logo
Nvidia's Jensen Huang thinks U.S. chip curbs failed — and he's not alone

Nvidia's Jensen Huang thinks U.S. chip curbs failed — and he's not alone

CNBC22-05-2025
Replacing Nvidia is a tall order. While Chinese competitors are years behind the company's cutting-edge technology, many analysts and insiders warn they are catching up, thanks to U.S. export restrictions.
U.S. chip restrictions on the sale of advanced semiconductor technology, especially those used in artificial intelligence, have been rolled out over several years, with the initial aim of curbing China's military advancement and protecting US dominance in the AI industry.
However, according to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, U.S. semiconductor export controls on China have been "a failure," causing more harm to American businesses than to China.
While the goals of cutting back the Chinese military's access to advanced U.S. technology and maintaining U.S. leadership in AI appear to have had some success on paper, loopholes and existing semiconductor stockpiles in China have complicated these aims, said Ray Wang, an independent tech and chip analyst with a focus on U.S.-China competition.
"That's partly why we are seeing a closing of the gap between Chinese and U.S. AI capabilities," added Wang.
Leaders of Nvidia and other American chip designers have long lobbied against chip controls as they worry about losing lucrative business deals. Huang said at the annual Computex technology trade show in Taipei that Nvidia's GPU market share in China fell to 50% from 95% over the past four years.
Indeed, chip experts say that the curbs create more harm than good for the U.S.
"The effects of the controls are twofold. They have the impact of reducing the ability of U.S. companies to access the China market and, in turn, have accelerated the efforts of the domestic industry to pursue greater innovation," said Paul Triolo, Partner and Senior VP for China at DGA Group.
"You create competitors to your leading companies at the same time you're cutting them off from a massive market in China," he added.
While Washington's most comprehensive export controls were passed during former U.S. President Joe Biden's term in the White House, curbs on Huawei and SMIC, China's largest chipmaker, go back to Donald Trump's first term in office.
On April 15, Nvidia disclosed that new controls, which restricted sales of its H20 graphics processing units to China, had led to a $5.5 billion charge against its revenue.
The restrictions are expected to be a boon for the demand and development of local Nvidia alternatives like Huawei, which is working on its own AI chips. They also come against the background of Beijing mobilizing billions as part of its chip self-sufficiency campaign.
"The bottom line is, the controls have incentivized China to become self-sufficient across these supply chains in a way they never would have contemplated before," Triolo said.
Chinese AI-related achievements, such as DeepSeek's R1 model and news of Huawei chip progress, have led observers to question the effectiveness of chip controls.
According Wang, the independent analyst, China's semiconductor and AI space has seen an acceleration of startups, market opportunities, and AI talent alongside the restrictions, which has clearly resulted in domestic innovations.
"I think the arguments that export controls accelerate innovation is quite valid," Wang said.
Nivida's Haung also noted these trends in April, telling lawmakers in Washington that the country has made enormous progress in the last several years and is right behind the U.S.
Nvidia's H20 chip was designed specifically to comply with existing chip controls prior to the clampdown on exports.
"We are not just talking about one export control, we are talking about a series of export controls that originate from all the way back in 2019," said Wang, noting that the evolving policies have had a couple of different objectives.
Meanwhile, in what DGA's Paul Trilio calls a "moving of the goalposts," it seems that the aims of the restrictions have shifted to an intention to slow down and contain Chinese AI and semiconductor developments.
"The continued expansion of the controls, and the lack of an articulation of what the clear end game here is, has really created a lot of issues, and created a lot of collateral damage," Trilio said, adding that it has led more people to question the policy.
In a statement earlier this month, the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, a U.S. think tank which has received funding from various technology companies, said in a post that "the Biden administration's export control policy for AI chips has largely been a failure since day one. Yet, year after year, it has doubled down, attempting to plug various loopholes."
"While [the U.S. government] is certainly right to prevent U.S. companies from selling advanced AI technology to the Chinese military, cutting U.S. companies off from the entire commercial Chinese market is a cure worse than the disease," Stephen Ezell of ITIF told CNBC in an email.
"U.S. export controls have cost NVIDIA at least $15 billion in sales, and those are revenues the company needs to be able to earn to invest in future generations of innovation."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Plans To Force Thousands Of USDA Workers To Leave D.C. Area
Trump Plans To Force Thousands Of USDA Workers To Leave D.C. Area

