logo
Sweating Spacecraft May Be the Key To Greener Space Travel

Sweating Spacecraft May Be the Key To Greener Space Travel

Newsweek01-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Space junk surrounds us. The European Space Agency estimates that there are approximately 130 million pieces of space junk from the over 6,800 successful rocket launches that have occurred since 1957. The South Pacific Ocean Uninhabited Area (SPOUA), a region near Point Nemo, is called the spacecraft cemetery as it is where those craft are routinely crashed at the end of their usefulness. Orbital debris falls into the Earth's atmosphere and burns up on its way back down.
Until recently, marked notably by the multiple successes by SpaceX, many spacecraft have been one-and-done use cases. The longest-serving spacecraft in history, the space shuttle Discovery, only flew a few dozen times before it was retired in 2011.
Scientists at Texas A&M University's Department of Aerospace Engineering are working to develop and test a 3D-printed material that aims to make spacecraft reusable and space travel greener in partnership with Canopy Aerospace.
The work is enabled by a $1.7 million Air Force Small Business Technology Transfer grant.
Reentering The Atmosphere
Reentering The Atmosphere
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty
Spacecraft returning to Earth are subjected to intense heat. NASA's space shuttle experiences temperatures around 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit during reentry. NASA's Orion spaceship sustains even hotter temperatures, near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit, the same temperature Apollo 13 reached during its reentry. Even higher temperatures are possible during hypersonic reentry.
Traditionally, spacecraft rely on heat shields or ceramic tiles to serve as a barrier from the extreme temperatures. SpaceX's Starship has an advanced heat shield, made up of approximately 18,000 hexagonal tiles.
The solution the partners are looking to prove out is a cooling method that acts as a heat barrier. Experts are testing transpiration cooling for spacecraft. This method features a layer of gas along the craft's surface that cools it and provides a barrier between the craft and extreme temperatures.
"The air around rockets becomes extremely hot as they reenter Earth's atmosphere — often exceeding 10,000 degrees Celsius. This requires heat shields to protect the rocket from overheating, which are not fully reusable. Upon mission completion, they need to be replaced or refurbished, which makes space travel astronomically expensive," Dr. Hassan Saad Ifti, assistant professor of aerospace engineering at Texas A&M University, told Newsweek.
"This technology creates a gaseous layer as the rocket 'sweats' or transpires a coolant gas, which acts as the heat shield. Once the mission is complete, the coolant gas tanks can be refueled for the next mission. This would make the rocket more reusable, and perhaps one day, we will have a fully and rapidly reusable rocket, just like the aircraft we fly today," he said.
This thermal effect is similar to how a puffer jacket works, Dr. Ifti explained. "This is why a puffer jacket is so effective. It traps air in these pockets, so it is the insulation from the air keeping you warm, not the solid part of the jacket."
The hypothesis is that when a vehicle uses the gas barrier as opposed to a single-use heat shield, flight times between missions could be reduced from years or months to days or hours, more similar to the turnaround time of a traditional passenger jet.
The gas barrier is not a new concept. Though the idea has existed for years, limitations in materials science, computational power and ground testing abilities have made it challenging to implement, Ifti said.
Testing rig development is being led by William Matthews, a fourth-year Ph.D. student at Texas A&M. "We should see that the material's surface is cooler at hypersonic speeds when the coolant flow is introduced than the baseline when no coolant is present," Matthews said. "Depending on how well the gas permeates the material, there are a lot of potential outcomes for this technology, and these tests should help us decide which direction we want to go."
Initial wind tunnel testing will take place at Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station's National Aerothermochemistry and Hypersonics Laboratory. The results of that testing will determine if a full-scale testing mission is worth investing in ahead of any possible application for commercial use.
"I am optimistic about this technology," said Ifti. "If all goes well, we could see sweaty spacecraft in the sky by the end of our lifetimes."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Higher Risk of Miscarriage in IVF When Father Is Elder Millennial
Higher Risk of Miscarriage in IVF When Father Is Elder Millennial

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Higher Risk of Miscarriage in IVF When Father Is Elder Millennial

