logo
When I was ambassador, Trump's advisers still had sway. Now the EU has to be ready to hit back hard

When I was ambassador, Trump's advisers still had sway. Now the EU has to be ready to hit back hard

Irish Times19-07-2025
'God be with the days' is a phrase I often heard older people use during my early years. As a student of history, I am sceptical of nostalgia for bygone eras that were usually much less glorious than imagined, but the current
EU-US impasse over tariffs
does make me pine away for the old world of multilateral trade talks.
I remember being involved with the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations when that diplomatic circus came to Brussels during my time there in the 1990s. Backroom deals were hammered out during all-night sessions. The Uruguay Round took eight years to complete. When it concluded in 1994, the result was a freeing up of world trade, a general reduction in tariffs and the setting up of the
World Trade Organisation
(WTO), of which Ireland's Peter Sutherland became the director general.
What a different world we now live in.
The decades-long liberalisation of trade has gone into sudden and sharp reverse
. US president
Donald Trump
's ambition to conclude 90 agreements in 90 days will clearly not be realised, but the world we knew in the heyday of the WTO may not be recoverable. Economic nationalism is now the order of the day in the United States, and others may be tempted to follow suit. Trump's approach echoes a wider mood among Americans.
Trade negotiators usually spend their time mulling over such things as commodity codes, market access and non-tariff barriers to trade. They tend to run dogged negotiating marathons rather than blue riband sprints. It can take years to work out the details of a trade agreement.
READ MORE
The
European Commission
has vast experience of handling trade negotiations as it is one of the commission's exclusive competences. Its counterparts across the EU-US negotiating table are the permanent officials and political appointees at the office of the US Trade Representative. In a normal world, those two teams would have sweated out a set of compromises in the confident expectation that their political masters would eventually give a 'thumbs up' to the results of their labours. Not so now.
The upheavals of Trump 2.0 may end up doing the EU a favour. Although reduced reliance on the US market would represent a painful transition, it may be a necessary one
I am sure that the two teams have explored solutions across the full range of trade-related issues. EU negotiators will have come armed with a set of concessions designed to appeal to the Americans. Sadly, however, this is not a conventional negotiating environment as Trump may well choose to disregard the advice of his negotiators. He enjoys an unmatched and unchallenged degree of authority.
Last week's letter
to commission president Ursula von der Leyen
read more like an ultimatum than a negotiating offer. So where is this dispute headed?
The second Trump term is a very different proposition from its predecessor during my years as ambassador in Washington. At that time, Donald Trump was a political neophyte. With the experience of four years in the Oval Office and time to reflect on what went right and wrong for him during Trump 1.0, he is now far more self-assured. His current team of advisers have less sway over him.
Trump's belief in tariffs is not widely shared, but it is deeply held and long-standing. He is actually less ideological than many of his supporters, but is animated by a deep conviction that his country has persistently been taken advantage of internationally, and that his predecessors have been too pusillanimous to protect American interests.
Europeans see things very differently, of course. They will point to the success of US companies in Europe and the profits they generate for their ultimate ownership across the Atlantic.
[
Trump's 30% tariffs would effectively cut off EU-US trade, Sefcovic says
Opens in new window
]
Since the so-called Liberation Day on April 2nd,
the EU has acted with a commendable restraint
designed to avoid an escalation of the transatlantic tariff dispute. It has patiently deferred retaliatory action, even in response to US tariffs on steel and aluminium which have been in place for months now. Even after the missive threatening 30 per cent tariffs landed in Brussels, the commission's tempered response prioritised negotiation and presented its planned countermeasures as a last resort.
[
Is Trump's tariffs plan working for the US? And where does it go next?
Opens in new window
]
It is genuinely difficult to predict how this will land, but an all-out trade war would be a mutually damaging outcome – one that both sides ought to be keen to avoid. The odds still marginally favour a last-minute agreement, but not necessarily by the August 1st deadline. Whatever the outcome, Trump will be keen to declare victory for his 'America First' policy. If agreement proves impossible, the EU will ultimately have no alternative but to hit back hard while probably delaying implementation in the hope that market reaction will soften Washington's position and obviate the need for full-scale retaliation.
Whereas the threatened US tariffs are across the board, the EU's reaction will target products likely to ruffle feathers in Trump-supporting communities. Selectivity is the wiser course, but it does require choices to be made, and that poses a dilemma for a 27-member union. Each member state has its own priorities on what to exclude from the EU's retaliatory package. And the issue of transatlantic security, where the atmospherics have improved since the recent Nato Summit, will always loom over European calculations. I expect that consensus will develop around the commission's current proposal for a €70 billion tariff package on imports from the US. That would put the ball back in Washington's court, with unpredictable consequences. My sense is that the EU is reluctantly ready to face up to them.
These unwelcome developments are especially problematic for Ireland
, given our unusual exposure to the US market. Important Irish exports like butter and sprits could be badly hit right away. Pharmaceuticals are being dealt with separately by the US, but they are clearly vulnerable too. Irish-based tech companies may find themselves blown off course by tariff headwinds.
The current standoff convinces me that the EU needs to work on building its own economic resilience. The upheavals of Trump 2.0 may end up doing the EU a favour. Although reduced reliance on the US market would represent a painful transition, it may be a necessary one and there are alternative avenues for European trade. Even if this impasse is sorted out, there is no guarantee that it will remain so. There's a new economic zeitgeist afoot and no going back, I fear, to those old days of predictable trade negotiations and their relatively benign outcomes.
We need to brace ourselves for a rough ride and play to our strengths.
Daniel Mulhall was Ireland's ambassador to the US during the first Trump presidency and is a consultant with Rockwood Public Affairs
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Donald Trump trounced Ursula von der Leyen in US-EU trade battle
How Donald Trump trounced Ursula von der Leyen in US-EU trade battle

