tries to back-track child abuse admissions
A former psychologist says he was misled into pleading guilty to sexually abusing eight male patients after his lawyers told him he'd be jailed for less than five years by doing so. The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017. The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress. Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way. However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson. The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants. The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard. A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead. "I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note. "I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done." The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told. After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea. The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position". "I don't appreciate being misled," he said. After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told. "I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court. Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants. She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea. The trial continues on Friday. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 A former psychologist says he was misled into pleading guilty to sexually abusing eight male patients after his lawyers told him he'd be jailed for less than five years by doing so. The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017. The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress. Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way. However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson. The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants. The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard. A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead. "I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note. "I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done." The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told. After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea. The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position". "I don't appreciate being misled," he said. After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told. "I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court. Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants. She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea. The trial continues on Friday. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 A former psychologist says he was misled into pleading guilty to sexually abusing eight male patients after his lawyers told him he'd be jailed for less than five years by doing so. The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017. The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress. Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way. However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson. The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants. The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard. A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead. "I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note. "I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done." The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told. After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea. The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position". "I don't appreciate being misled," he said. After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told. "I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court. Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants. She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea. The trial continues on Friday. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 A former psychologist says he was misled into pleading guilty to sexually abusing eight male patients after his lawyers told him he'd be jailed for less than five years by doing so. The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017. The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress. Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way. However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson. The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants. The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard. A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead. "I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note. "I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done." The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told. After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea. The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position". "I don't appreciate being misled," he said. After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told. "I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court. Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants. She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea. The trial continues on Friday. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Courier-Mail
4 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Can ‘repulsive' Diddy stage a career comeback after his bombshell verdict?
Don't miss out on the headlines from Celebrity Life. Followed categories will be added to My News. Sean 'Diddy' Combs' supporters chanted 'Free Puff!' — and poured baby oil over themselves — outside Manhattan federal court on Wednesday after the stunning verdict in his bombshell weekslong sex trafficking trial was revealed. But could he really make a comeback? A jury convicted the once-renowned music mogul, 55, of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, but acquitted him of the more serious sex trafficking and racketeering charges that could have landed him in prison for the rest of his life. Combs is now facing a maximum sentence of up to 20 years in prison on the two prostitution charges. His sentencing is scheduled for October 3. Before he was arrested in September, the three-time Grammy Award winner was riding high as one of the most powerful men in music. And while his career quickly came tumbling down, the jury's shocking decision opens the door to the possibility that Combs will try to rejoin the industry and fix his battered reputation. 'I do not think the court of public opinion will be forgiving,' Ann Olivarius, the founder of the McAllister Olivarius law firm and an lawyer focused on women's rights, told The Post in a statement. 'The damage to Diddy's reputation is real, and demonstrates that the world is watching and survivors matter, even if their abusers are powerful.' Experts have weighed in on the likelihood of a career comeback for the music mogul. Picture: Mark Ralston/AFP David B. Allan, a professor of music marketing at Saint Joseph's University, similarly believes Combs can't make a comeback. 'Once the wave of getting off on the more serious charges settles, the music business will pass judgment and his reputation will be done,' Allan exclusively told The Post. 'Sean has always been great at p.r. and publicity, but there's no coming back from this, as this is his legacy. 