logo
The household auto fleet is a money pit

The household auto fleet is a money pit

Fast Company02-06-2025
There's a financial crisis hiding in plain sight: the American household vehicle fleet. Families are hemorrhaging money through car payments, insurance, fuel, maintenance, depreciation, parking, and registration. In many cases, this adds up to more than a family's annual savings—or the cost of sending a child to college every four years.
Car ownership is nearly universal in the U.S., with 92% of households owning at least one vehicle. About 37% own two cars, and 22% own three or more. In 2023, the average annual cost to own and operate a new vehicle climbed to $12,182. For households with two cars, that's nearly $25,000 per year—a recurring expense that too often escapes scrutiny.
Now consider how those vehicles are used. In 2021, more than half of all daily trips in the U.S. were under three miles. Nearly 30% were less than one mile. We're paying a fortune to go nowhere. The rise of remote and hybrid work has amplified the mismatch between cost and use. As of 2023, more than a third of U.S. employees worked remotely full time, with another 41% following hybrid work models. Pew Research Center reported that almost half of remote workers would look for a new job if their employer took this option off the table.
Cars are parked roughly 95% of the time, depreciating as they collect pollen and bird droppings. And yet they demand monthly payments, insurance, fuel, and maintenance. The long-distance commute has been the primary reason for every working member of the family needing their own vehicle, but our travel habits have changed.
What if owning fewer cars was a sign of more success?
A growing number of families are experimenting with a car-lite lifestyle—ditching the second or third car and rediscovering local travel through bikes, transit, or walking. They're not doing it to make a statement. They're doing it to make ends meet—and to take back their time. At the center of this quiet shift: the e-bike.
Part appliance and part liberation machine, e-bikes are redefining what a 'vehicle' can be. School drop-offs, grocery runs, commutes, and social visits—trips once assumed to require a car—are increasingly accomplished with battery-assisted pedaling. Terrain and distance fade as barriers.
In 2022, more than 1.1 million e-bikes were sold in the U.S., nearly quadruple the number from 2019. E-bikes now account for over 20% of total bicycle sales in the U.S., and they represented 63% of revenue growth in the bike industry between 2019 and 2023. Bikes have become robust enough to handle everything from kid pickups to bulk grocery runs, and more cities are creating rebate programs to accelerate adoption.
Replacing a car with an e-bike can save a household $120,000 over a decade—enough to wipe out debt, fund a college account, or boost retirement savings. And as infrastructure improves with more protected lanes, slower streets, and secure parking, the e-bike can graduate from practical to preferable.
What if you spent less on movement and more on meaning?
What if streets worked as well for bikes as they do for cars?
What if getting around town felt like a lifestyle upgrade?
For too long, success was measured by how many vehicles fit in your driveway. But those cars aren't status symbols—they're financial sinkholes. Remember, more than half of America's car trips are under a few miles. If you're going broke to go nowhere, the journey needs a new map.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This Is... Our Independence Day (For Climate Solutions)
This Is... Our Independence Day (For Climate Solutions)

Forbes

time13 minutes ago

  • Forbes

This Is... Our Independence Day (For Climate Solutions)

The end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end Despite some last-minute successful rescue efforts on some small but crucial points, climate investors in the United States are reeling this week from the passage of the new federal law which not only rolled back prior incentives for renewables and other clean energy and transportation projects, but in some ways imposed new penalties on them. This is decidedly not good news for climate investors in the United States, to be clear. But we've been here before, and this time we have some key advantages that our sector has not had in prior such retrenchment episodes. Let's look at the last twenty years of the residential solar industry in the U.S. When I was first getting started as an investor, it was fascinating to attend solar industry conferences, because the sector was clearly at a transition point. Walking through the exhibitor halls, you could see investment bankers in full suits rubbing elbows with guys in Birkenstocks and wearing ponytails. One can only imagine what the latter conference attendees must have felt about the 'suits' invading what had been a small niche industry until then. The thing is, this was before any large-scale federal incentive program for solar had been put into place. This was even before a Republican president declared 'America is addicted to oil.' And it was before the costs for rooftop solar made sense without incentives. The industry was still far from 'breaking a buck' (ie: getting the cost of panel manufacturing below $1/watt). But the investors could all see the trend lines as well as anyone else, and understand the basic logic: That as solar PV and other renewable power continued to see dropping manufacturing costs, and significantly lower operating costs than thermal power generation, distributed clean power production was going to become important. And they were right. As the prices continued to drop, financiers took the baton and figured out ways to turn a 'total cost of ownership' ("TCO") advantage into an overall cost advantage, and solar adoption flourished. The thing is, as mentioned above there still wasn't some massive Federal subsidy system for solar. Yes, a limited solar tax credit was implemented. But investors who were around at the time will remember that the industry really wasn't taking off because of this federal tax credit – instead, there were various state-level incentives that the solar industry utilized. As one state after another implemented new incentives, the industry jumped from state to state and the early movers found strong advantages by being flexible and entrepreneurial. I'm old enough to remember when New Jersey was the focus of industry activity, for example. And that patchwork of state-level programs was enough to support strong industry growth that eventually became a nationwide trend and a multi-billion dollar market. So here the climate solutions sector is again, with the federal rug pulled out from underneath the industry. But this is the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end. 1. It's not just a solar and wind industry anymore. It's certainly overstating things to suggest that 'cleantech' (as it was termed back in 2005) was just a solar and wind game. There were robust efforts around energy efficiency, waste treatment, electric vehicles, water treatment, and many other sectors. However, solar and wind was the focus. Now, climate solutions investors have more broadly embraced these other solution areas and more. There are many sectors like waste-to-value that have been growing quickly without any real federal support at all, and in many cases without any state-level incentives either.2. Despite the political rhetoric at the federal level, states governments are more supportive of a wide range of climate and clean technology solutions. Waste-to-value solutions, for example, are really not a 'red state / blue state' issue. Landfill capacity constraints and a desire for clean food and water (see Exhibit A: PFAS concerns) loom larger for local-level legislatures versus the grandstanders in Congress and the White House. And for many of these solutions, especially those related to the circular economy, localization is a key success factor in any case. Waste diversion and re-use, for example, is not a national issue nearly as much as it is a local issue.3. The underlying economics of these new solutions make sense now regardless of incentives, for many applications. TCO is a real thing, and the financial industry has now figured out how to unlock overall cost advantages by 'spreading out' the higher upfront costs of cleaner solutions across many of these sectors. In electric vehicles, for instance, many consumers now recognize that an electric sedan or pickup truck may cost more up front, but will save them money (and in many cases simply provide a better driving experience) in the long run. Commercial fleet owners for the most part haven't yet figured this out. But they will, and an entire industry dedicated to helping companies profitably electrify their vehicle fleets is now in place and downside of not having consistent federal-level support is also clear from observing the past two decades of the growth of the solar industry in the U.S. – it wasn't a smooth growth curve. As the sector grew in fits and starts, there have been successive waves of fast growth followed by industry consolidation – some of us call it 'the solar-coaster'. We are currently seeing the same thing in fleet electrification, for example. But on the other hand, contrarian, long-term investors may find right now to be a really attractive time to be placing bets on these industries and solutions, while investment values are depressed. The long-term climate change megatrend remains in place. Other countries aren't throwing such obstacles in front of their own market growth, costs continue to decline, and state-level incentives remain in place across many U.S. regions. Investors and entrepreneurs interested in U.S.-based climate solutions across the energy, food, water, waste and transportation sectors should look forward, knowing that the industry is more resilient than ever. Yes, better federal support would make a lot of sense in terms of innovation, economic growth, and the climate change crisis. But we don't need the federal support to keep moving forward. In many ways, this is our independence day.