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Plans To Force Thousands Of USDA Workers To Leave D.C. Area

The Trump administration plans to push thousands of U.S. Agriculture Department workers out of the Washington, D.C., region by forcing them to relocate to far-away offices if they want to keep their jobs. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced the plan in a press release Thursday, with her office claiming the move would 'better align' the agency 'with its founding mission of supporting American farming, ranching, and forestry.' Rollins said the department employs around 4,600 workers in the D.C. area, but by the time the transition is over, it plans to have 'no more than 2,000' left in and around the nation's capital. It also expects to close most of its buildings in the area, including a major research center. The D.C.-area employees would be transferred to 'hub' locations in Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis, Indiana; Fort Collins, Colorado and Salt Lake City, Utah, the agency said. Rollins acknowledged the move would create 'personal disruption for you and your families,' in a video directed at agency employees. 'This decision was not entered into lightly,' she said. Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, a union representing USDA workers, told HuffPost in a statement that the move would damage the agency. He noted that, despite common misperceptions, 85% of federal employees already live outside the Washington, D.C., region. 'But D.C. is the center of our nation's government for a reason, as it facilitates needed coordination between senior leadership and field offices and ensures agencies are at the seat of the table when decisions are made at the White House and in Congress,' Kelley said. He singled out the announced closure of the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center in Maryland as particularly misguided, calling it a 'crown jewel' for critical research. 'I'm concerned this reorganization is just the latest attempt to eliminate USDA workers and minimize their critical work,' Kelley added. The relocation proposal is reminiscent of a similar, controversial plan at the USDA from the first Trump presidency. In 2019, then-Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced that two agencies within the USDA would be relocated to Kansas City to save money and place employees in the Heartland. The move crushed morale and prompted many workers to leave rather than upend their families' lives; it also fueled a successful union organizing campaign among USDA staff. Mick Mulvaney, who had served as Trump's budget director, later boasted about how many resignations the plan had spurred. HuffPost reported earlier this year on how that move was still dogging the agency and its mission more than five years later. A USDA economist said the relocation plan appeared to be little more than a mass layoff in disguise. 'We had a lot of people who had spent their careers working on very specific fields — very niche questions,' the economist said. 'And when they left, it was so sudden and abrupt that there wasn't time to bring in the next generation. You had to just leave all of your work and go.' Rollins argued that pushing workers to other states would benefit the agency's work. 'President Trump was elected to make real change in Washington, and we are doing just that by moving our key services outside the beltway and into great American cities across the country,' she said. The proposal aligns with Trump's broader attacks on the federal workforce. Since taking power in January, the administration has gone to great lengths to push federal employees out of the government, either by firing them through legally dubious means, enticing them to leave through early retirement offers or making them so miserable that they decide to quit. More than 15,000 USDA employees took the administration's 'deferred resignation' proposal earlier this year, raising concerns about how it would continue to enforce food safety, administer agricultural programs and conduct critical research. In fact, so many chose to leave that USDA leadership had to encourage some to change their minds. Related... USDA Cuts More Than $1 Billion Earmarked For Local Food In School Lunches More Than 5,000 Fired USDA Employees Just Got Their Jobs Back Trump Has A Plan To Sabotage The Government — And It Worked Perfectly His First Term

If You're Thinking About Buying an EV, Trump Made Now the Time To Do It
If You're Thinking About Buying an EV, Trump Made Now the Time To Do It

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If You're Thinking About Buying an EV, Trump Made Now the Time To Do It