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Paternal age plays a critical role in IVF success—even when using eggs from young, healthy donors—a study has found. At the 41st ESHRE Annual Meeting, researchers reported that male partners over 45 have higher miscarriage risks and lower live birth chances during IVF with donor eggs. The research, spanning 1,712 donor egg IVF cycles conducted between 2019–2023 in Italy and Spain, aimed to isolate the impact of paternal age by controlling for maternal variables. Doctor providing compassionate healthcare consultation while young couple patient holding hand, comfort each other after infertile report. Doctor providing compassionate healthcare consultation while young couple patient holding hand, comfort each other after infertile report. Moment Makers Group All cycles involved fresh oocytes (immature eggs found in the ovaries) from young donors (average age 26.1), frozen sperm from male partners and a single blastocyst embryo transfer. The average age of female recipients was 43.3. When results were analyzed, stark differences emerged between the two paternal age groups: Miscarriage rates were 23.8 percent among couples with male partners over 45, compared to 16.3 percent in those with younger male partners. "It was genuinely surprising to see how strongly paternal age affects miscarriage and live birth rates, even in oocyte donation programs," lead author and embryologist Maria Cristina Guglielmo of Eugin Italy told Newsweek. Live birth rates dropped to 35.1 percent in the older paternal group, versus 41 percent for those aged 45 or younger. "This challenges the common perception that maternal factors are the primary drivers of reproductive success and highlights the need to pay more attention to paternal factors in fertility," said Guglielmo. She explained that biological changes in sperm linked to aging—such as increased DNA mutations, abnormal chromosome counts, DNA fragmentation and altered epigenetics—can compromise embryo development and raise miscarriage risk. "Together, these factors affect both the genetic integrity and the functional quality of sperm, which can impair embryo development and contribute to a higher risk of miscarriage," she added. Importantly, the study only included first embryo transfers and excluded repeat cycles, allowing for a clearer comparison. According to Guglielmo, this strengthens the evidence that paternal age is not just a minor variable, but a significant factor in reproductive outcomes. "Our hypothesis is that time does not change the ability of sperm to produce embryos however, some genetic defects in sperm only become apparent later in the process, potentially leading to adverse effects on embryo development and contributing to negative selection outcomes in the fetus," she said. For couples who are considering starting a family later on in life via IVF, Guglielmo advises to consult with a fertility specialist early to understand how paternal age might affect chances and explore all the available options. "All women know how the miscarriage is associated to mother age; however, it's time to inform the couple about how the father age is also important, especially during the pregnancy, in order to evaluate a prenatal screening," she said. "Being well-informed and proactive can help couples make the best decisions for their family-building journey and improve their chances of achieving a successful and healthy live birth." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about IVF? Let us know via health@ Reference Guglielmo, M.C., et al. (2025). Advanced paternal age affects miscarriage and live birth outcomes following the first transfer in oocyte donation cycles. Human Reproduction.

This Silicon Valley founder broke up with Elon Musk. He has a warning for Donald Trump.
This Silicon Valley founder broke up with Elon Musk. He has a warning for Donald Trump.

Politico

time7 hours ago

  • Politico

This Silicon Valley founder broke up with Elon Musk. He has a warning for Donald Trump.

