logo
Japan is showing the world's economies how to age gracefully

Japan is showing the world's economies how to age gracefully

Washington Post25-06-2025
James Pethokoukis is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author of 'The Conservative Futurist.'
Economic coverage of falling birth rates these days sounds like a CNBC adaptation of the 2006 dystopian thriller 'Children of Men,' a film about societal meltdown in a childless future. Income growth will stall! Innovation will wane! Consumer demand will falter! 'This is how great civilizations throughout history have ended,' Elon Musk warned in one of his many grave pronouncements about 'population collapse.'
As this stagnation scenario becomes the default economic forecast, governments around the world are scrambling for ways, often at great fiscal cost, to slow or even reverse their baby busts. From cash incentives to paid leave, the results have been disappointing, and there's little sign of a promising untried fix waiting in reserve.
Yet Japan, 17 years into population shrinkage despite its own attempts at pricey natalist policies, now offers a surprisingly hopeful counter that an aging economy can still offer growth and prosperity.
Japan's falling birth rate has been treated as a national crisis both inside and outside the country for decades. The negative effects are visible enough: Rural Japan is hollowing out, offering a melancholic tableau that's great for TikTok doomscrolling: closed schools, shuttered shops and an abundance of abandoned homes, or 'akiya.' Perhaps you've heard about the village of Ichinono, where the remaining 60 or so residents craft and publicly display life-size puppets, a wistful echo of a more populous past.
The data, however, tells a more upbeat tale (if without any Miyazaki whimsy). A Goldman Sachs analysis this year found that wage growth has risen from 0.3 percent in the 2010s to 1.2 percent in the 2020s, while core inflation has climbed from 0.5 percent to a healthier 1.5 percent, an encouraging development in a country that was long stuck in a deflationary trap.
As Goldman sees things, the demographic decline that once drained vitality is now creating a 'virtuous cycle' of tightening labor markets, increased worker bargaining power and more investment in productivity-enhancing tech. These trends are helping prop up the economy even as it weathers a shock from the U.S.-led trade war.
When Japan's population peaked in the late 2000s, the country initially offset the decline by drawing more women and older people into the workforce. Rising participation helped mask demographic pressures and kept wages subdued. Now, Japan is running out of workers to tap, and scarcity is finally exerting upward pressure on wages, a boon for the remaining labor force.
But rather than just grumbling about the lack of workers, businesses are finding ways to use fewer of them. From software to machines — here's where AI and robotics can really lend a hand — productivity has gone up in Japan's most labor-starved sectors, with corporate profits hitting record highs in fiscal 2024.
Recent performance doesn't guarantee long-term results, as the report cautions. Still, the Japan scenario seems a more promising path forward than further natalist nudges. Hungary's lavish baby bonuses and generous parental benefits in Scandinavia have barely budged birth rates, proving again that you can't fight a values-based war with economic weapons. Cash-for-kids advocates Musk and JD Vance would protest, but no financially feasible subsidy can compete with 21st-century attitudes about families, career priorities and life goals. A survey by Pew Research Center this month finds that younger Americans report wanting dramatically fewer children than even just a decade ago.
Even if we do find ways to boost marriage rates and fertility at the margins, bigger changes would require a massive cultural shift. The religiously observant maintain higher birth rates; a Gen Z faith revival might prompt a revival in fecundity. People with higher incomes are having more children lately; an AI-led economic boom might build on this trend. And you never know, some futurists think a Muskian breakthrough in space travel might rekindle a sense of purpose for those eager to populate the new colonies.
These are fun scenarios to contemplate, but they offer little guidance to policymakers grappling with population trends staring them in the face right now. Accepting a Japan-like fate as a manageable result might encourage policies that help better adjust to it.
We could emphasize productivity — the business investment provisions in the Senate tax bill would help here, but so would retooling immigration to focus on letting in the smartest, highest-achieving workers. We could encourage a labor market that maximizes mobility so the right person is in the right job in the right place, perhaps by easing occupational licensing requirements and providing vouchers for job relocation. And there's no time like the present to reform pension systems to reflect the new reality of longer lives and shrinking workforces.
If a country that's considered an archetype of demographic decline can go gently into that good night, so, too, might the United States and other rich countries. Like the willow in the wind, better to go with the flow than fight against it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fixed Income ETF Assets Hit Record $2T
Fixed Income ETF Assets Hit Record $2T