Irish Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

How Donald Trump trounced Ursula von der Leyen in US-EU trade battle

Sunday's deal is the almost inevitable outcome of a declining great power placing its faith in an economically illiterate, mendacious, image-obsessed narcissist – and then asking that person to negotiate with Donald Trump Euractiv Perhaps the most humiliating aspect of the EU-US trade deal is that it's not even clear just how humiliating it actually is. The so-called 'framework agreement' – the EU's preferred euphemism for Sunday's Mafia-style shakedown – will likely see the average US tariff rate on EU exports increase from 13.5pc to 16pc on Friday, according to Bloomberg Economics: about seven times higher than before US president Donald Trump's return to the White House in January.

EU-US deal will stabilise transatlantic trade, says Gill
EU-US deal will stabilise transatlantic trade, says Gill

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

EU-US deal will stabilise transatlantic trade, says Gill

The tariff deal between the EU and the US will secure, stabilise and grow transatlantic trade and investment relations, the European Commission's Spokesperson on Trade has said. Olof Gill said both sides are "working very hard" to get the details of the agreement signed. Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, he said the 15% tariffs was not the outcome either the EU or the US wanted, but said "what we have now is something that gives us stability. It gives us clarity. It gives us predictability, which is what businesses want above all". Mr Gill said tariff "should kick in fairly soon," but could not give a precise date. "That is the intention of the US, the 15%. So that does provide a degree of stability immediately and predictability for businesses." Mr Gill said that in relation to agriculture and that Northern Ireland and the Republic have two different tariffs applied to their goods, details "can be worked out. "We're at the we're not at the end of the process here at the start of the process", he said. Meanwhile, Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke is to update the Cabinet on details of the EU-US trade deal. Mr Burke will outline some of the carve-outs or exclusions Ireland had campaigned for as part of the negotiations, including a zero-for zero-arrangement on aviation. He will also set out the supports that are available from Enterprise Ireland for businesses impacted by the 15% tariff on most goods exported to the US. The supports include a new market research grant of up to €35,000 available from next month. It will be available to companies to assess the impact of tariffs and other trade measures and to develop measures which will address pricing, supply chain and cost challenges. The minister is also set to update his colleagues on the views and concerns of the IDA and key business voices as a result of the trade deal, as the work continues on working out the finer details of the framework deal. Tánaiste to convene Trade Forum meeting on EU-US deal Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris is to convene a meeting of the Government Trade Forum on Friday to provide an update on the trade deal between the EU and US. The group is comprised of State agencies, business groups, unions and senior ministers. Mr Harris will use the forum to give an update on the latest analysis of the agreement and its implications. The meeting will also provide an opportunity for the Tánaiste to hear from stakeholders. Mr Harris said: "As we continue to analyse the full implications of the deal over the coming days, the Trade Forum meeting on Friday will be a timely opportunity to share and gain insights on what this deal will mean for the future of Irish businesses, jobs, and the economy." "Whilst the agreement between the EU and the US is welcome, we know that the imposition of any tariffs will have implications and that now is the time to intensify efforts to find and secure more markets for Irish businesses and Irish jobs," he added. The Tánaiste is also set to update the forum on other issues including plans to accelerate the passage of the Arbitration (Amendment) Bill 2025, which will allow for the ratification of the EU-Canada trade deal, known as CETA. It follows the Oireachtas Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade's decision to waive pre-legislative scrutiny of the bill following a request from Mr Harris. An update will also be provided on the decision to defer the implementation of alcohol labelling following concerns raised at the trade forum around the potential of the labelling to impact competitiveness.

Barclays profit up 23% as Trump tariff turmoil lifts trading
Barclays profit up 23% as Trump tariff turmoil lifts trading

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Barclays profit up 23% as Trump tariff turmoil lifts trading

Barclays' first-half profit rose by a better-than-expected 23%, the British bank said today, as its markets business reaped bumper returns from the frenzied trading activity sparked by US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs. Pretax profit for the January-June period totalled £5.2 billion, above analysts' average forecast of £4.96 billion. The bank also announced an expected share buyback of £1 billion and a half-year dividend of 3 pence per share, equating to £1.4 billion of total capital distributions to shareholders, up 21% from the year before. The earnings update from the Britain and US-focused lender saw its investment bank lift overall returns, even as it shifts spending away from that unit to refocus on its domestic retail and corporate banking business. "We remain on track to achieve the objectives of our three-year plan, delivering structurally higher and more stable returns for our investors," CEO CS Venkatakrishnan said in the statement. The bank's results were overall ahead of expectations and showed its 2026 target for a greater than 12% return on tangible equity looks increasingly achievable, Jonathan Pierce, analyst at Jefferies, said. The lender also said the financial impact of Britain's probe into how banks disclosed motor finance commissions could be "materially different" to the £90m it has already provided for. Lenders are awaiting the outcome of a Supreme Court ruling on the probe, due on Friday. Barclays' results followed Wall Street rivals such as Goldman Sachs which reported bumper second quarter earnings, as turbulent markets boosted trading. The British bank's equities income rose 25% compared with an average 18% gain for the top five US banks according to a Reuters calculation based on company statements. Barclays said revenue from trading fixed income, currencies and commodities, its traditional strength, grew 26%, against an average 14% increase for those rivals Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Investment banking fee income from advising on deals fell 16% for Barclays, compared with a 13% average gain for its Wall Street competitors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store