SAN FRANCISCO — A former longtime friend of Elon Musk has a word of caution for President Donald Trump about the tech mogul: He doesn't really move on. Philip Low, an award-winning neuroscientist who partnered with the late, legendary cosmologist Stephen Hawking as a test subject, learned that the hard way in 2021 when he fired Musk, one of his early investors, from the advisory board of the Silicon Valley startup he founded. Over an hour-long interview, Low weaved something of a psychological portrait of his former adviser, casting him as obsessive, prone to seeking revenge, power hungry and in constant search of dominance. He suggested Musk aims to explore every available avenue to establish competition with and ultimately overshadow bitter rivals. Low has known him for 14 years but doesn't believe Musk has matured over time, and he's convinced he never will. Though the two continued to speak for years after Low fired him, Low felt that Musk carried a grudge and their bond was permanently altered. It finally snapped in January when Low joined other critics in accusing the billionaire on social media of performing Nazi salutes at Trump's inaugural rally. Musk brushed off the public backlash as 'sooo' tired. 'I've had my share of blowouts with Elon over the years,' Low told POLITICO in a rare interview since Musk's ugly spat with Trump. 'Knowing Elon the way I know him, I do think he's going to do everything to damage the president.' Musk did not respond to multiple requests for comment directed to him and his businesses X, Tesla and SpaceX. A spokesperson for his super PAC, America PAC, declined to comment. Musk and Trump's made-for-TV breakup erupted earlier this month over the president's megabill that is still moving through Congress. Complete with threats, nonstop X posts and conspiracy-laced insults, their feud hit a peak after Trump mused about canceling the Tesla and SpaceX CEO's government contracts. In response, Musk unloaded on the social media platform he owns by trashing the president's megabill, floating support of a third party, chiding him for 'ingratitude,' taking credit for his election win and even insinuating in a now-deleted post that records of the investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 'have not been made public' because Trump is in them. (While it has long been public that Trump and other prominent figures are referenced in documents released in cases surrounding Epstein, Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing linked to Epstein.) Both sides now say tensions have cooled. The White House is eager to move on, with Trump telling reporters he'll keep Starlink internet and wishing Musk well. Musk, for his part, admitted some of his posts got out of hand and offered an apology a week later. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement, 'Politico's fixation on another palace intrigue non-story is laughable and fundamentally unserious. The President is focused on Making America Great Again by securing our border, turning the economy around, and pursuing peace around the globe.' But Low, who considers himself a political independent, said that Trump and the American public shouldn't be fooled. Simply put: Any reconciliation with Musk will be 'purely cosmetic' and transactional. 'He has been humiliated,' Low, 45, said of his old friend. 'The whole idea that Elon is going to be on his side and help woo Congress and invest in election campaigns for right-wing judges — Elon might do all of that, but deep down, it's over.' Low has observed that Trump, on the other hand, 'tends to make up with his former sparring partners like [Steve] Bannon a bit more easily than Elon does,' though the president is known for returning to his grievances as well. As he tells it, Musk and Low became fast friends after first meeting in 2011 at a social occasion in Paris. Their relationship deepened over late nights in Los Angeles — where Musk lived at the time — spent hanging out, attending each other's parties, texting frequently and trading stories about personal struggles. Musk asked to invest in the company Low built around a non-invasive brain monitoring device used to detect conditions like sleep apnea and neurological disorders. He participated in NeuroVigil's 2015 funding round and joined its advisory board. Low had already gained attention as a young innovator, launched a NASA satellite lab and demoed how his technology could translate Hawking's brain waves into speech. Musk gave Low some pointers as the neuroscientist was preparing to visit the White House for the first time, as a guest of former President Barack Obama. 'He said 'he's a human being like anybody else,'' Low recounted. 'He views Trump sort of the same way, just a human being.' During Trump's first term, as Musk was also grappling with how to balance Tesla's business interests against policy disagreements with the administration, Low returned the advice and recommended he step away from White House advisory councils he served on to protect the automaker's brand. Musk ultimately did in 2017 after Trump ordered the U.S. to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. A few years later, in 2021, Musk was looking to pull out of another business arrangement. He wanted off NeuroVigil's advisory board. Instead of letting him resign, Low said he fired Musk, which prevented him from exercising his stock options to hurt NeuroVigil. 'Let's cut ties here,' Low wrote in an email message to Musk at the time, viewed by POLITICO. Musk by then had launched his brain implant company Neuralink and had long been dreaming of colonizing Mars. 'Good luck with your implants, all of them, and with building Pottersville on Mars. Seriously, don't fuck with me,' Low wrote. Musk, of course, went on to donate $288 million during the 2024 election, which cemented his place in MAGA politics and status as the largest and most prominent individual political donor in the country. His America PAC once vowed to 'keep grinding' at an even more audacious political playbook ahead of the midterms. But Musk scaled back his 2026 ambitions, promising to do 'a lot less' campaign spending in the future, shortly before his public clash with Trump. With Musk's allegiance to MAGA called into question, Low predicted he could seek revenge behind the scenes — 'it's not a question of if, it's a question of when' — a possibility Trump has openly pondered. The president warned of 'serious consequences' if Musk funds Democratic challengers against Republicans who back his 'big, beautiful bill'— the legislation that would enact Trump's domestic policy agenda, but that Musk has scorned as wasteful pork-barrel spending. However, if