logo
Starmer's tsar attacks ‘two-tier' plans to prosecute Northern Ireland veterans

Starmer's tsar attacks ‘two-tier' plans to prosecute Northern Ireland veterans

Telegraph2 days ago

Sir Keir Starmer's Northern Ireland veterans' tsar has branded plans to axe a law protecting Troubles veterans from prosecution as 'immoral' and 'two-tier justice'.
David Johnstone, the veterans' commissioner for Northern Ireland, said that repealing the Legacy Act would lead to 'vexatious lawfare' against former soldiers.
He told The Telegraph that up to 70 former soldiers would be forced into the dock 'for doing their jobs' fighting the IRA on behalf of the British government.
Mr Johnstone, a former Army reservist, was appointed by Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, in January to act as an independent voice for veterans.
He has demanded that the Government abandons its plan, claiming that it will lead to a situation where former IRA terrorists have legal protections not afforded to veterans.
The high-profile intervention will be another blow to Labour's legislative agenda, as the proposals face mounting opposition and protests by the Armed Forces community.
Parliament will hold a debate next month after a petition demanding protections for veterans against Troubles prosecutions garnered more than 145,000 signatures.
The 2023 Legacy Act put an end to fresh historical inquests into deaths that occurred in Northern Ireland during the Troubles, as well as civil actions.
It created the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery, which would review deaths and serious injuries that occurred during the conflict.
However, Labour pledged in its manifesto to scrap the legislation, which it said was unpopular with Irish political parties and victims' groups as well as being incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The plans to repeal the legislation have caused alarm among veterans, who are worried that they will be forced into legal proceedings for actions they took decades ago.
Speaking to The Telegraph, Mr Johnstone said that it was wrong to persecute veterans for 'doing their jobs' when many Troubles-era attacks on British soldiers were never investigated.
He said: 'It's lopsided, it's two-tier justice, and if the Government thinks that they can reverse this and there not be pushback from veterans, well, I think they're in for a surprise, because veterans are just not going to stand for it.'
Mr Johnstone added: 'The pressure is on that this British Government should not make reversals that will put soldiers in the dock for doing their jobs.'
He estimates that 33 inquests would 'almost certainly' be allowed to proceed if the legislation is repealed, around half of which involve state forces pulling the trigger.
'You could be looking at 50, 60, 70, soldiers having files passed to the PPS [Northern Ireland's public prosecution service], many of them ending up in the dock,' he said.
Mr Johnstone said that repealing the law as the Government plans to would lead to a 'lopsided' approach to post-Troubles justice.
One of the most controversial elements of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement saw paramilitary prisoners released from jail as part of securing an end to the conflict.
The Commissioner said: 'The then-Labour government came to the society in Northern Ireland, and said, 'Look, in order to have peace, you must accept terrorists being let out of jail… royal pardons, effective amnesty for terrorists'.
'Then there was the decommissioning of weapons, which meant that the evidence that could have put terrorists in prison was destroyed.
'So society was asked to accept all of those things. And yet, 27 years on, we have this ongoing vexatious lawfare which is targeting and demonising those who wore the uniform.'
He continued: 'It was a legal Act of Parliament that sent them here. When they went out on the ground, and particularly the incidents that are caught up in these inquests, those soldiers were given orders by superior officers, and they carried out those orders.
'So the demonisation and this attempt to rewrite history is really why there is such a pushback among veterans.'
One of the men who could be caught up in the courts is Glen Espie, formerly a part-time soldier of the Ulster Defence Regiment, who survived two revenge murder attempts by the IRA.
Mr Espie took part in an SAS operation in Loughgall, Co Armagh, in March 1987, when an IRA unit mounted a gun and bomb attack on the local police station.
All eight members of the unit were shot dead after a gun battle. A civilian was also killed.
Mr Johnstone warned that Loughgall will be 'one of the first inquests that will come down the line' if the Legacy Act is repealed.
'Where is the inquest into the attack on Glen Espie and the many other thousands of people who lost their lives in Northern Ireland and many, many more who are injured and who carry the scars of the Troubles?'