If you've been on the fence about switching to an electric vehicle (EV), now might be the perfect time to make the leap. Tax credits for buying an EV were supposed to last through 2032, per CNBC, but President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' killed the tax breaks for new and used EVs. While the bill axed the credit, there's still time to take advantage before EVs become more costly. With the clean vehicle credit, qualified buyers can receive a $7,500 credit for new EV or a $4,000 credit for a used EV until Sept. 30 2025. The credit can reduce the cost of the vehicle by thousands; however, there are several restrictions to take note of. Read Next: Check Out: Here's what to know about the credit and why it might be the smartest time to buy. Clean Vehicle Credit Guidelines Not all buyers can cash in on the credit. According to the IRS, income ceilings stop at $150,000 for individual filers. That rises to $225,000 for heads of household and $300,000 for joint filers. According to Rob Dillan, automotive expert and founder of EVhype, there are price caps for vehicles, too — $55,000 for sedans and $80,000 for vans, SUVs and trucks. 'Fifty percent or more of a vehicle's battery must also be made with American parts, and the vehicle must be constructed with materials from the United States or countries the United States has trade agreements with,' he explained. 'These criteria will also rule out some EV models, so potential buyers will need to verify eligibility before purchasing.' In addition, the EV must weigh less than 14,000 pounds in gross vehicle weight, have a battery storage capacity of 7 kilowatt-hours or more, go through final production in North America, and be produced by a qualified manufacturer (excluding fuel-cell vehicles), per TurboTax. Learn More: Now Is the Time To Buy If you qualify, the credit could significantly lower the cost of buying an EV. 'The credit is going to make a big difference in cost, since the average transaction price of a new EV in 2025 is projected to be $56,910,' Dillan said. 'The federal tax credit is also likely to disappear in September based on timing alone, so now certainly seems to be the time for potential owners to move if they want to cash in on this financial bonus.' EV Considerations EV sales are up 11.4% year over year, according to Kelley Blue Book, with new models from Acura, Audi, Chevrolet, Honda and Porsche helping drive up sales. But before deciding whether an EV is the way to go, there are many things to consider. 'Depreciation is a big factor to take note of,' Dillan said. 'Some electric vehicle models hold only 49% of their value after two years, compared with 83% for gasoline-powered cars.' Reasons for the drop in value include battery life, limited charging stations, quickly evolving tech that becomes obsolete in older models and brand reputation, per Diminished Value of Georgia. With that in mind, it reported that the Tesla Model 3 and Hyundai Kona Electric are proving to have a higher resale value than previous EV models. Owning an EV will save you on gas, but Dillan said without the tax credit savings, 'the massive savings on maintenance and fuel bills are likely not enough to recoup the higher purchase price and possible depreciation hit of an electric vehicle.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on If You're Thinking About Buying an EV, Trump Made Now the Time To Do It Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Unusual Volume in Las Vegas Sands Call Options - Investors Bullish on Macao Gambling
Unusual Volume in Las Vegas Sands Call Options - Investors Bullish on Macao Gambling

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Unusual Volume in Las Vegas Sands Call Options - Investors Bullish on Macao Gambling