there was any lingering notion that Musk would completely retreat from politics, he dispelled it on Saturday by renewing his attacks on the bill ahead of a critical vote. Unlike his old pal, Low prefers to keep a lower profile. The Canadian neuroscientist wore aviator sunglasses indoors throughout the interview. When POLITICO first reached out, an automated reply from Low's email robot came back, noting that he was 'completely off the grid' and providing a math puzzle to solve to get on his calendar. POLITICO didn't solve the problem, perhaps because it's not solvable, but he replied anyway. Low spoke to the press infrequently between the early 2010s, when his company partnered with Hawking, and when he posted the takedown that ended any remaining friendship with Musk earlier this year. One of the rare exceptions was a 2013 fireside chat where Low, in an 'Occupy Mars' shirt, spoke next to Musk at the Canadian Consul General's Residence in Los Angeles. Low sees little daylight between the Elon he knew before and the one who fractured his relationship with the president. 'A lot of people close to him will say that he changed. I don't believe that to be true,' he said. 'I've seen this side of Elon over the years, but I just think that over time, he got cozy with the idea of showing more of that, and now it seems to have affected him.' When Musk came under fire for his salutes at Trump's post-inauguration rally, Low, the son of a Holocaust survivor, said he first confronted his former friend with a private message. He said in the email viewed by POLITICO: 'I am so glad I fired your dumb ass' and warned him to learn from the fate of Rodion Raskolnikov, the central character in 'Crime and Punishment,' who convinces himself that extraordinary men are justified in committing crimes if they serve a higher goal. Four days passed without a reply, and Low proceeded to cut contact before letting it rip in a nearly 2,000-word open letter that went viral on Facebook and LinkedIn. 'I made my displeasure known to him as one of his closest former friends at that point, and I blocked him,' he said. That's a diplomatic description. Low in his letter delivered a blistering portrait of Musk as a narcissist whose 'lust for power' keeps driving him to undermine the very organizations that challenge his hold on it. Musk didn't respond publicly. According to Low, those tendencies put Musk 'in a league of his own' in Silicon Valley — where he locked into power struggles with many a co-founder, from PayPal's Peter Thiel to Tesla's Martin Eberhard to OpenAI's Sam Altman. And the predictable playbook followed him to Trump's side as first buddy, a role Low dubbed his former friend's greatest investment. 'Elon has his own pattern of trying to destabilize companies. He wants to take over, and if he can't take them over, then he tries to create a rival entity to compete,' Low said. 'They were absolutely on a collision course, and I think that Trump tried to gloss over it by making it look as if he wanted Elon to be as aggressive as he was.' Musk is back in industry mode, for now. Earlier this month, he addressed an artificial intelligence boot camp hosted by the startup accelerator Y Combinator in San Francisco, downplaying the importance of the Department of Government Efficiency by comparing his work on the commission to cleaning up beaches. 'Imagine you're cleaning a beach, which has a few needles, trash and is dirty. And there's a 1,000-foot tsunami, which is AI, that's about to hit. You're not going to focus on cleaning the beach,' Musk told the crowd of students and recent graduates of why he ultimately left. His attention has since shifted to Austin, Texas, where Tesla heavily promoted and launched its long-hyped robotaxi service last weekend. Of companies within Musk's business empire, the automaker took the hardest hit from his political entanglements, battered by consumer protests, tariffs, declining sales and dips in its stock price that allowed SpaceX to overtake it as his most valuable asset. Low looks back at the Tesla Takedown protests that sprung up in the months following his letter with satisfaction. It was proof, in his mind, that the message struck a chord: 'The audience was the world, and it worked.' While few peers in Silicon Valley have called out Musk to the same degree, Low added that several reacted positively to him in private for taking those criticisms public. 'Many of these people happen to have investors on their boards, who made money with Elon, so they felt that they were putting themselves at risk if they spoke out,' he said. 'A number of people did reach out and thank me, and they were in violent agreement.' Low said he had 'an armada' of lawyers at the ready in case Musk went after him. That possibility hasn't yet panned out. Although they no longer speak, Low still follows Musk's activities. He said he was busy during the Trump feud and had to catch up later. But during the interview with POLITICO, he would reference the occasional X post from Musk, including a recent one where he shared negative drug test results to dispute reports of his alleged ketamine use. To Low, the post was a sign the rift hasn't been fully smoothed over and that Musk is 'playing defense.' Bannon has called for a federal investigation into New York Times reporting that claimed Musk took large amounts of ketamine and other drugs while campaigning for Trump. POLITICO has not independently verified the allegations. 'The way I read that is that he is concerned that some government contracts could be canceled and that the drug use could be used against him, so he's trying to already build a moat,' Low said. As for Trump, Low has some advice for handling a potentially resentful Musk: 'Abide by the constitution,' and perhaps, listen to some of the tech titan's policy preferences. Low was especially outspoken against the administration's ICE raids and efforts to limit immigration, arguing they will cost America its advantage in technologies like AI by sapping Silicon Valley of the global talent that allows it to compete. Many in tech circles had hoped Musk's seat at the table would help the industry loosen barriers for high-skilled workers, a cause he once vowed to 'go to war' with MAGA Republicans over. That's something that Low, given his experience with Musk, thinks Trump should take seriously. 'Elon has wooed enough of Trump's supporters to be an actual threat politically,' Low said, arguing that Trump would better insulate himself by moderating his agenda. 'He doesn't realize the battle that he has on his hands, and one way to cut the support away from Elon is to actually adopt some of the things he is for.'