'There will always be an asterisk by his name and his hits,' Allan stated. Ana Garcia, host of 'True Crime News: The Podcast,' shared a similar sentiment about Combs' future in the industry. 'Combs may have been spared life in prison but I am not so sure his career can be saved,' Garcia exclusively told The Post. 'How can you look at Diddy and not think this man is repulsive? The public cannot unsee Cassie's beating or the vile things he made her do.' 'I think Diddy's image and endorsements are ruined,' Garcia continued. 'This trial didn't up Diddy's gangsta cred. Instead, it revealed a pathetic and violent man who gets off on seeing his beautiful girlfriend urinated on. Who wants that guy endorsing your product?' Meanwhile, Tyrone Blackburn, a lawyer who is representing Rodney 'Lil Rod' Jones and others in civil suits against Combs, believes the star could make a grand return. 'Because these are not viewed as the really serious claims, or serious charges, I think he may be able to come back,' Blackburn exclusively told The Post. 'I think if he shows some sort of remorse, I think if he submits an apology, I think if he falls on his sword and takes ownership for what he has done, thanks the jury for their thoroughness and says he will get some help, he possibly can,' Blackburn added. Lawyer Joel Denaro told The Post: 'Like always, people's memories will fade, and given Diddy's considerable talent, I'm sure he will flourish musically going forward.' A court sketch of Combs during the trial. Picture: Elizabeth Williams via AP, File Tony Dofat, for example, is up to collaborate with the embattled mogul again. He composed and produced hit tracks for Diddy and Bad Boy Entertainment in the '90s. 'I would definitely work together with him again. We made a lot of great records together,' he told The Post. 'Maybe going through these things will put them in a different perspective. It'll probably create a different type of art.' Jeff Apruzzese, who runs the music industry program at Drexel University, believes Combs will 'certainly try' to wiggle his way back. 'Diddy has always positioned himself as both a creator and a CEO. That said, a public-facing comeback, whether through performance or media appearances, would likely face steep resistance,' Apruzzese noted. 'If he returns at all, it's more likely to be behind the scenes in a production or mentorship role, though that still depends on whether business partners are willing to re-engage.' Combs wouldn't be the first once-disgraced celebrity to recover from a major scandal. Chris Brown was all but cancelled for getting into a domestic violence incident with then-girlfriend Rihanna in 2009. The Forever singer, 36, has also faced other assault allegations over the years. But Brown experienced a career resurgence with the release of his albums Breezy in 2022 and 11:11 in 2023, the latter of which won him the Grammy Award for Best R & B Album. He's also about to embark on the US leg of his Breezy Bowl XX tour from July 30 to September 20. Apruzzese doesn't think Combs can replicate what Brown has done. 'Chris Brown's return unfolded gradually and under very different cultural conditions,' the professor said. 'The nature of the allegations against Diddy and the current climate in Hollywood means people are far more cautious about public associations that could create long-term reputational risk.' Apruzzese also speculated that other famous names 'will likely keep their distance, at least publicly,' from Combs for now. 'Collaborators now have to think about brand alignment, audience expectations and potential backlash,' he noted. 'So even if relationships still exist behind the scenes, we may not see them out in the open.' Other celebrities are likely to keep their distance from Combs, according to one expert. Picture: Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP File Along with the current lack of public support, Combs' finances have taken a hit since he became a pariah. Forbes last year estimated the rapper's net worth at around $400 million, down from the $740 million he was worth in 2019. Before his arrest, he reportedly stepped down and later fully divested from his cable television network, Revolt. He also settled a legal dispute with spirits company Diageo, which involved him relinquishing control of his alcohol brands Cîroc and DeLeón. Combs' record label, Bad Boy Entertainment, has also been affected by his legal troubles. In 2023, he returned the music-publishing rights to the artists and songwriters who helped build the company. At the time, Combs told Variety: 'It's just doing the right thing. I think that we as an industry, and as a people, have to look in the mirror and make a shift forward. It's about evolving, leading by example and reforming an industry that needs it, in a world that needs reform.' Bad Boy has not announced any major releases since Combs' arrest. The last album Combs put out was 2023's The Love Album: Off the Grid. However, Combs was recently featured on Kanye West's new song, which also included West's 12-year-old daughter, North. West, who has also been shunned for his own controversies, has voiced support for Combs and even made a brief appearance at the trial. Combs' legal costs have certainly added up over the past year, which could also endanger his potential resurgence. Before his trial began in May, an expert told Fox News that Combs' legal defence could cost him $15 million. After the verdict, legal expert Neama Rahmani told The Post that Combs' sex-trafficking case was the 'most expensive prostitution trial in American history.' In addition, Combs' ex Cassie Ventura claimed she received a $20 million settlement in her 2023 lawsuit against the hip-hop mogul. Video evidence of Combs physically assaulting Ventura, 38, from 2016 was released last year, before she testified against Combs during the trial in May. Ventura reacted to Wednesday's verdict in a statement via her lawyer, Doug Wigdor, who said she 'paved the way' for the jury to convict Combs on the prostitution charges. 'By coming forward with her experience, Cassie has left an indelible mark on both the entertainment industry and the fight for justice,' Ventura's lawyer said. This article originally appeared in the New York Post and was reproduced with permission. Originally published as Can 'repulsive' Diddy stage a career comeback after his bombshell verdict?
Courier-Mail
4 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Arncliffe, Sydney: Boy, 14, dies after falling from e-bike
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. A boy has died after he fell from an e-bike, NSW Police have confirmed. Emergency services were called to Broe Ave in Arncliffe, near Sydney Airport, about 2.45pm on Thursday following reports a rider had fallen from an e-bike. When police arrived they found a 14-year old boy with serious injuries. Paramedics treated him at the scene and rushed him to Sydney Children's Hospital in a critical condition, but NSW Police confirmed he in the evening he had died in hospital. Anyone with information about the incident is urged to contact Crime Stoppers. More to come. Originally published as Boy, 14, dies after falling from e-bike in Arncliffe, near Sydney Airport
