Trump officials release FBI records on MLK Jr despite his family's opposition
The release involves an estimated 200,000 pages of records that had been under a court-imposed seal since 1977, when the FBI first gathered the records and turned them over to the National Archives and Records Administration.
The documents on the murder of the civil rights leader were posted on a government website as critics and supporters of Donald Trump continue to call for him to honor a different campaign promise: the release of files from federal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender Trump socialized with for more than 15 years.
King's family, including his two living children, Martin III and Bernice, were given advance notice of the release and had their own teams reviewing the records in advance of the public disclosure. Two of his children have appealed to the public to engage with the documents 'with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief'.
'The release of these files must be viewed within their full historical context,' wrote Martin Luther King III and Dr Bernice A King in a statement. 'During our father's lifetime, he was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign orchestrated by J. Edgar Hoover through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).'
They also repeated the family's long-held contention that James Earl Ray, the man convicted of assassinating King, was not solely responsible, if at all.
Bernice King was five years old when her father was killed at the age of 39. Martin III was 10.
'The intent of the government's COINTELPRO campaign was not only to monitor, but to discredit, dismantle, and destroy Dr. King's reputation and the broader American Civil Rights Movement,' they continue. 'These actions were not only invasions of privacy, but intentional assaults on the truth – undermining the dignity and freedoms of private citizens who fought for justice, designed to neutralize those who dared to challenge the status quo.'
The murdered civil rights leader's children also write that they believe that their father was killed as part of a conspiracy that involved 'unnamed co-conspirators, including government agencies'.
'While we support transparency and historical accountability, we object to any attacks on our father's legacy or attempts to weaponize it to spread falsehoods,' they add. 'We strongly condemn any attempts to misuse these documents in ways intended to undermine our father's legacy and the significant achievements of the movement. Those who promote the fruit of the FBI's surveillance will unknowingly align themselves with an ongoing campaign to degrade our father and the Civil Rights Movement.'
Some civil rights activists were not so supportive of the release.
'Trump releasing the MLK assassination files is not about transparency or justice,' said the Rev Al Sharpton. 'It's a desperate attempt to distract people from the firestorm engulfing Trump over the Epstein files and the public unraveling of his credibility among the Maga base.'
The King Center, founded by King's widow and now led by Bernice King, reacted separately from what Bernice said jointly with her brother. The King Center statement framed the release as a distraction – but from more than short-term political controversy.
'It is unfortunate and ill-timed, given the myriad of pressing issues and injustices affecting the United States and the global society,' said the King Center, linking those challenges to MLK's efforts. 'This righteous work should be our collective response to renewed attention on the assassination of a great purveyor of true peace.'
Donald Trump promised as a candidate to release files related to John F Kennedy's 1963 assassination. When the US president took office in January, he signed an executive order to declassify the JFK records, along with those associated with Robert F Kennedy's and King's 1968 assassinations.
The government unsealed the JFK records in March and disclosed some RFK files in April.
The King records were initially intended to be sealed until 2027, until justice department attorneys asked a federal judge to lift the sealing order early.
Scholars, history buffs and journalists have been preparing to study the documents for new information about his assassination on 4 April 1968, in Memphis, Tennessee. King was assassinated as he was aiding striking sanitation workers in Memphis, part of his explicit turn toward economic justice.
Ray pleaded guilty to King's murder. Ray later renounced that plea and maintained his innocence until his death in 1998.
Members of King's family, and others, have long questioned whether Ray acted alone, or if he was even involved. Coretta Scott King asked for the inquiry to be reopened, and in 1998, then attorney general Janet Reno directed the justice department's civil rights division to take a new look. Reno's department said it 'found nothing to disturb the 1969 judicial determination that James Earl Ray murdered Dr King'.
In their latest statement, Bernice King and Martin Luther King III repeated their assertions that Ray was set up. They pointed to a 1999 civil case, brought by the King family, in which a Memphis jury concluded that Martin Luther King Jr had been the target of a conspiracy.
'As we review these newly released files,' the Kings said, 'we will assess whether they offer additional insights beyond the findings our family has already accepted.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
How are trade deals actually negotiated?
