1724919650-0%2FUntitled-design-(5)1724919650-0-640x480.webp&w=3840&q=100)
Imran's release unlikely, sons won't come to Pakistan: K-P Governor
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Governor Faisal Karim Kundi has said that the release of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan from prison appears unlikely, adding that his sons are also not expected to return to Pakistan.
Addressing senior journalists in Peshawar on Saturday, Kundi dismissed speculation about the involvement of Khan's sons, Sulaiman and Kasim, in PTI's upcoming protest campaign. 'It is highly unlikely they will come back,' he said, reiterating that prospects of Imran Khan's release remain slim.
Earlier this month, Khan's sister Aleema Khan claimed that both sons would join the party's anti-government protest movement, expected to begin in August. She had also stated that the former prime minister would lead the campaign 'from inside the jail'.
Reports suggest that Khan's sons have held meetings with key figures in the United States ahead of their possible visit to Pakistan.
However, Governor Kundi appeared dismissive of these developments, describing them as political optics rather than reality.
On the broader political and administrative front, the governor stressed the need for a tribal jirga to address unresolved issues in the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). He proposed that the jirga include tribal elders, ex-parliamentarians, and political stakeholders from the region.
'The merger of FATA with K-P cannot be undone without a constitutional amendment,' he said, urging the federal government to release the development funds that were promised at the time of the merger.
Turning to the security situation in the province, Kundi painted a grim picture. 'The law and order situation is dire. Extortion is being collected openly — even in broad daylight — from traders, local leaders, and ordinary citizens,' he said. 'In Dera Ismail Khan, people avoid stepping out of their homes after Asr prayers due to fear.'
He also criticised what he termed the federal government's Punjab-centric approach to national initiatives. 'Schemes like the laptop programme, youth development projects, and Daanish Schools have excluded the youth of K-P,' he said.
Commenting on the state of sports infrastructure, Kundi described the renovation of Peshawar's Arbab Niaz Stadium as substandard and said the lack of quality sports facilities was one reason why Pakistan Super League (PSL) matches have not been held in the province.
On PTI's internal politics, the governor claimed the party was facing deep factionalism in K-P. 'They cannot even bring out 20 vehicles for their planned protest on August 5,' he concluded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
K-P CM Gandapur urges consultation before imposing decisions on province
Listen to article Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur on Wednesday said that innocent and unarmed civilians were martyred in the Bajaur incident and asserted that decisions should not be imposed on the province without consultation. An emergency meeting on the law and order situation was held under the chairmanship of the chief minister. The meeting was attended by members of the PTI parliamentary party, the chief secretary, the inspector general of police, the additional chief secretary, and other relevant officials. During the meeting, the law and order situation was reviewed in light of the Bajaur incident, and the chief minister was briefed by relevant authorities on the latest developments. Following the meeting, CM Gandapur issued a video statement, stating that the provincial government stands by the decisions made during the recent All Parties Conference on peace and security. He said the government is preparing for the implementation of those decisions. Calling the Bajaur incident a tragic event, Gandapur said that military operations against terrorism are causing civilian casualties, which negatively impact public trust. 'These kinds of incidents are eroding public trust in the army, and without public confidence, we cannot win the war against terrorism,' he said. The chief minister said that the security personnel martyred in the war on terror are 'our children too' and are as dear as the civilians of the province. He said flawed policies are preventing proper recognition of these sacrifices and called for a revision of such policies. Read: Gandapur opens K-P's first food laboratory He said a schedule for holding jirgas in the merged districts had been issued. Local-level jirgas will be held over the next ten days, followed by a grand jirga. Consultations with local elders, elected representatives, and stakeholders will help formulate a future course of action and narrative. Gandapur said that the recommendations from the jirgas would be presented before security officials for a possible review of current policy. He reiterated that the fight against terrorism must be based on public trust. He also expressed reservations regarding the use of 'Action in Aid of Civil Power' and said an assembly session has been called from August 1 to debate this issue, among others, and determine whether it is serving its intended purpose. 'Our clear message is that we stand with the people and will go to every length for them,' the chief minister said. 'This is our province, our land. Wrong decisions should not be imposed on us without consultation.' He assured the public that Imran Khan's party, its workers, and the provincial government stand with them. 'We will not rest until their problems are resolved,' he added. CM Gandapur said he had instructed all deputy commissioners not to impose curfew or Section 144 without prior approval from the Home Department. Earlier, a meeting chaired by the chief minister was held on the law and order situation in Bajaur. Condolences and sympathies were expressed for the families of civilians and security personnel martyred in the incident. The chief minister announced Rs10 million in compensation for the families of each martyred civilian and security official, and Rs2.5 million each for the injured civilians and security personnel.