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fixed Income ETF Assets Hit Record $2T

What do fixed income ETFs have in common with the Department of Government Efficiency? The answer, given away by the headline above, is $2 trillion. Not only is that the amount the Elon Musk-convened group (hoped to) cut from the federal budget, but it's also the size of the US fixed income exchange-traded fund market. On a fun note, 2 trillion is also the most recent estimate of the number of galaxies in the observable universe. The US fixed income ETF business reached that milestone in June, following a flood of assets into products this year. '$2 trillion is pretty noteworthy,' said Matthew Bartolini, head of Americas ETF research at State Street Investment Management. 'It's not being fueled by one single factor — there are multiple drivers.' READ ALSO: Are Gambling ETFs Worth the Bet? and Crypto ETFs Are Diversifying. Can Demand Keep Up? With $186 billion flowing into fixed income ETFs in the first half of 2025, the products got 34% of the total ETF sales, Bartolini noted. 'That is double what their market share would indicate.' Fixed income ETFs also saw record sales in June, taking in $18 billion, with only one subcategory, long-term government bond ETFs, seeing net outflows, he said. The most obvious factor in recent demand for fixed income ETFs is yield, said Daniel Sotiroff, senior analyst on the passive strategies team at Morningstar. Compared with the yields in the 2010s, when interest rates were near zero, the 4% or 5% yields today are a big improvement, he noted. 'The yield on my savings account is pretty dismal,' he added. 'That makes even something like a Treasury bill ETF more attractive.' Other contributors to growth overall are advisors outsourcing investment decisions via model portfolios and asset-allocation products, as well as an increased appetite for income, he said. 'We used to talk about dividend ETFs six or seven years ago … but increasingly, that conversation is going toward fixed income funds.' According to Morningstar Direct data, these are the fastest-growing fixed income ETFs this year through May: By net sales, the iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF led the way, taking in $17 billion, followed by the SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF, at $7 billion, and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF, at $5 billion. But by organic growth, or net flows as a proportion of total assets, the biggest seller was the Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF, at over 10,000% growth, followed by the T. Rowe Price QM US Bond ETF, at 1,200%, and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF, at 930%. Actively Recruiting: Active management is also behind much of the recent demand and product development. Almost all of Vanguard's fund launches over the past couple of years have been fixed income ETFs, many of which are active, Sotiroff noted. That firm filed this week for the Vanguard High Yield Fixed Income ETF, following recent launches in that category by Capital Group and JPMorgan. Unlike with equities, fixed income has been an area where a significant number of shops have been able to outperform, Sotiroff said. 'It is an area where active managers can actually add some value,' he added. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive exclusive news and analysis of the rapidly evolving ETF landscape, built for advisors and capital allocators, subscribe to our free ETF Upside newsletter.

