
Meta owner Mark Zuckerberg spends Rs 1170000000000 to hire this man, his name is.., his expertise is to...
According to the media reports that Meta has acquired a company named Scale AI. However, the truth is that Meta simply made a large investment in Scale AI-it didn't acquire the company. If it was an acquisition, then Meta would have had to buy all shares of Scale, and all employees would have had to either receive Meta stock or cash out in some manner. This did not happen.
Instead, Meta invested $14 billion in Scale AI, which raised the valuation of Scale to $29 billion, and then made Meta's stake nearly 49%. Scale is still a separate company, and its board was unchanged. However, where there is this level of influence, it is very likely that the company is going to fall directly in line with Mark Zuckerberg's vision.
Alexandr Wang is the founder and CEO of Scale AI, and he was critical to making this deal happen. Wang is joining Meta but will remain on the board of Scale. With Meta and Wang's combined stake, they have potential control of Scale AI now. To put it another way, for the foreseeable future, key decisions for Scale AI could practically be dictated by Meta.
The deal was so large that some thought of Meta as buying the company outright. In fact, a significant amount of the capital ultimately went to Scale AI's employees because they were able to cash out their shares-partially, of course-but retain, and cash in, a percentage of their ownership. This allowed them to profit immediately while also staying invested in the company's future growth. It's said that this idea came from Alexandr Wang himself, ensuring that his team benefitted alongside him and didn't get left behind.
The most interesting thing about this acquisition is that it seems like Meta is not truly interested in Scale AI's core businesses. Scale AI is primarily a data labeler—providing the prep work for training machine learning models, which is usually a human-intensive task. It is also a low-tech task and therefore low in innovation. Scale works a lot with big clients such as Toyota, General Motors, and various governments, who want to adopt AI, except have no idea how to build AI.
For Meta, a tech of its size, Scale's business does not seem to quite fit either. Meta is not building a B2B data service business, and Scale's datasets are not valuable enough as datasets to warrant a deal on that level. The real purpose for the deal, it seems, Meta wanting to acquire Alexandr Wang, the CEO behind Scale AI.
This is not unprecedented. Google invested in Character AI and lured some of their best employees onto their Gemini team. Microsoft did something similar with Inflection AI. So why is Alexandr Wang so significant?
In the modern tech race, the player that builds the strongest large language models (LLMs) will win the game. It is a race to claim market territory. There remain many who claim they can build LLMs, but success is impossible without the right data, enormous compute, and the ability to scale. Users will always go with the highest-performing model. When it comes to this game, second best doesn't matter.
Meta has not kept pace in the AI race to date. OpenAI has already claimed the consumer software market with ChatGPT, and Google and Anthropic are established developer players. Meta has models made like Llama 2, but they have not been able to put the flag in the ground claiming 'first' in what is becoming a heated market. To this point, Meta's play has been to keep it open-source, and this was enough to gather a broad audience of developers and researchers. Now, Meta understands open source can take them only so far. They need a visionary leader capable of defining their AI future; in this case, Alexander Wang is expected to be that leader.
Meta is falling considerably behind in the AI race. OpenAI has taken the consumer space using ChatGPT, and Google and Anthropic have taken the developer space. While Meta has developed some models like Llama 2, its unable to stake a claim to the top of the competitive landscape.
Meta's approach thus far has been to keep everything open-sourced, and that did help garner a large community of developers and researchers,. Nevertheless, the company now realizes it cannot simply rely on open source. They need a lossy visionary leader to mold their AI future, which is why Alex Wang is in the limelight.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Chinese AI startup that 'shocked' biggest American tech companies is hiring big time
DeepSeek , the Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) startup based in Hangzhou, appears to be expanding its talent search beyond its borders, significantly increasing its recruitment efforts on LinkedIn. A report says that over the past week, the company posted 10 new positions on the Microsoft-owned professional networking platform, marking its first listings there in several months. The job postings, written in Mandarin with detailed descriptions, include three roles specifically focused on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). These positions are based in DeepSeek's Beijing and Hangzhou offices. According to a report by Bloomberg, similar roles were posted on popular Chinese recruitment sites earlier in 2025, the increased activity on LinkedIn is notable. LinkedIn ceased operating a localised version of its platform in China in 2021, meaning many candidates viewing these listings would likely be based outside of the country. Tech companies like Google, OpenAI and Meta increase 'AI hiring' DeepSeek's move to attract global talent mirrors the aggressive recruitment strategies of its US rivals, such as Google , OpenAI (developer of ChatGPT) and Meta Platforms. These companies are actively competing to secure top AI experts in the race to dominate the potentially world-changing field of artificial intelligence. Recently, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg introduced the team that will lead the company's 'Superintelligence' lab. The team consists of former employees of companies like OpenAI, Google and Anthropic, and will be lead by ScaleAI founder Alexandr Wang and former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman. Last year, Microsoft hired Mustafa Suleyman, co-founder of DeepMind – now part of Google – and Inflection, as CEO of Microsoft AI team. Elon Musk has, on several occasions, posted job opportunities for AI engineers to work in his AI comapby, xAI. OnePlus Nord 5 and OnePlus Nord CE 5: Unboxing and first look AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Running a classroom, not a company': Startup founder reveals the harsh realities of building a business in India