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
ECP also de-seats PTI's MNA from Chitral
Listen to article The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday disqualified PTI lawmaker Abdul Latif Chitrali and issued a notification declaring his seat vacant in view of his conviction in a May 9 case. The disqualification petitions against Chitrali were heard by a five-member bench headed by Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sikander Sultan Raja. Chitrali's lawyer appeared before the commission. During the hearing, the ECP's director general of law stated that the commission is not required to hear petitions against convicted individuals. The CEC asked if it meant that there was no need to hear references or petitions against such individuals. "Then the commission's role is only to act upon received court decisions?" he asked. Chitrali's lawyer contended that the ECP does not receive complaints directly and only the National Assembly speaker can notify it regarding disqualification after hearing the concerned party within the first 30 days. He said the notices they received also did not cite any specific constitutional article. He argued that disqualification is not automatic upon conviction, and the commission must examine whether the offense falls under Articles 63(g) or 63(h) of the Constitution. The ECP member from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa noted that the Constitution clearly states that a person sentenced to more than two years is ineligible to remain a lawmaker. The ECP Punjab member remarked that the Constitution empowers the ECP to decide on references sent by the NA speaker. During the hearing, Chitrali's lawyer referred to the PTI founder's disqualification case and mentioned CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja in that context, prompting laughter in the courtroom. Later, the ECP reserved its decision and announced it would issue a verdict by evening. Subsequently, the ECP rejected Chitrali's petition and declared the NA-1 Chitral seat vacant. An anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Islamabad on May 30 sentenced Member of the National Assembly (MNA) Abdul Latif Chitrali to 10-years in prison for attacking a police station during the violent riots that broke out across the country after May 9, 2023 arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan. MNA Abdul Latif Chitrali was elected from NA-1 Chitral with the support of the PTI in Feb 8 polls.
Express Tribune
13 hours ago
- Express Tribune
ECP out on a disqualification spree
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) appears to be increasingly under legal siege as a growing number of its lawmakers face disqualification on various charges, many arising from May 9-related cases. The wave of disqualifications has sparked concern among legal experts who argue the process may be circumventing constitutional procedures and eroding democratic norms. Though not unprecedented, the disqualifications are bypassing the route laid out in Article 225 of the Constitution, which states that no election of the national or provincial assembly can be challenged except through an election petition submitted before an election tribunal. Since the restoration of judges in March 2009, lawmakers have been unseated by the superior judiciary – particularly the Supreme Court under former chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry – on grounds such as holding fake degrees and dual nationalities. Even former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani was shown the door in a contempt case. During the tenure of former chief justice Mian Saqib Nisar, a string of PML-N lawmakers also faced disqualification. Notably, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was disqualified under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution. Subsequently, PML-N leaders Nehal Hashmi, Talal Chaudhry and Daniyal Aziz were disqualified in contempt proceedings. Two PML-N senators were also de-seated for holding dual nationalities at the time of filing their nomination papers. Now, it is PTI's turn in the hot seat. So far, four PTI lawmakers – two MNAs, one senator, and one MPA – have been disqualified due to convictions related to the May 9 riots. PTI founder Imran Khan himself was convicted in three separate cases before the 2024 general election, effectively barring him from contesting the polls. Recently, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan expressed concern that up to 39 more lawmakers could face disqualification over similar charges in the coming months. The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has also jumped into the fray. Acting on references sent by the National Assembly speaker, it has begun the process of unseating PTI MNAs. Most recently, PTI's Jamshed Dasti was disqualified by the ECP for failing to disclose assets in his nomination papers. The commission is now reviewing the eligibility of the leader of the opposition in the NA, Omar Ayub. During the tenure of former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa, the ECP was permitted to conduct recounts in three constituencies, leading to the de-seating of two PTI lawmakers. 