Mr Johnstone grew up in Northern Ireland and is himself a former soldier, having signed up for the Royal Irish Regiment Reserves in 1988, before going on to serve in Iraq in 2004.
As part of his role, he has spoken to many ex-servicemen who served during The Troubles, now mostly in their seventies and older, who fear ending up in court.
'I don't know any veterans that are afraid of the truth. But veterans, as far as they're concerned, followed the law. They were given orders.
'In that scenario there's something immoral about dragging them through a legal process, particularly when it's clear it is just part of a wider vexatious lawfare.'
In February last year, the High Court in Belfast ruled that elements of the Legacy Act passed by the Tories breached the ECHR.
Opponents who brought the legal challenge said that the parts of the legislation breached Articles 2 and 3, the Right to Life and the Prohibition of Torture.
Veterans' concerns have become more acute after an inquest earlier this year ruled that SAS soldiers were not justified in opening fire and killing a gang of IRA men in Clonoe, Co Tyrone, in 1992.
Kevin Barry O'Donnell, Sean O'Farrell, Peter Clancy, and Patrick Vincent died after carrying out a machine gun attack on the nearby Coalisland RUC station during which 60 shots were fired but nobody was injured.
The coroners' report cites previous judgements on whether the use of force was compatible with Article 2 of the ECHR.
While the Government has challenged the ruling and plans to submit it for judicial review, Mr Johnstone said that the judgement had 'set alarm bells among the veteran community'.
Mr Benn told the Commons in December that he would seek to 'correct the mistakes of the previous government's approach, ensure compliance with the ECHR, and deliver on what this Government has promised'.
But Mr Johnstone said: 'The ECHR was not designed to be applied to terrorists. It was designed for innocent people'.
The commissioner has met with Mr Benn in person twice, and the subject of the second meeting was specifically how to deal with legacy issues.
'There's no doubt that his ear is open to receiving the information about the feelings of veterans,' Mr Johnstone said.
But he added: 'The default seems to be, 'Well, it was in our manifesto, we've promised to do this, therefore we have to do it', as opposed to, well that promise may have been made in good faith during the campaign, but you must face the reality of now.'
The commissioner also warned that scrapping the Act would have a detrimental effect on recruitment to the military.
'Why would any young person want to join the military, if 50 years after an incident, in say, Ukraine, or whatever operational environment, there could be a knock at the door in the middle of the night and you're dragged through court proceedings potentially charged with murder,' he said. 'It just defies belief.'
Mr Johnstone mentioned the case of Dennis Hutchings, a Troubles veteran who died in 2021 aged 80, while he was on trial in Belfast over a 1974 shooting.
He also recalled appearing at a ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of VE Day, and meeting an elderly veteran who served in Operation Market Garden in the Netherlands.
'The contrast between a man who is lauded for answering the call of his nation and going to Market Garden in the Second World War, and then Dennis Hutchings, who was only 20 years younger, dying in a hotel room on his own, dragged through 10 years of court for what?' he asked.
'For answering the call of his nation, donning the uniform and following orders.'
Mr Johnstone said: 'Surely as a society, we're better than that, and this is why I feel like the Government has to really take a step back.'
Mr Benn insisted that the Government was right to scrap the effective Troubles amnesty.
He said: 'The Legacy Act has been rejected in Northern Ireland and found by our domestic courts to be unlawful, not least because it would have offered immunity to terrorists. Any incoming government would have had to repeal unlawful legislation and it is simply wrong for anyone to suggest otherwise.'
He said that the Government's commitment to veterans in Operation Banner [the deployment of British troops to Northern Ireland] was 'unshakeable'
He added: 'The Legacy Act did nothing to help our veterans – it offered only false and undeliverable promises.
'I and the Defence Secretary are engaging with our veterans community and with all interested parties over future legislation, and we will ensure that there are far better protections in place.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Streeting tells Israel to ‘get own house in order' in Glastonbury row
Streeting tells Israel to ‘get own house in order' in Glastonbury row