Trade deals have never been more in the headlines, as Donald Trump continues to threaten countries with higher tariffs until they sign new agreements with the US. But how exactly are trade deals negotiated between nations, and has the US president's forceful actions changed how the talks are conducted?Former Canadian trade negotiator Jason Langrish says that Trump's tariff threats have undoubtedly worsened the tone inside the negotiating rooms."Lately, as we've gone into a nativist, nationalist phase, these trade deals have become more defensive and accusatory," he Langrish, who helped Canada sign trade deals with the EU and India, adds that this contrasts with how such agreements were previously reached. "Traditionally, trade talks were positive because you're taking an agreement that works between two countries and you're upgrading it."He points to the continuing trade talks between Canada and the US as an example of the change in atmosphere. Their two teams are currently working towards signing a new deal by a 1 August deadline."It's what we would call a defensive negotiation. Canada didn't ask for this, but it's something that we have no choice but to engage in." Another former trade negotiator, Karl Falkenberg, who represented the EU in talks for many years, says that Trump "doesn't recognise the rules of the game". Mr Falkenberg doesn't mean that as a complement, but Trump would surely take it as how exactly are trade talks conducted? What takes place in the rooms behind closed doors?"A chief negotiator is appointed on each side," says Mr Langrish. "Teams are put in place for each table, so there might be a table for tariffs, or regulation, and government procurement. Each of those tables would have its own sub-negotiator."Then he says, "it's off to the races", caveating that deals often take years to finalise. For Mr Falkenberg, a typical day in negotiations involves a morning and afternoon session, but he says he can "remember leaving the office at 5am in the morning"."If meeting the deadline is looking possible, people are prepared to sit through long hours - the longest I did was 24 hours," he TV political drama will often sensationalise conflict in negotiations, most in the business say that the real work happens quietly, over long hours of strategic give and take."Because, at the end of the day," says Mr Falkenberg, "as a negotiator you want to come to an outcome with someone else, so you need to build trust and connection". Wendy Cutler worked as a negotiator for the US Trade Representative's Office for 27 years. I ask her whether in that time, she was ever assigned a good or bad cop smiles and says: "I've played all the different roles, but I don't know which one I've been the most successful in."For Ms Cutler trust was her most important negotiation tool."You're not going to have 100% trust, because each side has their own national objectives in mind," she says. "But if you feel that you can informally share proposals with the other side, and that's not going to be leaked to the press, or get out to your stakeholders, it's easier to find a successful conclusion."But while the internal dynamics in the negotiating room do matter, what is happening in the world outside can often make or break a deal, says Mr Langrish. He points to those opposed to an agreement being made, such as a sector of the economy that may be negatively impacted, or domestic political opposition."It's not just the people who are for the advancement of the trade deal," he says. "There's also people and sectors that stand to lose and they have political clout as well. The political side is ultimately what slows things down." Ms Cutler adds that what must be making life difficult for US negotiating teams is the fact that Trump wants them to sign new deals with most countries in a very short window. She cites the April declaration by White House trade adviser Peter Navarro that the US would secure "90 deals in 90 days"."Trying to conclude 90 deals in 90 days has been a bridge too far even for Donald Trump," says Ms since April the US has announced agreements with the UK, Vietnam, Indonesia, Japan and the Philippines, as well as a partial agreement with China."I don't think from day one that the US government has had the appropriate bandwidth to deal with all the requests to meet and to negotiate with the whole range of countries," she advice to President Trump and his inner circle is to stop using social media. "Sometimes being too public in a negotiation can hurt progress in that it boxes both sides in and brings the tensions to the public, and therefore it's harder for each side to back down."In the meantime, as US tariffs seem to endlessly – and confusingly - go up and down, the world's trade lawyers are in hot trying to work out what they need to pay for their imports and exports are seeking them out and Mollie Sitkowski, a partner at US commercial law firm Faegre Drinker says: "This is the busiest I've ever been."
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Moscow police department releases inmate accounts about Bryan Kohberger's life in jail
Convicted mass murderer Bryan Kohberger received four consecutive life sentences without parole for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The sentencing at Ada County courthouse in Boise followed Kohberger's recent guilty plea, which allowed him to avoid the death penalty. Documents released by Moscow police included accounts from inmates at Latah County Jail, who described Kohberger as a 'weirdo' and annoying. Inmates reported that Kohberger would wash his hands dozens of times daily, take 45-minute to hour-long showers, and stay awake almost all night. Kohberger reportedly lost his temper only once, when an inmate made a comment he believed was directed at his mother during a video call.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Army reveals the real cost of Trump's birthday parade in Washington
The controversial Army parade through Washington, D.C., in June that coincided with Donald Trump 's birthday cost the service branch $30 million, it announced on Wednesday. 'I can confirm the total for the Army festival and parade cost approximately $30 million,' an Army spokesperson told The Hill. The event, marking the 250th anniversary of the Army, was projected to cost between $25 million and $45 million, not accounting for the cost of police and street repairs tied to the event In addition to cost overruns, some worried the event would damage Washington's infrastructure, though an Army spokesperson said in late June the procession of military hardware had only been shown to damage a single curb, which the Army planned to repair. The parade featured columns of marching troops, fireworks, and antique and modern military hardware like tanks rolling through Washington. The parade may have exceeded expectations on cost and safety, but the event was a controversial one, nonetheless. Critics argued that the sight of the military marching through the capital, at the same time the Trump administration was using the military to quell protests against his administration in Los Angeles, had authoritarian undertones. 'This is the kind of thing that Stalin would have done. This is the kind of thing North Korea does. It sickens me that we're putting on this display just for one man's ego,' Donna Stork, 73, of Hagerstown, Maryland, told The Independent as she watched the event. 'I have no problems with the Army having a celebration,' she added. 'What I do have a problem with is the implication that this is more about Trump and military might than it is about the 250th anniversary of people who fought and died for our country.' Others, including some veterans, praised the event. 'I retired from the Army 30 years ago and I came to honor all the people that came before me, all the friends that I've lost,' Van Beal, 70, who first joined the Army in 1978, told The Independent. A June poll found that 60 percent of respondents thought the event was not a good use of government funds. The parade took place the same day as 'No Kings' protests against the administration, which drew between 4 and 5 million people, according to estimates. The Trump administration claimed 250,000 people attended the parade, though outside estimates suggest fewer than 200,000 were in Washington for the event.