Slate Auto's electric pickup is no longer ‘under $20,000' — thanks, Donald
Slate Auto's electric pickup is no longer ‘under $20,000' — thanks, Donald

The Verge

time22 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Slate Auto's electric pickup is no longer ‘under $20,000' — thanks, Donald

Slate Auto's American-made electric pickup — the one with no paint, no stereo, and no touchscreen — is no longer priced 'under $20,000.' The increase is a result of Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill,' which will end the federal EV tax credits on September 30th when signed into law later today. That sub-$20,000 price for the Indiana-built pickup was a big selling point for the EV startup backed by Jeff Bezos, and was only possible after applying the $7,500 tax credit to the retail price. The price promotion was scrubbed from the Slate Auto site as recently as yesterday, according to TechCrunch. The website now shows an expected price of 'mid-twenties.' Slate's under $20,000 price tag for a vehicle it won't start delivering until late 2026 was always accompanied by an asterisk, with fine print highlighting federal incentives that were 'subject to change.' And change was certainly expected: Trump campaigned heavily on the promise to end President Biden's fictitious 'EV mandate,' because electric cars are for socialists in MAGA world. Trump's embrace of oil and gas, while simultaneously dismantling incentives meant to spur the adoption of EVs and clean energies, is a gift to Chinese makers of electric cars, solar panels, and batteries. The US is now on course to own the past while China is firmly positioned to dominate the future.

Soybeans Rally on Wednesday
Soybeans Rally on Wednesday

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Soybeans Rally on Wednesday

Soybeans were in rally mode on Wednesday, with contracts up 20 to 26 cents on the day. The cmdtyView national average Cash Bean price was up 23 3/4 cents at $10.12 1/2. Soymeal futures were $2.90 to $4.10 higher on the day, as Soy Oil was up 110 to 140 points. Thursday will be the last trade day of the week due to Independence Day on Friday. Arabica Coffee Prices Are Falling. How Much Lower Will They Go? Brazil Coffee Harvest Pressures Weigh on Prices Coffee Prices Fall as Pace of Brazil's Coffee Harvest Accelerates Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Ahead of Thursday morning's Export Sales report, analysts surveyed by Reuters are looking for between 300,000 and 700,000 MT of old crop beans booked in the week of June 26. New crop sales are expected to total between 0 and 300,000 MT. Soybean meal sales are expected to total 100,000 to 650,000 MT, with bean oil bookings in a range of net reductions of 10,000 MT to sales of 26,000 MT. Earlier today, President Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam, stating the country is charging no tariffs on US goods. Nearly 5.7% of all US soybean meal export commitments for 2024/25 have been for Vietnam, with 2% of all bean commitments to the country. The 7-day QPF from NOAA shows rains up to 1.5 inches in parts of NE, IA, MN, WI, and the Dakotas. The ECB is showing expectations for lighter totals. Jul 25 Soybeans closed at $10.50 1/2, up 25 3/4 cents, Nearby Cash was $10.12 1/2, up 23 3/4 cents, Aug 25 Soybeans closed at $10.53 1/2, up 23 3/4 cents, Nov 25 Soybeans closed at $10.48, up 20 3/4 cents, New Crop Cash was $10.00, up 21 cents, On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store