Don't Ask AI ChatBots for Medical Advice, Study Warns
Don't Ask AI ChatBots for Medical Advice, Study Warns

Newsweek

time11 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Don't Ask AI ChatBots for Medical Advice, Study Warns

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Trust your doctor, not a chatbot. That's the sobering conclusion of a new study published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, which reveals how artificial intelligence (AI) is vulnerable to being misused to spread dangerous misinformation on health. Researchers experimented with five leading AI models developed by Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and X Corp. All five systems are widely used, forming the backbone of the AI-powered chatbots embedded in websites and apps around the world. Using developer tools not typically accessible to the public, the researchers found that they could easily progam instances of the AI systems to respond to health-related questions with incorrect—and potentially harmful—information. Worse, the chatbots were found to wrap their false answers in convincing trappings. "In total, 88 percent of all responses were false," explained paper author Natansh Modi of the University of South Africa in a statement. "And yet they were presented with scientific terminology, a formal tone and fabricated references that made the information appear legitimate." Among the false claims made were debunked myths such as that vaccines cause autism, that HIV is an airborne disease and that 5G causes infertility. Of the five chatbots evaluated, four presented responses that were 100 percent incorrect. Only one model showed some resistance, generating disinformation in 40 percent of cases. A stock image showing a sick person using a smartphone. A stock image showing a sick person using a smartphone. demaerre/iStock / Getty Images Plus Disinformation Bots Already Exist The research didn't stop at theoretical vulnerabilities; Modi and his team went a step further, using OpenAI's GPT Store—a platform that allows users to build and share customized ChatGPT apps—to test how easily members of the public could create disinformation tools themselves. "We successfully created a disinformation chatbot prototype using the platform and we also identified existing public tools on the store that were actively producing health disinformation," said Modi. He emphasized: "Our study is the first to systematically demonstrate that leading AI systems can be converted into disinformation chatbots using developers' tools, but also tools available to the public." A Growing Threat to Public Health According to the researchers, the threat posed by manipulated AI chatbots is not hypothetical—it is real and happening now. "Artificial intelligence is now deeply embedded in the way health information is accessed and delivered," said Modi. "Millions of people are turning to AI tools for guidance on health-related questions. "If these systems can be manipulated to covertly produce false or misleading advice then they can create a powerful new avenue for disinformation that is harder to detect, harder to regulate and more persuasive than anything seen before." Previous studies have already shown that generative AI can be misused to mass-produce health misinformation—such as misleading blogs or social media posts—on topics ranging from antibiotics and fad diets to homeopathy and vaccines. What sets this new research apart is that it is the first to show how foundational AI systems can be deliberately reprogrammed to act as disinformation engines in real time, responding to everyday users with false claims under the guise of credible advice. The researchers found that even when the prompts were not explicitly harmful, the chatbots could "self-generate harmful falsehoods." A Call for Urgent Safeguards While one model—Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet—showed some resilience by refusing to answer 60 percent of the misleading queries, researchers say this is not enough. The protections across systems were inconsistent and, in most cases, easy to bypass. "Some models showed partial resistance, which proves the point that effective safeguards are technically achievable," Modi noted. "However, the current protections are inconsistent and insufficient. Developers, regulators and public health stakeholders must act decisively, and they must act now." If left unchecked, the misuse of AI in health contexts could have devastating consequences: misleading patients, undermining doctors, fueling vaccine hesitancy and worsening public health outcomes. The study's authors call for sweeping reforms—including stronger technical filters, better transparency about how AI models are trained, fact-checking mechanisms and policy frameworks to hold developers accountable. They draw comparisons with how false information spreads on social media, warning that disinformation spreads up to six times faster than the truth and that AI systems could supercharge that trend. A Final Warning "Without immediate action," Modi said, "these systems could be exploited by malicious actors to manipulate public health discourse at scale, particularly during crises such as pandemics or vaccine campaigns." Newsweek has contacted Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and X Corp for comment. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about chatbots? Let us know via science@ References Modi, N. D., Menz, B. D., Awaty, A. A., Alex, C. A., Logan, J. M., McKinnon, R. A., Rowland, A., Bacchi, S., Gradon, K., Sorich, M. J., & Hopkins, A. M. (2024). Assessing the system-instruction vulnerabilities of large language models to malicious conversion into health disinformation chatbots. Annals of Internal Medicine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store