'Premature move' Former additional attorney general Waqar Rana criticised the ECP's move as premature. "The most appropriate interpretation of Article 63(1)(g) is that the election commission cannot do it on its own after a member has taken the oath of office." He argued that only upon a reference from the speaker can such a member be disqualified, and that too after the conviction is upheld by the highest court. "Indira Gandhi was disqualified by the court, but on appeal, the sentence was suspended by the Indian Supreme Court in 1975, and she continued to serve as both a member and prime minister," he pointed out. Waqar Rana posed a question: if, on appeal, the conviction is set aside, then how can you disqualify a person? The other question is: how has the ECP assumed that convictions will be maintained in appeal? "It is tragic that ECP continues to undermine the democratic process," he added. Another lawyer noted that Article 225 of the Constitution has become redundant, adding that only election tribunals have jurisdiction to take up such matters. Earlier, parliamentarians belonging to the PPP and PML-N were being sent home through superior courts by the exercise of quo warranto jurisdiction. Now, the same is being done with PTI lawmakers by the ECP, without conducting a trial. Likewise, PTI lawyer Abuzar Salman Niazi said that convictions of several PTI lawmakers by the Anti-Terrorism Court, Sargodha, are judgments delivered by a court of first instance and have not yet attained finality. It is settled law that an appeal constitutes a continuation of the trial and that the judgment of a trial court does not become final until all appellate remedies are exhausted. In Federation of Pakistan v. Gul Hameed Khan (PLD 1975 SC 254), the Supreme Court held that "the appellate process is integral to the administration of justice and a judgment in a trial court remains provisional until the conclusion of appeals". "Therefore, any action taken against the PTI lawmakers prior to the disposal of their appeals would be premature and legally unsustainable." Niazi said that the ECP's notification of disqualification, issued prior to final adjudication, constitutes a violation of the principles of natural justice and due process enshrined under Article 10A of the Constitution. Furthermore, the ECP's failure to provide the lawmakers an opportunity to hear before issuing the disqualification notifications is a grave breach of procedural fairness. "Article 10A guarantees the right to a fair trial, and the principle of audi alteram partem — that no person shall be condemned unheard — is a cornerstone of administrative and judicial proceedings. In Asad Ali Khan v. Province of Punjab (PLD 1986 SC 383), the Court emphasised that "the right to be heard is an essential part of the principle of natural justice and must be observed before any adverse order is passed." "The denial of such hearing rights renders the ECP's action not only unlawful but unconstitutional. Moreover, these convictions do not fall within the ambit of Article 63 of the Constitution; therefore, the procedure followed by the ECP reflects a manifest misreading and misapplication of the law." Lastly, he added, the ECP's selective enforcement of judicial decisions raises serious concerns about its impartiality and commitment to the rule of law. While the ECP rapidly acted to implement the trial court's decision against PTI lawmakers, it has failed to enforce the binding judgment of the Supreme Court's largest bench regarding reserved seats for over a year. He argued that such selective and inconsistent conduct undermines public confidence in the institution and violates the principle of equality before law as guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution. "As held in Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. Federation of Pakistan (2014 SCMR 1272), "the sanctity of constitutional bodies depends on their neutrality, fairness, and adherence to the rule of law." The current conduct of the ECP falls short of these constitutional expectations and requires immediate rectification," he added. A three-judge bench of the Lahore High Court will take up the Dasti disqualification case today (Wednesday). Meanwhile, May 9-related trials have accelerated following a Supreme Court directive mandating the conclusion of all such proceedings within four months. Legal observers argue that the courts have often allowed powerful circles to shape political outcomes by fast-tracking trials against selected parties — first the PML-N during the Panama Papers case, and now the PTI in May 9 cases. Once, the apex court ordered expedited NAB proceedings against the Sharif family; now the same court, under CJP Yahya Afridi, has directed ATCs to wrap up May 9 trials within a similar tight deadline.