There has been a huge, unusual volume in long-dated call options for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) today after its Q2 results release yesterday. It showed investors are bullish on the Macao gambling scene. LVS stock is up over +4.0% today at $50.67 per share after the earnings release. A huge volume of in-the-money (ITM) LVS call options for expiration on Jan. 16, 2026. More News from Barchart NVDA Broken Wing Butterfly Trade Targets A Profit Zone Between 150 and 160 Tariff Deals Spark Unusual Options Trading in Carrier Global Corp Stock Low IV Alert: Stocks that Could be Ready to Pop Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. That is a very strong signal that the investors who bought these calls expiring in 176 days (almost 6 months from now), expect to see LVS stock much higher. In effect, it works out to a cheaper way to buy into the stock. This can be seen in today's Barchart Unusual Stock Options Activity Report. It shows that over 45,000 call option contracts have traded at the $45.00 call option exercise price, even though the stock price is over $50.00. That means the trades were bought 'in-the-money' by the call option buyers. The midpoint price for these calls is just over $8.00 (i.e., $7.95 bid, $8.15 ask, or $8.05 midpoint). So, instead of paying $50.67 per 100 shares, an investor buying these calls only has to shell out $8.05. But the breakeven price, after paying the exercise price (on or before Jan. 16, 2026), is less than 5% over today's price: $45.00 +8.05 = $53.05 $53.05 / $50.67 = 1.047 -1 = +4.69% premium over the trading price The investor has almost 6 months for LVS to rise over $53.05, the intrinsic value of these long-dated calls. That seems very likely to occur, based on its results today. Let's look at that. Strong Gambling Activity Results in China Despite the company's name, Las Vegas Sands makes all of its money in Macao, China, gambling and resorts (as well as one in Singapore). So, this stock is a play on the Chinese gambling scene. The Chinese are gambling a lot, and Las Vegas Sands is making good money, based on its Q2 results. For example, LVS reported that revenue at $3.175 billion in Q2 rose by over +15.2% from last year's $2.76 billion. Moreover, its operating income skyrocketed +32.5% from $591 million last year to $783 million. In addition, its 'Consolidated adjusted property EBITDA' (i.e., earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) was up +24.3% to $1.33 billion. So far, the company has not released its cash flow statement, so there is no indication yet of its free cash flow. Nevertheless, its operating income margin was 24.66% compared to 21.4% last year in Q2. Given that its capex was $286 million, we can estimate that its free cash flow was about $500 million (i.e., $781m-$286m) before any net working capital flows. That works out to a FCF margin of 15.74% (i.e., $500m/$3,175m revenue) for the quarter. This is a strong FCF result, and implies LVS could be worth substantially more. Price Target for LVS Sands Stock (LVS) For example, based on analysts' estimates over the next two years, revenue could range between $12.13 billion in 2025 and $12.65 billion next year (i.e., $12.39 billion on average). So, using a 15% FCF margin (slightly lower than in Q2), we can estimate $1.86 billion in FCF over the next 12 months (NTM): $12.39b x 0.15 = $1.86 billion FCF That is significantly higher than my estimate of $1.237 billion FCF it made over the last 12 months (ending Q2). Moreover, using a 3.6% FCF yield (i.e., the same as multiplying by 27.8x), Las Vegas Sands stock could be worth over $51 billion $1.86b x 27.8 = $51.7 billion market value Just to be conservative, let's call it $50 billion. That is still 45.3% over today's market cap of $34.4 billion. In other words, LVS stock is worth +45% more than its price today of $50.67, or $73.62 per share Why ITM Call Buying Works Here So, you can see why an investor in these in-the-money (ITM) call options likes LVS stock. For example, let's say that the stock rises to $73.62. The estimated return (ER) is as follows: Intrinsic value = $73.62 - $45.00 exercise price = $28.62 ER = $28.62 / $8.05 price paid for ITM calls = 3.57 -1 = +257% Expected Return And remember that is just for a slightly less than this 6-month period. Moreover, given that all calls have extrinsic value, it's likely that the call options will trade higher than the $28.62 intrinsic value price (at least up until several weeks or days before expiration, assuming it's in-the-money by this amount). The bottom line is that investors in the calls expect to make a very good expected return. However, keep in mind that buying calls entails a large amount of risk, especially if they are not hedged. You can lose 100% of your investment. But, at least the calls have good intrinsic value as they are in-the-money. For example, let' say that the stock stays at $50.67 over the next 6 months. The investor would only lose: $8.05 - ($50.67-$45.00) = $8.05 - $5.67 = -$2.38 potential loss at expiration. $2.38/$8.05 = -29.6% Expected Value (EV) Return So, let's use an advantage player (AP) mentality with this situation. For example, let's assume that there is a 30% probability that the investor can make a 257% return, and a 70% probability that a loss of 29.6% could occur: 0.30 x 2.57 = +77.1% , plus 0.70 x -0.296 = -20.7% = Expected Value Rtn: +56.4% In other words, the investor doing this trade has a better than +56% expected value (EV) return. This assumes that there is a 70% likelihood that the in-the-money call option purchase fails. That is a very good expected return. So, you can see why there is so much volume in today's Las Vegas Sands in-the-money calls expiring on Jan. 16, 2026. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store