Telegraph

time17 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Streeting tells Israel to ‘get own house in order' in Glastonbury row

Dame Louise Ellman, former Labour MP and vice-chair of the Jewish Leadership Council, said the scenes were 'extremely chilling' and 'very frightening'. 'It's very frightening to see a performer whipping up a crowd with hate speech and specifically with anti-Semitism and hatred towards Jewish people on the public platform and particularly at a time when anti-Semitism is rising,' she said. 'It can't be possible and it can't be acceptable for performers at a major festival like this and the organisers to escape the laws of the land which are against incitement and incitement to hatred and that is simply what this is. 'Responsibility is across a number of people and primarily of course the performer who did all these things but the organisers of the festival too and the BBC as the national broadcaster. 'It is extremely chilling and very frightening and it can't go unattended to.' Former BBC executive and presenter Roger Bolton has told Times Radio that the BBC 'should have cut away' from the Glastonbury performance by Bob Vylan and 'cancelled the broadcast'. 'It's something the BBC should not have allowed to have happened,' he added.

Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'
Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'

Daily Mail​

time18 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'

Sir Keir Starmer has been put on notice of a fresh Labour rebellion over the Government's 'family farm tax'. More than 40 Labour MPs are said to be considering a bid to water down looming changes to agricultural and business inheritance tax relief. It comes after the Prime Minister performed a trio of embarrassing U-turns in recent weeks. Sir Keir has reversed his position on axing the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners, a national grooming gangs inquiry, and welfare cuts. This has left Labour rebels feeling emboldened that they can force the Government into further policy changes. According to the Telegraph, a group of Labour backbenchers are considering using amendments to legislation to exempt small family farms from a planned tax raid. At last year's Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced farmers will pay a 20 per cent rate of inheritance tax on land and property they inherit worth more than £1million. The Government has insisted the measures - dubbed the 'family farm tax' and set to be in place from April 2026 - will only affect the wealthiest quarter of landowners. But the National Farmers' Union (NFU) and others say the impact of Ms Reeves' measures will be much more widespread. Critics claim the move could wipe out family-run farms with tight margins, as they will be forced to sell up in order to pay death duties. There have been months of demonstrations by farmers in response to the Chancellor's tax raid, including tractor protests in Wesminster. A 'rural growth group' of Labour MPs is now proposing the raising of the £1million cut-off point at which estates lose their tax reliefs. They have suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10million, 50 per cent to £20million, and nil thereafter. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, told the newspaper they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government. 'I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' Ex-Cabinet minister Louise Haigh, who was a leading rebel over the Government's now partially-reversed welfare cuts, has called for Sir Keir to 'reset' his relationship with the British public. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she told the BBC in the wake of the PM's climbdown on welfare changes. 'And I think that has been accepted from within government and a lot of people, both in the parliamentary Labour Party, but crucially, the country will really welcome that.' The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England. It also cut the health-related element of Universal Credit. But, after Sir Keir offered concessions to rebel MPs, the changes to PIP will now only be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only. All existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will also have their incomes protected in real terms. A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'

A British Leyland of TV is the Government's worst idea yet
A British Leyland of TV is the Government's worst idea yet

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

A British Leyland of TV is the Government's worst idea yet

A show about a good-looking human rights lawyer who becomes a triumphant, reforming prime minister? Or a mini-series about a brilliant, glamorous economist who becomes Britain's first female chancellor? Perhaps a movie about a fiery red-head who works her way up from poverty to become the most powerful woman in the country? As the Government paves the way for a potential merger between ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 to create a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster, it is not hard to imagine the kind of shows it might commission. But hold on. A British Leyland of television is the Government's worst idea yet. What the industry actually needs is more competition – not less. It may still be a few years off. But Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Government is very clearly paving the way for a major consolidation of the British broadcasting industry. Last week, as part of its shiny new 'industrial strategy', it opened the door to removing the barriers that prevent a merger between the existing terrestrial broadcasters. Apparently, ministers will examine 'possible consolidation between broadcasters', along with 'closer strategic partnerships'. Meanwhile, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Ofcom will be asked to review their definitions of 'television advertising' to include YouTube and Netflix, which again will make mergers easier. Add it all up, and it is not hard to see where this is going. We will need a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster to cope with a changing market, stand up to the American streaming giants, and preserve what used to be one of the UK's strongest industries. Heck, they could even bring in the marketing whizzes who gave us Great British Energy and Great British Railways to come up with the branding for Great British Television. Of course, we all understand that something needs to be done. In a world where streaming dominates, and with most people under 30 barely even aware of what traditional broadcasting through signals and aerials was, the industry is in an increasingly dire position. ITV, the biggest of the three, has seen its share price slump from 265p 10 years ago to just 80p now, and the broadcaster is only worth £3bn. There has already been plenty of speculation about a break-up, perhaps with a sale of its production unit, or else a full-scale takeover of the company, probably by a foreign buyer. Channel 4 has been slashing jobs and cutting back on its programming budget as it grapples with a declining advertising market. Meanwhile, Channel 5, which has never been a huge success since it was launched in 1997, is also potentially in play as its American owner Paramount prepares for a takeover by media company Skydance. Why not put all three together and create a new British-owned powerhouse in commercial broadcasting?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store