House passes Trump's big budget bill
House passes Trump's big budget bill

Fast Company

time35 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

House passes Trump's big budget bill

President Donald Trump's tax-cut package cleared its final hurdle in the U.S. Congress on Thursday, as the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved the massive bill and sent it to him to sign into law. The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant victory for the Republican president that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 campaign. It also cuts health and food safety net programs and zeroes out dozens of green energy incentives. It would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Despite concerns over the 869-page bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, Republicans largely lined up in support, with only two of the House's 220 Republicans voting against it. The bill has already cleared the Republican-controlled Senate by the narrowest possible margin. Republicans said the legislation will lower taxes for Americans across the income spectrum and spur economic growth. Republican Representative Virginia Foxx of North Carolina described the bill as bringing 'Historic tax relief for working families. Massive investment to secure our nation's borders. Capturing generational savings. Slashing waste, fraud and abuse in government programs so that they may run more efficiently.' Every Democrat in Congress voted against it, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured. 'The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans, is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that was the longest in the chamber's history. Trump kept up the pressure throughout, cajoling and threatening lawmakers as he pressed them to send him the legislation by the July 4 Independence Day holiday. 'FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!' he wrote on social media. Marathon weekend Republicans raced to meet that deadline, working through last weekend and holding all-night debates in the House and the Senate. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday in 51-50 vote in that saw Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote. According to the CBO, the bill would lower tax revenues by $4.5 trillion over 10 years and cut spending by $1.1 trillion. Those spending cuts largely come from Medicaid, the health program that covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would tighten enrollment standards, institute a work requirement and clamp down on a funding mechanism used by states to boost federal payments – changes that would leave nearly 12 million people uninsured, according to the CBO. Republicans added $50 billion for rural health providers to address concerns that those cutbacks would force them out of business. Nonpartisan analysts have found that the wealthiest Americans would see the biggest benefits from the bill, while lower-income people would effectively see their incomes drop as the safety-net cuts would outweigh their tax cuts. The increased debt load created by the bill would also effectively transfer money from younger to older generations, analysts say. Ratings firm Moody's downgraded US debt in May, citing the mounting debt, and some foreign investors say the bill is making US Treasury bonds less attractive. On the other side of the ledger, the bill staves off tax increases that were due to hit most Americans at the end of this year, when Trump's 2017 individual and business tax cuts were due to expire. Those cuts are now made permanent, while tax breaks for parents and businesses are expanded. The bill also sets up new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime pay, seniors and auto loans, fulfilling Trump campaign promises. The final version of the bill includes more substantial tax cuts and more aggressive healthcare cuts than an initial version that passed the House in May. During deliberations in the Senate, Republicans also dropped a provision that would have banned state-level regulations on artificial intelligence, and a 'retaliatory tax' on foreign investment that had spurred alarm on Wall Street.

‘Trump Has Betrayed His Working-Class Voters': What 7 Conservatives Really Think of Trump's Bill
‘Trump Has Betrayed His Working-Class Voters': What 7 Conservatives Really Think of Trump's Bill

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

‘Trump Has Betrayed His Working-Class Voters': What 7 Conservatives Really Think of Trump's Bill

With President Trump poised to sign his signature policy bill into law, Times Opinion asked seven of our conservative columnists and contributors a simple question: Will it be good for America or bad for America? The group we convened included libertarians, New Right thinkers and traditional conservatives — people from all corners of the conservative universe. Here's what they thought. ← Bad Good → Best Provision David Brooks The increase in the child tax credit (to $2,200 from $2,000) and the tax-advantaged savings accounts for children (with a government contribution of $1,000 per child born from 2024 to 2028). Those are policies proven to decrease child poverty, and they are consistent with the general trend we should be taking: Spend more on the young and less on the old. David French The defense spending increase — the bill adds $150 billion to the Pentagon's budget — is necessary and overdue. America's military spending as a percentage of its gross domestic product is near its post-Cold War lows, in spite of the fact that Russian aggression has escalated and China is engaged in an immense military buildup. Matt Labash Even if I hate the bill — and I do — it also seems to deeply irritate Elon Musk. And anything that irritates Musk as much as Musk irritates the rest of us should earn grudging credit as a karmic delivery system. Katherine Mangu-Ward Extending the income tax provision in Trump's 2017 tax cuts was a perfectly reasonable thing to do (though it should have been paired with more spending cuts). The fact that the extension is permanent means a modicum of stability in the fiscal chaos. At least we won't have to have this exact fight again soon. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store