A pointed LinkedIn post by Sanket S, founder of Scandolous Foods, has sent ripples through India's startup ecosystem, sparking a flurry of reactions from entrepreneurs and professionals who say it highlights deep flaws in the country's talent pipeline. Check full text of the post here I hired 3 people from one of India's best tech colleges and honestly…it scared me. I'm not talking about some no-name college. These kids paid ₹40–50L for degrees from India's top private MBA, food, and hospitality colleges. But they walked out knowing… nothing that actually matters. No idea what precision fermentation is. MBA grad didn't understand P&L or cash flow. Hotel management kid had never seen a food processing line. And all of them are brilliant at making PPTs. That too stuff Gemini or ChatGPT can do in seconds now. What are we training kids for?? Because it's clearly not for work. It's to memorise outdated textbooks and polish case studies from 2012. And I'm sitting here, trying to build a 'globally competitive company' and this is the talent I get access to? What am I supposed to do? Train them from scratch, then I'm not running a company, I'm running a classroom. Or hire from abroad and feel like a traitor to my own 'Make in India' dreams? Honestly, I've spoken to so many founders, and this is not just MY problem. This is India's problem. And it pisses me off because founders can hustle, investors can bet big but if the talent pipeline is broken, the whole system crumbles. You want India to lead in food tech, biotech, climate tech, medtech? Then stop producing talent that's outdated before it even hits the job market. Because at this rate, we're not just 10 years behind, we're raising a generation that doesn't even know what the world looks like today. What did people say? "Yes it's every founder's problem. Need to train them from scratch and no guarantee that they stay with the company and can quit at any time. There's a huge gap in the education system which needs to be addressed immediately," said one user. "The situation is alarming. Sanket S you have raised a very valid point. In fact, many of us as an academician also find it in the same way. Institutes compete against peers in showcasing their highest placement packages; Similarly, students also want to be assured of getting a good placement and hence evaluates the institute on this one and only criterion. In this kind of transactional approach, intellectual resource, skill building, and many more things of utmost importance takes the back and many a times it results into something that disappoints practitioners like you at the end," said another user.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
This new AI learns from real human decisions to predict your next move easily
Have you ever wondered if a computer could really get inside your head, not in a sci-fi way, but in a way that actually understands what you might do next? That is exactly what is happening with Centaur, a new artificial intelligence that is starting to predict human behaviour with a level of accuracy that is making scientists sit up and take notice. How Centaur learns about us Centaur is not just another chatbot. In fact, it has been trained on a mountain of real-world data, more than 60,000 people making over 10 million decisions in all kinds of situations. This includes everything from memory games to tricky moral dilemmas, all boiled down into simple language so the AI could learn what people actually do, not just what they say they will do. Researchers took a powerful language model and gave it a crash course in human psychology. They did not start from scratch, either. They used Meta's Llama 3.1 as a base, then fine-tuned it with a special training method that focused only on the bits that matter for predicting behaviour. The whole process took less than a week, but the results are surprising. Centaur was tested on a huge variety of psychological experiments. It did not just spit out random guesses. When put to the test, it beat out the old psychology models that experts have trusted for years. How, you wonder? It could predict what people would do, even when the rules of the game changed or when it faced a challenge it had never seen before. In some cases, it even started to behave like a real person, making decisions that felt genuinely human. What makes this AI different One of the most surprising things about Centaur is that its way of thinking started to line up with patterns found in actual brain scans. No one told it to copy the brain, but the more it learned about human choices, the more its inner workings started to look like ours. It even helped scientists spot a new way people make decisions, something the experts had missed before. Centaur could end up being useful in all sorts of places. Think about smarter apps that actually understand how you learn, or tools that help doctors spot when someone is struggling. Of course, there are big questions too. If an AI can predict your choices, how much privacy do you really have? And who gets to decide how this kind of technology is used? For now, the team behind Centaur is working on making it even better, adding more voices and more types of decisions so it does not just reflect one slice of humanity. They have opened up their work so other researchers can build on it, hoping to create a tool that helps us all understand ourselves a little better. The Centaur study was published in the journal Nature on July 2, 2025. The research was led by a team at the Institute for Human-Centered AI at Helmholtz Munich. First Published Date: 03 Jul, 16:57 IST